DrumBeat: February 27, 2007

Scientists to U.N.: "Tens of billions" needed to combat global warming

UNITED NATIONS — To head off the worst of climate change, governments must pour tens of billions of dollars more than they are into clean-energy research and enforce sharp rollbacks in fossil-fuel emissions, an expert scientific panel reported to the United Nations on Tuesday.

The U.N. itself must better prepare to help tens of millions of "environmental refugees," the group said, and authorities everywhere should discourage new building on land less than one meter — 39 inches — above sea level.

The article includes some interesting Flash graphics.

Peak Oil: An Update

After two decades of almost continuous growth, global oil production has been stagnant around 84 million barrels a day for the past two years. This, of course, is exactly consistent with the peak oil hypothesis, which predicts that supply constraints will force up prices, destroying growth in demand.

It will be some years before we can tell for certain, but it is entirely possible that we're in the middle of peak oil right now. That's certainly consistent with the predictions of Kenneth Deffeyes, Colin Campbell, Matthew Simmons, and other geologists and oil industry analysts.


Smoke and mirrors

Each year in the July issue of the Monthly Oil Report, the International Energy Agency in Paris (IEA) publishes their first forecast for next year’s supply and demand. The geographic area where the IEA should have the best chance of making accurate predictions must be non-Opec ex FSU. In this area there is limited civil upheaval and political interference with the oil industry.

Since their forecast made in 2002, it turns out they have increasingly overestimated production growth each consecutive year.


Nuclear Energy for the Developing World

New reactor technologies offer poorer nations cheap, safe, efficient power. Sanctions designed to prevent the proliferation of weapons impede their use. What would a better policy look like?


Macro Musings

Here are a few excerpts from Putin's forceful remarks:

"Today we are witnessing an almost uncontained hyper use of force - military force - in international relations . . . We are seeing a greater and greater disdain for the basic principles of international law . . . The United States has overstepped its national borders in every way . . . and of course this is extremely dangerous. It results in the fact that no one feels safe."

This is more than just the pot calling the kettle black. This is the soot-covered black cat hiding in a coal bin in a dark corner of the basement calling the kettle black.


How global warming goes against the grain

The place where most of the world's people could first begin to feel the consequences of global warming may come as a surprise: in the stomach, via the supper plate.

That's the view of a small but influential group of agricultural experts who are increasingly worried that global warming will trigger food shortages long before it causes better known but more distant threats, such as rising sea levels that flood coastal cities.


Zero Degrees of US Dollar Seperation

The USDollar will be defended with gold levers, with oil levers, and with military levers as the American Empire fades anything but quietly. Natural forces oppose all three devices abused as tools. One should not regard it as unpatriotic to notice what occurs, since usage of the brain is an inalienable human right. The gold levers are opposed by Asian central banks, principally China and Russia, the outspoken rebel with nuclear capability, tremendous ambition, and willingness to use energy as a formidable weapon. The oil levers are opposed by Mother Nature, who is never to be denied for long. The latest public natural victim has been the Mexican Cantarell giant oil field in rapid 15% annual decline. The military (called in true Orwellian style “defense”) levers are opposed by those who wish not to be invaded on their own turf, a defense mechanism as old as the caveman. The USDollar depends therefore upon Eastern central bankers not to act too rebelliously, upon market mechanisms disobeying Mother Nature, and upon guerrilla fighters not prevailing. One can comfortably count on lost ground on all three fronts, over time. One should always remain aware that gold, oil, and the military are connected by zero degrees of separation.


Two Emerging-Market Oil Giants

I remain bullish about the prospects of the oil patch for several reasons. There is continued demand growth from developing nations such as India, China, and Brazil, and OPEC estimates that global oil consumption will increase 1.6% in 2007. In addition, there's a global scarcity of spare refining capacity, declining production rates in key regions such as the North Sea, Alaska, and Mexico's Cantarell field, and the uncertain political environment in many oil-producing nations such as Nigeria, Venezuela, Iraq, and Iran.


US's Iraq oil grab is a done deal

US President George W Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney might as well declare the Iraq war over and out. As far as they - and the humongous energy interests they defend - are concerned, only now is the mission really accomplished. More than half a trillion dollars spent and perhaps half a million Iraqis killed have come down to this.


Japan and Russia Agree To Increase Energy Relations

Japan and Russia have pledged to strengthen reciprocal relations in oil and natural gas development and increase trade at a ministerial meeting in Tokyo.


A Practical Use for Waste Methane

A direct method of converting methane into useful chemical compounds could reduce the release of the potent greenhouse gas at isolated oil fields.


TXU's emissions U-turn shocks power industry

TXU Corp.'s decision to whittle down plans to build 11 carbon-spewing, coal-fired power plants as part of its buyout deal with private-equity firms sent a chill Monday through both Wall Street and Washington, signaling that utilities can no longer afford to ignore climate change.


Big Ideas for a Greener World

Alternative energy companies are vying for investor dollars with some audacious approaches to providing cheap, clean energy.


Wishful thinking is no magical energy elixir

The U.S. Energy Information Administration believes the practical limit for domestic ethanol production is about 700,000 barrels per day -- in 2030. In 23 years, that will translate into about 6 percent of the U.S. transportation fuels market.


Quantum Awarded Contract to Expand Hydrogen Hybrid Vehicle and Refueling Infrastructure Programs for U.S. Army


Ontario may wait weeks for gas shortage relief

A gasoline shortage that started with Imperial Oil's Esso stations in southern Ontario is spreading to competing companies as efforts to restablish fuel supplies are hampered by weather.

A winter storm on Monday delayed repairs to Imperial Oil's Nanticoke refinery, which was hit by a fire two weeks ago. That incident cut production at the plant in half.

The problem, which was made worse by the recent CN Rail strike and a December fire at another Imperial Oil refinery in Sarnia, Ont., has started to force other companies to ration gasoline at the pumps. In some instances, pumps are being shut off because they have no fuel to sell.


Kenya: China Selling Off Oil Rights It Got for Free

There was outrage among European oil exploration companies interested in Kenya when it emerged last week that the state-owned National Oil Corporation of China - CNOOC - has quietly put out notices offering to farm out to third parties some of the oil exploration blocks granted to it by President Mwai Kibaki in April last year.


Saudis Say Terrorism Possible in French Attack; 4th Man Dies

Saudi Arabian authorities don't rule out terrorism in the killing of four Frenchmen, including two Schneider Electric SA employees, in the kingdom, holder of the world's largest oil reserves.


Relocalisation - acting locally on global issues

Peak oil is one of those ideas that have spun into mainstream thinking from society’s innovative fringe. What is interesting is how readily the idea has been accepted and how influential and knowledgeable people, some having an association with the oil industry, support it.


Backward and forward - Board looks at future of energy, financial history of county fair

A decreased supply and increased costs will impact all areas of life as we know it, including food production and distribution (the average food in the U.S. travels 1,200 miles from farm to table), transportation, housing, medicine and plastics as well as all government services such as police, fire, emergency, health care, housing, education and planning.


Need For A Balancing Act: Reducing Oil Dependence Without Triggering A Global Crisis

Three facts underscore the importance of the debate about the future of oil: oil is a finite resource; oil is one of the major anthropogenic sources of carbon dioxide; and the world economy is heavily dependent on oil, especially in the transportation sector. The most important questions are: How do we balance depletion, the environment, and economic growth – remembering that “we” includes human beings in oil-exporting countries as well as those in oil-consuming countries? Will the transition to new energy sources be seamless and easy, for oil-exporters as well as for oil-importers? How will oil-producing countries react to the non-market based efforts of oil-consuming countries to reduce their dependence on oil? Should oil-producing and oil-consuming countries cooperate to make the transition to new energy sources as painless as possible for all parties? Will these efforts at cooperation succeed in the long run if they are not market-based efforts?


Greatest Expectations

With the advent of Peak Oil, dreams of a world free of nuclear energy are fading. But, just like nuclear weapons, nuclear disarmament looms over us like a specter. They both wreak havoc with our peace of mind -- the first a threat to our existence, the second to our consciences.


Kunstler critiques urban planning, oil shortage

Humanities Symposium keynote speaker James Howard Kunstler spoke critically about the nation's energy sources, and the plan for the future to a packed audience in McManus Theater last Tuesday.


Tech giants join to cut industry's power needs

For Advanced Micro Devices' Bruce Shaw, combating the technology sector's impending energy crisis ``is the biggest problem facing the industry today.''


Costa Rica to cooperate with Dominicans in abating energy crisis


Zambia: Bio-Fuel - Experts Call for Caution

Bio-energy can succeed in Zambia if energy crops do not impact on food security but provide opportunities to benefit small-scale farmers who may be engaged in growing Jatropha.


Biofuels can replace oil

A comprehensive look shows that for every one unit of energy you put into growing the soy bean to crushing the oil to converting it to biodiesel, you get 2.2 back out. Ethanol has a lower return of about 1.2, but it is still a positive return. This article will take a closer look at these biofuels and offer solutions that are in the works.


Pakistan: Oil and gas production declined by 4.8% in H1

The total oil and gas production decreased by 4.8 percent during the first half of current financial year compared with the corresponding period of last year due to a decline in output by some major fields.


Venezuela to seize foreign oil projects

President Hugo Chavez ordered by decree on Monday the takeover of oil projects run by foreign oil companies in Venezuela's Orinoco River region.


Global warming a hot spot for investors

Droughts. Hurricanes. Rising temperatures. Melting glaciers. In a world abuzz with talk about global warming, climate change is elbowing aside tech and biotech as the major investment theme of the future.

Wall Street's savviest analysts are devising ways to cash in on crazy weather, just as they did in response to the profound changes brought on by the dawn of the digital age, globalization and the graying of America.


Price of gasoline continues to climb


Hydro may be striking more oil

Norwegian industrial concern Norsk Hydro reportedly has made a promising new oil and gas discovery in the Barents Sea, but it's also causing serious environmental concerns.


Oil exploration hits fishermen in Indonesia's Aceh

Oil exploration has cost fishermen in Indonesia's Aceh province more than two million dollars in income by damaging their nets and fish traps, a regional community leader said Tuesday.


The Oil Depletion Protocol: An Interview with Richard Heinberg


London mayor to announce climate change strategy

According to The Guardian, the mayor's office will set aside 47 million pounds in next year's budget to jump-start plans to cut carbon emissions in London by 60 percent by 2025.


Scientists wary of Lake Superior warming

Austin, a Duluth professor and a researcher with the University of Minnesota-Duluth's Large Lakes Observatory, has studied decades of data. What he found was water temperatures rising almost twice as fast as air temperatures — more than 4 degrees for the average surface temperature.

The increase is having dramatic effects.


Western states united to bypass Bush on climate

Five Western U.S. states have formed the latest regional pact to bypass the Bush administration to cut emissions linked to global warming through market mechanisms.


Dung power at U.S. ethanol plant


Sweden restarts nuclear reactors

Two of three Swedish nuclear reactors shut down this month following minor incidents were restarted this week, the Nuclear Power Inspectorate (SKI) said on Friday.


Enron prosecutor takes on Navajo uranium cleanup

The Southern California lawyer who successfully prosecuted top Enron executives has been hired by the Navajo tribal government to seek a full cleanup of the old uranium mines contaminating the country's largest reservation.


Nuclear station's challenges laid out

Count Silverio Garcia, a former supervisor and long-time worker at Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, was the least surprised person last week when the Nuclear Regulatory Commission downgraded the plant to being the most monitored in the country.

Garcia has been on a mission for more than a decade, pointing out to federal regulators all the wrongs he says he has seen.

The Feb 13 Oil Market Report from the IEA is now released for free, they show KSA at 8.42 mbpd for dec and jan.

Richlev, I am having trouble finding that figure of 8.42 mb/d. On both pages 13 and 14 I am getting the figure of 8.8 mb/d for December and no figures for January. Am I looking in the right place? Or am I using the wrong URL?

http://omrpublic.iea.org/omrarchive/13feb07full.pdf

Ron Patterson

Ron, see Table 3 on Page 46 of

http://omrpublic.iea.org/currentissues/full.pdf

If you search for "Saudi" in that document, you will also see references to 8.7 mbd for December 2006 and January 2007. Go Figure.

Calorie, thanks a million. This clears it up. I was accessing the archives copy. That copy is dated Feb 13, and apparently there have been some changes since then.

As for the different figures in different places, I think the lower figure is crude oil only and the higher figure is all liquids.

Thanks again

Ron Patterson

I'm sorry to repost that, but I think it may interest somebody.

This is the hypothetical Saudi decline, following a 8% decline rate since 9/05:

9/05 (0% decline): 9,5 mbpd
11/06 (9,34%): 8,6127
2/07 (11,34%): 8,4227
3/07 (12%): 8,36
4/07 (12,67%): 8,29635
5/07 (13,34%): 8,2327
6/07 (14%): 8,17
7/07-(14,67%): 8,10635
8/07-(15,34%): 8,0427
9/07-(16%): 7,98

I'm sorry to repost that, but I think it may interest somebody.

This is the hypothetical Saudi decline, following a 8% decline rate since 9/05:

9/05
9,5 mbpd (0% decline)
11/06 8,6127 (9,34%)
2/07 8,4227 (11,34%)
3/07 8,36 (12%)
4/07 8,29635 (12,67%)
5/07 8,2327 (13,34%)
6/07 8,17 (14%)
7/07 8,10635 (14,67%)
8/07 8,0427 (15,34%)
9/07 7,98 (16%)

Manmax, I do not think anyone expects Saudi to continue to decline at 8%. I think their existing giant fields are indeed declining at a rate of 8% but they are bringing some new oil on line. But the argument is, at least my argument is, this new oil will not make up for the decline in their old giant fields. They will decline, in my opinion, every year for many years, but not necessarly by 8%.

Ron Patterson

I understand, it was just a guideline to follow the numbers of the Saudi production, in order to know how far they are from a 8% decline.

Looks like all world markets are in for some adjustments today:

U.S. Stock-Index Futures Fall; Newmont Drops After China Plunge

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aXxoqW5OM1o4&refer=h...

Dow drops over 100 points in the first half-hour. I think the "Plunge Protection Team" will get some OT today...

Markets don't come with safety nets. If the bubble in China is bursting, which is possible since their stocks just had the biggest fall in a decade, then the idea that a small group of people could prevent the effects being felt here is not credible. In 1929 people thought a group of wealthy bankers would step in and prevent a crash, but it wasn't possible then and it isn't possible now.

Stoneleigh, I agree. The myth of the “Plunge Protection Team” started with an article in The Washington Post in 1997:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/business/longterm/blackm/plunge.htm

And it is even listed in “Wikipedia”.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plunge_Protection_Team

Founded in 1988 after the 1987 stock market crash, it theoretically ensures the stability of the financial markets, prevents liquidity problems, and ensures that stock market hiccups do not cause bank runs. Some Wall Street bears believe that it buys stock index futures or uses other methods to help keep the American stock markets afloat.

In theory and rumor, it prevents stock market crashes and bank runs. In reality it does not exist. Well, a group really does exist:

It includes the Secretary of the Treasury, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, the Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

And what can these guys do to prevent a stock market crash. Absolutely nothing!

Ron Patterson

All comments are accurate, but we should make a distinction in what the PPT can do in an already up market. If you look at the sell off in May followed by the rally the rest of the year, I can buy some of the argument that a PPT was keeping it going so to speak. Without a correction and everyone buying already, a PPT can increase the bids and push it higher than most bears thought possible. However that only works in a low VIX world, but now it's popped over 20% today alone!

Markets are more about perception than reality and behavioral finance will explode in popularity as people seek to understand why it was they we all lost our asses.

Without a correction and everyone buying already, a PPT can increase the bids and push it higher than most bears thought possible.

Tate, I do not understand your reasoning here. “Everyone buying already?” If everyone is buying already then there is no need for a Plunge Protection Team because the market is going up, not down. But that being said, how can they increase the bids? Remember we are talking about the Secretary of the Treasury, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, the Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. These guys do not buy stock. They have absolutely no power to increase any bid. No one in the government is allowed to buy stock with government money!

Ron Patterson

I don't know what Hank Paulsen did today. He didn't tell me. Duh. One thing I don't believe he did was sit around feeling or being powerless. I don't believe he was busy being a disinterested hapless observer.

Not that you are not entirely correct (in a formal way), but as the distinction between government and private blurs these days, it gives me pause.

Mind commenting on the Sprott study I posted below? I would appreciate your opinion.

Sam, the study has very serious flaws which leads me to believe that it is mostly fiction. From page 2:

The Plunge Protection team is not merely concerned with the stability of the stock market. Speaking in 2001 as a correspondent for ABC’s “Good Morning America,” Stephanopoulous also revealed that at the time the Long Term Capital Management crisis in 1998, the Federal Reserve directed large banks to prop up the currency markets.

A couple of problems here; the Federal Reserve does not have the power to tell banks how to invest their money. Buying currency in order to try to prop up the currency would involve enormous risk. And unless the Fed would be held liable for those risk, no bank in their right mind would go along with it. And it would be illegal for the Fed to accept responsibility for any losses.

And the second thing wrong with that statement is that such an endeavor would be useless anyway. Since the initiation of the FOREX, no bank has enough money to prop up any major currency, especially the US dollar, for more than thirty minutes.

http://www.tradingacademy.com/forextrading.htm

Daily volume in the currency markets is around $1.5 trillion. By comparison, the NYSE daily volume averages $25 billion a day.

Daily volume on the FOREX market is sixty times the daily volume, in dollars, of the NYSE. 1.5 trillion is a lot of change. No bank has enough money, especially enough risk money, to even attempt to intervene and sway such a market.

To put it mildly, I simply do not believe it.

Ron Patterson

Thx!

If you play with real money it is not necessary to put up trillions to sway the currency markets. Central banks prop up currencies every day as a normal matter of business. Always have.

True, but like some others have pointed out, are you really going to live in an insulated world to think it's not possible? I'm simply a bit more cynical in my short years. I read too much. I know my parents fu*cked this up and now this bull$hit is about to hit the fan.

Hey Ron I read Policy Pete who talks periodically about the PPT and he points to this site

Here is a reference to a study on surreptitious US Govt intervention in the US markets. Move Over Adam Smith: The Invisible Hand of Uncle Sam(.pdf) or this summary.

Why that report comes from Sprott Asset Management!! Aren't they a buncha hipies? Conspiracy theorists? Rumor mongers? Fags? Commies? Don't believe a word of it I tell you. All tables are fair, we deal from the top of the deck, no dice loaded.

Dow down 500 points. Needless to say, that triggered trading curbs to limit the decline...

What caused it to turn around and reverse 150 points before again heading downwards? Very curious.

Prototypical market bounce.

Garth

Then why did CNBC say that the traders on the floor had never seen anything like it? There was incredible downward momentum when it turned around.

Check out these...

http://blogs.wsj.com/marketbeat/2007/02/27/tabulation-trouble

http://forum.themarkettraders.com/read-m/71/2635

Note this did not start with China like they are claiming now. I have been watching MBS' particularly sub prime for two weeks really hard. IN the last eight days the lower credit was being BLOWN out. I mean up to yesterday they were down 40%. No one was buying. I MEAN NO ONE JUST LIKE TODAY! The sellers were in a classic liquidty trap and bids were non existant.

Now the tranches of sub prime im talking about are BBB- and it started working its way UP the credit spreads. Before you knew it the spreadh blew up 100 bps in a two day period last week. I said to a co worker yesterday NO BS, I think in the next two weeks, this unwinding starts. I didnt anticipate this, but my portfolio F#ucking performed! One port had 6% gains for the DAY! I wish it were all real money!

Anyway tomorrow wont be easier. THere is rumors that derivatives positions have been CRUSHED. Tomorrow is the last day of the month and new positions for next month will be adjusted for the new fear. BTW....VIX went up 60% TODAY ALONE. Sellers to buying voulume hit 50:1 at one point. THat was EARLY and i didnt see what it finished at. I know according to this chart...https://image.minyanville.com/assets/FCK/File/Reamer227a.JPG

Down volume hit a NEW record at 77.6 (not on this graph tho) against the old record 55.8 in FEB 2000. Folks the SHTF in econ terms anyway.

CNBC reported that there are huge amounts of unexecuted sell orders out there.

I remember a real estate pro a few weeks ago--who was bearish--commenting that he was seeing people buying houses on 100% financing that he would not rent one of his houses to.

deleted

the market will not crash from a lack of liquidity. Today's move just erases the last three month's gains... China is already bouncing back. i see this as just an overdue correction.

You keep seeing it that way and lets talk again this summer. This is barely the beginning. No one wants to talk about derivative losses. We've NEVER dealt with derivatives to the tune of $240 TRILLION notional value. That's 10X the world market! It's insane and the more imporant point is this. In April Japan raised rates on the Yen and in May look what happened. Japan recently raised rates again and with a little help from China yesterday morning we can see what the Yen carry trade has undone thus far.

All I asked for is volatility and it's finally back. Up 64% yesterday on a SMALL 3% drop. And you think this is a simple correction? Ok, lets agree to discuss this again in three full months.

CNN reported that there were computer glitches that caused a long delay (like, an hour) in the price reporting. So when they finally got it fixed, it looked like the Dow fell off a cliff. It didn't, really, but the "missing time" made it look like it did.

I watched it on youtube later and it was amazing to watch in under 5 mins.

my question is this.... when stocks go down, people move their money to bonds and gold right?.. gold markets open at 8am.. nyse at 9:30. If you were paying attention earlier in the morning, everyone was calling for a big drop; wsj ran a headline saying something to that effect before 9am, but if you look at the 1-day gold prices, they plunged right before the nyse bell, then fought back to even, and seesawed all day.
bonds did something similar it seems.

I am no economist, but my take on it is that "they" have kinda trapped people into the market. What would they do with their money if they pull it out?, gold is (was) down, bonds are down, and real estate? ( it would be better to get it in large bills and burn it for heat..). leave it in cash? (see previous). I think a small manipulation in the gold and bonds market can completely control the stock market.

Kalpa asks:

What caused it to turn around and reverse 150 points before again heading downwards?

Ron's mythical PPT.

I suggest that Ron go back and read the financial papers published after the LTD problem in 1998; there were several storiesa about Greenspan convening a meeting of bankers with the purpose of limiting the negative effects of such. So it is clear that the Fed chairman does have some ability to affect the market directly.

there were several storiesa about Greenspan convening a meeting of bankers with the purpose of limiting the negative effects of such. So it is clear that the Fed chairman does have some ability to affect the market directly.

Sceptical, you must explain that one. Stories about Greenspan meeting with Bankers to limit the effects of what? A plunge in the stock market? And just what could the bankers do, buy stock? Do you actually think the Federal Reserve banks, or other banks actually bought into the market today in order to stop the plunge?

Banks are in business to make money. They would not buy into a falling market unless they thought they could make a buck by doing it. And there are banking regulations that limit the amount of money a bank can invest in equities. After all, it is not their money, it belongs to the depositors.

Ron Patterson