"Deeply Troubling" (or, wanna have a laugh/cry...?)
Posted by Prof. Goose on July 11, 2006 - 9:09pm
Topic: Supply/Production
Tags: oil prices, peak oil [list all tags]
...then all you need to do is check out this BBC article from 15 FEB 2000 and then look at the CLQ06 chart (or graph) in the right sidebar. OPEC thought everything was fine then too.
I've kept a complete account of my fuel fill-ups since the mid-1990s. Here's a graph of the price data (sorry about the small text in places on the graph--the embedded summary's not that important, though, for I'm sure everyone knows the details):
Location is primarily northern CA from 1996-early 2000, then Oregon since. Mix in a little WA and ID for good measure.
Looks like I paid $1.15-$1.20/gal or so as recently as early 2003. And that was it. Prices have been climbing since. Definitely volatile, but on a clear upward trend that appears to be accelerating (a hint of exponential growth in price, I think).
The spike in 1999 was supposedly due to a refinery explosion in the SFO Bay Area.
-best
-best
He would look at this and insist the same thing today. He would say, "Companies can't gouge and that with the greenies no wells are being drilled. Take the East coast there is plenty of oil there but they can't drill for it thanks to those protestors!"
The symptoms all point to true hardship. Things are getting beyond desperate and even wise men want to keep everything as is at all costs. The denial is more powerful then even the greed that is creeping around out there.
Thanks for posting this as it shows how much can be forgotten in only a few years. It also shows that nothing changes except the numbers grow and grow!
2000 was before the tech bubble burst and September 11. Peak Oil was not even on the radar of the public psyche. Times change quickly.
Now I'm starting to sound like a grandfather talking to his grandkid (I remember the days when we used to use cassette tapes in our cars and we'd call people on regular phones...not these new-fangled gizmos).
Thanks for the flashback!
Any chance you can post a copy of the image?
I thought PG meant that there was a graph in the right side-bar on the BBC page! I was assuming that it was a prediction of what the price would be in 2006 (six years out from the article).
As you were.
Dec 09 contract
I am new to this and I have a question that may have been asked before:
I understand that the Americans and Brits have satelites capable of reading the headline on a newspaper. Why don't we just put them over Saudi Arabia and have a look at where the rigs are, what they are doing and how fast they are moving across the oil fields? Would this even help?
Chris.
A week or so back TODers started posting lots of links to satellite images - mainly on Google Earth - where you could see some of the KSA and Kuwait oil fields - easy to spend weeks analyisng this stuff. If you have time, look back through the posts from around 4th July.
This would not only include sat. images of fields, rigs, and tanker traffic, but could also include, in the case of the U.S. for example:
Human assets i.e. spies, within Aramco and its contractors, the SA Gov't etc.
Sigint i.e. they can listen in on all the cell phone, sat. phone, and telefax conversations in the oil fields and elsewhere
We also know that they have access to SWIFT and most other banking networks, so they can track the financial flows that support the industry
But I did hear of this, then old, agreement, before oil became a hot topic.
However:
The U.S. snoops on everything, everybody, everywhere, all the time.
We may never get Osama (or Usama) because he lives in caves and moves by night, when we cannot see him. This pisses off Rummy and crowd no end.
BTW, Castro also figured out in 1962 that satellites have greatly reduced vision at night. It is SO easy to fool satellites (and also reconaissance aircraft).
As I said, I have never seen this mentioned elsewhere but it came to me through the grapevine of friends who still live and work in Washington, DC, and who I believe have a reasonable chance to be telling me the truth. I certainly cannot prove it so I would urge you to not necessarily believe it outright but to possibly consider it as an alternative explanation for events we have seen in recent years.
Speaking of back to the future...
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200607/s1684649.htm
-------------
The world's biggest meeting of Antarctic scientists has heard trees could be growing on the continent within a century.
More than 850 delegates are in Hobart this week for the combined meetings of the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research and the Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programs.
US Professor Robert Dunbar, from Stanford University, says it is likely that carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere are set to double in the next century or two.
The last time levels were that high was about 20 million years ago.
Professor Dunbar says Antarctica could return to how it looked then.
"There were trees, there were bushes, there were fields of grass," he said.
"In fact, the evidence of pollen fossils is that much of Antarctica was vegetated and these were plants that were able to adapt to periods of darkness.
"But the key is that it wasn't cold enough to freeze water."
=====================...And Antarctica could be the new frontier:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200607/s1684224.htm
------------------
Oil expert says industry might use Antarctica
An international oil industry expert who says global oil supply has reached its production peak has warned places like Antarctica may not be safe from oil exploration.
Dr Ali Samsam Bakhtiari has given evidence to a Senate committee about his calculations that crude oil demand will out-strip supply within five or six years.
He says one polar region in the Antarctic is already close to being exploited.
"I hope that the oil industry will not go into Antarctica but when the price will be $200 or $300 per barrel, then anything can happen," he said.
-------------------------------
My question is how did they geologically investigate this prospect? Did some of our subs covertly map offshore areas with high power sonar? Or did the oil companies investigate gravimetric data from environmental research satellites--would that be highly ironic? My guess is this first area is offshore, but there are a few land areas devoid of snow and ice--unless the oil cos. have figured how to drill on a moving glacier.
Bob Shaw in Phx,Az Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?
Is this another international treaty that will be bent or Ignored by America and probably others?
The Law of Diminishing Returns helping to force Olduvai Gorge is kicking-in into Abaco and Greece:
http://www.jonesbahamas.com/?c=45&a=9437
---------------
Blackouts Damaging Abaco's Economy
Ivar Unhgem, proprietor of Scandi Homes & Scandi Woodworks in Marsh Harbour, Abaco yesterday told the Bahama Journal that his business suffered a power outage from 11am to 4:30pm Thursday, which he said is generally "an everyday occurrence."
"It is a disaster. It is bad. When the power goes out we have to shut down..... People have started having problems with their freezers and refrigerators and so this is really is a problem. And we have a lot of tourists here who are basically packing up and leaving to go back home because they just cannot deal with it."
At the time, he pointed out that the two principal electrical generators were both down, one with "very serious problems," which could take upwards of two weeks to resolve. "The problem appears to center on poor maintenance and upkeep."
------------
Greece may be next:
--------------------
Greek consumers of electrical power should brace themselves for a difficult summer. Yesterday's accident at the Ptolemaida power plant in northern Greece will intensify pressure on the already-strained electricity supply. Power blackouts, which were already expected, will become more common and problems with Greece's power grid should increase by the year. Consumer needs are growing and the gap between supply and demand is deepening. The Public Power Corporation has shied away from investments in electricity production as well as distribution. At the same time, plans to deregulate the country's energy sector, which could ease demand on the state-controlled corporation, have stalled.
---------------------------
http://www.ekathimerini.com/4dcgi/_w_articles_columns_100020_29/06/2006_71457
Bob Shaw in Phx,AZ Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?
Go see a doctor. You've got chronic confirmation bias.
The Greek case you point to, once again, has absolutely nothing to do with peak oil. There was an accident in a power plant and the country did not invest in transmission infrastructure. This is what has always caused blackouts and always will.
On the other hand, yesterday I saw a cloud shaped like an oil drum which then vanished and the bird entails I examined did indicate that the bird was dead. Maybe you are right.
Thxs for responding, you are entitled to your own opinion, of course. I am merely pointing out the trees in the energy forest that might be heading into potential jeopardy.
This is entirely in keeping with Duncan's Olduvai thesis that eventually, directly due to the loss of cheap FF energy, that insufficient funds, over time, will be applied to try and maintain the electrical grids. The blackouts will become longer and occur more often in a positive feedback loop.
This is exactly the kind of gradual complexity collapse that Tainter and Diamond write about. If you can disprove their writings--you have got a potential best-seller on your hands.
Bob Shaw in Phx,Az Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?
"Collapse, if and when it comes again, will this time be global. No longer can any individual nation collapse. World civilization will disintegrate as a whole.
Competitors who evolve as peers collapse in like manner." -- Joseph A. Tainter
"Energy has always been the basis of cultural complexity and it always will be. The past clarifies potential paths to the future. One often-discussed path is cultural and economic simplicity and lower energy costs. This could come about through the 'crash' that many fear -- a genuine collapse over a period of one or two generations, with much violence, starvation, and loss of population." - Joseph A. Tainter
I think we may have made a breakthrough here. I understand from your post that the events that you refer to may not be indicative of peak oil, but rather are consistent with other theories, such as Olduvai and complexity collapse.
I still think that you asre stretching the point. I see the Greek case indicating little more than that the country needs to improve the management of their electric system. I do think several of the more ethusiastic peak oil propoents do take minor incidents that would occur in any environmnmet and read them as confirmation of impending doom.
However, we can agree to disagree. I don't mean to be oppositional and my post was meant to be humorous, not insulting.
LOL! No harm, no foul--I am really an easy-going chap myself. I agree that determining primary versus secondary reasons for decline can be difficult to clarify, but I still think Duncan's reasonings are sound, but who really knows what are the correct timelines? We will just have to wait for the 'rear-view mirror' to come into focus at some later time, but hopefully we first take a good look out the front windshield and steer for the mitigation exit.
Bob Shaw in Phx,Az Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?
http://www.energybulletin.net/13171.html
The above link takes you to a story by Megan Quinn on how Cuba survived a localized oil peak. Cuba couldn't afford to buy all of the oil they needed on the open market after the Soviet Union collapsed. As a consequence, Cuba's oil fired generators were shut down for hours at a time. The blackouts--because of a shortage of oil--lasted for up to 16 hours at a time.
IMO, we will see increasing examples of this (initially) in developing countries as we go through progressive cycles of demand destruction.
Also, oil consumption is up in the US and China, and increasing rapidly in many oil exporting countries (up 5.6% year over year in the Arab countries), while world crude oil + condensate production--as predicted by the HL method--is down 1% since December. Someone is being forced to cut back, and I suspect it is primarily the developing countries that are being forced (for now) to cut back on consumption.