Market Assessments

From NYMEX:

CLV5 (crude) 69.81 up 2.61

HOU5 (H.O.) 2.0759 up 0.1671

NGV5 (NG) 11.659 up 0.52

Gasoline: 2.4745

Also, please make sure to go check out econbrowser's assessment of the oil markets.

Update [2005-8-30 15:59:7 by Prof. Goose]:95% of all gulf oil production "shut-in" today.

Remember that's a little worse than the GOMEX models predicted.

Here's some questions: why did the market not spike as much as thought today, except for gasoline? Is it because we do not have a complete damage assessment of supply as of yet? What will more information do?  how will the market react if the GOMEX numbers are confirmed?  Isn't the nightmare scenario that 10% of production will be down for more than 90 days? So, it's possible energy prices will move higher. One analyst suggested that if 10% of the oil production from the Gulf of Mexico doesn't come back online for, say, three to four weeks, look for crude oil to hit $100 a barrel. Among other things, CNBC's Rob Reynolds said this afternoon, consumer spending would "seize up like a rusty boat engine." Technorati Tags: , , , , , .
Oil closed at $69.81
that's what I get for blindly copying the bloomberg numbers.  wonder what's up that...
The market isn't perfect and will react as more information comes in; just like peak oil, a big catastrophe like this has its share of denial "oh, they will get production on line again, just like Ivan". We tend as humans to go on what happened in the past.

The on-land experience of Katrina is much worse than in the past; remains to be seen what on-sea and under-sea damage looks like.

As for the broader stock market -- I believe its in danger of a more significant drop in the near term should it become obvious that more than a few hundred thousand barrels a day or more are off line for a longer period of time, or if gasoline "appears" to be in shortage (via price hikes).

Its rather remarkable that so far the market is taking this all in stride. Had this happened last year - crude likely would have shot from 40 to 60 and that movement would most certainly have killed the stock market off for a month or more, in my opinion. Higher prices have become a fixture and to some degree market participants are expecting this now.

What isn't yet fully priced in is the impact to the economy from inevitable price hikes in energy / petrochemical dependent products, nor is a move to much higher prices that "stick".

Nor is another bad weather event in the area...

If refining capacity drops, you have less demand for crude.  Still, I would expect the price of September/October deliveries to go up.

Trader logic/rationale seems to be an oxymoron.  

hate to disagree with your figures, but this NYMEX quotes site shows

CLV5 (crude)     69.81  up 2.61

HOU5 (H.O.)     2.0759  up 0.1671

NGV5 (NG)     11.659  up 0.52

Gasoline is same as yours except for missing 2 (should be 2.4745)

yeesh, sorry guys.  I can't get why these numbers are so different.
Bloomberg follows their own logic on their energy quotes page - that's why I switched to the INO.com site referenced in my comment - wide and deep (goes all the way out to Dec 2011, and includes the overnight ACCESS quotes if you want to follow the NYMEX market in the wee hours) - keep up the good work
"Closing" prices -- there are different trading sessions in each and every day. Few web sites explain what the price is from - open outcry (regular trading session)? After hours? Some keep a running price showing "last" price rather than the close of the regular session.

What matters most is whether price closed up or down, and whether it broke a two day high or low. Its more complicated than that in some ways but that's the bottom line to determining whether its in an up swing or down swing. The big deal right now: does the "breakout" above the prior range of consolidation hold or not. If so... price is headed higher in the fairly near term.

Thanks for clearing that up a bit. I had kept a simpler model in my head.
SPR will be used it can handle a 1.5mbpd draw down for 90 days. Also oil stocks are currently ok 320million which is above the 5 year average. The problem is gasoline which is already tight. The refinery damage is what is going to effect this market big time. not so much the production losses

The problem with this event is people wont associate it with peak oil it will just be weather related shutdowns that cause a  spike then we will return to "normal".

This winter is going to be very interesting

yes indeed.... if prices merely hold here in natural gas, heating costs for the average homeowner are going to go up by 60 - 100% this winter even in an average winter season.

Price doesn't spike like this in the summer; some of this spike is as a result of the natural price alignment with oil; but there is, or will be, an appreciation of the 'scarcity' value of natural gas by the market one of these days.

http://www.trendvue.com/charts/2005/08/tv20050830-28.gif

As I note on the chart above... is this a spike or what traders call a "breakout" to new and ultimately much higher prices.

http://www.trendvue.com/charts/2005/08/tv20050830-29.gif

On the shorter term daily chart this is a classic breakout through and above a consolidation zone in a very strong trend. So strong a trend that under "normal" situations, experienced technical traders would be looking for a significant market reversal.

During last weeks CL and NG sell off I felt the market was, in my judgement, acting too quickly on the technical signs suggesting a potential big reversal in CL/NG and dismissing to readily the potential for Katrina. I held and added to my positions on the dip.

Now... post breakout, especially on a breakout which was facilitated by a big news event, there is still greater than 50/50 chance price will pull back significantly here, but the breakout level will be first tested to see if it acts as new support.

Unless the news coming out of the GOM is very, very good, we can expect that level to hold, if it indeed is even tested.

Finally, I will draw your attention to the gap up on the daily chart - gaps are found, more often than not, near swing turns. They are very often a sign of unsustainable (at least in the short-intermediate term) price movement. You need more buyers to step in to keep prices going up, and often a gap up creates a natural lull in buying as market participants judge a stock or market as having climbed too far away to consider jumping on board.

Quite often such gaps mark a swing high, sometimes even a major top, depending on where price is in the market's cycle. This market has been running up strong for a very long time, so by conventional rules and history, some technical traders will have been expecting a significant pull back if not even a reversal in the trend from up to down.

Now that we are clear on what frequently follows a news or event driven gap... sometimes the follow on is quite different indeed.

When a gap forms because of a change in fundamentals - where the story has changed for the intermediate to long term - such a gap can mark a point in time where price, often after pausing for a day or two, never returns (never being relative as in weeks or months or sometimes years and occasionally never).

Could we be there? Very possible. What to do about it?

Well if one is a trader and is not already long the market, such a person carefully monitors the multi day high and piles on there, or on any suitable retracement or useful pattern that occurs within the range formed above the gap, and looks to hold if price clears the recent highs anew, ultimately moving up protective stops to break even once price has cleared "noise".

A market that runs away higher than such a gap -- at a time when price is already at historic highs -- would soon draw in more participants and create a melt up, or a siuation not unlike 1999 - 2000 or GOOG where price just keeps on growing higher and people keep piling on in fear that they've missed it forever.

Ultimately, peak oil or not, such a move simply can not sustain itself, and price will pull back, often sharply, for a while - but it may not come back to the breakout levels but instead create a new range of consolidation at much higher prices.

An ideal time for that... if Katrina impact is very long... will be next spring.

PS: One thing to watch for in the energy sector stocks (producers) is any talk about revaluation --- changing the traditional metrics by which such stocks are historically priced. Once upon a time price : cashflow ratios would be in the low single digits. Some are talking that perhaps high single digits would be more appropriate, implying 50 - 100% gains in some energy sector stocks.

PSPS: I didn't intend for this to turn into a little analysis lecture, and reading this I see that lack of intent showing up as an incomplete effort, but I have my other work to attend to so will leave this as an installment which may or may not be useful to anyone.

The Times Picayune is back up reporting from Houma.

http://www.nola.com/newslogs/breakingtp/

This behavior by N.O. cops will shock anyone who has never lived there before:    

"Even a cop joins in the looting
Mike Perlstein and Brian Thevenot
Staff writers

Law enforcement efforts to contain the emergency left by Katrina
slipped into chaos in parts of New Orleans Tuesday with some police officers
and firefighters joining looters in picking stores clean..."

chaos in parts of New Orleans Tuesday with some police officers
and firefighters joining looters in picking stores clean.

I can certainly seem them looting if its to serve the public; the darker scenario is, being first responders on the scene and knowing more than all of us do about the situation, they've all concluded the situation is utterly hopeless.

what about the levees? how many broke and how wide
and how much is flooded ? how much could flood?
how much will the river rise with the rainfall?

(sorry if you guys already covered this)

There is a lot of confusion in the media, but the Times-Picayune just reported that Uptown is now starting to flood, with the water 5 blocks from St. Charles Ave.  This area was dry earlier today.  Check out http://www.nola.com/newslogs/breakingtp/ for the latest.  
"Chevron Corp. said it planned to conduct fly-overs at its production facilities in Louisiana and Mississippi. However, the company was uncertain whether it had enough fuel for its aircraft, which had to be moved to East Texas from Louisiana..."

~ Reuters

One of those What th f.... moments

there was a scroll somewhere that had "LA gov calls for evacuation of city..." but then it didn't come on again.  no way to confirm that, but if 80% of the town is flooded, that makes sense.
"4:25 p.m.: New Orleans Residents Told To Evacuate
The governor of Louisiana says the thousands of New Orleans residents who are huddled in the Superdome and other rescue centers will have to be evacuated. --Associated Press"

http://www.wdsu.com/weather/4913354/detail.html

Someone needs to fill in forbes on the fundamentals driving the market.
In fact Forbes' opinion is why, I believe, the market sold off last week. The speculators sense they are living on borrowed time. Futures traders, if they are to live, are not stupid people. Price doesn't shoot straight up forever, and likely wont even in a peak oil world, if for no other reason that we aren't yet past the peak (visibly, demonstrably).

Until we can look back and say with conviction - June 200x was the peak, markets will jam up and down all the time.

However, I will completely disagree with his premise - that its high only because of speculation. That most certainly is not true.

And even if price does come down to 35, 40, 50 - so what... that won't be a "crash" in the true sense, as the longer term floor will remain much higher than in the past. Crude won't drop down to 10, 15, 20, 25, unless literally the world is once again awash in the stuff (unless there literally are millions of bbl/day in provable spare capacity, not the phantom stuff we are treated to by OPEC) and that certainly is not on the horizon.

"I'll be blunt, there's hardly a hedge fund in North America that hasn't speculated on oil futures. So I'll make a bold prediction ... in 12 months, you're going to see oil down to $35-$40 a barrel. "It's a huge bubble, I don't know what's going to pop it but eventually it will pop - you cannot go against supply and demand, you cannot go against the fundamentals forever." Forbes said the higher the oil price rose, the harder it would eventually crash. "I don't think it's going to go to $100 but if it does the crash is going to be even more spectacular," he said. "It will make the hi-tech bubble look like a picnic - this thing is not going to last."
I don't know how smart Mr. Forbes is, but his prediction may come to be correct. The unmentioned reason for the "pop" will be if a global recession ensues and dramatically staunches petroleum demand. Otherwise, there is no reason to believe prices will come back to $35 - $40. He may well believe that crude prices will retreat on their own, but I think he's just avoiding stating the precipitating factor.
I'm going to keep popping into this thought that "recession will staunch global demand" and remind everyone that:

  • recession does not reduce total world wide GDP output, only slow its growth
  • unless total world wide GDP output drops and for an extended period of time, more crude will continue to be needed.
  • IF GDP output drops for an extended period of time, that is, my friends, a depression, not a recession.

There is also a chicken and egg thing happening here - surging prices might well cause a recession and reduction in demand growth (not total demand), but they have to rise first. We are there now... and rising.

Some other economies are going to fail first. Note the Phillipines, some Asian economies -- high oil prices are causing them currency problems and the potential for a repeat of the Asian Contaigion... currency crisis and short or intermediate term melt down.

It may be that's what it takes, and it would not be the brilliance of Government that causes (or stops) this from happening.

http://money.inq7.net/topstories/view_topstories.php?yyyy=2005&mon=08&dd=31&file=1

Energy Secretary Raphael Lotilla said oil consumption has to be cut for the Philippines to cope with the global oil price crisis.

"We need to bring down consumption and protect our foreign exchange reserves," he said. "Runaway prices can threaten our foreign exchange reserves."

The country's oil import bill could well soar to $7.5 billion this year, more than double last year's $3.5 billion, Lotilla said.

The oil import bill rose from 7.7 percent of the gross domestic product in 1995 to 22 percent last year, one of the worst ratios in Asia, Energy Undersecretary Peter Anthony Abaya earlier said.

Note in the Phillipines where energy costs are a much bigger component of GDP and personal income, they are seeing demand drop. We aren't there yet, here in the "first world".

i feel this is the future.  poor countries demand
will decline while the rich countries' demand
continues to grow.

the rich get richer and the poor get poorer

but on a country scale.  the rich countries will
continue to extract whatever they want from the
poor countries. and the poloarization will get
uglier and uglier

As bad as things are presently, I was wondering if maybe Eritrea, Indonesia, the Phillipines, etc., will be better off in the long run for having gotten off the oil juggernaut early.  I guess it depends on how the geopolitics play out.
Keep up the good work.
If American oil demand collapses because our import facilities are down to Katrina, terrorism, or dollar collapse, the international price of oil will go down as the price of gasoline on your street corner goes up.
Lets also remember that oil is an international market, and not all markets run through NYMEX.

For example:

Imperial Oil Raises Edmonton Par Crude By C$20 Cu. Meter        

08-30-05 05:00 PM EST

CALGARY -(Dow Jones)- Imperial Oil Ltd. (IMO) raised its purchase price for benchmark 40-degree gravity light crude oil at Edmonton by C$20 a cubic meter to C$530 a cubic meter, effective Tuesday.

In terms of barrels, the company is now offering C$84.27 a barrel, up from C$ 81.09. The new purchase price indicates an export price delivered to Chicago of about US$72.08 a barrel after considering transportation and import charges and foreign exchange rates.

Actual export prices are confidential but are believed to be closely related to the posted levels.