DrumBeat: January 1, 2007
Posted by threadbot on January 1, 2007 - 9:05am
Topic: Miscellaneous
Ukraine still feeling gas pressure: "Life is desperate and with the energy bills going up, it's going much, much worse"
There is now speculation in the media that some people may simply stop paying their bills."This problem may lead to a negative chain reaction," says political commentator Volodymyr Fesenko.
"If the public doesn't pay, this may cause a shortage of funds for the energy companies. This is fraught with political problems and risks."
Belarus avoids cold new year by bowing to Gazprom demand for price increase: Russia's tough line adds to Europe's energy worries
The five-year contract will require Belarus to pay $100 per 1,000 cubic metres, a steep rise on the previous tariff of $45, but a reduction from the $105 that Gazprom had demanded. The agreement requires Belarus to pay gradually increasing prices after the current contract until world market levels are reached by 2011.
US panel to review CNOOC-Iran gasfield development deal
WASHINGTON - A US congressional committee will review a gasfield development deal between China National Offshore Oil Corp (CNOOC) and Iran to determine if US sanctions are called for against the Chinese company, a US lawmaker said.
Concern for rainforest forces RWE to scrap palm oil project: Sustainability of supplies questioned
A leading German utility has abandoned plans to convert a British power station to run on palm oil, in a blow to the promotion of biofuels in Europe.The decision by RWE npower to scrap the project at its Littlebrook plant in Dartford, Kent, which was seen as a test case for palm oil as an alternative energy source, comes after it was unable to secure sufficient supplies without risking damage to tropical rainforest. The move highlights the mounting alarm over the scramble in South-East Asia to bring more land into palm oil cultivation.
The best business books of 2006
Internal Combustion: How Corporations and Governments Addicted the World to Oil and Derailed the Alternatives. Edwin Black. St. Martin's Press. 396 pages.The relentless author of the essential IBM and the Holocaust presents a meticulously researched case that leads to the inescapable conclusion that our present energy "crisis" is just the latest chapter of a criminal scheme as old as civilization itself.
Britain closes 2 oldest nuclear plants
LONDON - The two oldest commercial nuclear power stations in the world were closed down Sunday after 40 years of service, the British Nuclear Group said.
U.K.: Fuel bills could fall by 30%
The cost of heating and lighting our homes could fall following a 50% drop in the wholesale price of gas in 2006.
Divers seal broken Gulf oil pipeline
A ship trying to moor in the area, where the water is about 90 feet deep, might have dropped its anchor on the pipeline, Plains Pipeline spokesman Jordan Janak said.It was too early to say when the line would be repaired or how much the damage will cost the company, Janak said.
Keys fear disaster if Cuba taps nearby oil
Experts say the size of Cuba's offshore oil deposits is still in question, but the potential is impressive. A U.S. Geological Survey study estimates that a curving belt of ocean floor north of Cuba may contain at least 4.5 billion barrels of oil and nearly 10 trillion cubic feet of natural gas....For impoverished Cuba, the oil prospects are dazzling, and Fidel Castro's government has wasted no time in pushing to develop the fields. The region has been divided into 59 exploration blocks, and Cuba has signed deals with foreign oil firms to begin drilling in earnest.
Uganda to test-run Kiira power station
Uganda has seen hydropower production drop from 265MW to just 120MW in 18 months. With Lake Victoria water levels yet to recover, however, the new turbine is not expected to bring an immediate end to the energy crisis.
Islamic Banking in 2007 Set for Massive Growth
With oil prices and liquidity projected to be sustained at roughly the same levels during 2007, the budget surpluses of Gulf Cooperation Council countries will continue to be high. The Saudi budget for 2007 is projected at a staggering SR160 billion. This is important for the Islamic finance sector given that it will further drive both the public and private sector involvement in the sector.
World faces hottest year ever, as El Niño combines with global warming
A combination of global warming and the El Niño weather system is set to make 2007 the warmest year on record with far-reaching consequences for the planet, one of Britain's leading climate experts has warned.
Huge Arctic ice break discovered
The chunk of ice bigger than Manhattan could wreak havoc if it moves into oil drilling regions and shipping lanes next summer, scientists warned....."The risk is that next summer, as that sea ice melts, this large ice island can then move itself around off the coast and one potential path for it is to make its way westward toward the Beaufort Sea where there is lots of oil and gas exploration, oil rigs and shipping."
The U.S. Geological Survey suggests that the Arctic Circle may hold more that 25% of the world's untapped reserves. And this number doesn't reflect the vast unknown potential the area contains. Fact is, the Artic Circle is one of the most unexplored areas left on earth, and could very well include oil fields that would rival those drilled in the Middle East.
Travel Habits Must Change to Make a Big Difference in Energy Consumption
...picking a large sport utility vehicle that goes two miles farther on a gallon of gasoline than the least-efficient S.U.V.’s would have an impact on emissions of global warming gases about five times larger than replacing five 60-watt incandescent bulbs. The dollar savings would be about 10 times larger. And the more-efficient light bulbs would have a negligible effect on oil consumption.
Oil prices may cool in 2007 after record year: analysts
Despite hitting record highs in July, oil futures in New York ended the year about 1.5 percent lower than at the beginning of 2006, with futures in London up just 2.0 percent."This year, the main story has been the political risks story," Global Insight oil analyst Simon Wardell said.
Nissan to launch auto production in India
The factory will turn out one-liter-class subcompacts, the daily said. Some 30 percent of the vehicles will be sold in India with the remaining 70 percent to be exported to Europe and other markets....Nissan, which currently only exports some 200 vehicles to India from Japan a year, will work on developing a dealership network and eventually open about 100 branches in major urban areas by 2010, the Nikkei said.
Energy and the environment: will we be able to resolve the conflict?
1. Will the world's increasing population make energy shortages inevitable?(The answers, according to the article: yes, maybe, no.)2. Can China's growing energy needs be met, or is a resource war between China and other major energy-consuming countries inevitable?
3. Is there a realistic hope that new and renewable energy sources will be found before pollution from the use of fossil fuels has produced irreversible climate change?



http://www.thedanielislandnews.com/artman/publish/article_1695.php
No mortgages from that bank for beachfront properties?
If you can't get insurance, you can't get a mortgage.
If you can't get a mortgage, you won't buy the house.
This is what you call large scale capital destruction. The owners have insurance, but can't sell anymore. Plus, their premiums go up bigtime. Not a nice position to be in.
Think it's bad now? Wait till after the next big storm.
A "managed retreat from the coasts" is what we should be doing. If the free market prevailed, the retreat would happen, though "managed" is probably not how it would go down.
The free market isn't prevailing, of course. Unfortunately, the government is really screwing it up. In Florida, the state - IOW, the taxpayers - is insuring homes that insurance companies won't.
In North Carolina, Hurricane Fran decimated some towns in areas that weren't supposed to be rebuilt with federal money. They were supposed to pay people to relocate, but not to rebuild. But emotions ran so high after the disaster that they got a waiver. The result was a huge jump in prices. Houses that used to cost 1 million started going for 2 million. And more people moved into harm's way.
A predictable development. Governments have votes as their no.1 priority. They must see the sign on the wall, but if that is more further out into the future than the next election, guess what?
Politicians can afford to wait for insurers to act first, and they in turn proceed with caution, since they need clients. Moderately higher premiums, more money down, the kind of thing that rolls out of computer models.
Still, it just that next big storm, and everything will change.
By the way, isn't it hilarious somehow that a bunch of Germans, as in Munich RE, and Swiss, in Zurich RE, cast the decisive vote on the value of large parts of US real estate?
My Energy Resolutions for 2007
I will be moving to Scotland by the end of January, and as a result we will be selling our house in the U.S. (as well as both vehicles). This gives me an opportunity to make some positive changes in 2007. Here are my resolutions (feel free to add your own or suggest additional ones):
1). I resolve to get the most fuel-efficient car I can find in Scotland.
2). I resolve to search for a house that allows me to take public transport or my bike to work.
3). I resolve to place a very high priority on energy efficiency as I search for a new house.
4). I resolve to reduce the meat in my diet (it takes much more energy to produce meat than to produce vegetables).
5). I resolve to support local farmers’ markets.
6). I resolve to continue instilling the importance of energy conservation into my family.
7). I resolve to get completely out of debt (easy, since my only debt is a mortgage).
8). I resolve to talk to at least 1 person a month about Peak Oil.
9). I resolve to preach conservation as something each one of us can do to stretch energy supplies and better prepare for Peak Oil.
10). Not energy related, but I resolve to read at least 40 books in 2007. I read 48 in 2005 and 34 in 2006.
I expect my posting frequency to be spotty during the transition, but I hope to make substantive contributions to TOD in 2007.
Happy New Year to all.
Robert Rapier
Robert,
hope you get used to the weather :-)
Hogmanay celebrations in Glasgow and Edinburgh were curtailed because of the weather (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/6221557.stm)
Still, looks like a good set of resolutions.
re: 2) - should be easy if you are in the Central Belt (Glasgow / Falkirk / Edinburgh); it was one of my considerations when I moved back 10 years ago
5) - having got off to a slower start than in England, there are at least 3 that I know of in Glasgow that are every two weeks or so
6) - it's hard. I still have to remind my sons to turn off lights when they are not in a room :-(
regards,
Alasdair (Not ManCon)
it's hard. I still have to remind my sons to turn off lights when they are not in a room :-(
Ditto. I am constantly walking through the house turning off computers, Playstations, and lights. I try and try to explain why we shouldn't waste energy. I have found that it is difficult to instill conservation in children.
Ditto,
Came into the computer room to find the kids had left the computer on all night. They absolutely don't get it.
I explained to my children and explain to my grandchildren that electricity and gasoline cost money. Kids as young as four or five can get the idea that the more money that is spent on electricity the less there is to spend on getting them stuff that they need or want. Sometimes it is hard to do this in a very gentle way, but patience pays.
A child who is wasteful at age five is likely to be a wastrel at age fifty-five. And definitely, if not by eight, then too late.
My own parents drilled a fanatical frugality into me from as early an age as I can remember--about three. I think one reason my wife left me was because of my strict habits of conservation and thrift.
BTW, it is tough to avoid a "holier than though" attitude as a stingy old man; I find that firmness, gentleness, and good humor help.
My seven year old gets on my case when I leave a light on because it hurts the earth.
If you have a toddler it's easy. Starting at age 2&1/2, I started carrying my daughter around the house to turn off lights at bedtime, or when we left a room. She gets it.
Put stickers on the switches when you do that. Having to remove a sticker to turn something on will be a reminder.
Maybe put a Kill-a-watt on the offending devices and charge for energy?
Best of luck, Robert. Keep in touch.
I read 48 in 2005
I'm really amazed by the amount of books you have read per year. Assuming that you are reading every day of the year: 365/48= 7.5 days per book! How do you do that?
Happy new year!
How do you do that?
I just read constantly. I don't like to waste a minute, so if I am watching a football game, I am reading during commercials and between plays (I am watching the Cotton Bowl right now and reading). I read while working out, during lunch, etc. I can usually knock out 30-50 pages a day just by utilizing down time.
Robert,
Good list!
Let me urge you to read some of the older books this year. IMO most of the most important and worthwhile books were not published during the past twelve months.
For a specific suggestion, Garrett Hardin, "Voyage of the Spaceship Beagle: Exploring New Ethics for Survival," 1973.
If you don't mind looking for a hard-to-find book, let me also recommend Earl Cook, "Man, Energy, Society," 1976.
My rule is that every time a new book comes out, I read or reread an old one:-)
Don,
I have a list of books that were recommended the last time we talked books here. You are right, there are a lot of good older books. One of my first priorities is to get Taintor's Collapse. It seems like everyone but me has read that one. I also try to mix it up a little bit; right now I am reading Deepak Chopra (Life After Death) for the first time. I think he is full of crap, but I intend to finish the book.
happy new year Robert:
good luck with your resolutions:
1). I resolve to get the most fuel-efficient car I can find in Scotland.
VW LUPO / You can get a Prius but a Deisel VW Lupo does better miles for less outlay.
2). I resolve to search for a house that allows me to take public transport or my bike to work.
FAT CHANCE OUTSIDE OF EDINBURGH - GLASGOW
3). I resolve to place a very high priority on energy efficiency as I search for a new house.
BETTER BUILD FROM SCRATCH
4). I resolve to reduce the meat in my diet (it takes much more energy to produce meat than to produce vegetables).
TATTIES AND NEEPS WILL HELP
5). I resolve to support local farmers’ markets.
LOCAL FARMERS MARKET = TESCO
6). I resolve to continue instilling the importance of energy conservation into my family.
FAIR ENOUGH
7). I resolve to get completely out of debt (easy, since my only debt is a mortgage).
YOU GOT A HOUSE IN SCOTLAND?
7 TIMES AVERAGE WORKERS SALARY GETS YOU A 3 BD
HOUSE
8). I resolve to talk to at least 1 person a month about Peak Oil.
THATS EASY.... THERE IS A LOT OF PEOPLE HERE WHO UNDESTAND PO.
TRY TALKING TO UKGOV, SCOTGOV, LOCALGOV.
9). I resolve to preach conservation as something each one of us can do to stretch energy supplies and better prepare for Peak Oil.
NICE....GOOD LUCK...SEE ABOVE
10). Not energy related, but I resolve to read at least 40 books in 2007. I read 48 in 2005 and 34 in 2006.
BTW: Hope it works out for you and yours.
Truly.
Enjoy.
Scotland has a lot going for it... unless you are young and poor
Its young, educated people are leaving in droves.
The smart ones are heading for NZ or Canada.
I am hoping to put number 1 son off the pursuit of Pure Physics at University and steer him to plumbing.
NZ Needs plumbers.
Scotland is a great place for book-lovers. All those wonderful used book stores...
Scotland is also a good place to buy excellent foul-weather gear, the kind used by Scots fishermen. And in Scotaland, staying dry can be a challenge . . . .
Being happy has a lot to do with being dry and warm enough.
Hi Robert,
Just a note to say I'm glad you started this topic! (Lots to think about.) And to wish you and your family many happy days in your new place.
And, in view of your patience with my previous questions (thanks)...I'm wondering...something hearkening back to the posts about your interview with your friend Jerry.
Is it possible, do you suppose, for people of "like mindedness" *within* the oil industry, (such as yourself) to make the proposal Jerry was talking about, when he used the word "pro-active"? (eg., to suggest companies voluntarily give up subsidies, say). (Which I assume would be part of a greater plan or announcement of some sort?)
I'm just wondering if you see any possibilities for what you might consider positive action "within the system" so to speak. If not personally (for your own situation)...(because I'm actually not trying to put you on the spot, I'm truly curious)... then in general?
Happy New Year to one and all. Here are some predictions from earlier in the year on TOD: (Oops, forgot to copy the person or the date. Mea culpa)
Some made it (Oil production and price). Some didn't (Dow)
Looks like prediction is still a black art.
(Oops, forgot to copy the person or the date. Mea culpa)
This post:
http://www.theoildrum.com/story/2006/1/2/172633/2721
I had a kooky idea yesterday, and I could use one of our physics PhDs to debunk it. If we were to put solar panels in the desert, we would produce a good deal of electricity, but there would be an offsetting effect that I haven't found mentioned anywhere. According to this website, one of the references for the Wikipedia article on albedo, the albedo of sand ranges from .2 to .4. I'll assume an average of .3, meaning that about 30% of the sunlight hitting the sand is reflected. I haven't been able to find a good reference for the albedo of solar panels, but the few I've been able to find say that they have an albedo of about .1, so only about 10% of the light is reflected.
So if we replace the albedo of sand with the albedo of solar panels by putting the solar panels in the desert, we increase the light being absorbed by about 20%. If the solar panels are 15% efficient, doesn't that mean that we're adding ground-level atmosphere heating for the remaining 5%? How would that 5% compare to the GHG forcing of the fossil fuels used to replace an equivalent amount of electricity?
On the other hand, the oceans have a very low albedo, so if we put the solar panels on the surface of the ocean we would be getting the electricity as well as an improvement in albedo, at the expense of phytoplankton. (Gotta watch those storms, though.) Likewise, there are lots of man-made surfaces (parking lots, for example) that we could cover with solar panels with little or no added heating.
Is this completely or just mostly wrong?
Come to think of it, one problem is that burning fossil fuels produces heat too. I bet no one talks about it because most of our ways to produce electricity produce prodigious amounts of waste heat. It isn't as though nuke plants are cool-touch. Wind looks a little better from that perspective, I suppose.
Roofs are still by far the best places to put solar panels. Putting the panels close to the place where the electricity will get used is a good idea. A program to install solar panels on roofs coupled with a program to use high albedo roofing materials for all roofing would make a lot of sense.
If the roofs are covered in solar panels, you are not going to get the 'reflect the energy back into space' effect you are seeking.
eric unrelated:http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,240542,00.html
happy new year
I would imagine that a single melted glacier has a much greater albedo impact than all PV solar panels combined. And there are many melted glaciers.
What's the albedo of solar thermal electricity generation plants?
On the converse, Los Angeles is trying to get local factories & warehouses to paint their vast flat roofs white, to reduce the "island" heating effect.
The heat generated by burning fossil fuels is an insignificant part of the global warming problem, as would be the heat added locally in comparison to the cumulative effect of the forcing due to the added CO2 (i.e. it keeps on giving over the years).
The immediate local effect is interesting, though. I had (naively) assumed that local heating would be lessened by solar panels (taking energy away as electricity), but it seems that, with current efficiencies, it's a wash at best.
With roofs, it's better to have PV on it than burn the equivalent fossil fuel, but one covered with PV will cause more urban heating than a white one (high albedo). Not good news for Phoenix, AZ.
. If the solar panels are 15% efficient, doesn't that mean that we're adding ground-level atmosphere heating for the remaining 5%?
Any electrical power you get is, mostlikly, going to be converted into heat at ground level.
You have an incorrect problem setup. You must compare the effect of avoided GHG emissions vs the local heating caused by PV. My prediction is that the second effect would be insignificant, compared to the first one.
Theoretically the whole energy used by humanity can be captured by solar panels with an area of 317,000 km.^2 (assuming 8 kwth/day, 15% efficiency). This is just 0.06% of the world surface and is about the size of US paved area (as a side note - does anyone know about the climate change effects of paved areas?).
Urban areas are known to be warmer than rural areas in what is termed the "urban heat-island effect". Some of the worst places are Phoenix, Las Vegas, and Miami, but the effect can be seen in almost any urban area if you compare their daily temperatures to surrounding rural sites.
There are lots of data and articles on this effect. A google of "urban heat island" should get you started.
This effect is supposed to be taken into account in the GHG studies, but I personally cannot vouch that it has been done properly.
This urban heat island effect "issue" is a load of paid shill skeptic BS. As if all weather monitoring stations sit in urban areas and climatologists are too retarded to account for station biases. How about that (in)famous denialist "proof" in the supposed lack of sea surface trends. Where is it now? Sitting with the rest of the irrelevant drivel that denialists concoct. BTW, one of the clearest indicators of global warming is the increasing temperature and moisture trends in the upper troposphere. This is solid prediction of the models and is verified by observations.
This (concisely) talks about all of the adjustments done on the data. Go to the site for revealing graphs...
The US Historical Climatology Network