Sunday Acronym Open Thread...

We're putting together a list of acronyms as a sidebar resource.  Start the list here in the comments (see the comments below in Stuart's post for a discussion of why, etc.) and then I will pull it together into a post.
I can't think of that many acronyms used here...

B - barrels (of oil)
MB - millions of barrels
GB - gigabarrels, i.e. billions of barrels
TB - trillions of barrels
MBD - millions of barrels per day

These are obvious I think:

PO - peak oil
TOD - the oil drum!


ASPO - Association for the Study of Peak Oil www.peakoil.net, also www.aspo-usa.com
BG - Biomass gassification
BTL - Biomass-to-liquid
CAB -
CERA - Cambridge Energy Research Associates (Chairman Daniel Yergin) www.cera.com
CTL - Coal-to-liquid; see FT
DoE - US Department of Energy www.doe.gov
EIA - Energy Information Administration; division of US DoE www.eia.doe.gov
EROEI - Energy return on energy invested; aka energy profit ratio (EPR)
FIP - Fields in production
FT - Fischer-Tropsch process of converting methane or coal to liquid fuels
GOM or GOMEX - Gulf of Mexico
GTL - Gas-to-liquid; see FT
IEA - International Energy Agency www.iea.org
IHS - IHS Energy (consulting company, parent of CERA)
IOCs - International oil companies
JODI - Joint oil data initiative www.jodidata.org/
LNG - Liquified natural gas, refrigerated for shipping
LPG - Liquified petroleum gas (propane and butane)
LQHC - Low quality hydrocarbons, i.e.tar sands and oil shale
MENA - Middle East and North Africa--includes Algeria, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates
MER - Maximum effective rate (of production)
MMS - Minerals Management Service; division of US Dept. of the Interior
MRC - Maximum Reservoir Contact
MSM - Mainstream media
NG - Natural gas (mainly methane)
NGL - Natural gas liquids (ethane, propane, butane, isobutane and natural gasoline)
NOCs - National oil companies
OGJ - The Oil & Gas Journal
OOIP - Original oil in place
RUL - Regular unleaded gasoline
SA - Saudi Arabia
SPR - Strategic petroleum reserve
TOD - The Oil Drum www.theoildrum.com
ULSD - Ultra-low sulfur diesel
USGS - United States Geological Survey
URR  - Ultimately recoverable resources
VMT - Vehicle miles traveled
WTI - West Texas intermediate (crude)
Go for it, Bob G!
Replying to the best on topic post, here are my two contribs that I haven't seen yet:

Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE)
Gas Oil Separation Plant (GOSP)

-Ptone

OECD = Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development
OPEC = Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries
Non-OPEC = Info here: http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/nonopec.html
P/Q - Pique to Qumulative
BTUs - British thermal units
FSU - Former Soviet Union
GHGs - Greenhouse gases (CO2, methane)
Quad - Quadrillion BTU.  

Yes, I know - it is not really an acronym - more of an abbreviation, but it is still part of the "secret language".

TSHTF - Usually preceded by "When."
Terms that everyone should understand (PG, I assume you're going to put the together the post w/definitions, right?)
  • EOR (enhanced oil recovery)
  • E&P (exploration and production)
  • URR (ultimately recoverable reserves)
  • OOIP (original oil in place)
  • LNG (liquified natural gas)
  • GTL (gas to liquids conversion)
  • CTL (coal to liquids conversion)
  • BOE (barrels of oil equivalent)
  • BBLs (barrels of usually oil)
  • MBPD (million barrels per day == MMb/d
  • GB (gigabarrels = billion barrels = Bbo
  • RP ratio (reserves/production = years)
  • Qt (the estimated URR from a Hubbert Lineariation)
  • TCF (trillion cubic feet -- dry natural gas)
  • MMx (million x)
  • IEA (International Energy Agency in Paris)
  • CERA (Cambridge Energy Research Associates (Daniel Yergin
  • EIA (Energy Information Admistration (DOE)
  • DOE (Department of Energy
  • NGLs (natural gas liquids eg. condensates)
  • USGS (US Geological Service)
  • IOC (international oil company eg. British Petroleum, ExxonMobil)
  • NOC (national oil company eg. Saudi Aramco)
  • OPEC (organization of petroleum exporting countries)
  • FSU (former Soviet Union)
Well, that should get us started... that's enough for now, already tired...

And a few others...

  • WTF (what the fuck)
  • SHTF (shit hits the fan
  • AFAIK (as far as I know)
  • EBAAN (esteemed and beloved Ali Al-Naimi)
I've seen people here use IIRC as an acronym. Can anyone tell me what that means please?
If I recall correctly.
Dave,

You forgot FUBAR and SNAFU.

Also, not an acronym but "klick" is military slang for kilometer, and also kilometer per hour.  I used this in my Geology class once and got a roomful of blank stares.

"How far is it to base?"
"10 klicks."
"How fast we going?"
"120 klicks." in Germany after all :) "Be there in five minutes"

As long as you're doing colloquial acronyms as well as topical ones, I suggest:
  • IMHO (In My Humble Opinion)
  • IM<HO (In My less than Humble Opinion)</li>
  • 2LoT (2nd Law of Thermodynamics)
  • TANSTAAFL (There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch, h/t Robt. A. Heinlein)

Warning..... Meta post

I think that the oil drum is too big for the current setup.
It needs a new layout.

I also think there should be a way for regular posters to do diaries and graphs, and if they are good enough, they can be promoted by the other readers.
This IMHO would increase the number of topics discussed and increase readership and this would equal more advertising dollars for the site.  (More warnings....I know nothing about websites, marketing or layouts, so ignore me if you must)

I don't think you're wrong bd.  We've been talking about that kind of a move for a while...that's why we chose scoop, actually.
One current way to do this is to start a local site as outlined on the rightside tab at the top. I feel there is much local work to be done.
I would have serious reservations about a reader vote determining what others are able to publish. I don't think a popularity contest is the best way to determine content. Some of the best commentary - and that which creates the best discussion - is contrarian.

Fundamentally, I think the current system works. People who comment often and would like to create posts such as Dave and Bubba have become Contributors. Others guest post. I have wanted to but am too lazy and have been relegated to the comments section where I belong.

I totally disagree. You couldn't be more wrong. You need your own section of this website. Preferrably at the top-right, with a gold-star border.
It's a shame that you and I got off on the wrong foot, Jack. We probably agree on a lot. Relax, grab a beer, and have a good laugh at my (our?) president tonight.

(Btw, I responded to your post, Oil CEO)

oops wrong link, lol.

here it is

I agree with Jack, apologies OC. I abhor limitations on free speech (is that bloody funny in someone who disagrees with money and is more communist than most, or what?). We do have a VERY small minority of trollish posts here, could be some of mine could be interpreted that way but I would never write them with that intent. While that is so I would suggest that judicious post post moderation is the most appropriate means of control.
NOAA  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

WAG  wild arse guess
SWAG  scientific wild arse guess

IMHO In My Honest Opinion  

IMO the honesty isnt stressed..

I always thought IMHO was "In my humble opinion."
Both meanings are widely used, and pretty interchangeable when you come down to it.
IMNSHO comes off better with one meaning than the other ;-)

the "NS" meaning "Not So"

You need to stadardize the use of capital letters.  MBPD, or mbpd for example.  Given that MCF is the standard usage for 1,000 cubic feet of gas, I assume that MBD would most commonly be used for thousand barrels per day.  So, would the little "m" be used for million?
The industry usage is MMCFH for million.  You might want to go with MMBPD to avoid confusion, although usually it's obvious from context.
IKIHB-- ( I know it's hopeless, but)--- Sure would be nice if every body would use SI ( standard international units, or metric system) instead of this hodgepodge used now. ---IKIH.
HL = Hubbert Linearization
Not acronyms, but since this is an energy blog:

1 hp = .7457 kw = 2546.1 BTU/hr = 178.23 cal(gm)/sec

From Perry's Handbook of Chemical Engineering

Typical Heating Values

Fuel oil #1      137,400  BTU/gal
         #2      139,600
         #3      145,100
         #4      148,800
         #6      152,400

Propane          91,500   BTU/gal
Natural gas       1,035   BTU/SCF
Bituminous Coal  11,500-14,000  BTU/lb
Subbituminous     8,300-11,500
Lignite           6,300-8,300

Coke-oven gas      590    BTU/SCF
Producer gas       150
Water gas          308
Synthetic gas      290

Whoops. Make that

Multiply hp by .7457 to get kw
  "      hp by 2546.1 to get BTU/hr
  "      hp by 178.23 to get cal/sec

Let's see, since a btu is about 1000joules, and a kg is about 2 pounds, then for people like me who think in SI units, a btu/lb is  somewhere around  2kilojoules/kg
 (or more nearly,1055*2.205=2.326kJ/kg)

I quit teaching engineering about 30 years ago, but I had thought then that students were switching to SI units. Is it true that  only the USA and what- Burma? are still not using SI?

I'm taking engineering classes now, and we still get the slug problem every so often ( 1 slug = English unit of mass = 14.59kg)
How About 1hp = 550 ft-lbs/sec or even 1hp = 1ft-lb @ 5252rpm
Even more important: 1/4 mile = 1320 ft
- Stop the Iran war -
IIRC - if I recall correctly

IMHO - In my humble opinion

IMO -- no humility

ER - Energy Resources, a Yahoo discussion group devoted to Peak Oil issues

ROE2 - Running on Empty 2, another Yahoo Peak Oil board, this one more concerned with grassroots personal preps.

Two guides for the perplexed.

The The Oilfield Glossary: Where the Oil Field Meets the Dictionary from Schlumberger. No acromyms, but many, many terms defined.

A page of Oil Industry Conversions. How to convert between units.

As far as case goes (mbpd vs MBPD), shouldn't an acronym always be upper case? Also,

  • FUD (fields under development)
  • FOP (fuel oil price)
  • FUA (fields under appraisal)
  • YTF (yet to find -- a personal favorite, especially in Saudi Arabia's Empty Quarter)
  • API (American Petroleum Institute)
  • API gravity (scale expressing the gravity or density of liquid petroleum products-- Crude oil is often described in terms of "lightness" or "heaviness" by an index called the API gravity. A high number denotes a "light" crude, and vice versa. Degrees API Gravity= (141.5/Specific Gravity at 60 Deg. F) - 131.5)
Also, a correction. I said for NGL's eg. condensates. But that's wrong. Look here for a correction. Bob G's definition was more correct. Here's a typical use for the Schlumberger glossary for condensate. Things do get complicated sometimes! For example, "all liquids" includes oil, NGLs and condensates in the usual usage. This will include further types of liquids including CTL and GTL as these go into wide-scale production.
As a former teacher of economics, I object to the use of acronyms. They are a form of "secret language" of the inner priesthood, much as Latin was during the Middle Ages. Furthermore, I have observed that the more acronyms that are used, the less deep thinking occurs. Could it be that a big reason the U.S. lost the war in Vietnam was acronyms? Could it be that failures in our space program (such as the failure to convert from an English to a metric system of measurement) were in part due to overuse of acronyms? Could it be that the fungus-like spread of acronyms account in large part for so many things being FUBAR?

I allowed my students to abbreviate the date on their essay tests--but nothing else.
Don

Re: FUBAR

Nice joke. For the general reader, shouldn't that read "Could it be that the fungus-like spread of acronyms account in large part for so many things being fucked up beyond all repair"? It's all a real SNAFU, isn't it?

But seriously, using the acronyms is only a kind of short-hand so we can be succinct about the points we're making. You should look at presentations from IHS Energy and the like. Without knowing what the acronyms mean, a person would be completely in the dark--and maybe they would be completely in the dark anyway . I've made it a practice to spell out acronyms used in my posts but not necessarily in my comments. TOD is a pretty technical site sometimes and if you don't know what an acronym means, Google is available. But I think a permanent acronym terms page listed on the TOD homepage is a very good idea.

best, Dave

BOHICA: "FUBAR" translates as "Fucked Up Beyond All Recognition" as any good dictionary will show.

FYI BOHICA stands for "Bend Over, Here It Comes Again." That is good advice when things are FUBAR.

But in all seriousness, I do think that an overuse of acronyms frequently is an attempt to conceal lack of substance in thinking. Furthermore, excessive abbreviation (as is often found in the labelling of graphs) is a serious pedagogical error.

In addition to economics, I used to teach logic, in which clarity and precision are essential. I question deeply whether the prevalence of acronyms contributes to or detracts from clarity and precision of logic.

If acronyms must be used, then let them be defined the first time they are used.

One last set of queries: Did Newton use acronyms? Did Einstein? For that matter, did Hubbert? Did Malthus use acronyms?

Acronyms without explanations are dangerous.  This thread is working to rectify the situation.  I agree for official or formal documentation, acronyms should be used sparingly, but it is fine write the full spelling out with the acronym in parentheses the first time and then the acronym by itself thereafter (IMHO).
Another site I read on occasion likes to insert links to acronym expansions automagically.  Trouble is, acronyms are not unique and they often get the wrong expansion.
Added note (in keeping with the main theme of this thread):

CTL = "coal to liquid conversion"
GTL = "gas to liquid conversion"

Whoops - I just saw that these had already been previously defined.  Sorry!
Oh my, how could I have forgot NIMBY -- Not In My Backyard
This is a great idea. As a long time lurker I have started to frequent TOD more often but found the almost endless usage of acronyms frustrating. Being a mining major from CSM in the '70's I was somewhat familiar with the oil patch (at a very rudimentary level) from friends who majored in PE but quickly got lost in the more in depth articles that appear here.

Now the Longwall Mining article made perfect sense :)

TEOTWAWKI - The End of the World as We Know It (and I feel fine)
Becoming more common as NIMBY is found wanting and likely to stand in the way of efforts to provide renewable alternatives - BANANA (planning) Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anybody
Guess we are all going back to the BANANAs. Too bad there are too many monkeys already.
Don't forget NOPE:  Not On Planet Earth.
I'm not sure if it is the same as LNG, but many cars here in NZ in the 80s ran on CNG (Compressed Natural Gas).

Also, here in NZ we fill up our barbeque cyclinders with LPG, but you folks in the US refer to this as "Butane", is that correct?

Also, how about a quick definition of the various hydrocarbon molecules. E.g. NG=Methane, LPG=Butane, Petrol=Octane(?), etc.

Gas grills in the U.S. use propane.  Lighters use butane.  Both are LPG.

Gasoline (petrol) was mostly octane a long time ago but now is a blend of alkanes, alkenes, cycloalkanes, aromatics, and probably stuff that only the oil companies know.

Duncan

There are CNG buses used in Sydney.

Also LPG - Liquid Petroleum Gas is a mixture of Butane and Propane.

NYMEX - New York Merchantile EXchange (?)
As this is also an open thread, I'd like to ask a different question.

Does anyone know of any websites that detail what some city councils are doing to mitigate the effects of Peak Oil.

I've done a bit of a search, but the trouble is these councils don't usually mention the fact that they are doing these things because of Peak Oil.  Most just seem to talk about energy efficiency, and that makes it more difficult to narrow the search.

I'm interested in putting together a talk for my local council to try and get them to start thinking about the issues. It would be good to include what other councils are doing.

I think you will have a problem finding anything that admits to Peak Oil. In my area UK, Bristol, there are 2 transport studies in progress. All the figures are based on official surveys and models completed in 2001/2. PO was not on the radar then and the assumption was that oil would average $25/B for the forecasting period to 2010 and even 2020. This includes the forecast for traffic through the airport. These studies will set the plan for major infrastructure investment in roads, public transport etc.
Clearly anyone on TOD will say crazy, get your base assumptions up to date and then re project. That is not how the official mind works. If the local council was to come out elsewhere and say we are doing this or that because of PO then they must logically restart the transport studies. These are centrally funded and the Govt has not admitted PO so we just blunder on to produce wrong conclusions from out of date data (GIGO)at the tax payers expense.
Yes, but some councils are being more open about Peak Oil.

For instance, John Hickenlooper, Mayor of Denver, got up at the ASPO-USA conference in November last year and talked about what Denver city was doing.

This is the kind of information I was looking for.

Kinsale, Ireland has done a bangup job on this. You can find at through the ASPO Ireland site.
Maybe the Unplanner who posts here now and again can help you.
Here's one from Canada:
http://burnaby.fileprosite.com/contentengine/launch.asp?ID=9181
I think Woking, UK has been a trailblazer, try here:
http://www.woking.gov.uk/environment
You can find some good audio of meetings for local peak oil mitigation at GPM, hunt around:
http://www.globalpublicmedia.com/
This is an NZ site, has lots of stuff if you look hard, may help:
http://www.oilcrash.com/
Coversion ratios
Distance: kilometre, mile
Mass: pound, kilo, metric ton, tonne
Volume: US gallon, Brit gallon, litre, cubic foot, barrel
Speed: mph, kph, knot, metres per second
Energy: BTU, joule, kilowatt-hour
Power: horsepower, watt
Pressure: psi, bar, atmosphere, pascal
Fuel consumption: mpg, km per 10L
Energy density:  BTU/gallon, joules/kilogram
Power to weight: hp per pound, kw per kilogram
Go to www.onlineconversion.com
"Converts just about anything to anything"
Gonna do a little post on my homeland:

I've seen a lot anxiety here at TOD about Russia's future oil export capacity due to growth in domestic use.

Even though it has been said that Moscow's population has grown recently by 30%, taken as a whole, Russia's population has decreased by 7% in the past 15 years.

Source:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/elsewhere/journalist/story/0,7792,1674948,00.html

So even with a growing economy, IMHO, its possible to keep oil consumtion relatively flat in the years to come.

Related: it would help if there a units conversion program available here at TOD - energy, power, length, area, volume, etc. Energy equivalents. Perhaps if it were table driven, it could be open to some TOD members to updating it.

If I were younger and more energetic, I'd volunteer do it myself. But I passed peak quite a while ago.

actually dbg, there's a neat thing in google.

type "1.14 acres in square feet" into a google search...

The acronym sidebar/glossary has long been needed on TOD.  Thanks Stormy for your input, and Prof Goose for reacting so quickly.
Helpful thread.

While not acronyms, maybe someone could add definitions/overview of the various types of reseves and measurements? There's a great deal of discussion about reserve reports, and this would help clarify the discussion.

Thanks

If we must have acronyms, here is a useful one I invented: DUET for Deep Universal Eternal Truth.

Here is an example of a DUET, in my translation from the Latin. Speaking of politics, a famous Roman said, "The people want to be decieved. [Hence] Let them be deceived."

Empirical observation has shown that people who win high political office in the U.S. adhere to this DUET without exception.

For example,
Woodrow Wilson: "There is such a thing as being too proud to fight."
F.D.R.: examples too numerous to even begin listing, especially relating to the Great Depression and to the certainty that if he were elected in 1940 the U.S. would most certainly not become involved in World War II.

and on it goes . . . .

How many of you think Hilary Clinton, the great fearless liberal, will advocate a stiff tax on gasoline?

In democratic politics, the way to get power is to promise people what they want in a convincing way. As Nixon said, "Once you learn to fake sincerity, the rest is easy."

These fatal flaws in democracy were recognized and clearly explained by both Plato and Aristotle. The well-educated founders of the U.S.A. knew that anything resembling a pure democracy would be fatally flawed, and hence they designed a Constitution that had as many elements of aristocracy and oligarchy in it as it did of democracy. As models they ingeniously used both the Roman Repubic and also, to some extent, some elements found in the great confederacy of Iroquois nations. Of course our political system today is nothing at all like that envisioned by Jefferson, Madison, Hamilton, Franklin, etc.

Democracy degenerates to mobocracy and rule of the lawyers, by the lawyers and for the lawyers. Unfortunately, our form of government is fatally flawed now and does not function well at any level, from the Federal right down to local school boards. In a crisis situation such as World War II, we drop democracy, go to authoritarian rule and create magnificent achievements such as the Manhatten project. With business as usual, I suggest that as individuals we recognize that there are not enough life boats aboard the Titanic and that there are going to be a great many Darwin awards handed out during the next twenty years.

Great post, Don. One question: I've noticed a few others claim that the Founders were influenced by the Iroquois, but I've never seen serious substantiation. Would you mind providing a source so I may educate myself? Thanks.
I'm relying on memory here (always fallible), but Ben Franklin was much impressed by the Iroquois and wrote about their government. Try Google with Franklin Iroquois Constitution or something close to that, and it should not be too hard to trace. One word of caution: There was a strong tendency in the 18th century to romanticize Native Americans as Noble Savages, and some of what Franklin and other writers attributed to the Iroquois may have been and almost certainly was wishful thinking.

On a different subject, the Iroquois culture (or cultures, to be more precise) is fascinating; among the 1,000 most interesting Native American cultures I'd put the Iroquois among the top ten. Please do not ask for the other nine . . . LOL

SAGD - Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage
TD - Terminal Depth
PDC - Polycrystalline Diamond Cutter
Some definitions:

http://www.spe.org/spe/jsp/basic/0,,1104_3306579,00.html

and a few building energy abbreviations:

HVAC, or HVA/C = Heating, Ventilating and Air-Conditioning
U = Thermal conductivity of a building assembly
R = Thermal resistance of a material

FUD also = Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt

Did anyone mention:
GIGO = Garbage In, Garbage Out
GUT = Grand, Unified Theory

Steam assisted gravity drainage is presumbly when you pump steam down an oil well full of heavy oil, it condenses at the bottom to water, liberating heat, which makes the thick (heavy) oil liquify and flow down through the pores of the rock to the bottom where you can suck it up through another oil well. Also sometimes called "Huff and Puff". Kern oil field is heavy oil and is depleting rather slowly. We found it in 1880 or around then and are still getting oil out. That works out to a depletion rate of less than one percent.