DrumBeat: January 8, 2007
Posted by threadbot on January 8, 2007 - 10:05am
Topic: Miscellaneous
As to peak oil, predictions of the end of oil have been made often in the past and it is not clear that frightening scenarios will play out in the short run that some suggest. There are complex issues of geology, technology, and prospective efficiency considerations. The accepted definition of proven reserves includes what is known and can be exploited economically with existing technology. Both price and potential supply are conservatively estimated for this purpose, although some experts suggest that producers have a strong interest in overestimating their reserve position. Because OPEC quotas are based on proven reserves it is in the interest of members to greatly exaggerate their reserves so they can pump more. Such “political barrels” are estimated to be 44 percent of the total reserves OPEC claims. Russia’s reserves are also uncertain but probably 30–40 percent lower than officially claimed.9 Some countries have been extracting large amounts of crude but maintaining the same proven reserves figures. Companies too have incentive to exaggerate their reserves. In 2006 Shell had to admit it had overestimated its reserves by nearly a third and its stock price promptly fell. Finally it is also the case that for the past two decades the oil taken out of the ground has exceeded new discoveries.
Goldman Sachs cuts oil forecast again
Bank drops crude outlook for second time in less than a month, expects prices to hit $69 a barrel this year due to warmer weather.
Scientific American and the Silent Lie
As long as the forces of industrial expansion are able to spew pro-growth propaganda that denies the laws of physics and the reality of overpopulation, the sustainability movement is at a disadvantage in reaching the public.
Warm weather spells relief for homeowners
PORTLAND, Maine - That sound New Englanders are hearing in their basements — the sound of silence as their oil-burning furnaces sit idle — is saving them money as heating oil consumption drops with this season's warm temperatures.
Cold Snap Kills At Least 260 People In South Asia
The cold weather has highlighted acute shortfalls in the country's energy supply, especially of natural gas, as households increase their use of gas heaters.Pakistan's current energy crisis is expected to worsen over the next two years as demand rises by an anticipated 50 percent.
Pakistan: Power Ministry to review energy crisis in country
ISLAMABAD: A high level meeting of the Water and Power Ministry is going to be held today to review the prevailing energy crisis and load shedding in the country.
Pakistan: Power crisis to deepen in coming years: 50% demand rise in two years likely
The power shortage that has been estimated to remain in the range of 1000-2000MW during the current year is likely to cross 3,000MW next year and to increase to about 5,300MW by 2010. Overall, Pakistan’s total energy requirement is expected to be around 80 million tons of oil equivalents (MTOE) in 2010, up by about 50 per cent from the current year’s 54 MTOE.“Since four out of five major initiatives, originally planned for meeting this demand, are uncertain at present, the shortage could be anybody’s guess,” said a senior government official.
Is the Anglo-American empire losing the "Great Energy Game"?
As revealed in the San Francisco Chronicle report, both China-Kazakhstan deals have come at a steep price (that China is willing to pay), and over intense and continuous opposition from Washington and western oil consortiums. China has agreed to build and finance the proposed 2,000-mile pipeline from Kazakhstan to eastern Chinese border.
Take biofuels for instance. The use of agricultural products such as sugarcane or wheat has created a dilemma over whether crops should be used to feed people or fuel vehicles and industry.The matter is of course particularly acute in the mainland, where the world's largest national population puts enormous pressure on food security. Moreover, the party has, notwithstanding occasional horrific food policy reversals during Mao Zedong's weirdest phases, historically put food security as its chief priority.
Green Funds Appeal to German Principles and Pockets
FRANKFURT - Renowned for their recycling habits, booming solar and biofuel industry and boasting one of the world's oldest Green parties, Germans are catching on to a global trend in green and socially conscious investing.
Gore mobilizes global warming activists
Hundreds of volunteers from across the country have flocked to Nashville this fall and winter and more are here today as part of a grass-roots training effort to spread the word on global warming.
Policy: A Scene Set For Change
As China pushes 'Green GDP,' officials fear careers may depend on cutting the costs of pollution.
Since majority of the people of Bangladesh live in rural areas, providing energy to them is almost impossible. Only renewable or limitless energy like wind can solve the problem and improve their life style. As has already been mentioned, Bangladesh has strong potential for wind energy and it needs to utilise this opportunity through drastic measures. If we can substitute only 5.0 per cent of our electricity by wind energy that will be bring in great benefit t
Why India's import pipelines have remained pipe dreams
It is high time India tries to bring in the talents of private oil companies to negotiate by giving them a chance to invest in the project. Otherwise our pipelines will remain pipe dreams for years to come.
Grease is the word for Hammonton man
John McQueen still hasn't figured out how to turn worthless metals into gold or grow money on trees.But he can perform one transmutation that might qualify as modern alchemy: Making dirty, used restaurant cooking oil into a cheap petroleum substitute.
Belarus blocks transit of Russian oil
MINSK, Belarus - Belarus has blocked the transit of Russian oil through its territory to European countries including Germany and Poland, news reports said Monday, raising the stakes in a bitter energy dispute between Russia and the neighboring former Soviet nation.
U.S. puts squeeze on Iran's oil fields
A campaign to dry up financing for projects poses a threat to Tehran's ability to maintain exports, analysts say.
General Electric to buy oil-services firm
LONDON - General Electric Co. said Monday it agreed to buy oil services company Vetco Gray for $1.9 billion from private equity funds Candover Partners Ltd., 3i Group PLC & JP Morgan Partners LLC.
Americans covet beach homes, but insurers fret over hurricane risk
Many Americans dream of owning a beachfront home with ocean views, but big home insurance firms are retreating from the Atlantic coast amid fears that climate change will unleash more dangerous hurricanes.The insurers say the risk of a "perfect storm" causing vast damage to communities along the Atlantic coast has simply become too high since Hurricane Katrina obliterated New Orleans in 2005.
General Motors say China sales jumped
BEIJING - General Motors said Monday its sales in China's booming car market grew by 32 percent last year, a boost for an automaker that has seen demand slump in its key North American market.
In other words, the foundation of the "doomer" perspective is implicitly theological - and as such is open to theological critique.
I hope readers don't suffer surf-fatigue before looking at that last one (Misplacing the apocalypse).
Good stuff.
I posted it, but the article makes no sense to me. Perhaps because I was raised in an atheist family, and in a largely non-Christian culture. To me, it looks like he's a hammer, so every problem looks like a nail. Of course a theologian is going to see it as a religious issue. How could he not?
Leanan,
I am not a Christian, but the article makes perfectly good sense to me. What is being done is an examination of the history of ideas. You can look at the Old Testament as history, and especially a history of ideas, quite apart from any religious perspective.
Prophets prophesy doom for various reasons, and I think it repays our efforts to understand these reasons.
I am a Christian, and I think I agree with this article entirely (and with embarrasment for what passes as Christianity today). This apocalyptic thinking is a theme that runs through certain segments of society. PO doomers and Apocalyptic Christians are pressed from the same mold. Both get a twisted sense of satisfaction from the idea of other people suffering and dying for their false beliefs.
For what it is worth, I am persuaded that the New Testament prophecies about the "end of the age" refer to the destruction of the Jewish temple, preisthood and 1000+ year old system of sacrifices at the hands of the Romans in 66 to 70 AD. The Jewish polity has never existed in this form again. For Jews this was certainly "the end of the age". By the way, the term "end of the world" is an unfortunate King James mistranslation of the Greek word which is the exact same word as the English "aeon" or "eon". Christians are living with the consequences of that mistranslation even today. Most modern translations have correctly rendered it "end of the age" or "end of the era".
I recently watched a History Channel documentary about the end times. It claimed the whole "Rapture" deal is an American invention, and of fairly recent vintage. Based on one man's flawed interpretation of the Bible.
But then, couldn't you argue that god wouldn't allow his word to be mistranslated unless that's what he wanted? Maybe it was the original authors who got it wrong, and this "mistake" is a correction. For only the chosen people, of course.
/the whole "Rapture" deal is an American invention/
This is in large part true. Apocalyptic fever is in large part absent from the writings of the historical church fathers and from modern-day Christians on other continents.
For what it's worth, only the looniest and strictest (American) fundamentalists think that a translation (namely the King James) can be directed by God. Everyone else recognizes that although God inspired the original scriptures, something is always lost when we translate it into our own language. If you translate Greek literally, it comes out as jibberish. Among other reasons, Greek does not use a syntax of word order as English does. A certain degree of "paraphrasing" is inevitable.
jesusneverexisted.com
and the bible was written by idiots.
I can't help smiling. This is true creationism.
They are trying to create a second reality, the determined rewriting of history to exclude elements they don't like. Some people never accept the most probable case, even when confronted with overwhelming arguments.
It's worth noting that the Jesus myth theory is quite new. The early opponents of Christianity didn't question Jesu existence. To be a believer of "the Jesus myth", one also have to ignore the evidence for the historical Jesus.
I'm sure everything fits well and you see confirmations of your theory everywhere.
True creationism.
You ought not to be so haughty about this, especially as the case you oppose is, contrary to your misrepresentations, very strong.
It is rather ironic when you say ‘the early opponents of Christianity didn’t question the existence of Jesus’, when in fact the mythicist case shows, convincingly, that the very earliest Christians, including Paul, had no conception of a historical Jesus at all. That came later, with the Gospel of Mark. In other words, it would be better to say ‘the earliest believers in Christianity didn’t question the historical non-existence of Jesus’ – he was the mythical Son of God, the intermediary between man and the divine, and not a historical person. Even the earliest apologists never speak of Christ as a historical person. One of them, in the Felix Menucius, even laughs at the idea that Christians worship a man nailed to a cross (and no, he doesn’t go on to say ‘because he was really the son of God’ – he just scoffs and leaves it at that, as if he is dismissing some sort of lunatic historicizing process that had then just begun).
You talk about the ‘evidence’ of the historical Jesus. Well, there isn’t any. None. Except the Gospels, which of course were not contemporaneous and are totally unreliable, for obvious reasons. And as I have indicated, earlier Christians appear not to be referring to a historical person. Look at Paul’s writing carefully, without historicist preconceptions. He never attributes sayings to Jesus, but to God or to Scripture. He never mentions anything about the historical details of Jesus’ existence. Why not? We all know religious nuts obsess on such stuff, if they believe in it. But Paul didn’t – because he wasn’t talking about a historical person.
But from your tone, I know I am talking to a closed mind on this. So if anyone else is interested in this, check out Earl Doherty’s Jesus Puzzle web pages at http://pages.ca.inter.net/~oblio/home.htm Very extensive, very well argued. Unless you already have some emotional investment in the idea of a historical Jesus (and unfortunately far too many people do, even athiests), you will never accept a historicist interpretation again.
I have an intellectual passion for thruth and strongly feel it's unethical to lie, nor do i desire to subscribe to one.
Hebrew chapter 10, verse 5.
Therefore, when Christ came into the world, he said:
"Sacrifice and offering you did not desire,
but a body you prepared for me;
6with burnt offerings and sin offerings
you were not pleased.
7Then I said, 'Here I am—it is written about me in the scroll—
I have come to do your will, O God.' "
You probably have another interpretation of this verse, and several others. Also, i don't see what rationale you have for rejecting the gospels as a historical source. At least Luke's writing style is very detailed and exact, with lot of (unnecessary) historical references and facts.
Perhaps you should do some critical reading of Luke, not just read books written by people whom made up their minds prior to the investigation?
I have never met any scholars (or non-scholars) subscribing to the Jesu-myth theory without also being an atheist and strongly opposed to christian culture.
Well, it's ironic that you pick something from Hebrews, because that is regarded by Jesus mythicists as one of the best examples of an epistle that is talking about a mythical and not historical Jesus. But, I do not intend to argue this with you. It's a Peak Oil site, after all. I posted because I want anyone who is curious about it to realize that the mythicist case is stronger than is usually portrayed, and is worth checking out. So if anyone cares about this debate, they should check out e.g. Doherty, where it is covered in great detail.
Have you ever heard of the historian Josephus? He was a contemporary of Jesus and an eyewitness to his existence and actions.
But in cases of invincible ignorance, I would not expect a person to look at the historical evidence.
No he was seen recently waiting for a train in Sydney.
http://au.news.yahoo.com/070108/23/11zxi.html
I thought the concept of the Rapture was invented in Scotland in the late 19th century.
Everyone else recognizes that although God inspired the original scriptures, something is always lost when we translate it into our own language.
Ah, you haven't read Shakespeare until you've read it in the original Klingon...
Why does the meaning of the word 'god' shift for Christians depending on the situation? A quick example: the Bible was inspired by 'god'. Ok, but if 'god' is the all-knowing all-powerful creator of the universe, then all writing is inspired by 'god'. If Christians were to truly examine their various usages of the word 'god', they would realize that attributing anything to 'god' is the same as saying 'anything happens', which quite frankly is meaningless.
By the way why do Christians always assume in the face of strong evidence to the contrary that 'god' is benevolent? Or is 'god' really not very powerful? Or is Christianity, as as all religions, just a form of delusion?
God: My beliefs and I will follow the crowd and make some rather flat , exclamatory statements of which I am sure many will disagree.
First I wanted to find out about God. I had heard years and years of mostly nonsense from the pulpits. Since my religion had only been around a few hundred years (Southern Baptist,Missionary type) I doubt that they had as much knowledge about God as they thought. In fact I found lots of confusion and contradictions.
Therefore I reasoned that God had passed the Torah to the Jews and that since it contained the first 5 books of the Old Testament, and that God had made numerous covenants with them and stated that they were his 'chosen people' and since they had therefore been studying and debating about God for a couple thousand years THAT perhaps they had more insight and knowledge than some country bumpkin preacher who said he was 'Called' and with very little theological or historial perspective ansdwas going to tell me how I needed to live my life and how to take care of MY soul.
I figured it was more my outlook than theirs anyway and I was taking on very little of what I had not proven or experienced my own self.
After a long time I descended into the realm of Jewish Mysticism. There I found the apparent bedrock of the issue. This is what I will briefly speak to:
God is not God's name. The name of God is never pronounced by Jews but another word is substituted instead. The 4 characters in Hebrew that are the name or not known presently. One a year the high priest went into the Holy of Holies in the Temple and spoke the then known name of God. With the disapora the name was no longer known. Still not to this day as I read and study.
The word substituted is Adonai,,or what we anglicized it to. Its possibly greek and translates as LORD. The Jewish word for God is Elohim. This can be pronounced and is and we translate this as the word God. Yet that is not the name of God. The word God does not exist in Hebrew..its Elohim(the sound of it in English--transliterated I suppose). The word Adonai(or Lord) was not in the Hebrew until Elohim had finished with the total creation. After that he was referred to as Adonai Elohim. Very important such distinctions. Almost no one except Jewish scholars note such as this. We do a surface read and never truly understand what is really being stated. Its more like a novel I suppose to many. They read it and then simply trash it and call it nonsense..all the while never having gotten a glimmer of the underlying structure and nuances.
The 4 hebrew characters are not printable here unless the Hebrew font is used. They are referred to as the Tetragrammaton(from the Greek).
Aside: The name of Jesus Christ is not Jesus Christ either. There is no J in Hebrew, none in Latin and none in Greek(as I read). There was also no J in English for a long time , until about the 17xx or 18xx(not going to google it right now) and it was apparently derived from the French.
Jesus was really Ieosus or more yet like Yeshua (pronounced as it sounds)or even other slight variants. Christ is Greek and means Messiah. The rightful name of Jesus would then be Yeshua Ben Yosef. Son of Joseph. The sign that Pilate placed on the cross was INRI Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum. Some may disagree but if you look at the sign on the cross in any Catholic Church that is what you will see. It means Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews(as we have rendered in our theology..protestant and catholic I believe) NOTE: No Js!!!!!
As I said we toss about the name God. Therefore what we have done is nicely tied up God, put a name on the unnamable, put him in a merchandisable package and marketed him/her/adonai/whatever.
When anyone makes a statement regarding God such as "God wants us to love one another"....they are telling us that they know the mind of God. Clearly they do not. Preachers do not either. No one knows the mind of God or even if he has one.
God is not definable. God has no limits. God can not be labelled. Gods works can only be judged or realized and yet that does not define God.
Even my stating the above is a travesty for I have no knowledge EXCEPT what I experience myself that I can label as enlightenment and what works for me in that spiritual aspect , I cannot attribute to being true for any other. There is no universal salvation except that which is personal. Mere words can not save anyone. Its actions and others are not able to judge you on what your internal belief system is. Supposedly if you find yourself in a hot place you have chosen wrong.
Perhaps if you chose NO belief then you have nothing to think about. You are simply worm food and there is effectively no soul to translate.
I would suggest that anyone in search of THE TRUTH must investigate upon their own. This is where one departs from the dogma and bullshit of the various religious factions and delves into a personal realm of belief or not as they choose. Its a solidarity path IMO. You go it alone.
Basically in my opinion God(if you believe) does interact with his creations(humankind). How this is effected I am uncertain. I have looked very closely to Quantum Mechanics. It might be possible that the electromagnetic spectrum and energy forces (simplistic I know) might be a form of communication or networking , to put it in a vague light.
I simply believe this. Your thoughts and soul are yours to take where you wish. What comes back may depend on you and what you seek.
This I believe. Those who would place God in a box are those who would cheapen the spirituality and effectively place man's value upon God. This is when it all breaks down.
The worst sinners in the world IMO are the tele-evangalists who are nothing but destructive ego driven con men of the lowest ilk of the lowest scum sewers of the earth. They are not preaching the TRUTH nor the LIGHT. They are filth.
Notes: My wife is a Catholic. My mother is a Catholic. My son is a Catholic, my grandparents on my mothers side were all Irish Catholics.I am by choice a Baptist since the basic baptist creed is that NO ONE needs to come between the individual and his God/salvation. That all he needs is scripture and that is it. Each person is his own priest. No priesthood required and none needed.
Some other points:
1.God did not offer eternal life(heaven). He never placed it on the table. Jesus did,,big time. Look and you will NOT find it in the Old Testament.
2. Jesus told his disciples that he came ONLY FOR THE LOST SHEEP OF THE TRIBE OF ISRAEL. Not to the gentiles(us).
3. Jesus NEVER left the holy land(Israel) and in fact expressely told his disciples to NOT go to the gentiles.
4. Jesus NEVER wrote a single word down. His was an oral message.
5. The Jews never really professed a belief in a SOUL. The translations are not usually correct.
Here is the biggie:
6. Man was created by God from the earth(humus) and God breathed the spirit of life into his nostrils. God 'fabricated' woman from man and not from the soil and did not breath into her nostrils. In others words you could say that she derived from Adams DNA.
# 6 will cause many females to become outraged and absolutely NO preacher or priest will speak of this but it happens to be scripturally sound. Translate it your self or not. Thats what is says.
The point I make is that you are not being told the absolute truth about what the bible says. Most are being gulled by scoundrels.
I refer the reader to The Five Books of Moses by Robert Alter
As well as the Kaballah(in all its books) in many interpretations by noted scholars.
Also there are many websites devoted to the study of the Torah and other areas. The Dead Sea Scrolls as well as The Nag Hammadi and other
areas. Study of the Gnostics and Essenes are also of value.
IMO the phsical church needs to be more of a POINTER and less of a end unto itself. They become social clubs the longer they control peoples minds. They allow people to sit in pews, drop money in the collection plate and smirk at all the rest whom they consider lost.
The RCC is very serious in this area. I have sat thru the entire RCIA and spent many hours in deep discusssion with priests of the RCC.
The truest religion must have been among those early christians who were chained up and waiting to be fed to the lions for the amusement of the roman crowds or placed on many crosses lining the roads to Rome. Murdered and murdered and yet they held to their faith.
Here in Amurkah were get all pissed off if a sports event is blacked out on the TV.
Perhaps the hungry lions are waiting and we are being led unwitting to the coliseum. I will take whatever faith I can garner and hope for the best. Not a time for me to be shouting denials from the rooftops. Not on your sweet ass it isn't. I been heading down this path a long long time before I started noticing the price of gas and a back-water internet website called TheOilDrum.
I am not slighting in the least the masterful(perhaps arrogant?) work and endeavors that the owners and contributors make on this website. They are truly the modern day prophets crying in the wilderness of this 'fruited plain'. Mostly they go unheeded.
airdale - my story and I wrote it myself so I am sticking to it
everyone gets a chance to write their own
P.S. I do love the women folk. Really I do.
P.P.S.Please don't take it personal...I did not write the bible,
I just read it and try to make it thru.
Airdale,
Whew what a can of worms, religion and Peak oil. Leaving aside that one could argue even writing is vanity (i.e my mistakes may live on after me and your observation that Jesus left no written record though he perhaps wrote in the sand (some theologians I believe speculated he wrote in the sand the sins of those accusing the woman caught in the act of adultery), I'll make the following comments. My understanding is there is an Elohist and Yawhist writing current seen in the Old testament. Yahweh, also translated Jehovah, refers to the revealed name of God given to Moses at the burning bush. It relates to the concept of "being" and is translated now as "he who is" or "I am who am". This word, I think, was reserved in Jewish worship and held sacred. If the idea that God reveals himself as "I am" is not curious to you perhaps you should give it a second thought. Christ alludes to and plays off of this concept more than once in the Gospels. This is not chapter and verse but I will trust it is basically correct. When the pharisees challenge him saying, "You aren't yet 50 years old ... are you older than Moses", he replies "before Moses was I am" Both indirectly declaring his divinity and perhaps contrasting Moses' faithfulness with their doubt. Again when he is captured for crucifixion it is asked are you Jesus and it is related when he declares "I am" the soldiers fall back. You are right the name of God is His and ineffable still I wonder if the beginning of the Gospel of John was presented as an Eastern Koan or new age mysticism, "In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God", it might be given some thought. The Greek translation used for word is "logos" which also implies reason or rationale thought. Pope Benedict recently discussed this passage while reflecting on Christian Muslim relations basically asking the Muslim world in a round about way "Is there the possibility for rational discussion with you on the nature of God?"
As for the validity of scripture, I would just point out whoever records things like this, I mean read the thing. Lot sleeping with his two daughters, Judah mistaking his daughter in law for a prostitute, Absalom after revolting against his father King David having intercourse with his concubines on the roof of the King's Palace. Who would preserve these things? There are many more examples, say Jeramiah's whole prophecy about "hey you're about to lose this war".
As for atheists, there are very few actual intellectual atheists. If one wishes to better oneself and conceives of that which they wish to improve in themselves, more intelligence, money, strength have they not defined their conception of God? There are many, like I often am, who give fate or God the finger because of, rarely, other's suffering and, most often, that someone or thing hurt us, perhaps a stubbed toe.
As regards Jewish Christian relations I would implore the assistance of Israelites who are dealing with these same questions on such a deeper level. I have the luxury of distance.
I would argue that God has declared in numerous ways that he wants us to love Him and each other. This does not imply I have a full understanding of God just as I may not know my boss but know what he expects from me. This tenant, though I would not speak for other religions, is I suspect at the core of the all the great world religions.
Per disclaimer, yes I am ostensibly Catholic, missed mass last week and might hit you in the nose for absolutely no reason. But all that is really irrelevant as to the question of does God save (the translation of Jesus being "God saves"). A question for a peak oil era and one for 100 years from now.
ZPDM123,
You said "the translation of Jesus being "God saves"
I ask. Have you translated the Hebrew characters for the name?
I thought that EL was the approximation for God. El Shaddai, Micha el,Gabri el,etc. (note the EL)Will have to check.
As to your comments. Thanks for the thoughtful reply.
Name of God. yah hey vau hey..in english. We then create the word Yahweh and once more try to put limits and labels upon our God. Granted we need a word to describe yet why does it become our most favorite cussword?
The Jews honor the name. We desecrate it.
This discussion could consume the whole TOD website and still not even get started. I just wanted to express my views since so many were expressing theirs.
My personal experience is that some type of entity exists(God is real). It wants ,in fact demands to be worshiped. I worship it with truth as far as I can and ask forgiveness when I falter. What it is is way beyond my (or possibly human) comprehension but the effects it can produce are knowable and can be witnessed. I do not put a real name to it. I just believe in it.
It makes my life more understandable and peaceful. I do the best I can with what it gives me and beyond that I cannot go.
In closing I believe that much of the scripture is not realized. Its read just on the surface like a novel.
Year before last I spent 3 months on just the first few verses of Genesis Chapter 1. The first verse in Hebrew.."Berashith Bera Elohim Ath Ha Shamaim Va Ath Ha Aretz"....can according to Hebrew scholars be translated 16 different ways. Since the Torah was given without vowel points, no spacing and in one continuous stream..so to speak. That is classic bilblical hebrew as put down in the 'Bera' scroll portion.
Note the Jews do not use the Greek names given to their scripture that we use.
The word Elohim is plural. Its says then "GODS" created. On just this one point I spent days and days of study and searching. Interesting that what we with English pass over without a single thought can have such numerous possibilities such that a facile interpretation can easily render a false impression or misunderstanding.
The mystics believe that the Torah mutates and is alive in that sense.
I am a poor judge of these matters and not that good of a scholar. What I do find is what I seek and that is what I term 'enlightment'.
May you find it as well or savor it if you have already. Without something to cling to in this world that is hastening towards a destructive path I would perhaps go mad indeed. I do not foist it on others but if discussed I will speak on it or if asked.
Yesterday a friend(from church) discussed with me a woman of approx 40 yrs of age who had been self-militating herself for some time. Her chest area was covered with numerous scars from using a razor blade on herself. As well as her arms and other areas. He asked me how did I obtain peace with myself since he observed that I had a very bad childhood yet was coping with my life. This woman was seeking my friends help. I could offer little. I believe that she had been badly led astray by religion and dogma. It promises so much by its priesthood(preachers,etc) yet in the modern world seems to deliver so very little and IMO can be very destructive to one. I have seen it time and again. I sometimes attend therefore the gathering together but remain mostly outside the mainstream. I go for the fellowship of neighbors since it is a wonderful method of communication with your neighborhood and community. On occassion a young person will stand before the rest and sing. Sometimes such faith can bring tears to your tired old cynical eyes and then later you see the kid grown up and on hard drugs. Or cut his throat in the county park at the age of 14. (both have happened) Our world cries out for compassion but its in very short supply. We can do almost nothing. We just watch as it circles the drain and try to salvage ourselves or our close ones.
Airdale,
Appreciate your heartfelt response, will consider it more.
Here's a picture of "The One" we pray to:
Any questions?
How ya like me now?
Keep on strokin' ?
Seize the day ?
Ha ha --funny not.
Airdale,
I think you are to be commended for doing your own homework. When it comes to Peak Oil we should all do our own homework--and lots of it. Now in regard to the teaching of the Jews (and of course Yeshua was Jewish) it is noteworthy that Judaism is a strictly ethical religion; in other words, what you DO matters, what you "believe" or "have faith in" is squat.
According to Jewish doctrine, the virtuous gentile stands equal with the virtuous Jew at the gate of heaven. (And sinners won't make it through the metaphorical gate, regardless of denomination.)
I am a proponent of ethical religions such as Judaism and Buddhism: In regard to Peak Oil, what we do (Conserve, discuss respectfully, communicate with others, economize, localize and produce) matters. What we "believe" (as opposed to our actions) does not matter.
Thus, I don't think the nature of your religeous beliefs (or mine) matters. What matters is how we treat people, what we do, how we behave. Arguments over details of belief often detract attention from more important issues of what we should do.
I hereby nominate Don for sainthood.
He stands shoulder to shoulder with Frank Sinatra.
Now we see why:
To do is to be .... Aristotles.
To be is to do .... Socrates.
OObe DooBe Doo ... Sinatra.
:-)
I couldn't have said it better. Thank you.
airedale
A very well written, passionate & incisive comment. 2 things resonate with me in particular:
"Basically in my opinion God(if you believe) does interact with his creations(humankind). How this is effected I am uncertain. I have looked very closely to Quantum Mechanics. It might be possible that the electromagnetic spectrum and energy forces (simplistic I know) might be a form of communication or networking , to put it in a vague light."
'Conventional' religious types would call me an atheist, but what I really believe is that consciousness creates the world - not the other way around. Therefore we attempt to create god because god IS us, and we don't have souls because the soul has US. Trying to put it the other way around, as the vast majority of churchgoing Christians do, looks to me like a crowd of children waiting in line to sit on Santa's lap at the mall.
"Those who would place God in a box"]
Are you familiar with Doug Pinnick by chance?
The Rapture is American and yes, church hierarchies do not encourage popular religious fancies. Apocalyptic thinking is endemic in Christianity, always has been.
A useful and amusing older work is Norman Cohn's Pursuit of the Millenium. In paper, in used bookstores, once popular college text.
For a more recent and much more humane take on some of the same notions simply listen to Bob Marley sing 'Get Up, Stand Up'. Examination of most any popular religious music, from anywhere or time, would show more of the same.
As for the article being discussed the preacher gets where he wants to go by stacking premisses one atop the other until the construction can't be taken seriously.
I think the great defensive lineman, and ordained minister, Reggie White was on to something. He bailed on Christianity, learned Hebrew, and read the Torah.
Learning Hebrew and reading the Torah in no way implies a person has "bailed" on Christianity. A great many Christian scholars have studied ancient Greek and Hebrew in order to better understand the messages of the Bible. The Bible has many apparent contradictions which could only be resolved by an understanding of ancient literary styles.
I have seen in the arguments put forth by atheists certain straw man or should I say straw god tactics. The worst is the argument that if God is all loving then why is there war, disease, poverty, etc. They conclude that if evil exists then God doesn't. The usual believers response about free will is just as lame. God created order out of chaos and the laws of physics, chemistry, and biology are the way order is maintained. With out these laws then existence would not be possible. People run up against the limits of these laws, bang their heads, and call it evil.
The Torah evolved as a way of maintaining order in a community and is an ancient example of the rule of law. Most ancient societies were governed by the principle of might makes right. Their kings could do no wrong because the king decided what was right or wrong. The Torah put forth a power greater than the king as a decider of right or wrong. A Hebrew king could be wrong if he violated any of the 613 commandments of the Torah. The stories of the Bible are mostly about the mistakes made by their kings.
Let's consider what Jesus said about good and evil. In Matthew 28 he talked about those who fed the hungry, clothed the naked, visited the prisoner, and cared for the dying. Those who did those things were practicing the true religion. What is important is not that evil exists but in how we respond as individuals and as nations to those who suffer. Peak Oil is a new challenge for believers in God. Climate change is a new challenge for believers in God. I believe we Christians must advocate the case of those most victimized by Peak Oil and Climate Change. It looks like more than a billion people will lose their homes and livelihoods to PO and CC in the next few decades. We could choose to build walls and gun towers to keep these people in their place or we could use those energies in creating new communities in new locations for and with them. Its what Yeshua ben Yosef would do.
"But then, couldn't you argue that god wouldn't allow his word to be mistranslated unless that's what he wanted?"
Nope. God gave man free will. That includes any mistranslation of the bible. We are allowed to translate it into a nursery rhyme, we can Seuss it or Bork it, if we so please. The copyright has long expired and there are no legal, spiritual or whatsoever consequences for abuse, maybe with the exception of looking silly/stupid.
Free will also includes the fact that the bible is not the word of god but the word of man inspired by god. And inspired man can err just as much as non-inspired man. Probably even more. The bible itself says so, if I am not mistaken in its dislcaimer to be beware of false prophets.
Careful not to be too credulous about the "Jewish temple, priesthood and 1000+ year old system of sacrifices" ...