DrumBeat: April 26, 2007
Posted by Leanan on April 26, 2007 - 9:05am
Topic: Miscellaneous
Colombia in the dark about blackout
A nationwide blackout hit Colombia on Thursday, with authorities struggling to determine the cause of the electrical grid's collapse.President Alvaro Uribe told journalists in the southern city of Cali that authorities would "know in a few minutes" the cause of the blackout, which took place at about 10:15 a.m. local time.
He said the blackout "appears to have affected the entire country."
Oil prices expected to drop next year
But there are signs that crude oil may be headed down from its current level of about US$65 (about P400) per barrel at some point next year. "The fact is that demand is very weak, the non-OPEC supply is catching up, so you're going to see more pressure on OPEC to cut back over time," said Michael Lynch, president of Strategic Energy and Economic Research Inc."That's going to make people feel like there's less of a threat from small places like Venezuela and Iran for political reasons," he added. "I think prices will stay above $50 for the rest of the year but gradually down to the mid 40s by next year."
Coal Power Worsening Australia Drought
Australia's coal industry, one of the world's biggest, is aggravating the country's worst drought in centuries, which may raise questions about expanding production, the head of an environmental group said on Wednesday.
Drought Threatens Australia's Hydropower Scheme
Australia's biggest renewable electricity source, the Snowy Hydro power scheme, may have to shut down major generating turbines due to the nation's crippling 10-year drought.In a desperate attempt to keep running, the Snowy Hydro operator said on Tuesday it had turned to cloud seeding to boost water inflows.
National oil companies lack security knowledge
The awareness of growing risk to energy security and its implications is relatively low among national oil companies (NOCs) that control more than 90 per cent of the world's oil reserves, according to a study released yesterday by Marsh, a global risk and insurance services firm.
While most media attention on African oil focuses on the sensational, spectacular or just plain lurid, important developments are taking place at sea. Widely considered to be one of the most promising new oil sources in the world, the 34 billion barrels of proven reserves buried in the deep waters off Africa’s western coast in a region expected to account for as much as 25 percent of U.S. oil supplies in the coming years represent a critical opportunity for the United States to diversify its energy supplies. But doing so will require being mindful of the considerable security risks and adeptness in engaging in the cut-throat competition for contracts that often makes no accommodation for scruples.
The Spin Over the "Joint Nuclear Energy Action Plan"
In my over 20 years in journalism -- including a stint as an editorial writer and book editor that blessed me with the trade's brassiest awards, from the Pulitzer Prize on down -- I have never encountered a slicker spin than the administration's announcement today, April 25, of a "joint nuclear energy action plan" between the United States and Japan.
California Threatens to Sue EPA Over Greenhouse Gas Regulations
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Wednesday said his administration will sue the Environmental Protection Agency if it fails to act more quickly on California's request to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles.
Greenpeace: China must end its dependency on coal
"The bank, which is mainly supported by the rich countries, must stop financing projects focused on coal," Greenpeace said, denouncing the "hypocrisy" of European countries which talk about fighting climate change while allowing the bank to continue funding polluting projects.
Taiwan power outage looms, some fear
China's missiles may not be the biggest danger to Taiwan. A possible power shortage could cause blackouts within three years and weaken the nation's economy.Power production is failing to keep pace with demand because of a ban on new nuclear plants and delays in completing projects already under way, says Jeffrey Bor, a fellow at the Chung-hua Institution for Economic Research, which advises the government.
Al Bartlett’s resources depletion protocol for a sustainable Australia
In a recent paper, published in the journal of Natural Resources Research, Bartlett criticises the Australian Government’s approach to energy resources management (namely, claiming to embrace a sustainable and secure energy policy for the future whilst simultaneously ramping up the exports of Australian fossil fuels). In his classic style, Bartlett uses simple mathematics to demonstrate that our leaders are totally innumerate in thinking that growth in consumption of non-renewable resources can be considered to be a sustainable plan for any useful timeframe.
Turkey, Iraq strike tentative oil deal
Turkish officials say meetings with Iraqi leaders last week included new oil export deals with Baghdad, bypassing Iraqi Kurds.Turkey threatened to stop exporting needed fuel products to Iraq after Baghdad told Ankara it would have to deal with the Kurdistan Regional Government regarding shipments. Kurdistan, like the rest of Iraq, faces a shortage of transportation, cooking and heating fuels.
China's Protein Gap Will Stoke Global Inflation
In 1995, Lester Brown, then president of the Worldwatch Institute in Washington, had seen the avalanche coming in his book "Who Will Feed China?"Since then, China has done a good job feeding a fifth of the world's population with less than a 10th of global farmland.
What has changed in recent years is the sustained increase in oil prices and the consequent diversion of food crops globally to the production of ethanol.
Religion and Peak Oil: The City of Progress
When I suggest that our current predicament has its roots in a religious crisis, then, I don’t mean to say Christianity has much to do with the matter. In most of the Western world, Christianity in any of its historic forms has been a minority religion for centuries. The illusion that it remained a majority faith rose because a newer faith took over its outward forms, in much the same way that a hermit crab takes over the cast-off shell of a snail and pulls it along behind it through the sand. That newer faith, of course, is the religion of progress, the established church and dogmatic faith of the modern industrial world.
Richard Bell: House Hearing Puts the Heat on Climate Stagnators
In their opening statements, the panel’s Republicans were clear and unequivocal—Select Committee or no Select Committee, they intended to battle on against the threat of godless environmentalism and its fellow traveling sidekick, global warming.
Examining the politics behind the U.S. government's failure to act on the biggest environmental problem of our time.
It's still not easy selling green, experts say
Eco-friendliness may make consumers feel good — as long as it comes with other attributes, such as superior performance, cost effectiveness or health benefits, says Stafford, who has done extensive research on the topic.
Tom Whipple - Peak Oil Crisis: By Order of the Governor
Earlier this month, the Governor of Virginia issued what is sure to be one of many orders, laws and regulations mandating greater efficiency in the use of energy. Although justified in terms of saving taxpayer money, wise use of natural resources and reducing greenhouse gases, the order serves equally well as a preemptory strike against the consequences of peak oil.
Byron King: Ali Samsam Bakhtiari and peak oil
I HAVE RECEIVED more correspondence from Ali Samsam Bakhtiari of Tehran, Iran. I want to bring Dr. Bakhtiari's important work to the attention of the readers of Whiskey & Gunpowder.
Malaysia's oil output will continue to grow
Malaysia’s oil output is forecast to continue to grow in the long-term after a series of world-class deepwater discoveries, an analyst said.“In stark contrast to the outlook at the turn of the last decade, when production declines from core legacy fields were a major concern, a series of world-class deepwater discoveries have set the scene for a resurgence in output," said Kate Broughton, Head of Oils Research at Wood Mackenzie, an international energy and life sciences consultancy firm.
Oilsands give a little Texas town its future back
Once-roaring refinery town was 'dying' before Alberta bitumen came along
Pakistan: Tapping of small gas fields needs incentives
The draft Petroleum Exploration and Production Policy 2007 is devoid of incentives needed to exploit small gas fields, which hold massive reserves but are not being utilised due to low economies of scale, a petroleum expert told The News.
REFUELLING at gas stations countrywide is turning out to be the worst nightmare for motorists.They have to chase around for hours, for what has surprisingly become the scarcest of commodities - diesel.
As the fuel crisis escalates queues of frustrated city motorists are forming out at fuel-starved stations, rationing has spread, pump prices are shooting through the roof and crooks are taking advantage of the situation. They sell adulterated diesel on the black market.
Ghana: Sell cement at approved price
The Government has warned that it would not hesitate to institute price controls to protect the interest of consumers if distributors and retailers continued to sell cement at arbitrarily high prices....The energy crisis has affected the production of cement, leading to a hike in prices. Diamond Cement, whose production output stands 95,000 to 100,000 tonnes per month slackened by about 10 percent.
GHACEM also had to cut production in line with the request to all industries to cut their energy usage by 25 per cent.
The shortfall in supply has led to a price hike of the product from about ¢60,000 to between ¢75,000 and ¢90,000 per bag.
Competing pressures for land – to grow food, house a burgeoning population and keep people employed – are on a collision course as Greater Vancouver politicians try to cut a new deal to contain the region’s growth.
Will Ethanol Provide Our Daily Bread Or Are We Toast?
There are many unanswered questions regarding the future of the energy industry and any answers you are likely to receive depend largely on who you ask. Ask a vegetarian or environmental campaigner how much oil is used to raise a beef steer and they will probably quote a figure in excess of 280 gallons while some beef farmers claim the real figure is around 14 gallons.
Bio-fuel crops are environmentally unfriendly and bio-fuel production can lead to increased carbon production, Colin Pritchard of the University of Edinburgh, said on Wednesday.
Green initiatives lead to survival, prosperity
I am not an environmentalist. I get just as annoyed with peace-sign-tattooed "tree-huggers" as my dad and his dad before him. I am a student of engineering, being trained in the premier innovation center of the world, Silicon Valley. I have no agenda except my future prosperity and the prosperity of my American peers.That prosperity is being threatened. It is being held hostage by the stubborn voting of our parents and grandparents. We are being held to the ideals and thoughts of two generations that have seen the mechanized forces of American supremacy overcome all threats, survive and thrive. But we have come under a new threat, never before faced by humanity, and the solutions appear radical and dangerous to those that have lived their lives in the blanket of technological comfort and cheap energy bliss.
Climate change to cost Western Cape billions
Cape Town - The Western Cape is likely to have to fork out billions of rand over the next 20 years to limit and adapt to the effects of climate change.The Environmental Affairs Department's director for strategic and environmental management, Mark Gordon, told the Cape Argus on Wednesday that the money would be needed for new power stations, desalination of sea water, new dams, changing crop cycles, finding new export revenue streams and the effects on housing and coastal development of possible rising sea levels.
Ethiopia blames Eritrea for attack
ADDIS ABABA, Ethiopia - Ethiopia on Wednesday blamed its rival Eritrea for an attack on a Chinese-owned oil exploration field that killed 74 people, raising tensions between the neighbors who have yet to resolve a border issue following the end of a two-year war in 2000.
Conoco left out of Venezuela's Orinoco deals
Venezuela signed agreements on Wednesday with five foreign oil companies to hand over operations of four massive Orinoco heavy oil projects, with ConocoPhillips alone failing to sign the accords.
Kuwait: $60-plus Oil 'Damaging' in Long Term
Sustained oil prices above $60 a barrel will deter global oil demand and harm producers and consumers in the long term, an executive of state-owned Kuwait Petroleum Corporation said Wednesday."So far, at least in OECD countries, the price of $60 a barrel has been accepted. I think any increase above that level is damaging," said Jamal A. Alnouri, managing director of international marketing at KPC at the World National Oil Congress in London.
Exxon Mobil 1Q profit rises 10 percent
Exxon Mobil Corp., the world's largest publicly traded oil company, said Thursday its net income grew 10 percent in the first quarter, as higher refining, marketing and chemical profit margins overcame lower crude oil and natural gas prices.
New ways to gasify and clean coal emerge
A recent Massachusetts Institute of Technology report said carbon capture and sequestration at the plants could boost power bills by 20 percent.That leaves opportunities for companies to gasify coal close to where it is mined, send the natural gas via pipeline for home heating or for burning at power plants, and sell the carbon dioxide for pumping into nearby aging oil fields where it can boost production.
Ice shrinks, birds migrate early in warmer Arctic
A Norwegian glacier has shrunk on an island 1,000 km (600 miles) from the North Pole, a usually frozen fjord is ice-free and snow bunting birds have migrated back early in possible signs of global warming.
Film on global warming is challenged
A group of British climate scientists is demanding changes to a skeptical documentary about global warming, saying there are grave errors in the program billed as a response to Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth.""The Great Global Warming Swindle" aired on British television in March and is coming out soon on DVD. It argues that man-made emissions have a marginal impact on the world's climate and warming can better be explained by changing patterns of solar activity.
British Millennium flora store banks billionth seed
Britain's Millennium Seed Bank filed away its one billionth seed on Thursday in a race against time to save the world's plants from global warming wipe-out.
Dutch consider tough biofuels criteria
It's the new climate change dilemma: finding alternatives for oil and gas without doing more harm than good.In the rush to develop biofuels, forests are burned in Asia to clear land for palm oil, and swaths of the Amazon are stripped of diverse vegetation for soya and sugar plantations for ethanol.
On Friday, a Dutch committee will unveil stringent criteria for growing biofuels in ways that don't damage the environment or release more greenhouse gases than they save.
The US Department of Agriculture’s Agricultural Research Service (USDA ARS) has undertaken a large-scale, five-year project to determine the amount of crop residues (e.g., corn stover, cover crop) that must remain on the land in order to maintain soil organic carbon (SOC) and sustain production....Some initial results already suggest that twice as many cornstalks have to be left in the field to maintain soil organic matter levels, compared to the amount of stalks needed only to prevent erosion. In other words, when factoring in soil quality as well as erosion, the amount of biomass feedstock available for cellulosic ethanol production is cut in half.
A new research paper published online in the journal Biomass and Bioenergy argues that the battle against global warming may be better served by instead heating the biomass in an oxygen-starved process called pyrolysis, extracting methane, hydrogen, and other byproducts for combustion, and burying the resulting carbon-rich char.
Sandia, A Step Closer to Achieving High Yield Nuclear Fusion
An electrical circuit that should carry enough power to produce the long-sought goal of controlled high-yield nuclear fusion and, equally important, do it every 10 seconds, has undergone extensive preliminary experiments and computer simulations at Sandia National Laboratories' Z machine facility.



New Song: Gas Pump Blues
Hey, take a listen to this.
I introduced my close friend Forrest McDonald and wife Catlin to Peak Oil this last year and they wrote and recorded this.
Take a listen to Gas Pump Blues.
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendi...
If you love blues etc you would love their album.
I think it's a neat song.
Forward it to those you know.
Nice peak oil message in a fun form. Could be an icebreaker for talking about solutions. Forward it to every school teacher you know.
Great song, He reads alot of articles I send him about Peak Oil and he visits this site too.
One of our own so to speak. Try to give him some air play if you can. He plays the guitar, was a session guitarist for Mussle Shoals Recording studio at one time. His wife has a great voice don't you think? If you like that one the others would be enjoyable too.
Thanks
John
Congestion Charging at The Energy Lean Buffett
By Stein X Leikanger
April 26, 2007
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3567
Baltimore Green Week
http://baltimoregreenweek.org/page.php?id=1
http://baltimoregreenweek.org/page.php?id=349
They are looking for speakers ... I wonder if PO would be too dire.
Go for it. Peak oil is no worse than global warming on the doomerosity scale.
Don't you think Peak Oil is worse in the sense that its effects could clobber the affluent denizens of the globe much sooner than the effects of Global Warming (as opposed to the impoverished majority of the planet, who are already suffering due to both Global Warming and Peak Oil in any case)?
Yes, I agree with this. GW will play out over the century -- PO will play out over the next few decades, and in terms of war is already playing out.
"Democratic presidential candidate and New York Senator Hillary Clinton said Tuesday that it might be necessary for America to confront Iran militarily,....Still, she said, all avenues should be explored, since "if we do have to take offensive military action against Iran, it would be far better if the rest of the world saw it as a position of last resort, not first resort, because the effect and consequences will be global."
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1177514487245&pagename=JPost%...
Confront Iran for what reason? Because they dare to try and build a nuclear arsenal? Both the US and Israel possess nuclear weapons. Why shouldn't Iran?
Hilary Clinton is a horse's ass. Another skirt trying to prove to the red-meat crowd that she's "tough" enough to incinerate other human beings -- but only as a last resort, mind you.
Because Iran would use them for aggression. The US has only used them to finish a war begun by an unprovoked attack, Israel has never used them (or even admitted having them), and both have done quite a bit to keep the violence down to a dull roar compared to the 30 years previous.
Iran would not try a nuclear first strike. If they did the response would be immediate and terrifying. It is outrageous for a great power to be frightened of smaller nation's armaments. It is the smaller nations who naturally fear our power.
Our best interest is an orderly, peaceful world. If some other nation should break the peace, we are ready to act. But it makes no sense for us to be the aggressor.
Really? You're talking about the government which held 44 diplomats hostage for over a year (an act of war), has used its proxies to kill hundreds of Americans with truck bombs starting in Beirut, and has a cult of martyrdom. They have a mythos of "the Great Satan" which will collapse and die, inshallah. You may believe that Iran is as rational as the Soviets were, but the evidence is such that it would be madness to rely upon it.
Hi EP,
Would you care to delineate the clear moral gulf that separates 18 months of Iranian hostage taking from recent well-publicised USian extrajudicial and extraterritorial imprisonment and abuse (for what, 4 years and counting - so far)? Sure, diplomats are protected by the Hague convention, and the phrase "Great Satan" is so much more invigoratingly primitive than "Axis of Evil". Are those the only relevant distinctions?
I would strafe the rest of your rhetorical home turf grid square by grid square, but I've got about half a litre of dark rum twisting in my gut. Anyway, I'm Only Asking Because I Want To Know...
The litany of Evils for the Soviet Union is *FAR* worse !
"Evil Empire" is almost too mild a term.
Yes, Iran is as rational, and IMO, more so, than the Societ Union when it became a nuclear power. Stalin and Beria were as evil a pair as any (including Hitler and Himmler).
The US used proxies to kill tens of thousands of Soviets to get them out of a country they were occupying that the US did not want them in. The turning point was when the US escalated and gave the proxies shoulder launched SAMs.
BTW, AFAIK, zero Iranians have been suicide bombers in Iraq. The majority whose identity could be traced were our friends the Saudis (who are also the premier financiers for the large majority of attacks on US troops in Iraq and, with less certainity, in Afghanistan).
I have no fear of an Iranian first nuclear strike. They did not even "second strike" against Saddam's poison gas attacks. Just because a society is different does not make them evil per se.
And, given that the US destroyed their democracy (history shows a CIA budget of $2 million for exactly that purpose) and installed a despot, "Great Satan" is not an unreasonable characterization.
Best Hopes,
Alan
So apparently the political screed that beats the drums of war reaches many ears.
Iran, despite its belicose (and toothless) president shows no sign of expansionist intent, agressive militancy or propensety towards war. They haven't launched any first strikes on anyone, and the examples you bring up were the disorganized actions of thugs empowered during the fires of a revolution, hardly representitive of the current power structure in Iran.
That revolution is nearly thirty years dead, and one must remember, a direct reaction towards the fumbling agression of the US CIA's coup for the crime of the democratic government nationalizing the oil fields. As for the propensety for Iran's likelyhood of using nuclear weapons, its more elequantly investigated in Of Mullahs And MADness:
http://nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2006/0519nj1.htm
India, Pakistan and China also have nuclear weapons and have never used for aggression. Same goes for China, Russia, various former USSR states, Britain, and numerous other countries which could make one relatively easily (Japan, Canada, most of western Europe, South Korea, etc...). Of all of these countries, the only country to ever seriously, publically, have discussion about using nuclear weapons in aggression is the US (post cold-war anyway).
Iranian leaders, aside from possibly the president (who is not a powerful figure in Iran, and never threatened to literally wipe Israel off the map, despite years of intentional fabricated translations to that effect), aren't stupid. They know, just like everyone else, that large scale nuclear war is unwinnable. But when the good ol' USA, a country that has been making threatening gestures towards you for years, thinks about using "tactical nukes" on you, being able to threaten an ally (Israel) is about all they can try and do.
For all the posturing, all Iran is "threatening" is too get a few nukes as a deterent. Like Israel has. Now, I'm not defending the leadership in Iran in general, but when threatened by a country who has a recent track record of unprovoked attacks in your region, well, I can see why they want a little something.
Engineer-poet:
Japan's unprovoked attack on the US came three days after the US imposed a naval blockade of fuel to Japan. I don't think GWB would need three days to respond in the same, unprovoked way.
The US had nothing like a blockade of Japan until near the end of the war (remember, the entire US battleship fleet was in harbor on 7-Dec-1941). An embargo (forcing Japan to go to other sources) is a very different thing.
In 1941, the US was still heartily sick of war and just coming out of the Depression. Major political forces wanted the US to ally with the Axis. Somehow, your revisionist history has turned the (oh-so-pure, despite the Rape of Nanking) Japanese sneak-attack on Pearl Harbor into "American aggression"; so long as you believe anything from those sources, your conclusions will be nonsense.
Any link/reference for "Major political forces wanted the US to ally with the Axis."? I havn't heard of this before.
The European Fascists had many prominent US supporters, including Henry Ford and Thomas Watson (IBM).
This surprised the heck out of me too, but it makes a certain amount of sense when you think about it. The word "holocaust" meant nothing to most people, the whole world was coming out of a period of desperate poverty, and the USA itself had a "strong leader" (FDR) who was seen as responsible for the nation's improvement (current analysis suggests that he delayed it instead). Hitler was seen as doing miracles for the German economy, and that was probably enough to get most people to overlook his flaws. Even England under Neville Chamberlain was eager to appease Hitler's first military adventures rather than go back to war.
It was a different world, and even though the whole disaster was foreseeable it's hard to grasp it without the benefit of today's experience. If only....
Hi Engineer,
I'm glad you brought this up.
I once interviewed a WWII vet (no longer living)...prior to the interview, he said along the lines of the following: "Most people (in the US) were against going to war...and, not only that...most people didn't know which side to back. This was something people talked about..."
i.e., that what we assume was clear, was really not clear.
I think the "flaws" may not have been as well known as people think. Many people were just struggling (as always) in their own lives...
This same person was shocked (I believe traumatized, really) at the discovery of "the camps".
WW I, just over two decades before, has many stories of German atrocities that later turned out to be just war time propaganda. Thus, before the liberation of the camps, many people believed the same of "rumors' and claims.
Alan
BS !!
First, the Japanese fleet took months to prepare and a week to sail from Japan to Pearl Harnor.
And it was *NOT* a "Naval Blockade". We just refused to sell them oil, our oil.
The concept was a peaceful embargo (see many other examples) to change Japanese behavior (invading China).
Attacking Pearl Harbor did not suddenly open up Texas oil supplies for the Imperial Japanese Army.
Alan
This is the kind of ignorant, stupid , asswipe comments that in the past were the purview of the Hothgar tribe. I see many are again on the rise with their spew and sputum.
Its for sure you were not alive, as I was, during WWII.
You need to google the word HISTORY and get a very clear understanding of just what it means.
You might want to read the non-fiction book titled FLYBOYS,wherein the facts(extremely well documented) are that the Japanese officers tortured and stripped the flesh off our captive airmen then cooked and ate the flesh. Not once but many times(as well as the liver).
These people were the offal of the universe and now you wish to lay blame on us(the USA)?
Get a grip fool. I see more intelligence in the ass end of a mule than your twaddle.
Airdale--I still don't care much for the citizens of Japan though I hold them a bit higher than the Islamic trash we are now engaged with and many of the TODers support for some odd reason whilst degnigerating Christianity.
All religious fundamentalists are ignorant, childish whackjobs who choose curiosity-destroying lies to uncomfortable reality. Pretending one religious cult is better than another is elevating one delusion over another - an exercise in nonsense. ;) All humans have the potential for brutality, but this is especially true of religious minds, which usually lack critical thinking skills.
Religion is a fixture of humanity. It has existed in many forms throughout history. It is part and parcel of the human experience. Those who deny religion (in all its various forms) deny a part of their own humanity. Religion precedes civilization. And please don't BS about religion being different from spirituality. That's a modern mental schism used to try to cover up the entire aberration of modern thinking, which is wholly detached from reality.
Ghawar Is Dying
The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function. - Dr. Albert Bartlett
Sorry, but I think there is a difference, and it's an important one.
"Religion" most commonly refers to a state religion. That is, a religion that evolved as social control - a substitute government, almost. We've sort of lost that...because of the fossil fuel fiesta. The purposes of religion have not been necessary.
Anthropologist Marvin Harris discusses this at length in his books. He points out that organized religion always regulates consumption. No meat during Lent. Pork is unclean. Cows are sacred. Etc.
The old joke about Native Americans used to be, "How do you find the chief?" "Look for the poorest man in the village." Because in tribal societies, the way you gain power is to give your followers material goods. The chief was the man who gave away the most.
Harris argues that state religions evolve when a society has outgrown its resource base to the point that the priests/chiefs, rather than gaining power by giving material goods to their followers, must promise the goods in the afterlife.
I agree that spirituality is an essential part of humanity (even though I am an atheist myself). But religion, as we know it, is not.
Thank you for saving me from a response Leanan. let me add this though.
Most people don't have a clue about Native American's and their "spiritual" beliefs. I have been lucky enough to have been "taught" lets say about that. The Native AMerican did have some aspects that were very tough in their belief's. Take the Sun Dance for instance. But the difference is the acts of "belief" undertook by the participants was always on a "personal" level. It wasn't for the benefit of the "tribe" or its "beliefs". Spiritual is a personal understanding between Creator and the human, religion is a group and much more..
Many people don't even WONDER why the American Indian were able to take Christianity when it was offered. The "history" says this was because they were savages and pagans etc. LOL, this is SO FAR from the truth that its just laughable.
I'm spiritual, and you couldn't get me to join a religious organization/church. Creator and I, we work on the right path each day. I don't need a preacher to tell me what to do. That is the difference.
Quid Clarius Astris
Ubi Bene ibi patria
Religion is a set of beliefs, dogmas and rules. It is about accepting the authority of a book or prophet. Spirituality is about investigating whether the everyday human experience is the ultimate reality or just the trance of believing in appearances and taking them to be real (like watching a movie). In spirituality there is no final authority although you may seek the guidance of a teacher.
There has only been one country in the history of the planet to use nuclear weapons on another country--you're sitting in it. To say that the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was unprovoked is downright dishonest--and to continue by stating that nuclear weapons were simply used to "finish a war" is to demonstrate a serious lack of historical knowledge. This is the kind of rah-rah "my country has never done wrong" ideology that is going to lead to nuclear war.
AFTER Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the War Cabinet had a split vote over whether to surrender or not. Many (half from memory) still wanted a prolonged fight to the death, destroying the Japanese nation in a "blaze of glory".
From somewhat vague memory, the Emperor had to break the tie vote !
The alternative would have cost a million+ American lives (including my father's) and many millions of Japanese lives as well as the culture of Japan. And the Soviets would have gotten their zone in Northern Japan (see North Korea).
If a convential attack (Operation Downfall - Operation Olympic + Coronet) conquered the southern half (or even all of) Kyushu at enourmous cost, it seems unlikely that the War Cabinet would have surrendered. And the US occupation (whenever it occurred) might have been less benign. The Soviet occupation zone would certainly have been far less benign !
Yes, the atomic bomb "just ended the war", saving tens of millions of lives.
Best Hopes,
Alan
A brief overview of the alternative:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Downfall
Hi All,
Here is yet another view on the role of the US use of nuclear weapons in regard to WWII.
http://www-instadv.ucsb.edu/pa/display.aspx?pkey=1414
"UCSB Historian Awarded Prestigious Prize for Acclaimed Book About the Role of the Atomic Bomb in Japan's Surrender in WWII..."
Excerpt from press release:
"While many Americans believe that World War II ended in the blinding flashes of the atomic bombs dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August of 1945, historians have hotly debated if the American use of the atomic bombs was justified. With their exclusive focus on the atomic bombings, however, historians have not fully examined other important factorsóthe entry of the Soviet Union into the war and a confused and divided Japanese leadership.
Examining in detail the deliberations of the Japanese leadership immersed in squabbling over how to end the war with the emperor system intact, Hasegawa claims the bombs were not the most decisive factor in Japan's decision to end the war. Only when the Soviets, jockeying with the United States for post-war influence in Asia, declared war and invaded Japanese-held Manchuria did the Japanese leadership capitulate to prevent falling under Soviet dominance.
"The Soviet factor has been treated as a sideshow by traditional history," said Hasegawa, who is fluent in Japanese, English, and Russian and studied documents and conducted interviews in Japan, the United States, and Russia in researching his book. "I bring it to center stage. I think the Soviet presence was crucial."
The blindness of you victims of revisionist history never ceases to amaze and astonish me. I guess I'm not cynical enough yet.
Ah, war history. You can't trust the participants to tell the truth, and everyone else doesn't know what they're talking about.
Dear PeakOil Tarzan,
Iran should never be allowed to own a nuclear weapon.
For the simple reason that we cannot "liberate" Iran after that and "pay" for the reconstruction of Iran with their (our) oil.
Operation Iran Liberation (OIL) should commence this year
Roger From the Netherlands
Montreal Metro Opens First Extension in 19 Years April 28th
A three stop, 5.2 km extension North to the island of Laval.
http://stm.info/English/metro/a-mapmet.htm
This will make a 66 km subway system with several unique features. The extension was Can$145 million/km.
Several other extensions are desired but no funding is available yet despite plans announced in 2000.
The government of Quebec plans to spend more than $1.56 billion (C) on public transit projects in the next 10 years, mostly for Montreal metro extensions north to Laval, east to Anjou, and south to College Edouard Montpetit in Longueuil. There will be 4.3 miles of new subway tunnels and eight new stations, plus a new GO Transit commuter rail route to Mont-SaintHilaire.
These are in addition to a previously announced, $350 million, three-station metro extension to Laval that would connect with the commuter rail line to Blainville at the St. Martin inter-modal station. [Opening this weekend]
Line 5 will reach St-Lacuteonard-Anjou, while Line 4 will be pushed deeper into Longueuil and possibly extended on the downtown end from its current terminal at Berri-UQAM to the McGill station. Each route would get four new stations.
The province will need about $800 million (C) from the Canadian government to carry out this plan. The source of these funds is a $2.6 billion (C) federal transportation infrastructure fund
Best Hopes for More Urban Rail,
Alan
Alan,
Madison, Wisconsin, My home, is working to implement light rail to span the width of the city.
Cost of Commuter Rail Presented
I hope it happens soon!
Tom A-B
From CNNMoney:
The money quote is at the end, and really sums up the incompetence (or willful ignorance) of the EIA:
or more likely complicity.The EIA is "humbled" by the market, and so are we all. Only thing -- the oil companies seem to control the market. They alone decide how much refining capacity is needed -- and that would be just enough to ensure adequate profit margins. As the price of gas goes up, and supplies shrink, the oil company profits go up. This could be the work of a "free" market if the term is carefully defined.
The oil companies have recently invested billions in new refining capacity. As supply shrinks they will be stuck with idle equipment and trying to explain to Wall St why they built them as their share price drops.
"We're continually humbled by the market."
At any given moment, there is always a price that will bring supply and demand into equilibrium. If supplies are not increasing relative to demand, then that price will trend higher. And anyone who thinks that anything other than that will happen will indeed continually be humbled.
Y'know, if there's an issue that would cause one to lose faith in the government more than Peak Oil, I'm not aware of it.
Our good friends the Kuwait'ies are coming through for us !
"Kuwait produces some 2.5 million barrels a day of crude. The country plans to boost oil production to around 3.5 million barrels a day in 2015, then 4 million barrels a day by 2020, Alnouri said."
Alnouri is Director of Marketing at the Kuwait Petroleum Corportation, so he would know.
But how?
What are the new projects?
I can only find an additional 600 Kbpd of output additions between now and 2014 (megaprojects db).
Burgan is declining as well.
Does anyone know the output from the Burgan field so I can plug in a nice easy 2% decline as see what their real output could be?
Take your pick, on the basis of the first story below, I would guess current output in the region of 1.70 million bpd.
“The peak output of the Burgan oil field will now be around 1.7 million barrels per day, and not the two million barrels per day forecast for the rest of the field's 30 to 40 years of life, Chairman Farouk Al Zanki told Bloomberg [article below].” in November 2005.
http://www.mindfully.org/Energy/2005/Burgan-Field-Kuwait12nov05.htm
http://www.gregcroft.com/burgan.ivnu
http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLD,GGLD...
A Crude Awakening
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2172974371664867705&hl=en
The video could not be found on youtube or google video in its entirety. So here it is.
Highlights:
Around 15 min.—there is some great footage of declining oil fields—Matt Simmons commentary throughout—and the last quarter covers the plausibility of alternative fuels.
Rob Kolakowski
Outstanding documentary. Top notch production values, writing, editing, scoring, and research. It's not just talking heads -- the filmakers obviously spent countless hours sifting through archived footage and selecting the best images and music to underscore the message.
I watched "Crude Awakening" on Sundance, excellent! I was particularly chilled by the footage of the abandoned oil fields in Texas - and Venezuela!
For Comcast customers it's available through their "OnDemand" feature through the end of the month; go to "Top Picks", then choose "The Green", and then you'll find Crude Awakening and a handful of other greenish shows. Probably through a Sundance option in there too.
The film is not yet available on DVD, so see it wherever you can-it's very well done.
It may not be available for purchase on DVD, but it's definitely available through Netflix - I just received a copy yesterday.
Interestingly, one of the opening credits is for "Red Envelope Entertainment" which seems to be a Netflix subsidiary especially for rental of independent films.
BTW, I highly recommend the raw interview footage under the special features section.
it's available for purchase at LATOC:
http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/ItemCategorySubPages/MultiMedia.html
Whore mode off, lurk mode back on.
Warning: Shameless plug detected! =D
tod overlords: feel free to delete my above whore-linking if you think it approrpriate. (So far as I know it's not available other than through LATOC for purchase or Netflix for rental)
TOD overlords: please keep this link available!
We need all the outlets we can get!
Chimp, I was being facetious
Even whore-linking, our simian friend is too modest to note his star turn in this film, framed by his emergency water supplies...BTW, Matt, when are you going to share the location of your happy place with the rest of us? We who are geographically flexible want to know...
SD,
Not yet, for a couple of reaons:
#1. don't want the prez of Blackwater (who does read LATOC and noted it in the company's tactical newslwetter) finding out and thinking "hey that's a damn good idea . . . "
#2. I may change my mind, then I will look like an idiot.
#3. Other people may think "gee that chimp's idea seems good . . . I should move there too! . . ." then it turns out I'm wrong and they're fucked.
I don't have access to any info that isn't available to everybody else. If my analysis is better than the next person's it's only because I'm willing to psychologically stomach the worst case scenario, not because my analytical skills are any better. (Remember I graduated at the top half of my law school class . . . the top half of the bottom half that is.)
As an example: I just uncovered a very depressing piece of information that makes one particular place I'm considering look (potentially) much less attractive. If a month ago I had said "hey this place looks like it has a good shot of being one of the not tottally horrible parts of living hell come the dieoff!" you can see how this would now be problematic.
If you're willing to consider/stomach the worst case scenario - which I posit has now become inevitable - then your guess as where to go is as good as mine.
The problem with most folks - including very intelligent and noted ones - is they are only willing to consider areas/scenarios that fit a preexistig political agenda or a scenario that is politically palatable to the greater PO community. The less palatable one's projected outcome, the less popular one will be and thus less social status in the short term.
If you delete the inevitablity of total nuclear exchange, then places like San Francisco or Portland have a lot going for them. If you factor that in, then not so much (to say the least):
http://www.ki4u.com/nuclearsurvival/states/ca.htm
http://www.ki4u.com/nuclearsurvival/states/or.htm
http://www.ki4u.com/nuclearsurvival/states/aatargets.htm
I also have a preferred place AND strategy, but chose not to go down that road.
Strategy would to get job as high school (or local equilavent) science (backup math) teacher several years before TSHTF. Do a DAMN good job (I can teach quite well in a classroom), so that the young adults will fondly remember "Good Ol' Drake" as well as their middle aged parents (less strongly). Also become a local source of technical expertise (help others before TSHTF). Perhaps help with some microhydro installations (already found one guy locally interested).
Build up social capital in what is likely to be an extremely robust social order (one quite likely to survive even if most areas see a breakdown in social order).
But I would rather stay in New Orleans and live (and help) in our disaster area instead !
Happy JazzFest !
Alan
http://www.nojazzfest.com/
Sold Out
Actually, they got the archived footage off LATOC which I found via the wayback machine. I posted it 2 years ago. They told me that's where they found it.
All of it? Kudos to you then. The archival stuff lifted the presentation out of PowerPoint territory and into the realm of thoughfulness and emotional resonance.
I'd say between 70% and 90%.
I came across it in the way back machine around Thanksgiving 2005 and posted it all, broke down by category. I specifically remember linking up the bit where the woman lost her dress and cosmetics, the stupid ford commercial, the 24 hours of progress commercial, and the standard oil commercial about the saudis, and some of the other oil industry footage.
the stuff of the people swimming in the stuff they found that independently.
A Crude Awakening
I just finished watching the entire documentry, all one hour and 22 minutes of it, on the link posted by Rob Kolakowski above. It was the first film I have watched that really told it like it is. In the end there was no "Here is what we must do" line. They offered no hope, just a warning of what to expect.
And yes, this link gives the whole show, not just part of it.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2172974371664867705&hl=en
Yes, they talked a lot about alternative fuels. The message there was basically "forget it, it ain't gonna happen".
I could not dispute anything in the film. I think they hit the nail on the head.
Great documentary, and it is now free on the web. Watch it if you dare.
Ron Patterson
And now the filmmakes who made it and fronted a ridiculous amount of money will get fucked in the ass and be in the poorhouse.
Thanks to whoever posted it: Way to go, asshole!
While we're at it could somebody post the following books in their entirety:
The Party's Over
Powerdown
The Long Emergency
. . . and so on. . .
Let's make sure Richard and Jim end up in the poorhouse where they belong along with the makers of A Crude Awakening! I want to see those bastards starve!!!
1. After downloading the video from bittorrent and posting it to Google video I learned today that there were parts of the DVD that are not on Google video—like the uncut interviews. I'm actually thinking about buying it.
2. More importantly, exposure of this excellent documentary is precisely what would benefit the general public.
e.g. Sitting at work talking to a coworker—"Hey Bill, check out this Google video about oil." — get the picture?
If the goal of the film is to make money then I dont want to have anything to do with it. Informing people about peak oil should be something we all want to do so we can better our situation and perhaps create a society that our children will be able to maintain for years into the future.
If they wanted to make money off a movie, they should have licensed the rights to some lame comic book and hired a team of computer graphic artists to create an action-packed blockbuster the whole family can enjoy!!!
You know how much it costs to make a film like this? Forget about making money as the film will be lucky to brake even given it's not realy in theaters. This is a mater of them not ending up in the poorhouse and then having to prostitute themselves out to the usual suspects so they can eat.
Same reason why TOD runs ads. Running the server ain't cheap and I don't think Leanan should have to whore PG and HO out to pay the bills around here. Kapisch?
Question: If you want to make money, why the hell make a film about peak oil???
It's not a matter of "making money" or "making a profit". It's a matter of them recouping the considerable outlay of capital it took to produce the film.
You are intelligent enough to post here at TOD, you should be able to understand this. It's disturbing that I have to explain something so simple again and again to you. I will operate under the assumption you are still a student and financed by your parents and/or the government, thus an understanding of basic economics escapes you:
Spend alot to make a film (plus) fail to recoup the costs (equals) poorhouse (and) no other films like it getting financed or made in the future.
First of all, your assumptions are incorrect. I have a family of my own (1 daughter, one on the way) and I havent seen either of my parents in a year. I havent been a student since I was 16! Yes, I am a dropout but I'm not stupid or ignorant!
I understand the whole recoup losses bit and basic econ, but with the internet it is to be expected that some 1337 h4x0r will hack, crack, and rip some dvd he rented and torrent it or upload it to google/youtube. However, I do not condone this behavior and I urge people to buy the DVD, not just for the sake of the film makers, but because I'm sure it will have special features and commentaries available with more information than what was given in the actual film.
Now if the film makers do fail to recoup their losses, then I suggest ELP.
Chimpster,
I'm sure you of all people understand that piracy is part of the human condition. I don't see that changing anytime soon.
That said, viewing Crude Awakening online makes me feel compelled to buy it, so I can show it around to friends and family who wouldn't be interested in watching it online. However, your website says "Sold Out". :o(
-best,
Wolf
First, to the TOD Overlords: I'm about to link-whore* again but only because said link-whoring* was solicited:
You can hit the order button and places your order, it'll ship out later this week or early next week. I have 50 backorders, 150 on the way that will be arriving over the next few days.
*no offense to any actual whores reading this.
yes, of course. as is raising a stink about it. ;)
It's not so much the actual piracy (it's not my film after all) it's this attitude that "well everything should be for free particularly if it's about an important issue . . . the producers can just beg for money for all I care . . ." that is prevalent among info-age youth and aging hippies.
Thanks for the info on the order... I'll get right to it.
Yes, I understand your point. I've seen the attitude often myself. I've worked in the arts and in design--it's amazing how much effort people hope to get for free!
-best,
Wolf
-"Hey Bill check out this DVD I bought/rented." - get the picture?
My guess is your o-chem degree did NOT come for free. How would you feel if somebody was hurting your ability to repay the considerable amount money you had to front for the degree?
Rob,
Here is the exact text of an email I just sent to the filmmakers. You really don't seem to understand how damaging this could be. Your actions are the sort of thing that could prevent if from getting into theaters as everybody will have already seen it for free online. There would thus be no (or at least potentially less) incentive for a big time distributor to pick it up and get it in theaters.
I do not enjoy doing this sort of thing, it makes me feel "snitchy" and petty but it really is important. If in the future you could exercise better judgement it would be greatly appreciated.
I don't want to pollute TOD with any more of this. If you want to discuss basic economics, ip law, business ethics, etc off-board feeel free to email me directly:
matt@lifeaftertheoilcrash.net
I will also forward to him the names of some excellent copyright attorney (s) if he needs them.
standard cost of defending/pursuing a copyright case these days.
$250000.00.
copyright attorneys do a percentage on getting, not so on defending. big mucho difference.
Chimp, wasn't that news about Columbia was it that gave you pause about your spot.
Hope you find your spot.
Quid Clarius Astris
Ubi Bene ibi patria
no, it's not columbia.
let me emphasize: I have no intel that isn't accessible via google searches and other "open source" info. Furthermore, my analytical skills are likely no better than average on places like this board with the only (possible) difference being the range of (very stomach-churning) scenarios I'm willing to seriously contemplate.
if anybody wants my two cents it would be this:
#1. assumme the worst case scenario you can stomach and let that form the parameters of your analysis.
#2. it's not about finding a "good" place. for those of us accustomed to our currenty way of life, I doubt there will be any place that is not akin to a living hell. So it's a matter of trying to position you and yours so that you have a shot of living in the first level of hell as oppossed to the seventh.
Blackburn (2004) studied P2P affects on the music industry, and the data looks like P2P positively affects sales for lower 3/4 percentile of artists, and reduces sales for the upper 1/4.
If movies are affected in a similar way it may be a positive thing for the ultimate sales/regain of investment for Crude Awakening to be on the internet. Anyone who is interested in the matter may wish to look into it further...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics_of_file_sharing (Pollock has some Blackburn extracts)
"You can never solve a problem on the level on which it was created."
Albert Einstein