Wednesday's Open Thread

As you wish  . . . .
In 2004 the world produced about 30 bln litres of fuel-ready ethanol from fermenting and distilling mainly sugar or maize. In oil terms, that is over 500,000 barrels per day (bpd), representing 2% of global gasoline use.

http://www.energyfuturecoalition.org/pubs/Biofuels%20Seminar%20FOLichts.pdf

OK, I'll repost here ...

NYTimes is dissing the Prius mileage:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/08/business/08leonhardt.html

Odograph discussed claims against hybrid mileage on his blog. http://odograph.com/?p=446  I asked a coworker, and she claims 55 mph in warm weather, but only 45 mph in the cold, which makes some sense.

Regarding the point about auto manufacturers using the non-guzzlers to balance guzzlers under CAFE, I'd rather have the choice to buy one or the other anyway.

Of course I'd also like to have a practical, affordable EV, but that seems to be too much to ask.  Which will be crushed first, the last EV-1 or GM itself?

still much better then a 20 to sub 20 mpg suv..
I replaced a Chevy Blazer with a 2005 Toyota Prius.  This change is typical of the many Prius owners here in Austin.  After the break-in period and with some driver training, 52 miles per gallon is what I get on a daily 23 mile round-trip commute on the highway.  But for fun I sometimes make the same commute on slower city streets and use the "Pulse and Glide" technique which is mostly coasting under 40 MPH with neither gasoline nor electric engine engaged - I get 65-70 MPG.

Most people don't know that the Prius is also a PZEV (Partially Zero Emissions Vehicle) in which the first few minutes of driving have quite low MPG in order to minimize polutants.  The on-board real-time MPG display usually shows less than 30 MPG average for the first five minutes.

I recommend the car for those who can afford one and in particular for those who do mostly stop and go driving.  

in which the first few minutes of driving have quite low MPG in order to minimize polutants.

How does getting worse MPG lead to less polution?  There must be something I'm missing here.

the car's warm-up cycle burns extra gas to get the catalytic converter hot as quickly as possible to reduce emissions

http://priuschat.com/forums/kb.php?mode=article&k=14

I recommend the car for those who can afford one and in particular for those who do mostly stop and go driving.
The entire New York City yellow taxi fleet should be converted to Priuses as the existing cars age out. That's 12,778 cars, each of which does nearly nothing but stop and go traffic for 24 hours a day (two shifts per car). It looks like the city's taxi regulatory agency has authorized the following models:
2006 Ford Escape Hybrid, 2006 Mercury Mariner Hybrid, 2006 Toyota Highlander Hybrid, 2006 Toyota Prius, 2006 Honda Civic hybrid, 2006 Honda Accord hybrid, and the 2006 Lexus RX 400H.
That's interesting: there's no GM product on your list.  I seem to recall that after the demise of the traiditonal NYC Checker cab in the 1970's, the fleet was largely Chrevrolet Caprices or Ford.Mecury Town Car of similar bulk.  Size is a definite factor for the taxi fleet,and it's hard to imagine the prius being large enough to pack people in.
Victoria, BC taxi company is into the Prius in a big way (relative to size of fleet):

http://www.empresstaxi.com/

<snip>...90 passenger vehicles in total, that include over 33 Toyota Prius (Hybrid) vehicles...</snip>

Two years ago I looked at the Prius & Insight and went anotehr direction, a low mileage (73,800) 1982 Mercedes Benz 240D (manual transmission).  My experience (synthetic lube everywhere) is 31 mpg city and 35 to 42 mpg highway (depending upon speed).

Not as good, but good enough for my low annual mileage.

Greater durability, higher quality construction, biofuel option (the older M-B diesel fuel pump is uniquely suited to a variety of fuels), probably greater safety and lower cost (I won eBay bid at $10,500) than anew car.  And I have confidence that, absent an accident, it will be my last car (I am 52 and this should last me into by 80s, if I live/drive that long).

I think the best part of that article was where they talk about the Hybrids offsetting gas guzzlers on the fleetwide MPG calculation. Talk about Jevon's Paradox codified into law!
I'm going to put bumper stickers on my Suburban and my wife's Tahoe that say "My other car is also an SUV".  Thanks, Prius drivers, for the "demand destruction."  Please keep it up!
Thanks Consume More for helping keep a spare room for demand destruction! (and raising price of oil in the meantime)

Keep up!

Too bad there are so many affluent asians coming "on-line" at the same times as those Prius, huh?
2005 Toyota Echo manual transmission gets 38 Mpg, which in not that far away from the Prius.

If both are driven for 200K miles in their lifetime gas should be $8/per gallon to compensate for the 10K difference in the price tag.

My diesel engined Smart car from Mercedes Benz, not available in the US I believe, gets 75 miles/US gallon. They have experimented with a hybrid version that does 15% better.
LevinK - You're right strictly with regard to $$$, but there are a lot of differences between Prius and Echo besides mpg. The Prius has much more cargo space, more passenger space, better performance, many more bells and whistles and is much, MUCH safer. (For instance, you can't get stability control on the Echo.) Those features account for most of the $10k. Tax breaks may account for most or even all of the rest. (In Colorado, for instance, you could conceivably get $7k back in state and federal credits.)

For those who want their hybrids cheap as well as fuel-efficient, the Kia Rio hybrid is scheduled to be released late this year. I wonder how it will be received. The economic challenge is that the cost of the hybrid drive is basically the same whether the car is an econobox or mid-priced sedan, so, from the consumer standpoint, the hybrid premium actually increases on cheaper cars: The difference between $11k and $14k (27% increase) is more likely to deter a potential buyer than the difference between $21k and $24k (14% increase).

Ok, I should have picked something closer to its class like the 2005 Corolla (35 mpg, real world).

Actually I think that hybrids are great. I am mostly frustrated that we do not move faster in the direction of plug-ins, which would already represent a qualitevely different step in the right direction.

I just last week bought a 2001 Kia Rio (4-banger and not hybrid) and after a week of use, I logged 185 miles before loading my second load of fuel onboard. When I bought it I topped off the tank. After the 185 miles, I needed only 6.9 gallons to top the tank again - 26 miles per gallon. Not bad for a 5 year old car. I drive a mix of city and freeway miles, so it's all-around mpg.

The easiest way to measure gas mileage is the way I describe above. At 7 gallons per week, that's one gallon a day. I wonder if it can burn E-85 right. It would be a lot better to feed alcohol distilleries than terrorists! If I used E-85 instead, the terrorists would get only one gallon/week's worth of my "donation".

I bought the car becuse a bus I would ride otherwise started carrying an idiot who hated me for no obvious reason and had no bones about letting me know. Since transit must cater to ANYONE, undesireables get to board buses and trains. Something missed by transit boosters. And in Israel, transit is known to pick up suicide bombers, meaning buses are targets. And trains are too tempting for any smallpoxer.

This is an interesting post. I'm not sure how to respond and probably shouldn't - but, will anyway.

If everybody thought the way do(and don't take this personally, because I've read some of your other stuff and am generally impressed) - and I don't know how else to say this - but, we would have hit peak oil 50 years ago.

People do, in fact, make decisions based on a broad variety of factors, some concious, some not. However buying a car to travel alone and burn even more gas because some guy looked at you the wrong way. Boy, that's the spirit. Did you consider shooting him?

No, but I figured that an altercation was high probability. The train station is not bristling with cameras to help catch idiots after the fact. The problem is that more people are riding that bus, making competition for what few seats there are - and I'm better at competing for the seats than the bully. Meanwhile the bus agency buys buses with fewer seats(!) making for increased chance of a "bus rage" altercation.

Worse, the bus agency buys buses of such poor quality that you'd think they bought them from Wal-Mart. The back door is so drafty that it can't hold HVAC, meaning it's A/C'd in winter and heated in summer. And the seats are like a La-Z-Boy chair with springs and cushions and a suspension comparable to the axles welded to the frame. It's like riding in a storm chasing plane unless the road is literally smooth as glass.

I was considering a motorcycle before the bully emerged to make the long unpleasant commute that much worse. The buses are found in Chicago's suburbs (pacebus.com) and that agency makes the CTA look good by comparison. Let the bully harass someone else. I don't need a "yellow school bus effect" along with bouncing like a lotto ball every time the bus hits a pebble. I couldn't wait before I took motorcycle lessons once the idiot emerged.

You ask a (very) good question, and that's my answer.

You are funny. But you raise another question. Which are worse - terrorists or idiots?
Worst of all are the bean-counting bureaucrats who don't provide enough buses with enough seats for the needs of the people.

The needs of the bureaucrats outweigh the needs of the many --Spock.

Good question, and I will answer. Terrorists are (fortunately) rare, but idiots are exceedingly common. That includes the bean-counters who ordered the buses to set the stage for the bully idiot and of course the bully idiot who drove me to drive. Idiots incluse rick idiots like Steve Fossett who with his money bought an "experimental" plane to joyride around the world AND purposely overshoot just to get in the world record book. I get one consolation: Steve Fossett while "driving" over India encountered heavy turbulence, so he had a chance to expierence what it's like to ride a PACE Bus. Just like me, as he shook in his "drivers seat" like I would in an ordinary seat.

Fun note. I occasionally do Flight Simulator and always had some interest in aviation, though for non-noble reasons. Due to this interest, I often mix aviation and automotive stuff together. (like a "load of fuel" and "tank of gas") I do see a terror danger in DISGRUNTLED PILOTS becuse they are well-trained (and expierenced) who could, in theory, pop a copilot then put the flaps back up as the plane rolls to barely take off to hit the airline headquarters building a la 9/11. This would take only seconds and be unstoppable and only take a patient pilot to fly out of the wrong airport on the wrong runway. (only obvious to a flight sim player)

Since idiots are way more common than terrorists, this is a bigger hazard all around. We can see idiots as we drive. The "disgruntled pilot" hazard has precedent with an EgyptAir pilot and of course the disgruntled postal workers, and suicide gunmen unconnected with any terrorist group. Idiots become "independant operatives".

I apologize. I underestimated you. What I thought was funny is actually a certain profound realism. BTW, I don't know where you came up with your name, but the first 10 minutes of (the original)Mad Max is some of the best film-making (and driving)ever.
Two points
I bought a Kia Sephia in '99 and get similar mpg.
Did you complain to the transit systems management about the problem passenger?  The system I worked for could ban passengers who were repeatedly causing trouble. ADA does not protect trouble makers.
Good question with answer. I was not patient to deal with idiots in management when I decided to buy and use a car. Why? Becuse my entire expierence with authorities and bullies dictates that they will ignore me. The ONLY effective strategy I ever found was to avoid a bully, seemingly by any means necessary short of violence. (violence is counter-productive as it exposes you to worse bullies!)

The alternative to the bully was to wait for the next bus which would be the EXACT same vehicle, but with worse crowding. I have gone to a PACE public hearing before this problem, knowing that things wouldn't change. I spoke up about the other problems (not bully-related) and noted I only had a chance to perform as a comedian. Not good. The 3 execs/stooges are nearly unreachable - certainly without a car. (ironic, eh?)

The problem with the suburban bus system is that the management knows that the ONLY alternative is to do what I did, drive. The bully merely was that tipping point that got me to say "F%&k it" and proceed to drive. My conclusion is that mass transit and our suburbs are a very poor match, on a par with drinking and driving. :(

here's a story about crazy people on buses.

i was visiting L.A. a few years ago for a conference. i had taken super shuttle from the airport on arriving, but during my stay i figured out that for the return trip i could take a bus from near my hotel to the airport for real cheap. i didn't really need to save the money (was getting reimbursed anyway) but felt inclined to take the bus anyway. (i was poor years ago and certain habits linger.)

but at dinner w/ a bunch of folks somehow this came up and a guy there urged me not to do it. he said he'd lived in L.A. for like twenty years and could tell me with authority that the buses were a bad situation. crazy people, dirty, smelly, scarey people. he said, it's not like in the movie "speed" where the bus driver knows people by name and everyone is nice and clean cut and normal. he was quite clear about the risks of taking the bus and seemed to know what he was talking about.

okay so i figured i'd do it anyway. smelly people, big deal, right? so i took the bus to the airport on the morning of my return.

guess what? everyone on there was well dressed, freshly shampooed, normal, and not crazy. the bus driver knew people by name, and even had a discussion with one regular passenger about another who hadn't been seen lately. i mean, i figured the guy who warned me might have been exaggerating a little, but to find out that he was just totally, utterly wrong in every detail -- that was surprise!

the funny thing was, he didn't actually take the bus (he told me). he just "knew" these things from living in L.A.

(not casting doubt on your particular bully story.)

Ironically, it was the very familiarity of the same people on the Pace bus each day, and all low-income enough to be deterred from driving. While high-income yuppie crowds can harbour bullies (they become managers), lower income groups have their share. One just started using the bus and after a month of the stupidity, I had to act.

Bullies aside, the suburban bus system by Chicago could use a lot of improvement. But with the economics being like a monopoly with a greatly costlier alternative, it is shoddy at best - and non-existent as the norm.

My 1985 model Suzuki SA-310 (sold as Chevrolet Sprint and Pontiac Firefly in the US) gets 5 litres per 100 km in the summertime on longer road trips at less than highway speed (that's about 47 mpg). If i push the pedal to the metal on highways the consumption rises to 7 litres per 100 km (33 mpg). The average consumption in my use (mostly long trips at sub-highway speed and shorter distance driving within the city I live in) is less than 6 litres per 100 km (more than 39 miles per gallon).

I've grown fond of this little car, although it's already started to fall apart so badly that I'm going to have to get rid of it before the next autumn. It irritates me a lot when I have to fix it (I have the repair manual for it and some skills, but the spare parts cost quite a lot money), but every time I fill the tank I remember why I love that car.

My 2003 echo with automatic transmission gets up to 40 mpg (long trips at moderate - less than highway - speeds).  Worst I ever got (short trips in winter) is about 32.  I got an automatic because a long search for a manual specimen on the used market in the NE USA came up empty.  They don't sell new ones (2004+) here any more.  Why?  Perhaps not enough of a profit?  The Echo is/was Toyota's best-kept secret.

If both (Echo and Prius) are driven for 200K miles in their lifetime gas should be $8/per gallon to compensate for the 10K difference in the price tag.

- not even then?  If I compute that using 38 mpg vs 45 mpg I get about $12.  Also, if oil got more expensive, the purchase-price difference would get bigger, since it costs energy to make the stuff.  The real question is: does the hybrid pay for its energy of manufacturing, relative to the best we can do with non-hybrid technology.  Just the battery in the Prius is about $4000, and I wonder how long it'll last - if you need to replace it before those 200,000 miles are done, add that to the cost difference...  And that's the relatively small battery that has not much plug-in utility.

If we want to save fuel, we need to accept the concept of driving (or riding) smaller, lighter vehicles.  Yes if you get hit by a large truck you're in trouble.  That's true in an SUV too.  So should we all drive Sherman tanks?  Alternatives include: lower speed limits, and less driving to reduce risk.  Even with large vehicles, 100 people die on an average day in accidents in the US, and many many more are injured.  If that many died in some other activity we'd regulate it down to nothing, but car-driving is the national addiction and we repress the risk in our minds.  The same over-protective parents that won't leave a 15-year-old home alone for an hour, or let him/her walk half a mile, will give him/her the keys to the car at 16.  This while the stats show that car accidents are the biggest risk to teens, by far.

Question to hybrid owners: how well does the real-time MPG display match the gold standard: the comutation based on the odometer and the gallons bought at the pump?

I used 50 mpg for Prius hence the difference (the average between 45 in winter and 55 in summer).

I don't fully agree with you about hybrids vs small cars. First I don't see why don't we go in both directions in the same time (plus mass transit as a third direction).

Second and more important, hybrids are the first step to electric transportation. IMO, if there is a solution to our oil problem, it will go through scrapping those 15% efficient ICEs in the next several decades.

On my Prius commute, I reset the real-time MPG so as to have a new goal each day, and have calculated the MPG per tank only a few times.  However on the prius-chat fuel economy forum, the question has arisen.  Here is a sample:

I compare lifetime mileage (miles driven divided by total fuel pumped into the tank) and also guage mileage on the MFD. For the last 4,500 miles the calculated mpg is 1.2 mpg better than the average of the guage mpg.

http://priuschat.com/index.php?showtopic=9624&hl=mpg+display

I work at Toyota and we hear things like this all the time from customers. Unfortunately, the fuel tank in the prius isn't a rigid tank like most vehicles. Instead, it's a flexible bladder inside a protective shell. The size of the bladder (and therefore it's capacity) is variable, so you can't calculate mpg by miles driven divided by how much fuel you put in the car. I'd think that using "lifetime mpg" would eliminate most errors, but maybe he lives in a cold climate or something.

A short suggestion: Don't run your prius out of fuel. The computer freaks out and needs to be recalibrated at a dealer, and it isn't covered under warranty.

One last thing: The terrain you drive in has a very large effect on a prius' mpg. Here in Southern California we have a lot of mountains. People here typically get 10-20 percent less mpg than customers on the East coast.

If we wanted to improve mileage of our fleet, have NHTSA require an average MPG display in all cars.  No one can resist trying for high score.  What else is there to do on the 2000th time you've driven to work?
Bingo.  I've heard this comment from several people in various places, and I'm convinced it's right on the money.

I had this kind of real-time MPG thingie on a 1987(!) BMW 325is, and it definitely improved my driving habits.

Thing to do- put a big DayGlo sticker on your rear window giving the biggest lie about gas mileage your conscience can take.  Example, my teutonic wife keeps records of everything, so I know her Matrix actually gets 34.67mpg averaged over a year.  I can stand a 20 percent lie so I put a sticker on the back saying Ya-Ya, this car gets 42 mpg.  Everybody sees this and starts secretly computing their own mileage.  Makes them feel guilty and generates an unconscious desire to buy next car with bigger number.   The world is saved, at low cost to investor.

Me, I am striving to create a little commuter that will say on the back, This thing might smell a little funny, but it goes 20 miles on a double handfull of wood pellets.

I thought of that sticker idea last year, when considering a motorcycle. I would have put on the back of the leather jacket or riding suit the mpg as calculated to get SUV drivers to think about their mpg (or gpm with Hummers). I would have bought a smaller bike, not the biggest Harley.
My gut feeling is that while some people will try to beat their record, others will be trying to beat their anti-record. Especially at this (still ridiculous IMO) gas prices.

In this line of thought, anybody know how I can reduce gas consumption for the first couple of miles? I don't have a mileage meter, but my short commute to the train staion is probably in the single digits.
(and no, biking is not an option)
(aham a Prius is not either, I'm waiting for the plug-ins to appear before I buy)

Get a mechanic to tell you exactly how to drive your particular car. Mechanics know more about cars than most of us. I always buy used cars from auto mechanics, usually the car his wife owned and that he maintained, and I always ask questions about how to drive in cold weather, are there any tricks, etc.

It turns out there are a whole bunch of tricks, some obvious, others less so:

  1. Be a fanatic on correct tire inflation.
  2. Never let your car idle to warm up, instead just be very very gentle with the accelerator during the first sixty to ninety seconds.
  3. Follow the owner's manual. (Well, duh.) But how many of us change spark plugs at recommended intervals?
  4. Drive as if you are a cautious little old lady--gentle, gentle, gentle on the acceleratior; look two blocks ahead to figure out when you will have to slow down, and use the brake as little as you can. It is amazing what a huge difference this last piece of advice makes.
  5. When the engine is hot and you are accelerating on a highway, do not hestitate to use three seconds of acceleration (smoothly, gently) to kick the car into its highest gear and get the very best efficiency from low rpms.
  6. Learn to watch the tachometer. What? You don't have a tach? tsk, tsk.
  7. Develop a good long-term relationship with your vehicle. You love your car, she will treat you right. You hate and abuse your car or van or SUV or truck? Well, how do you think she feels?