DrumBeat: May 23, 2007

Oil rises after US report confirms fears of tight gasoline supply

Oil rose after the US reported gasoline inventories remained low just days before the peak demand summer driving season kicks off. The US Energy Information Administration said gasoline stocks rose 1.5 mln barrels in the week to May 18 but remain 'well below the lower end of the average range' in its weekly snapshot of fuel inventories.

Simon Wardell, Global Insight analyst, said gasoline stocks should be rising more sharply in May and June, but refinery outages have stopped inventories from building. Some market players were 'hoping for a bigger build (in gasoline),' he said, adding today's rise was not enough to ease concerns of tight gasoline supply ahead of the peak demand period.

EIA Inventory Report Highlights

Refineries operated at 91.1 percent of their operable capacity last week. U.S. crude oil imports averaged nearly 10.9 million barrels per day last week, up 560,000 barrels per day from the previous week. Over the last four weeks, crude oil imports have averaged over 10.6 million barrels per day, or 563,000 barrels per day more than averaged over the same four-week period last year. Total motor gasoline imports (including both finished gasoline and gasoline blending components) last week averaged 1.3 million barrels per day.

U.S. commercial crude oil inventories (excluding those in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve) rose by 2.0 million barrels compared to the previous week. At 344.2 million barrels, U.S. crude oil inventories are just above the upper end of the average range for this time of year. Total motor gasoline inventories climbed by 1.5 million barrels last week, but remain well below the lower end of the average range. Distillate fuel inventories increased by 0.5 million barrels per day, and are just below the upper end of the average range for this time of year.

Total products supplied over the last four-week period has averaged 20.8 million barrels per day, or 2.2 percent above the same period last year. Over the last four weeks, motor gasoline demand has averaged nearly 9.4 million barrels per day, or 1.2 percent above the same period last year.

Who’s most to blame for record-high gas prices?

Poster: Albert A. Bartlett

Comment: Demand for petroleum is close to exceeding supply, a situation that was predicted in 1956 by M. King Hubbert. Hubbert made many reports to the Congress in following years, pointing out these facts very clearly. The Congress has ignored the reports for decades. The Congress is to blame for the high price of petroleum in the U.S. The same thing is happening with natural gas. Production has peaked in North America, so prices will rise substantially every year from now on.

Oil inches up ahead of stockpile report

U.S. government stock data is due for release at 10:30 ET. A Reuters poll of analysts has forecast a 1.4 million barrel rise in gasoline inventories over the week as refiners lifted output ahead of the Memorial Day holiday this weekend, which marks the start of the summer driving season.

Gas prices at new heights; at $3.50 a gallon, some put brakes on holiday plans

Whether prices go even higher this spring and summer, this year’s peak will far eclipse previous local records of about $3.10 a gallon set during the last two summers. Current prices are about twice what they were when regular bottomed out in the $1.70s a gallon in mid-January.

Eastern Germany's sunny future

Germany has invested $1.3 billion in photovoltaic research over the past decade, creating a $5 billion industry that accounts for 52% of the world's installed solar panels. Of 45 producers in Germany, 33 are start-ups in the former East Germany, employing 70% of the industry's 8,000 workers, with 2,000 new jobs on the way. Even companies headquartered in the west have most of their production in the east.

Impact of rising gas prices 'fairly limited', economists say

Drivers may be griping about record high gasoline costs, but the recent surge in the price at the pump will have little impact on most consumers and will be hardly noticed in the broad economy, say several economists, including those at Standard & Poor's, LaSalle Bank and the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.

The Pros And Cons Of 'Price Gouging'

As gas prices rise a coalition of Democratic governors, including New Jersey’s John Corzine (left), have issued a letter to President Bush urging him to support legislation working its way through Congress that would prevent “price gouging” at the pump and help them pressure oil companies into reinvesting profits to increase their capacity.

House plans pre-holiday vote on gas price gouging

The bill makes it unlawful for anyone to sell crude oil, gasoline, natural gas or petroleum distillates at a price that is "unconscionably excessive" or "indicates the seller is taking unfair advantage of unusual market conditions to increase prices unreasonably." The legislation leaves enforcement to the Federal Trade Commission. Punishment for a corporation can include fines up to $150 million and for individual fines up to $2 million and up to two years in prison.

Tyson Slocum, director of the Energy Program for Public Citizen, charged that the major oil companies have not re-invested their "windfall profits" into ways to ease prices for consumers but rather into dividends and stock buybacks.

BP leak causes further chaos at Prudhoe Bay

Oil giant BP has been forced to shut down a quarter of its operations at its Alaskan oil field following a water pipe leak. The company, which discovered the leak on Monday, said it expected production at its Prudhoe Bay field to be down by around 25,000 barrels per day while action is taken to repair the leak to a processing facility which separates water from crude oil. "We expect the facility to be down a few days while repairs are made," said BP spokesman Ronnie Chappell yesterday, giving details about how long the damage could take to repair.

Russia slams US bill to sue OPEC groups

Russia said the US House of Representatives broke international law when voting to approve a bill to allow the US government to sue OPEC and similar organisations for price manipulations. "This decision is a violation of the norms of international law," Vesti 24 state channel quoted a statement by Russia's Foreign Ministry as saying.

A few extra stories from Stoneleigh:

India to seek exploration rights in Iraqi oil fields - oil minister

India will offer Iraq help in building refineries in the war-torn nation in return for oil explorations rights when Iraqi oil minister visits here later this week, the Press Trust of India reported.

Russian oil companies increase drilling 37.8% in Jan-April

Russian oil companies drilled 278,500 meters of exploration wells in January 2007, up 37.8% year-on-year, in addition to 4.2 million meters of production wells (also up 37.8%).

Gazprom to press on with EU investment

Gazprom, the Russian gas monopoly, pledged on Tuesday to press ahead with downstream investments in the European Union in spite of uncertainty generated by worsening relations between Moscow and Brussels.

Alexander Medvedev, deputy chairman, insisted the group would stick to its existing programme of diversifying outside Russia and investing in the EU.

"Our strategy was already announced several years ago to become a leading world energy company which will participate in all parts of the value chain and with a diversified portfolio of products and diversified geographical activity," he told the FT in an interview.

Brazil energy minister quits on corruption accusation

Rondeau, 54, said he is innocent of the accusations, but said that he would resign "to avoid jeopardizing the energy sector ... and so that the image of the government is not affected in any way."

A Federal Police report leaked to the press raised suspicions that Rondeau had received 50,000 dollars from Gautama Construction, accused of involvement in a public works fraud network, which led to the detention last week of 47 persons, including politicians, businessmen and bankers.

Gazprom exec: natural gas pact unlikely

The idea of natural gas producers forming their own cartel akin to OPEC is increasingly unlikely, the deputy chief executive of OAO Gazprom told a German magazine.

In a report set to be published Thursday by Capital magazine, Deputy CEO Alexander Medvedev was quoted as saying that it would be difficult for natural gas producers to form such an organization to mirror the structure of the Vienna-based Organization Petroleum Exporting Countries.

"Our business is based very much on long-term supply contracts. It is therefore impossible to develop a cartel mechanism like OPEC," Capital quoted Medvedev as saying.

EIA Chief:US Retail Gasoline Prices Aren't At Peak Yet

Record gasoline prices are expected to continue until at least June due to ongoing U.S. refinery production problems and low imports, the head of the Energy Information Administration said Monday.

EIA chief Guy Caruso concurred with suggestions that U.S. retail gasoline prices haven't hit a peak yet.

"No, I am very hesitant to say we've reached the peak, mainly because we have ongoing problems in Nigeria, which are very important not only to the light sweet crudes, but Nigeria itself is having to import gasoline, putting pressure on the global market for refined products," he told reporters on the sidelines of an energy seminar.

US looks set for trade war with Chinese

The 14 Chinese ministers, led by Vice-Premier Wu Yi, appear not to have brought any concessions strong enough to satisfy the growing US anti-China lobby.

The cover of the latest edition of The Economist, reflecting this mood, features a panda version of King Kong marauding through New York, and the headline "America's Fear of China".

Democrats who now control the US Congress complain about China's $283 billion trade surplus with the US last year, claiming it is substantially due to an undervaluing of the yuan that helps China's exporters, and are calling for a revaluation of up to 40 per cent.

A week ago a trade panel voted to impose special duties of up to 44.3 per cent on imports of polyester fibre from China. A few weeks earlier, the US imposed duties on glossy paper imports.

Several items of new legislation, including one that would impose a 27 per cent tariff on all Chinese goods, and five concerning currency issues alone, are on the table. Their introduction would lead to a full-scale trade war.

Once and Future Environmental Leader?

Brazil appears to be about to pass over a prime opportunity to affirm itself as a leading environmental power in negotiations to bring the threat of global warming under control, according to environmentalists and analysts.

Crowned with the dubious honour of being one of the five countries that produce the most greenhouse gases, Brazil is unique in that three-quarters of its emissions of these gases are due to deforestation.

A drastic reduction in deforestation could be achieved simply by enforcing what is already official policy: that is, stemming the advance of agricultural and mining activities as they illegally encroach on the Amazon rainforest.

But the administration of President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is refusing to commit to specific emission reduction targets, which so far are compulsory for only 35 industrialised countries.

Saudis to top Baker Hughes books

An executive at Baker Hughes said today the US oil service company expects Saudi Arabia's state oil company Saudi Aramco to become its largest customer in 2007, replacing both the UK's BP and Us giant ExxonMobil, which have historically vied for that role.

Kuwait drops peg in body blow to Gulf currency union

Kuwait unshackled its dinar from the tumbling U.S. dollar on Sunday and switched the exchange rate mechanism to a basket of currencies, throwing plans for currency union with other Gulf Arab oil producers into disarray.

Kuwait's central bank, which battled speculators for weeks to defend the peg, said the dollar's slide against other currencies had forced it to break ranks with fellow Gulf states to contain inflation from the rising cost of some imports.

Serendipity - I was just wondering if this link, http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2007/05/28/100049... , had been posted. Pretty hard numbers, which is not always the case.

No need to check about the link further - it is either double posted, or this is a first post.

I will stick it in there. Not sure if Stoneleigh is managing the Drumbeat this morning. (Stoneleigh, if you are about to post a bunch of stories, you can change the Drumbeat author to yourself.)

I'll do one tomorrow, but please feel free to add to it as you know more US sources than I do. If I do DrumBeats too often the non-Canadians will get bored :)

By the way, if any readers have articles that they'd like to see in the Drumbeat while Leanan is away, they can send me the links at Stoneleigh2006(at)msn(dot)com and I'll add them.

Feel free to throw your own stories in there as well. I have 2 sources that I use. I get a constant news feed at work that sometimes has stories that I don't see anywhere else. On top of that I do Google News searches for keywords like "peak oil", "gas prices", "energy conservation", etc.

Where's Leanan? Just some time off I hope?

Vacation.

Whoa, that's an early Drumbeat. If some stories don't start popping up soon, I will try to stick some in there. Today's inventory report promises to be interesting. If we see anything less than a healthy gasoline build, it's off to the races again. But I think we are likely to see a build, and gasoline prices to soften by middle of June.

They ran Ethanol Demand Is Boosting Food Prices Worldwide on SlashDot yesterday. It's worth a browse and it's a good demonstration of comment moderation. If you look at the 36 3+ comments they aren't too uninformed. If you go below that into the rest of the 462 comments, well... you can see what the average computer nerd is thinking. Not much general knowledge about energy and even less about agriculture.

hence the crude oil to rise?

Crude supplies have surprised me lately; rising when I thought they would fall. Normally I would expect high refinery runs to be pulling on the inventories, but the recent refinery problems have resulted in crude builds. I won't be surprised to see another crude build, but I expect to see crude inventories fall, and gasoline and distillate inventories rise.

I know my gasoline prediction is in line with that of the analysts, but I don't think I have seen predictions for crude and distillates.

Bloomberg survey: Crude +0.6 million, Gasoline +1.20 million, Distillates +1.30 million, Refinery Utilisation +0.45%

Reuters: Crude +0.60 million, Gasoline +1.40 million, Distillates +1.20 million, Refinery utilisation +0.40%

Could it be that the SPR not buying oil is causing the rise?

I was having a quick look at the ExxonMobil 2006 annual report today: http://www.exxonmobil.com

While the bottom line is 135% reserves replacement ratio, 75% of their reserves additions were through purchases! (746 out of 990 million barrels, before year end price effects). Somebody else lost a lot or got completely swallowed to give Exxon such a rosy shine :-)

Year end price effects added another 325 million barrels, so total additions were 1315 against production of 976. Don't know why year end revisions were so high, especially because the oil price at the end of 2006 was about the same as end of 2005.

cheers
Phil

www.philhart.com

So, according to your numbers, their production was 733Mb and they found new reserves of 244Mb, so they only replaced 1/3 of their reserves... actually, it is even worse than this WRT liquids...
THey are booking new gas reserves in Qatar and calling them 'boe'; production from old fields are mostly liquid while new reserves are mostly lesser value stranded gas... and, worse still, their investements and 'reserves' in Venezuela are disappearing. IMO, gassier xom will find oily oxy irrisistable at, say, a modest $60B.

XOM does not just know the future, they are in it.

And yet they continue to push demand up as much as possible with their denials of peak oil and their denials of global warming.

Good guess about Occidental, if XOM doesn't want them, Chevron or Connoco-Phillips will. The annual report also boasted about 11,000 acres in the Newark Barnett Shale (Fort Worth), and their land acquisitions in the Piance Basin. That's all economicially marginal gas, but its their first significant onshore US plays in 30 years. They also have a big woodford-barnett play in the Marfa basin, not in their report. I'm thinking that the political heat is making them pursue US gas exploration.
One notable absence is the Athabasca tar sands, which means they don't consider it an economic play.

These figures are oil (liquids) only. Exxon does at least report oil and gas reserves separately, unlike most of the other major oil companies, who are indeed using BOE to hide their own oil reserves failures.

Who’s most to blame for record-high gas prices?

There were lots of responses, but this one caught my eye:

Poster: Albert A. Bartlett
Comment: Demand for petroleum is close to exceeding supply, a situation that was predicted in 1956 by M. King Hubbert. Hubbert made many reports to the Congress in following years, pointing out these facts very clearly. The Congress has ignored the reports for decades. The Congress is to blame for the high price of petroleum in the U.S. The same thing is happening with natural gas. Production has peaked in North America, so prices will rise substantially every year from now on.

http://www.pbs.org/now/php/quotes.php

Maryland McMansions growing even larger

State ranks second in percentage with 4 or more bedrooms

By Timothy B. Wheeler
Sun reporter
Originally published May 23, 2007

There was nothing really wrong with the old house, Arena said, but there was no more land to add onto it. The new home is similar in layout, but each of the four main bedrooms has its own bath. At 5,600 square feet, not counting the finished basement, it's more than twice the size of their old home.

"Everybody likes the big house," says Chris Rachuba, president of the Maryland Association of Home Builders. Size still matters to high-end homebuyers bent on "keeping up with the Joneses."

"It's 'How big's your house?' Not 'What's in your house?'" Rachuba says.

Custom builders like Jim Selfridge, who constructed the Arenas' home, says relatively few of his customers seem all that concerned about rising energy costs. "Our particular market, it's still bigger and better," he said.

Builders are starting to offer energy-efficient appliances and fixtures and even solar or geothermal systems, but Selfridge says that hasn't translated into downsizing. Even empty nesters building a new home will opt for four bedrooms, Selfridge says, if only to ensure they can get a good price if they decide to sell.

http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/realestate/bal-te.md.homes23may23,0...

Meanwhile, here in Baltimore City we had ten shootings and three stabbings within a 24 hour period.

Thanks for the Bartlett comment...that is priceless.

Rick

Yeah, that gets top billing in Drumbeat for now. At least until the inventory report is released.

Letter to My Senator, Jon Tester:

Dear Senator Tester,

I watched the May 15th Senate hearings on gas prices and I was appalled. Given that you are on the Energy Committee, I wanted to clear up some blatant misrepresentations made by some of your committee colleagues. First, while I work for an oil company, let me make it clear that I am not speaking on behalf of the company. These opinions are my own.

I think politicians display a stunning degree of naivety over energy issues. The strategy seems to be to appeal to popular opinion by vilifying the oil industry. One of your campaign workers visited my house in Billings during the campaign, and I did tell him that I thought some of the things you said that were directed at the oil industry were unfair. While we do profit from high prices, we neither set nor control the prices. Workers in this industry lose their lives every year to make sure that your corner station has gas when you need it. The campaign worker told me that it wasn’t personal; that it was just politics. And I suspect that’s what the hearing last week was all about. But I want more than political posturing from my senator. That’s why I am writing this letter.

It is not clear to me whether you were at the hearing, but there is one primary issue I want to address. I listened to various senators question again and again why refiners – with their record profits – are not investing in refinery capacity. Paul Sankey, an expert witness, explained again and again that investments are being made, and that refinery capacity is at an all time high. Time and again his testimony was ignored, and the senators repeated themselves and said it didn’t make sense that capacity wasn’t being invested in. Senators Wyden, Thomas, and Menendez are 3 examples of this behaviour.

Furthermore, Senator Menendez stated “I mean there was a time that we had greater refining capacity, and the industry reduced that refining capacity…” This is simply untrue. I can provide the EIA statistics for you if you want. In the past 10 years, capacity has increased by 2 million barrels per day. In the past 5 years – when Senator Wyden harshly criticized the industry for not investing in capacity – capacity increased by 700,000 barrels per day. To put this in perspective, the expansion in the past 5 years is about double the entire ethanol capacity in the U.S. As I am not a constituent of these other senators, I can’t write them to make sure they have their facts in order. But I can make sure that you have the facts at your disposal, in case they are interested in them. The oil industry has a bad enough public relations problem. We don’t need U.S. Senators fabricating facts and putting them on the record. This is entirely unacceptable, politics or not.

If you or a staffer wish to respond to this message, please do so by e-mail as opposed to phone as I am currently on assignment in Scotland. Feel free to verify my information by calling my home number; my wife and children are still in Billings.

Sincerely,
Robert Rapier

Robert,
You are ecoming to the defence of your industry, as I would too. I have these observations.

Politicians must get elected - this is not your or my world, everything they hear goes through that filter. What you see in these hearings, and that you don't like, is highly refined filtering by people who live and die by what the average person thinks. They are at the top of the political heap, these are the most politically savvy people you will ever see. You are getting your views sent back to you with editing, take notes.

The years of making less money doesn't fly with the ave. voter. I see this all the and it makes me mad too. "Oh you are rich!" (sorry lets go back to the days where we recorded using a stamp in a ledger, and talk about being poor) "Oh! I would never live like you did!!" (Well then shut up). You will never get them to understand - never.

Americans are scandal weary. Enron? Collusion? Conspirisy? Price Setting? Average voters will not believe you - It doesn't matter what you say. Politicians know this all to well.

If you want a consumption tax I think it will have to come out of oil co profits. It is the only workable political solution. Pass it on to the customer like every other expense.

This situation is only going to get worse, and you know that. If your industry believes PO is upon us then they will need to do some business soul searching. This won't be business as usual.

I wish you luck. You are in an ever tightening vise imho.

You are ecoming to the defence of your industry, as I would too.

It is not a blanket defense, though. As I remarked in the gas prices thread, there are criticisms that are valid. My objection here is that the Senate Energy Committee, for God's sake, is spreading misinformation. Spin is one thing, but when you state factually inaccurate information in a public hearing that is covered by the media, it needs to be exposed. If they don't even know the facts, how on earth can we expect them to formulate any sort of coherent energy policy?

We are facing some tough times over the next decade, IMO. The Energy Committee needs to be well-informed if we are to have a prayer.

If you want a consumption tax I think it will have to come out of oil co profits. It is the only workable political solution. Pass it on to the customer like every other expense.

Believe it or not, I am starting to come around to the same conclusion. The problem I have is the incredibly naive view that politicians are going to make the oil companies pay for running gas prices up. Over the long-run, investment will dry up and supplies will run short faster - dramatically boosting prices. It is incredibly inefficient, and will play out over a longer period of time than a simple gas tax, but it may be the only measure that has a prayer of passing. Of course the politicians will stand around scratching their heads a few years later when gas prices have doubled again.

I admire your efforts to get the information correct. It seems obvious to me that energy is the critical issue we face. I hope you can bring this awareness to the politicians. This will not be business as usual for them either I have a feeling.

Delusional, (and Robert)

Corporate Amurkah!!!!

After what we have seen the business execs(CEOs et al) do to this countries workers,its industry and its business environment? All in the name of absolute flaming GREED?

That I would somehow TRUST the oil execs and their thin scammy screed?

Get f**king real won't you?

Those kingpins like Lee Raymond who parachute safely to ground on golden wings of unbelievable riches, taken from WHO?,,,after I see this revolting bullshit then I am to take what they say as gospel?

I take it as just more greed and ego and am not certain in the least that they give a tinker's damn for the folks in this country and our lives. Just so long as they can exist in their ivory towers and look out upon the squalid masses consuming their products and be happy that they are above it all.

Yep, fly me to Acapulco. Let me dash away from this maddening crowd, my fine clothes, my trophy wife,,etc etc...yada yada

I saw it all in my years working for the corpos.
There was a day when the employee was respected and the companies were patriotic. Now they salute the dollar and greed. They could give a shit less about us out here on the highways and byways with us wondering what the hell is going on and what will tomorrow bring.

I hope that Joe Sixpack does get this real rude awakening and rips some of their assholes out. Thats my wish.Also take the frigging politicos out on a rail with tar and feathers and would serve the filthy scum well.

They stood by idly while this country began to choke and now will die and they want CLEAN HANDS? The supposed folks who run this country and the execs who are at the top of the food chain? They want a secure lifeboat? They needn't to want to stop by my campfire on the way out of hell. They won't be welcome.

Yeppers,,I don't buy what they are touting for one solid millisecond. Its all a game to f**k us over. Yeah we grabbed the golden ring on the merry go round but only becuase they put it their in our reach and enticed us with soooooo many advertisements of the good and golden life. The life that only they seemed to get.

Airdale-forgive me but I just got off the phone with corporate hdqtrs for Andersen windows who I paid $1500 to for a piece of junk bay window put together by illegals in some hellhole distribution junkyard and all the midlevel exec could say was " sorry to hear you feel that way". A 24 page assembly and installation set of doc that might just as well have been thrown in the trash. I think no better of any corporate officers in this country where pride and quality once was practiced, at least by the working man. When they invented Corporation and Corporate law then the start of the END was just created. We are now living that end. No one is responsible yet everyone is on the take or is on the outside looking in and wanting a piece of the action.

PS.Its a rant,yes but I think some rants are in order what with the train wreck ahead on the rails and growing bigger every day. Someone besides the consumers are to blame as well for I don't see ANY clean hands out there. They used every trick in the book to screw us into their gameplans.
Cheap energy...they are still touting all their bogus claims on reserves. When will we ever learn that Corpos are born liars?

So begins the "Anger" phase in the US...this will be a long and painful phase in our history and I would be scared if I were in a political office right now.

Wait until the recession/depression hits. People are angry now, then the will be rabidly insane. Watch the news for daily attacks on Hummers and their drivers, Gas truck hijacks, gas stations on fire, etc....i wouldn't even blame them or stop them. I'm angry too.

Did someone say Hummer?
fuh2.com

Sit in the recliner by the side of the river and watch the bodies of your enemies float by. :-)

There was a report here in KC, MO yesterday about someone that broke into a U-Haul lot and drained the tanks of some the moving vans in the lot. Makes me nostalgic for the 70's.

...nostalgic for the 70's...Where are the hitch hiking girls with the "My ass, your gas" signs. That would be an eye opener for my son. LOL

RR, why do we hate the corporations so much?

Consider a post I copied down at TOD a couple of weeks ago:

***

From here...

http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/histinc/h05.html

I get $17,710 as the median income in 1980 in 1980 dollars. Then I
plug 17710 into here....

http://www.minneapolisfed.org/research/data/us/calc/

and I get $44167. Using the same table as the first link I see median
income in the last year reported (2005) as 46326.

***

5% growth in 25 years? That's worth rioting about. Yet the corporate media tell us we've living in an economic boom... we must be, because corporations now (mis)rule our roads, our utilities, our healthcare, our security, our military, our religion and both political parties, and how else can that be justified except through massive economic improvement?

Of course the average income has gone up a lot more than the median. And the executive and shareholder class are a large part of that, and have used that growing advantage to make America more unjust in every respect.

So either we scapegoat the oil companies in particular for our financial distress, a task made easier by Cheney, Bush, Rice and Khalizad all being tied to your industry while we wage war on oily Arab soil, or we get mad at the entire corporate system, which means declaring war on capitalism itself.

As the demon said in Ghostbusters: Choose the form of your destroyer!

By the way, do you think once the combined excess death toll from peak oil and global warming hits 100 million, someone will calculate how many years of mitigation efforts were delayed by oil companies and their pet political parties denying that there was a problem? Let's stop talking about price gouging and start discussing crimes against humanity. As in, corporate mass negligent homicide on a scale that will dwarf Communism and fascism combined.

Go to the BLS website and try that calc on non-supervisory wages. That +5% becomes a very negative number.

No arguement.
I'm no fan of 1,000,0000+ exec's. The rank and file has suffer you are correct. We are in a heap of trouble.
It started so quitely. I went to buy a simple dial microwave for my daughter when she went to college 4 years ago. Bi-Mart $29.95. Same power as one I bought when we moved to our current house 16+years ago that cost $114.95.

There are a few people (4) that I know that see the problem with this. Most are so fucking happy with low prices they can't believe it.

Every dime you spend buying cheap imported goods is giving economic power to some one else. Our government has allowed this while telling dosmestic bussinesses to compete with all the wage and hour laws, enviromental laws, etc. This has been going on for a long time in 1,000's of diferent ways. Everyone espired to be come yuppies and low prices allowed (Wal-mart) to expand accross america and force the small guys out.
We have chosen the form of our destroyer one dime at a time.

The problem isn't so much buying some things from overseas, it is the systematic gutting of our economy to the point that we have nothing left to export in exchange.

We needed to have a rule in this country that for every dollar that we spent on imports, we had to earn a dollar on exports. That would have made a huge difference - especially wrt energy.

So either we scapegoat the oil companies in particular for our financial distress, a task made easier by Cheney, Bush, Rice and Khalizad all being tied to your industry while we wage war on oily Arab soil, or we get mad at the entire corporate system, which means declaring war on capitalism itself.

While the oilcos hardly have clean hands, I do think it is a broader thing. It is not that capitalism is altogether a bad thing, it is just that we have allowed a good thing to go too far.

Economists classify all goods as falling into one of four categories: private goods, public goods, toll goods, and common-pool goods. The hypercapitalist ideology in the US has been aggressively pushing the privatization of the toll goods and common-pool goods sector, and the shrinkage of the public goods sector, at least since Reagan (actually, starting long before that). State socialists, of course, always want to expand the public sector, absorb the toll good and common-pool goods sector into the public sector, and minimize the private sector.

We've already learned that state socialism doesn't work very well (except for the people in power). We are now learning that hypercapitalism doesn't really work ve