A Credible Threat?

Average Saudi daily oil production (left scale), by month, from EIA, JODI, and IEA, together with Baker Hughes oil rig count (right scale). Jan 2000-present. Click to enlarge. Sources: IEA Oil Market Reports, EIA International Petroleum Monthly Table 1.1a, JODI, and Baker Hughes.

So I was awoken from my peak-oil slumber by this fairly extraordinary oped in the Washington Post. It consists of a series of threats by Nawaf Obaid, a "an adviser to the Saudi government", who is expressing opinions that are "his own and do not reflect official Saudi policy", but nonetheless speaks in short clear declarative sentences about what the Saudi government will do if the US withdraws from Iraq.

Some choice grafs:

Just a few months ago it was unthinkable that President Bush would prematurely withdraw a significant number of American troops from Iraq. But it seems possible today, and therefore the Saudi leadership is preparing to substantially revise its Iraq policy. Options now include providing Sunni military leaders (primarily ex-Baathist members of the former Iraqi officer corps, who make up the backbone of the insurgency) with the same types of assistance -- funding, arms and logistical support -- that Iran has been giving to Shiite armed groups for years.

Another possibility includes the establishment of new Sunni brigades to combat the Iranian-backed militias. Finally, Abdullah may decide to strangle Iranian funding of the militias through oil policy. If Saudi Arabia boosted production and cut the price of oil in half, the kingdom could still finance its current spending. But it would be devastating to Iran, which is facing economic difficulties even with today's high prices. The result would be to limit Tehran's ability to continue funneling hundreds of millions each year to Shiite militias in Iraq and elsewhere.

So, is this last threat credible? Well, I updated my graph of Saudi oil production and rig count, added the IEA estimates to those of EIA and JODI. The result is above, and detail showing the production slide this year more clearly is below. How many rigs is Obaid proposing that the Saudis now rent, I wonder?

Average Saudi daily oil production, by month, from EIA, JODI, and IEA. Jan 2004-present. Graph is not zero scaled. Click to enlarge. Sources: IEA Oil Market Reports, EIA International Petroleum Monthly Table 1.1a, JODI, and Baker Hughes.

So then we are left to judge whether this threat is more or less credible than the last:

To be sure, Saudi engagement in Iraq carries great risks -- it could spark a regional war. So be it: The consequences of inaction are far worse.
A shooting war between Saudi Arabia and Iran would certainly make for interesting times in the oil markets...

(FWIW, my guess is that the US won't withdraw from Iraq in an orderly way soon. The Bush administration doesn't want to, and it's in the best political interests of Democrats to make a public show of calling for withdrawal while privately making sure not to do anything that would force the administration to change it's politically disastrous course before the 2008 elections. So the whole mess will probably continue to snowball a while longer -- until something so bad happens to American troops that public revulsion for the war becomes uncontainable.)

You're fucking shitting me. Hahahahahaaa. How's Jim Morrison? I just happen to tune in right now and get the first post in? Too funny. Welcome back, buddy. I was getting tired. I can't do these graphs all myself, y'know.
What a nice way to welcome him and his efforts back.
Nate - are you up early, working late or travelling in europe?
b)
i guess also a)
definitely not c)
I was waiting for him. It's obvious I love him more than anybody here. No?

You were just a little bit too slow. The Oil CEO is quick.

Welcome Back Plotter!

Welcome back, your graphs were your ticket back
Welcome back, to the same old site that you laughed about
Well the names have all changed since you hung around
But those dreams have remained and they're turned around
Who'd have thought they'd lead ya (Who'd have thought they'd lead ya)
Here where we need ya (Here where we need ya)
Yeah we tease him a lot cause we've got him on the spot, welcome back,
Welcome back, welcome back, welcome back.

Truly, welcome back Stuart.

PS: I apologize for little Arnold Horshack (you know which one he is) he can't help himself.
LMAO - oily as Horshack - that really is perfect.  Same for the theme song you chose to welcome back Mr. Plotter.
As you know, the best charts have got lots and lots of lines on em.  Khebab has learned this and now leads the way.

Just happened to be looking at North Sea rig count yesterday - was more than surprised at what this showed:


You know me, Cry Wolf, I love lines.
So what about Microhydro's lines? aaaaaaghhh!
Hello Euan,

Good question.

  1. Are they being retired for age, rust, safety reasons, and unsuitability for ultra-deep exploration?

  2. Or are they being moved to the Mideast to help ramp up E&P there?

  3. Or are they just being mothballed for lack of any decent drilling propects at $60-75/barrel--Yikes!

Bob Shaw in Phx,Az  Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?
Hello Bob, I find it amazing that you guys are still up - what's the time in Phx?

All the North Sea rigs are either semi-subs or jack ups - i.e. highly mobile.  During down times, they get stacked up in an area called the Morray Firth - just north of where I stay - and go rusty.  Then during boom times they come out of retirement.  What seems to have happened during this "mega-boom" is that rigs have come out of retirement and been moved else where (I'd guess Africa).  Simple case of companies drilling where exploration and production prospects are best.

I'll be writing a bit more on this next week.

Hello Euan,

Hard to sleep when the World appears to be going to Hell.  It is 4am here, but I am kinda of a night owl anyways, but heading for some shuteye shortly.  Looking forward to your future post.

Bob Shaw in Phx,Az  Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?

paint your wagon
They were moving else where in during the bust and as the boom started elsewhere and earlier than in the North Sea (start ups here are sluggish), they stayed away.

Also: Entry level costs are higher, safety compliances, new kit, zero emissions / spillage compliance etc means that if you loose two rigs, only one may come back.

It has been the same throughout each boom - bust cycle since 1986. After each bust, fewer rigs in operation.

Two of the Moray Firth rigs are heading off across the Atlantic to the US.
I have heard a couple of Gorrilla Heavy duty Jack ups are coming across to the North Sea.

Swings and roundabouts

But the general trend has been down for a few years now.

But, the high rig rates may now offset the high entry costs.

Trouble is, high rates can mean fewer wells per Exploration budget.

We will see.

I'm just saying. I kind of find it ironic. I'm the last person here who needs to ask permission for my behavior.

Stuart and I go way back. Way back before all of you.

I'll say what I want. I made my choice. 666.

MicroHydro's boring.

When this graph is compared with the one for the lower 48, which showed no pick up in production despite the increased rig count, it is difficult to argue that KSA is not at peak.  I guess it will take the next spike in price to convince most.  
With regard to the Saudi's plan to flood the oil market and thus deprive the Iranians of funds - what happens when they cannot supply the market and the Iranians oil revenues increase?
When this graph is compared with the one for the lower 48, which showed no pick up in production despite the increased rig count, it is difficult to argue that KSA is not at peak.

It may well be; But its also possible that SA wants to upgrade its idle capacity for hegemonic market purposes. For decades SA has had excess capacity for times of high demand that often were on hold, and its only recently that they have been unable to produce at will.
Why do you say that? You know nothing of 1973? Or you have some inside knowledge of some things the rest of us know nothing about?
Care to explain what happened in 1973 ?

Saudi produced 11% more in 1973 than it did in 1972 - pretty much the same increase as earlier years - ever wonder why the global hubbert slope is so smooth on the way up (to 1973) ?

it is difficult to argue that KSA is not at peak

Huh? No it's not. It's not difficult to argue that you are a crack addict. In fact the reason why nobody tries is because it is so easy.

Yeah, I'm real curious. What's your theory of the week? Go for it. Try something new. Cuz we're sick of hearing the same old shit. Thanks.

you're not talking about your old shit, aren't you?
I tend to agree. For years the Saudis have sought to maintain an excess production to preserve their position as swing producer. With the flat-line trend of the past year or so, it seems they may be eating into that excess and producting at nearly 100%. The exponential growth in rig count suggests they are trying to bring new production online before they start to see declines... Unfortunately, as the exponential shape suggests, they are having some difficulty.

True, it's possible this is to start some price war with Iran, or get a stockpile of funding to finance support of a particular faction in Iraq, but more likely some people in the kingdom of Saud have noticed a concerning trend....

Either way, we'll know by summer...

So, it wasn't tod pleadings, but an oped in the dc post that was irrisistable... may we infer you've been doing something useful in the corridors of power to save the free world as we know it?  Was it your manipulations that gave the dems the gavel(s)? I'll take silence for modesty.
Welcome back.  

Interesting to see how much good 3x rigs are doing the saudis.

Referring to the article, if sunnis want the us to stay, they might show a sign.  So far it looks very much as if they prefer a view of our backsides.

RE: Jkissing's comment about the lack of results following the increase in rigs. Perhaps this is a naive question. . . but here goes anyway.  Is there a time lag here? The rig count starts to go vertical in about January 2005. Assuming that some of these rigs did strike oil, how long would it usually take for newly-discovered oil to come on stream and show up in the statistics?
We don't know. There obviously must be a lag. But nobody has tracked this kind of thing. Extremely hard to do. We're trying. More questions?
Yes, another question.

When was the Peak of Light Sweet Crude(PLSC)?

My feeling is that its' importance is underestimated. After this EROEI is definitely going down accros the board. Maybe we should work with PLSC as being the peak, instead of All Liquids, or even C + C.

Added benefit would be there is no need anymore for "discussions" between Westexas and Hothgor/Hutter.

Well. We don't know the answer to these questions. There has been no peak.

There has been no peak of LSC. Deffeyes has been very wrong for the last five years. Very wrong.

I have a hard time with it. I like to be right. I'll say 87 before 79. Peakist/Hubbertians are saying 85 no matter what.

Sorry, I have to scale/interperet for C+C. But we can ride Deffeyes' numbers.

I'll pursue this again in the morning.

Deffeyes has been very wrong for the last five years. Very wrong.

Deffeyes has always predicted a crude + condensate peak for a time period between 2004 and 2008, most likely in late 2005, and (EIA) crude + condensate production so far has consistently been below the 12/05 number.

He observed,  a few year ago, that the world may have peaked in 2000, earlier than his predicted range, but that was not a prediction.

WT/Jeffrey,
 Thanks for saying this (once again).
Amphora - rigs are used for 4 principal activities:

  1.  Drilling production wells on existing fields
  2.  Drilling water / gas injection wells on existing fields
  3.  Well workovers - cleaning gunk out of existing wells to improve flow rates
  4.  Exploration wells.

My guess would be most of the rigs will be used for 1, 2 and 3.  So your question really is how long to drill and hook up new development wells - ball park figure of three months.

If they make a big new discovery - your talking 5+ years to bring it on.

I appears that about 15 rigs were enough for #3 for KSA, with capacity for some #1 & #2.  We have FAR more rigs working for Aramco today. Few, if any, of the new rigs are doing workovers (yes more are done as the price rises, but not THAT many more).

So we are in-fill drilling and developing mature fields at a dramatic rate or new/immature fields (Manifa among them) are being developed.

Half of the US GoM offshore rigs (almost 90) have been leased by Aramco and are being towed to the "other Gulf" (from memory).  I do not see those rigs in the graph above (yet).

I suspect that KSA is looking for new prospects (including NG) offshore) and developing what is known.  Still, the rig #s are outstanding given that most KDA production is onshore.

Best Hopes,

Alan

Yes, there's a lag.  The oil industry types at PO.com said the lag was typically three years, I think.  Or something like that.  
Good. Keep doing that. It works good.
US e&p's typically take 20 days spud to spud when drilling around 5-7000 ft deep.  Infill drilling requires minimum new pipelines, etc, particularly when volume is not increasing much, if any.  So, in an assembly type operation, new wells could come on line every 20 days for every rig drilling.  FOr sa, they have been adding rigs very steadily, so the new rigs should be adding to production almost as soon as they arrive on site.  In some cases in the us permits are required, presumably not necessary in sa.

A new discovery is completely different, requiring new infrastructure etc before the first well can come on line. However, once again aramco presumably does not need to wait for permits, so this type of delay probably does not occur there.  If on shore and not, say, deep in the rub-al-khali, I would guess a new discovery could begin producing within 3 years. Of course, rigs would not begin drilling in regions where the infrastructure is not yet in place; every available rig will be drilling for immediate production somewhere.  

With 3x rigs drilling and, apparently, declining production, one might conclude that new wells are producing less than 1/3 what they used to.  And, the situation may be worse - it used to be that a fraction (half?) were drilling for oil, others for ng and water, while with declining oil production one might assume that most new rigs are drilling for oil.  

All rather alarming, if true... perhaps there is some other explanation. In the absence of such, I will assume that sa will not be adding to world production when quotas come off.

There seems to be renewed interest in NG in KSA.  Statements about more coming on0line etc.

Perhaps field development somewhere requires large amounts of NG to be injected, or KSA needs more domestically (instead of buying NG from Qatar, etc.).

Alan

Just to clarify - the numbers above are strictly oil rigs.  BH also say there are 23 rigs drilling for NG in KSA, which is roughly double the counts through 2005.  That gives a total of 76 between oil and gas.  Schlumberger's count for the combined total is 84 in October.  Not sure the reason for the discrepancy, but it may be as simple as counting as of different dates in the month.  Schlumberger says that 74/84 are operating on land, while Baker Hughes says 69/76 are on land.  So if you are correct that there are 40 odd offshore rigs on the way to KSA from GoM, that is going to cause the counts to rise a lot higher yet.
Looks like blind panic to me.  Imagine hundreds of rigs drilling away through the endless sands...

Meanwhile we will see less production in our own gulf as more and more rigs are poached.


So, it wasn't tod pleadings, but an oped in the dc post that was irrisistable... may we infer you've been doing something useful in the corridors of power to save the free world as we know it?

:-)  I suppose it's fair I explain somewhat.  I've been a) earning a living, and b) working my way towards starting another company which may, I fondly hope, eventually help with the problem, albeit in an indirect way.  I also found after I came back from summer vacation that I just wasn't obsessed with the subject any more.  I kind of think I mostly understand the issues, my views on the subject have been pretty stable for 6-9 months, and each additional days reading and/or writing wasn't making much difference to my understanding (and therefore wasn't that compelling).  I kept meaning to come back and never getting to it....

So going forward, I'll probably post occasionally, but not with the frequency of before.

I probably speak for many in hoping that you find time to update your curves on occasion.  But, we realize that new companies can be absorbing, too.  GOod luck.<