Rita Old Comment Thread 1 (Rita graphic now moved up closer to the top)

This is now the old commenting thread from when the picture of Rita was down here...the link to the graphic and the new post/comment thread is here. Feel free to use this one though...just was getting kinda long.
Holy crap, it's HUGE!

I wonder, what's the size difference with Katrina when it was around the same location?

Rita is actually a little smaller right now.  But her windfield is definitely growing, even in that hour that is lapsed.
That's interesting, because Katrina had to overcome a land passage over southern Florida, while Rita just sailed clear through the Straights of Florida. Maybe that means that the GOM waters have cooled a bit.
Maybe that means that the GOM waters have cooled a bit.

There has been some comment that Katrina riled up the GOMEX waters to such an extent that the very deep cool water has been drawn to the surface and might have moderated surface energy avails.

I'm no scientist, so who knows what to believe....

I'm not a scientist, either, but there is more that affects a hurricane's size and strength than just water temperature.  I'm sure there are several other variables that have changed between these two storms.

That said, water temps are still really high all across the gulf, which is why both these storms are able to gain so much strength (compared to, say, Ophelia)

Here's an interesting map from the NHC - it shows water surface temperature anomalies - notice that the Upper East quadrant of GOMEX is cooler than normal, obviously caused by the eastern wind wall of Katrina - the rest of GOMEX seems to be at expected or slightly warmer temps

(presumably the warm water up near Nova Scotia is the result of Ophelia's rain, as the map is 4 days old)

Here's a map from the Navy from yesterday, just for comparison.
you know that the deathwish christians are gonna be expecting to be sucked out of their socks pretty quick if they spot that little cross-shaped patch of hot water, don't you?

it's south at about 40W lat.

...RITA BECOMES THE FIFTH MOST INTENSE HURRICANE ON RECORD...

DROPSONDE DATA FROM AN AIR FORCE RESERVE UNIT RECONNAISSANCE
AIRCRAFT AT 416 PM CDT...2116Z...INDICATED THE CENTRAL PRESSURE HAS FALLEN TO 904 MB...OR 26.69 INCHES. THIS MAKES RITA THE FIFTH MOST INTENSE HURRICANE IN TERMS OF PRESSURE IN THE ATLANTIC BASIN.

RITA CURRENTLY RANKS BEHIND HURRICANE GILBERT IN 1988 WITH 888
MB...THE 1935 LABOR DAY HURRICANE WITH 892 MB...HURRICANE ALLEN IN 1980 WITH 899 MB...AND HURRICANE KATRINA LAST MONTH WITH 902 MB.

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/text/refresh/MIATCUAT3+shtml/212146.shtml

...RITA BECOMES THE THIRD MOST INTENSE HURRICANE ON RECORD...

THE CENTRAL PRESSURE IS PROBABLY AT LEAST AS LOW AS 898 MB...AND PERHAPS EVEN LOWER. FOR OFFICIAL PURPOSES... A PRESSURE OF 898 MB IS ASSUMED... WHICH NOW MAKES RITA THE THIRD MOST INTENSE HURRICANE IN TERMS OF PRESSURE IN THE ATLANTIC BASIN. SOME ADDITIONAL DEEPENING AND INTENSIFICATION IS POSSIBLE FOR THE NEXT 12 HOURS OR SO.

RITA CURRENTLY RANKS BEHIND HURRICANE GILBERT IN 1988 WITH 888 MB AND THE 1935 LABOR DAY HURRICANE WITH 892 MB.

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/text/refresh/MIATCUAT3+shtml/212351.shtml

Man, that is one big honkin' storm.

The detail that has me just as concerned as Rita's category and exact place of landfall is its speed.  It's crawling along, and if it hovers over the Texas coast it could do a lot of damage before it weakens or moves on.

(I lived in NE Pennsylvania during the 1972 Agnes flood, so I'm particularly aware of what happens when a storm gets locked into one area for a while.)

Rita hits Category Five

National Hurricane Center Miami Fl
255 PM CDT Wed Sep 21 2005

Data from reconnaissance aircraft indicate that Rita has reached Category Five intensity with estimated maximum sustained surface winds of 165 mph.

NHC XML feed, http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/nhc_at3.xml

Yeah, the NY Times just confirmed the Cat 5 designation:

NEW ORLEANS, Sept. 21 - Hurricane Rita approached Category 5 intensity this afternoon, the deadliest storm designation, as it churned through the Gulf of Mexico on a course that could send it over coastal Texas and southwest Louisiana this weekend.

Lovely Rita indeed. I wasn't the first poster to drag in Sgt Pepper. Well, it IS obvious.
It's deja vu all over again. Now all we can do is sit here and watch this baby!!  
Just like all those people sat in those $100 seats in the superdome and watched their lives unravel, now we can sit at our $800 computers with  our $40 per month connection fees and watch our own way of life .  Yes. lovely Rita indeed!  And yet, maybe lovely Rita will save us all.
So what are we all rooting for exactly. Obviously we are not rooting for death and destruction (at least I hope nobody is!). However, if the storm does knock-out supplies for a while, it simply further highlights how tenuous the oil supply situation is and how susceptible we are to supply disruptions foreign and domestic. I don't think the hurricane really affects the actual date of when peak oil will occur though, unless the price spike actually causes people to reduce demand.
Not likely. People, and Americans in particular (don't worry, I am one), have very short attention spans. 6mo to a year from now, we'll be consuming as fast as they can produce. Especially after a cold winter--we'll want our luxury back.

Now, if the price spike turns into a long term high price, well, that might help reduce demand. But I wouldn't guarantee that.

I must agree with ianqui

(not to be too genral but) knowing the republicans they will probably use the huricanes as justification to drill in alaska and import more oil.  

Keep in mind that oil is money and money is power and the USA wants all the power so the USA wants to use the middle east oil (before is uses its own coal or alaskan oil) to continue geopoplitical dominace

I can't wait for the day we find out that the military has been keeping its own SPR

In the long run I think there's zero chance we'll pass up on drilling ANWR and everywhere else there's oil on US land.  Once US gasoline gets expensive (and it's not close yet), the American public will be clamoring for oil companies to extract every drop.

(I know someone will ask what I think expensive gasoline is, so here's my answer: A sustained price above $6/gallon.)

The retail and entertainment sectors of the enconomy would lose too much money if gas was 6 dollars a gallon. The USA fed. gov. will quietly subsidize gas if it gets past 4 dollars a gallon.  Big corporations and banks will do anything to keep ignorant consumers spending.  Short term profits over long term quality of life. This is why every buisness and goverment leader will say that everything is fine no matter how bad the real world is.  The poor people must be calmed because if they panic the rich people lose their power.

How exactly are we going to subsidize oil prices?  We have huge budget deficits, the mess in Iraq, and now the cleanup in New Orleans.   Next we will have a cleanup in Texas.
Maybe the Chinese will lend an additional few hundreds of billions...
Although I could foresee the fed and state govs eliminating gas taxes I doubt there would be outright subsidies.  More likely would be more indirect subsidies of the kind that are already in place:  big tax breaks for new discovery, the lifting of drilling bans in ecologically sensitive areas, and subsidies for alt fuel production (ethanol from crops, coal to natural gas and diesel, etc).

Of course we've seen short term gas tax repeals already.  What kills me is that a tax cut in response to a short term supply deficit is not at all likely to actually cut prices.  Prices still must rise high enough to curtail consumption; if the state doesn't collect taxes then the refiners and distributors will pocket more of the markup.  The best way to get short term prices to drop is to curtail demand - federal and state governments could ban non-emergency employee travel, or could issue employees free bus passes and require them to use the passes at least once a week.

Heck, I'm a patriotic guy.  When gas goes over $3/gal I'll happily do my part to reduce demand and ride my bike to work.

So does anyone think we'll see panic buying before Rita hits the coast?

I plan on doing some panic gasoline buying tomorrow :)
"More likely would be more indirect subsidies of the kind that are already in place:  big tax breaks for new discovery, the lifting of drilling bans in ecologically sensitive areas, and subsidies for alt fuel production (ethanol from crops, coal to natural gas and diesel, etc)."

Don't forget things like the Iraq war.. That's an indirect oil subsidy, and if you don't believe it, ask yourself it this war would have happened in a country that had no oil.

another backfire, maybe. or, maybe not.

getting into the war, who were the most vehement agitators of longest standing? certainly not the inhabitants of israeli american think tanks like PNAC, AEI, JINSA and AIPAC.

i know you are trying to keep focussed, all of you, but this thing is way too big to stick in one box.

and if you start factoring in sea level rise from global warming, overshoot of the natural warming cycle, and a potential sea level rise of 240 feet, you begin to see reasons why israel needs to get started on the greater israel project, now, before peak oil cripples american support for israel.

and nobody in a million years is allowed to ask himself: who benefited from 9/11, who was in position to pull it off, who was in position to promulgate the official conspiracy theory. who was in position to turn the investigations into whitewashes and coverups, and, finally, who called for "a new pearl harbor" in september of 2000 to kick off the program we now see being implemented?

I think your point is valid, although I'm not sure we tread exactly the same ground when it comes to the Iraq war.  I don't think Bush and his cabinet wanted the US or US companies to end up owning Iraq's wells outright - even the most obtuse politician would understand the likely response across the rest of the Arab world.  But certainly they wanted a Iraq government that would be friendly to our mindset, one that would support aggressive new production development and would serve as a good pro-democracy, pro-free market example to nearby neighbors.

So much for that thought.

Whether on not Hussein posed a real threat I agree that Iraq's oil revenues gave him the capability to follow through and without those revenues he would have been ignored.

At least our troubles in Iraq clearly demonstrate the difficulty of imposing the government of out choice on another nation.  Hopefully even if neocon ideology continues to hold sway after the next election the next administration will use or not use our military might with more wisdom.  I also hope the American public is wary enough of overseas military adventures that even when our oil supply problem really becomes desperate they will seek solutions within our borders.  Better to sacrifice our freedom to drive around the block at will and avoid taking the bus to work than any more of our soldiers' blood.  As scary as rationing is to a politician I don't see many of them favoring the blood for oil trade.  But perhaps I'm too much of an idealist.

good ol' WWII style rationing is my guess.  If refining gets nailed in Galveston, you ain't seen nothin yet.   (NB, I added a gasoline chart in the sidebar...)
Rita, along with Katrina, could expose the precarious state of North American natural gas. Sustained production loss combined with a cold winter in the US and Canada would drive NG stockpiles to their baseline.  Chemical industries dependent on NG heat or NG hydrogen would close.  All of those cheap NG turbines that have been installed to meet peak electrical loads would be idled, allowing brownouts and blackouts. The cost of NG heat for homes will spike, even compared to oil-based heat.

With luck, the NG situation will become an object lesson to North America, goading us to prepare for Peak Oil.

This is ALREADY happening; off the top of my head I can think of three examples where N.A. business is closing, or suffering, due to NG costs or Katrina induced manufacturing shortfalls.

  • Methanol production - Methanex, the worlds biggest producer, is closing its Kitimat BC plant - N.A. gas prices too high. They also had supply shortages in South America earlier this year when one country, a normal supplier, diverted its gas to a neighbour country to make up for shortfall there.

  • Diluants - in short supply in N.A., these are waste products from NG processing which are used for processing oil sands into usable bitumen. EnCana and others looking to import these light oil distillates from off shore (still lots of NG world wide, just not usable to NA market at present)

  • Cott, big private label softdrink maker, lamenting this week that plastic supplies for bottles impacted by current state of affairs.

We can find many of these stories. Eventually short falls or cost increases will make it through to consumers in the pocket book, not just at the gas station.

And eventually the street (wall street) will figure it out. Three big down days in a row may be a start of that process....

The right way to deal with this would be to call for conservation, invest massively in efficiency (new techs, techs we already have (like hybrids), etc).

The wrong way to deal with this is to say: "Oh, we don't have enoguh reffineries, that is the problem. Lets build more!"

Could someone explain me how lack of refineries increase price of crude oil. For me it sounds logical that if there's no enough refinery capacity, it would decrease price of crude as there's more that stuff than demand for it.
This confuses me too, but maybe it has to do with the level of vertical integration that the industry has - if you produce oil, you want to know quickly where that is going to be shipped to so you can arrange for it, lest it sit on your inventory costing you money. So you don't have any incentive to produce more than you can find a refiner to accept, thus supply is limited.

Can one of the experts weigh in on this?

as soon as oil is pumped out of the ground, it goes into a pipeline or barge and enroute to a refinery.  so, if there are infinite refinery capacity, the oil producers would need to place supply quotas so as to make some $.

But, the Saudi's made a deal w/ the americans.  give us cheap oil (i.e. keep supplies abundant) and we'll keep you in power.

but with the onset of Peak Oil, things have changed.  OPEC has lost control of prices and are pumping at maximum.  Oil companies have stopped exploration because they know of peak oil and in anticipation that tomorrow's oil will be less than today's oil in volume, have also stopped new refinery constructions.  hence, refineries are refining at maximum.  once we hit decline, oil producers will be pumping at maximum, refineries will be refining at ever decreasing capacity, thus giving oil companies even less incentive to build more refineries.  but regardless of how hard people are pumping, there will be inadequate oil supply.

It would if there was that much difference between the supply of crude and the needs of the refineries.  Remember that there is a lot of crude production now shut down in the GOMEX and that suppies of crude were smewhat tight before.  (The talk about their being an excess of crude available from Saudi Arabia generally ignores the fact that the remaining oil that they have is largely from the Manifa oil field which is currently largely unrefinable due to its composition).  We are getting some refined product, short term, from Europe and Japan (as we posted earlier) but have also already drawn down about 10 mb from the US SPR, and that is crude oil that is being withdrawn, so there is a need out there.  But also remember that part of the increase in price is due to speculators, who might be following Econbrowser's advice.
what is econbrowser's advice
Sorry, this has been a debate between us for a while.  See, for example,

his first post on this

Though I wish Houstonians no harm, I can't help but think that this twit was tweaking the nose of Fate:

"Houston officials have capably planned for their own possible severe hurricanes, and that disaster planning is now selflessly put at the disposal of their neighbors to the east."

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=4784

  1.  is the animated gif showing the latest of Rita's movements?
  2.  if so, it seems, Rita is heading more due west (to mexico) then northwest (to Galveston, i.e. taking down some oil rigs).
yep, it updates on its own.
If you look at http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT/gmex-ir4-loop.html and turn on the latitude longitude, You will see that it is actually moving WNW and not West. If it doesn't change direstion, it will hit Southern Texas. But That typically is not the way of Hurricanes. At some point, it will turn North. That is when the trajectory becomes important. This should happen in the next day or two.
I was born in Freeport, grew up in Angleton.  My folks evacuated at noon today.

The way I see it, we've got a choice between destroying the gas wells in the western Gulf and destroying the refining and petrochemical infrastructure.  The gas well option probably kills the fewest people, but has the highest odds of spawning tornadoes which damage/destroy the South Texas Nuclear Project.

I think the worst possible scenario (other than tornadoes ripping apart the South Texas Nuclear Project) is for the eye to come ashore at Sargent.  That would put all the refining and petrochemical infrastructure (Dow Oyster Creek A and B, ConocoPhilips Old Ocean, BASF Freeport, and lots of smaller ones close on the eastern side.  It also puts the narrow part of the Houston Ship Channel into the bulls-eye, blocking or silting it up, and damaging it's refining infrastructure (Shell Deer Park) and would basically wipe Follet's Island (the island to the southeast of Galveston) off the face of the earth, which would in turn expose the Intercoastal Canal to the Gulf.  

Most of the chemical infrastructure in the Freeport area has a substantial levee around it, at least 15 feet high, but no one has any idea at this point whether it'll be enough.

Two of the five most intense hurricanes back to back? It is definitely not because of global warming. But because God hates gays, the pro choicers and liberals. But of course why are so many God fearing christians affected? They are just collateral damage!

From the latest NHC update:

...RITA BECOMES THE FIFTH MOST INTENSE HURRICANE ON RECORD...

DROPSONDE DATA FROM AN AIR FORCE RESERVE UNIT RECONNAISSANCE
AIRCRAFT AT 416 PM CDT...2116Z...INDICATED THE CENTRAL PRESSURE HAS FALLEN TO 904 MB...OR 26.69 INCHES. THIS MAKES RITA THE FIFTH MOST INTENSE HURRICANE IN TERMS OF PRESSURE IN THE ATLANTIC BASIN.

RITA CURRENTLY RANKS BEHIND HURRICANE GILBERT IN 1988 WITH 888 MB...THE 1935 LABOR DAY HURRICANE WITH 892 MB...HURRICANE ALLEN IN 1980 WITH 899 MB...AND HURRICANE KATRINA LAST MONTH WITH 902 MB.

LOL
Or maybe god is punishing America for its corrupt government?
</snark>
It's tracking for Crawford, btw...
...RITA BECOMES THE THIRD MOST INTENSE HURRICANE ON RECORD...

DROPSONDE DATA FROM AN AIR FORCE RESERVE UNIT RECONNAISSANCE
AIRCRAFT AT 623 PM CDT...2323Z...INDICATED THE CENTRAL PRESSURE HAS FALLEN TO BELOW 899 MB...OR 26.55 INCHES. THE DROPSONDE INSTRUMENT MEASURED 32 KT/35 MPH WINDS AT THE SURFACE...WHICH MEANS IT LIKELY DID NOT RECORD THE LOWEST PRESSURE IN THE EYE OF RITA. THE CENTRAL PRESSURE IS PROBABLY AT LEAST AS LOW AS 898 MB...AND PERHAPS EVEN LOWER. FOR OFFICIAL PURPOSES... A PRESSURE OF 898 MB IS ASSUMED...
WHICH NOW MAKES RITA THE THIRD MOST INTENSE HURRICANE IN TERMS OF PRESSURE IN THE ATLANTIC BASIN. SOME ADDITIONAL DEEPENING AND INTENSIFICATION IS POSSIBLE FOR THE NEXT 12 HOURS OR SO.

RITA CURRENTLY RANKS BEHIND HURRICANE GILBERT IN 1988 WITH 888 MB AND THE 1935 LABOR DAY HURRICANE WITH 892 MB.

I was just looking at the satellite loop at the NHC (which covers the last six hours).

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT/gmex-vis-loop.html

Looks to me like she's been heading a little more northwards than most of the models have been saying - could be she'll come out a little closer to the Louisiana border.  Never can tell though - these hurricanes don't seem to do as they are told.

That looks right. This is not yet reflected in the current NHC discussion (#17):
THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE STEERING PATTERN AND RITA IS MOVING WESTWARD OR 275 DEGREES AT 11 KNOTS. THE HIGH PRESSURE SYSTEM THAT HAS BEEN FORCING RITA WESTWARD IS FORECAST TO WEAKEN AND SHIFT EASTWARD. THIS WILL ALLOW THE HURRICANE TO TURN GRADUALLY TOWARD THE WEST-NORTHWEST AND NORTHWEST DURING THE NEXT DAY OR TWO. THE CORE OF RITA IS BASICALLY MOVING TOWARD THE TEXAS COAST AND THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH THE TRACK MODEL CONSENSUS.
When and how much will it turn to the NW? That is the question.
Any northward movement should show up in the wind swaths, and we'll see that at the next update at 11 ET/10 CT.
agreed. imo the turn looks very similar to the one katrina made. could be that the high pressure system north of the gulf coast is moving east a little quicker than expected - allowing the hurricane to begin to track NW
Yes, could be. I don't think the large degree of northward turn Katrina took will happen but the sharper Rita's inflection to the NW is the closer to oil & gas Armageddon we are.

Meaning, in the next weeks we won't be worrying about gas prices if the worst happens -- we will be worrying about finding gas to buy.
you're 100% correct ... this doesn't look good. not at all.
there is increasing data that suggests RITA is going to get trapped UNDER the Ridge and NOT leave....stalled for 5 days over central or eastern TX / eastern and central OK .... with some places seeing I would guess 12-16 inches of rain...(from easternwx.com)
Re: "increasing data..."

I'm not seeing this (easternwx.com????) Link?
it's behind a wall.  you have to have an account (easy to do, but they're slow to authorize them, I have mine from Katrina)...so I can't link you.  tried.
and sorry, it's http://www.easternuswx.com (then forums)
WHAT!? Prof., can you shed some light into that data? Does it come from message boards or from any sort of meteorological measurements? This is the first I've heard of this.
Never mind. I found an interesting discussion of this possibility over on Jeff Masters' blog.
sorry, was off on a run.  it's some of the models are predicting just a complete stall out of the progress of Rita once inland.
also: Some suggestions here:

Dallas Fort Worth will be hit hard by flooding, thanks to slow movement. Texarkana AR and Shreveport LA have excellent hotel facilities, but the latter has lots of NO refugees. So evacuation ought to aim sharp west (San Antonio could escape rain problems, though get some heavy downpours and a period of strong winds) or farther northeast (Little Rock AR and Tulsa OK).

Texas is flat and low, folks.  Remember that.  Get these people out of there now.

A beautiful new map I just found a rigzone:

http://gom.rigzone.com/rita.asp?Command=MAP

It will also be available in the resources post below this one.

Thanks for noticing Tropical Cyclone Heat Potential (THCP). I commented on this a couple of days ago.  Note that in about 24 hours Rita will be over a pool of even higher TCHP sea water.  I suppose that the central pressure could go even lower before landfall and the wind field increase in size.
The National Data Buoy Center (NDBC) has many buoys in the Gulf of Mexico with some of them on actual oil platforms! Check the following map to access to the buoys' weather data live:
http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/Maps/WestGulf.shtml
for instance:
Auger (Shell platform)
Brutus (Shell platform)
Mars (Shell platform)
Brutus is already experiencing winds above 30 knots.
One can never prove it, but I have to believe that human-induced climate change is helping to strengthen these ferocious storms. Now Rita, by hitting petroleum infrastructure, is actually going to bite the hand that is feeding it.

John Ruskin would say that treating an inanimate object as though it has thoughts and feelings is "pathetic fallacy." I agree that's unwise, but it's certainly tempting.

I was waiting for someone else to bring climate change into this discussion. Thanks, Rick.

I mean, c'mon, how unusual is this? Two Category 5 hurricanes making landfall in the Gulf within a month? Unusually warm SSTs, increased wind shear, etc. Rita is now the third largest storm of all time! -- measured by millibars. I can already hear the hurricane people saying "nothing weird going on here..." and the climate scientists saying "you can never associate any particular weather event with climate change....".

Yeah, OK, everybody has their ass covered as the merde hits the microwave.
Dave-
The "One can never prove it" line about climate change was self-conscious and very intentional ass-covering. I expected a reaction to it.

This is an academic habit that I've gotten more respect for. In academic circles, if you can prove something, do it. If you can't, and we often can't, be honest that it's an (well-founded or otherwise) opinion. Otherwise, you're open to gratuitous attack by debunkers with poor intent.

There are plenty of highly charged opinions on peak oil and climate change. I figure we need some passionate voices, and some careful, dry academic voices as well. Properly done, they complement one another (even if they rarely compliment one another ...).

I absolutely believe these hurricanes were amplified by a human-caused warmer atmosphere. I'm also virtually certain that we can't prove it--yet. In the meantime, I opine carefully.

Over here in Europe, they explain it very good. We ARE entering a natural high activity hurricane cycle, but climate change IS responsible for every other tropical storm becoming a huge cat 5 monster. Would all of this have been even an issue, if Katrina had been a cat2, and Rita a cat1?

As a European, I am amazed at the media attitude in the USA. They have really developed a consensus where no mention of the words "climate", "change" and "warming" is allowed in any combinatioin. Not on the TV, newspaper, nor even in the Internet.

That is incredible and coupled with the newly reinvigorated attacks on science on behalf of the christian fundamentalists's "Intelligent design" against evolution teaching in the schools, it is very, very sad (and very dangerous also).

http://euler.atmos.colostate.edu/~vigh/guidance/atlantic/early1.png

The new models are compiled (the first link in the resources post below).  More of a turn towards Galveston and better convergence.

The sooner Rita passes 25N, the more of a turn she will make...man oh man.

Shit. Awful. Awaiting that NHC next model ensemble update....
The eye is skirting 25N right now, and as I said earlier, the general movement is NNW
The SST is very warm near the Texas coast, Rita could be category 5 on landfall!
http://hurricane.methaz.org/hurapak/AAL182005_ref_root.html

here's the REALLY experimental refining damage estimates from KAC/UCF...double digit damage is bad news for an industrial site.

Latest track from NHC at 11:00 PM is well to the right, NE of previous track.  Houston is close to bullseye at present.

Rita has slowed forward motion somewhat.  This is bad.  There is a high pressure ridge holding Rita in the gulf which is drifting eastwards.  Rita will curve sharply to the north when it gets around the western edge of the ridge.

Well, let's be specific:
RITA IS EXPECTED TO SHORTLY RESUME A MORE WESTWARD MOTION. THE 18Z NHC MODEL GUIDANCE IS A LITTLE MORE CONVERGENT THAN PREVIOUS MODEL RUNS... WITH THE GFS AND GFDL MODELS DOING THEIR USUAL AFTERNOON EASTWARD SHIFT. THOSE MODELS NOW BRING RITA ACROSS THE HOUSTON-GALVESTON AREA IN ABOUT 72 HOURS. HOWEVER...THE OTHER MODELS SEEM TO HAVE STABILIZED THEIR FORECAST TRACKS FARTHER WEST WITH THE CONSENSUS HAVING SHIFTED A LITTLE MORE TO THE RIGHT. THE OFFICIAL FORECAST TRACK WAS ALSO SHIFTED TO THE RIGHT...BUT NOT AS FAR AS THE GFS/GFDL MODELS...SINCE IT NOW APPEARS THAT THE GLOBAL MODELS HAVE A REASONABLE HANDLE ON WEAKENING THE MID-LEVEL RIDGE ACROSS TEXAS AND THE GULF COAST BASED 22/00Z UPPER-AIR DATA INDICATING 40 METER HEIGHT FALLS ACROSS THIS REGION DURING THE PAST 24 HOURS.
I read this to mean that the models are now diverging with the generally reliable GFDL model giving us bad news. I don't know how to read this, but it doesn't look good... landfall appears to now forecast north of Matagorda nearer to Galveston/Houston and that is very bad news....
here a difference image between the last two sucessive predictions (4PM and 10PM):

here

saw that over "there" too, khebab...that's nice work.  might steal that tomorrow.
Thanks! The next forecast is due tomorrow morning at 4PM CDT, I will try to make another image.

You may also be interested by the following image:

5-day plot - Live Wind Speed, Wind Gust and Atmospheric Pressure    Combined plot of Wind Speed, Gust, and Air Pressure for the Auger Drilling Platform (Shell)

This oil platform will probably be directly hit by Rita.

As I said in an earlier thread, tomorrow is the day of Judgement (turns to the North?) and Friday/Saturday is the day of Reckoning...

Apparently, God (Nature) is going to be really harsh on us this time... I think, looking at this data, that's it time to "Come to Jesus" with respect to our near-term energy future. Fill up your gas tanks now.

And no... I am not a religious person ... though I do believe that there is definitely something unusual going on here... see above about Climate Change. But we might as well pray at this point, that's all we can do, isn't it?
Gang, starting a new comment thread for overnight...it will be under the top post...but I will leave this up for you if you wish to continue the comments here.