DrumBeat: March 27, 2008

Truckers back a national 65 mph speed limit

A highway slowdown has begun in response to high energy prices—and the big trucking companies are leading the way. Con-Way Freight, one of the nation's largest trucking firms with 8,500 rigs, has announced it is turning back the electronic speed limiters in its entire fleet from 65 miles per hour to 62 mph.

One more incident to add to the irony file… Last night as I was reading the TOD, an SUV careened out of control and smashed into the power pole at the foot of my driveway plunging my home into darkness; thankfully the driver wasn’t seriously hurt, but I suspect the vehicle is a total write-off. This is a secondary pole that supports the line that feeds both my home and my neighbour (my neighbour’s home was unaffected). The pole is cracked and leaning badly and will need to be replaced; so too my entrance mast, as the upper portion is bent and detached.

The good news is that Nova Scotia Power has temporarily restored my service as I wait for an electrician to replace the mast and meter base. The other good news is that the lineman replaced the original feed with a heavier gage conductor that will allow me to upgrade to a 200-amp service at some future date – this is something I’ve wanted to do for sometime but have held off due to the high cost; now with the insurance company footing the bill for the new line and mast, all I need to do is replace the main panel.

The other interesting thing is that I’m told the line that serves our two homes is grossly undersized and that much of the insulation has melted away because of this (my neighbour’s home is electrically heated). The lineman was quite shocked at its poor condition.

A couple of weeks ago I mentioned our main line operates at 2,200-volts and I had an opportunity to ask why. The technician said the utility would like to upgrade our street due to the excessively high line losses, but can’t move to a higher voltage without trimming the trees and there are some powerful folks who have thwarted this (every other street in this neighbourhood operates at 14.4); another example of bad politics trumping good engineering.

Cheers,
Paul

another example of bad politics trumping good engineering.

What would be a mechanism that could change this ?

Do you really want a mechanism to trump that little iota of local control - even if it is likely only exercised as a veto?

I have seen, more than once, where it's turned out to be very wise that a homeowner has had really BIG rocks, posts, etc around their house. It's to keep the cars from trying their best to go right through. What are known as "big ass" boulders, posts, etc have saved many lives, for those engaging in the practice of sitting in their living room, sleeping, etc in an environment where out-of-control cars are far more of a danger - even in your house! - than earthquakes, terrorist attack, lightning, meteors, or any of the other BS people in suburbia worry about.

Nice to hear the driver wasn't badly hurt, now maybe he'll consider the wise alternative, the bus.

Do you really want mob control of our infrastructure?

I think a better idea would be to put 'breakers' on the lines that supply the lower voltage lines. Maybe when they keep popping their breakers they will learn that their infrastructure needs to be upgraded.

I was watching the Charlie Ross show yesterday with the head of Shell America on it. He was saying that the pipelines in the Northeast haven't been upgraded in 30 years. (He also said we haven't build a new refinery in 30 years which is know is technically correct but we have done massive upgrades to the ones we have)

No new refineries in 30 years, and specifically the last seven, is the best economic and political evidence of peak oil.
If the oil majors really wanted and needed a new refinery, they would have seen a historic opportunity to push it though the Bush administration.
299 days, 1 hour and 56 minutes is simply not enough time, the door is closed.

No new refineries in 30 years, and specifically the last seven, is the best economic and political evidence of peak oil.

It's the best evidence that we had massive overinvestment in refineries 1970s and 1980s and when the oil bubble collapsed it didn't make sense to build refineries.

Th US has a trading system in place for sulphur dioxide emission. This trading system has a tendency to favor existing installations over new build installations. So 'repairing' or 'refitting' an existing intsllation is chaeper than building a new one if one wants more capacity. And before you ask, refineries are major sulphur emitters.

Interesting tie to this - On the watt podcast #75 they discuss how the coal power plant reduction happened.

Lower heat content, lower sulfur coal was shipped in VS using 'local' higher heat, higher sulfur coal.

Thus lower sulfur emitted, higher CO2 emissions.

WHEEE!

Now I'll bet they wish they installed scrubbers (or whatever it is that captures the sulfur), and had "waste" sulfur to sell. Last I heard it was something like $900/ton.

No new refineries in 30 years? Existing refineries have been expanded as this is less costly than applying for environmental permits to build new ones. New refineries were being built overseas also. If you believe in peak oil you will find that a time is coming when there will be enough refineries, but not enough oil to refine.

Hello Rainsong,

Good points--I agree, but also without FFs, there additionally won't be much recovered sulfur for processing I-NPK and all the other critical uses of sulfur and sulfuric acid [not much is mined anymore]:

Powerpoint PDF on Sulphur:

http://www.choa.ab.ca/documents/Apr12TL-ppt.ppt

Recall that Gazprom wants to raise sulfur prices Sevenfold in 2008:

http://www.meed.com/petrochemicals/news/2008/02/maaden_to_dominate_ferti...
-------------------------
...Costs in Russia, a key rival, are set to escalate dramatically, with Gazprom set to raise sulphur prices more than sevenfold in 2008. Maaden, in contrast, will have access to cheap local sulphur.

"Maaden's sulphur will be cheaper than most," says Barrie Bain, director of Fertecon, a UK-based fertiliser consultancy. "But the phosphate rock will be expensive compared with Morocco and US producers who have their own rock. It depends on how Maaden accounts for the capital cost."
----------------------------
The postPeak battle to be a price-maker vs a price-taker is on! If I was an FF-exporter: I could further juice my profits by removing the sulphur first to later sell to constrained importers at a high profit. Why let the importing refineries make the sulfur bucks$$ when they refine the crude?

Bob Shaw in Phx,Az Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?

Recall my often posted phrase:

Sitting in the dark is pure luxury compared to starvation.

Another way to rephrase it is:

Taking away a person's gasoline or electro-juice just pisses them off, but take away their food or their NPK-ability to grow food--now your talking CONTROL.

Consider how easy it was to control Tadeusz Borowski, #119198:

http://dieoff.com/page226.htm
---------------------------------
THIS WAY FOR THE GAS, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN

....Around here whoever has grub, has power.
---------------------------------

The new standard for local utility distribution voltage is 27,600 Volts (27.6 kV). Most utilities are upgrading to this voltage.
Old systems have a real mix; 13.8 4.4 etc. Line losses are proportional to the square of the line current. Double the current, quadruple the line losses. Upgrading a distribution system is not an easy task. That entails replacement of thousands of poles, lightning arrestors, transformers, autoreclosures, SCADA switches.

Distribution systems already have "breakers" installed throughout to protect equipment. They are in the form of substation circuit breakers, distribution line autoreclosures, and fusing at customer step-down transformers.

C'mon, where's the free marketeers ?

Shoot the Bastards in the Head............But seriously Sheeple, in the coming Fast Future, the politicians will stand and Fiddle while Rome burns. Listen to what is being said in the current Pigfest for the White House....

BZ

Hi RBM,

I confess I'm a bit torn by this. One of the things that very much attracted me to this street were the mature trees and the very dense canopy that stretches across the winding roadway. That said, the city is planning to install sidewalks so many of these trees will be removed, or at least the ones along my portion -- I expect the more affluent homeowners further down the road will be "spared".

Cheers,
Paul

The trees are worth more than the power lines or the sidewalks.

Hi Twilight,

I tend to agree. Whilst I appreciate the importance of pedestrian safety, I would hate to see trees lost to make way for a sidewalk. In terms of trimming for power lines, I just don't know; I guess it would depend on how much of the canopy would be affected.

With respect to democracy in action, it's more likely that one or two voices are being heard. Perhaps I’m too cynical, but I'm thinking one may be the guy with the 10,000 sq. ft. "guest house" equipped with a three story waterfall (I kid you not). BTW, wealth does not guarantee good taste... that place is butt ugly.

Cheers,
Paul

Got a picture for us to laugh at?

Hi free,

This Google map is out of date (a lot more has happened since then), but it's the property with the multiple boat slips. This person owns all of the homes at the tip of this land except for one (a little old lady refuses to sell), as well as the island where he maintains a second guest house.

http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&num=10&lr=&as_fi...

If time permits I'll take a picture from across the basin later today. Of course, you probably won't be able to make out the "His and Her" Hummers.

Cheers,
Paul

IS burying (as in digging down) an upgraded power service an (expensive) option?

Pete

Hi Pete,

Sadly, prohibitively expensive (solid bedrock) and trenching would mean digging up a portion of the driveway and cutting through a retailing wall. If money were no object....

[My insurance company just reminded me of my $500.00 deductable....] :-(

Cheers,
Paul

Yeesh! Talk about excess. Must be Dick Cheney's secret hideout (and thus the owner is his secret identity).

Hi Free,

As promised, a picture of said house taken from across the Basin (believe me, the front side is no less flattering... =:-O

Note the roofline of the building to the immediate right of the power pole with the matching roof tile that transitions to glass.... that would be a three story "tiny some'em" he built on top of what appears to be gravel fill in the Google shot. From all accounts, this is still very much a "work-in-progress", so we're told there's a lot more yet to come.

See: http://www.datafilehost.com/download-fab6ce28.html

Best hopes for more cute little Cape Cods.

Cheers,
Paul

Too big for chickens and too small for cows, eh? I agree, tasteless and ugly. No offense to barns intended.

Don't worry, if barns are offended, they're offended by that house, not your comments.

Yuk - trees are more beautiful than that too. Even ugly trees.

You got end customer distribution on poles with uninsulated wires?

That is a lot of repairwork after a storm.

Hi MR,

Well, they are fully insulated but this one is undersized for two homes, one of which is all electric and so it had deteriorated badly. I'm guessing it would be rated for 100-amps and between us our panels would total 300-amps. I know NSP replaced the leg from this secondary pole to my mast with a notably thicker cable so that I could upgrade to a 200-amp service; what connects this y-joint to the transformer on the opposite side of the street is identical to what had originally run to my house.

Cheers,
Paul

You want/need a 200Amp supply? REALLY? Even at 110v that's still 22kW - how can you need that much? You obviously don't use electricity for heating from your comment about your neighbour, so where is all that energy going to go? Unless you've got an obscenely big house, surely a bit of energy conservation would pay great dividends? Sorry if I've got something wrong here...

If it were me, I might like one of those tankless electric water heaters. Here in Ontario, the electricity is about $0.05 (+0.05 legacy charges, etc), and comes from hydroelectric. It would probably cut my electricity bill by $20/month or so. Continuously keeping water hot is a waste. Still, during the few minutes per day they are on, those heaters take a lot of power.

Hi JW,

Will you be using most of your hot water during off-peak hours? If not, you're going to be dinged pretty damn hard once you're switched to TOU rates (all Ontario residents will be converted within the next couple years).

Cheers,
Paul

Generally, my peak use would be 8am (mid-peak), so I guess instead of the 10c I estimated, I might be paying about 12c/kwH. Now, given some off the top-of-my-head reasoning, I need to heat 130cm x 65 cm x 20cm of water (less than 200 liters) of water about 30c (15c to 45c) = 6e+6 calories = about 25e+6J. About 1.7kwH of electricity for one bath, say 20 cents. Maybe $6.00 per month once they put in the Time of Use rates. Now, standby use might be $50 - $100 per year? I wasn't able to find that, so maybe I'd only save that. Still, it doesn't matter whether you use the electricity in one shot at time of use, or slowly to bulk heat the water; the issue is that standby cost. $50 - $100 year isn't a lot, but it is something, and the other benefit is 4 square feet of living space in my condo.

http://www.hydroonenetworks.com/en/community/projects/smart_meters/faqs_...

Hi JW,

Other than the issue related to foot print, you might still be ahead with a conventional water heater under time control. A newer 180-litre tank with an EF of 0.92 or better would "leak" roughly 50-watts of heat or roughly 438 kWh per year. If your condo is electrically heated, you could pretty much slice that in half as these loses would simply offset what would normally be provided by your baseboard heaters (obviously less if your unit is heated with a heat pump or natural gas). During the summer months, we might assume each kWh of waste heat generates 0.3 kWh of a/c demand. Also, I'm fairly sure the energy component of Hydro One's off-peak rate is 3 cents per kWh, whereas the mid-peak is 7 cents, or more than double.

If I didn't have to head off to bed, I'd would spit the numbers through Quattro Pro.

Cheers,
Paul

A better direction, if feasible for you, is to store hot water from a solar hot water heating system. Or purchase a heat pump hot water heater instead if you are currently heating your water with electricity.

Hi nc,

No, I can understand your confusion. I'd like to have the flexibility of using either fuel oil or electricity depending upon their respective price and, if things go south, availability. I will be installing an electric hot water tank next month and at some point I'd like to add a second ductless heat pump to serve my lower level and possibly a small electric boiler beyond that. Alternatively, Nova Scotia Power offers inexpensive off-peak power to customers with electric thermal storage (ETS) units. At $0.053 per kWh, that's less than half the cost of home heating oil which is currently running between $0.12 to $0.13 per kWh(e) at 82% AFUE. A pony panel in the laundry room will allow me to feed the water heater, but everything else would require a service upgrade.

Cheers,
Paul

Don’t Miss This One!

Sadat Al Husseni on CNBC Video

Sadat Al Husseini, former ARAMCO Vice President, was on CNBC this morning. He said we have used about half global reserves and there is another half left out there. He said we are finding a lot less oil than we are consuming. Said the biggest future oil for the US is conservation. He was asked the peak oil question directly and he kind of danced around the question but, in my opinion, his answer made it quite clear that he was well aware of peak oil.

He said that it is costing $70 to $80 dollars per barrel to get at the new oil which is being brought on line now. He was talking about the very deep water stuff. It was a long interview and I probably did not rrmember it all correctly. But the link is above so listen to it yourself. I think you will find it very interesting. One thing that the interview showed was what such IDIOTS the CNBC regulars were. Some of their questions were unbelievable.

The interview is ten and one half minutes long.

Also a CNBC news flash on the Iraqi pipeline explosion.

CNBC video of Pipeline Explosion

Ron Patterson

My favorite question was the one that suggested that Peak Oilers claim that we are "running out" of oil. The other favorite way for cornucopian types to frame the Peak Oil debate is to claim that Peak Oilers assert that we "stop finding oil" once we peak.

The implication that they want to convey is that Peak Oilers think that we stop finding oil and then one day we suddenly go to zero. By framing the argument this way, any oil discovery--and continued oil production--can be used to refute their version of the Peak Oil argument.

However, as we have shown there are numerous cases of net oil exporters going to zero net exports pretty quickly. Have you noticed that CNBC has not had Jeff Rubin back on to discuss declining net oil exports?

Yes, that was a good one but my favorite part was where Husseini said: "We have used about half our global reserves and half is left out there". Then the CNBC guy asked: "You said we have used half, do you mean half the stuff that has already been processed and is already in barrels?"

In other words, he thought Husseini was saying that we have gone through about half our above ground inventory and still half that inventory left. Those guys simply have no concept of what Peak Oil really means.

Ron Patterson

It's called a straw man. And it's not surprising considering the fact that besides evil child molesters, the news is always tempered toward good.

And net exports going to zero are very bad.

Not completely idiotic, I think. The female anchor (I don't know her name) said::

economic recession in the United States, they think that that will eventually hurt oil prices... ...we think, "wait a second, why wouldn't you [OPEC] increase production after the gains we see in oil prices?"
around 6-7 minutes. Personally I think she was baiting him to slip and say OPEC doesn't have the ability to increase production.

Squeek Blab regulars = stock pumpers. Good ol Joe was a stock jock. The regulars are always telling people to 'buy stocks, they are a good deal at these levels.'

A little analysis will destroy their claim. As WT has pointed out, stocks are overpriced since the amount of FFs that the US will be able to afford going forward will be less than the current perception. How would the US afford enough oil to pay down the huge debts it has amassed? Another problem with stock prices is that at current levels I do not see a recession priced in and P/E (forward looking) ratios are skewed by over optimisim. Anyone that currently owns stocks tied to discretionary spending or financial or RE stocks is asking for trouble. I see few bargains in stocks now...even solid multinational manufacturers are going to be effected by oil constraints and the disaster that housing deflation in the US and EU economies is causing.

There are only two choices going forward. Inflation or deflation. Neither is appealing and right now we have a bit of both showing up in the US economy. I do not believe that the Fed can inflate enough to overcome trillions of $s of RE losses and I believe that deflation will happen eventually. That said, I will add that I have been wrong at least once a day for my entire life. :)

At around 5:50 CNBC asks Husseni, "how are we going to conserve if prices haven't been reducing demand yet", and Husseni, is like "don't worry you will feel it this summer or later in the year".

Now that's a bullish indicator.

Now that's a bullish indicator.

I'll say.

Ya, that line really propped up my eyebrows.

Is there any way to download this video, e.g. via keepvid.com? Doesn't seem to work for me. (Keepvid works great for youtube videos.)

Vt...

I used to use various Firefox add-ons too. (UnPlug still works in FF2.0 and would grab your video.)

Then recently after an OS "refresh"... I had cause to download Real Player.

Now I know that historically Real was considered nuisance-ware.

However, version 11 has a surprise... a download manager that shows a pop-up "Save this video" on any streaming video. Works in both IE7 and FF.

Checked with above video and it offered to save.

And Real no longer inserts itself all over your OS.

Not a solution for me: dial-up at home, can't "install" software at work. Keepvid.com lets me download at work, then watch it at home.

Also, I will never trust Real-anything. Even if it seems benign now, I consider them spyware.

Is there any other solution?

A low bitrate audio-only version (2.5 megabytes) for the bandwidth-impaired is now here. (Or here: directly to the MP3 file.)

Iraq's main export pipeline in the south destroyed

Oil prices have risen above $107 a barrel after one of Iraq's main export pipelines is blown up.

A company official said damage would cut Basra's exports by a third, adding to supply fears and increasing concern about stability in the region.

"We see events in Iraq as having taking a dangerous turn with the stability of the southern oil system now starting to become a potential concern," said Barclays Capital analysts in a note.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7316138.stm

The surge is working!

That's EXACTLY what the Pentagon said yesterday!

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hCRQcD2TIGwoSyU_ODCiwSBbdlMA

After watching "Bush's War" on Frontline I didn't think the spin could get worse (in the Bush Adminstration).

I watched it also. The entire time I was waiting for a good discussion of motivation. I can accept that Cheney was simply motivated by the oil. But what about the neocons, Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld. They were pushing the Iraq invasion by the morning of the 12th. Why?

The Power of Nightmares: Baby It's Cold Outside

The Power of Nightmares: Phantom Victory

The Power of Nightmares: Shadows In The Cave

About one hour apiece, all on Google video. That will start to answer your question.

Welaka said

But what about the neocons, Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld. They were pushing the Iraq invasion by the morning of the 12th. Why?

!

To help Israel?

I had read that Israel did not consider Sadaam to be their most serious threat. Was Iranian backed Hezbollah a worse threat?

Look up PNAC and read it. Document was finished over a year before Bush was president. Rumsfeld, Cheney, Bush, et al. were involved in writing it.

Well, the surge was working. Oh wait, nope. Nevermind. That was just the Mahdi Army taking a breather.

Well the surge is working, but it's not the surge the media are talking about. The media are talking about the surge in soldiers that is working, but it's the surge in bribes and pay-offs that is working.

All the different factions in Iraq are being paid massive amounts of money to stop blowing up Americans, so there's less pressure from congress to 'bring em back home'. Of course, a few weeks before Bush leaves office, the payments stop so the violence will start in full again once Obama comes into office and gets blamed by the lunatic mass attack media.

Time to up the payments, I guess. American workers should try it.

NPR had someone on yesterday about these "payments".

You do not BUY their co-operation - you RENT it.

Rent might be due.

Pete

Yes, I would imagine there was a big surge in oil through that hole in the pipeline.

Cid--
They captured one of the propaganda puppets for the occupation also:

Iraqi Spokesman Kidnapped in Baghdad
By KIM GAMEL, Associated Press Writer
Thursday, March 27, 2008

Printable Version
Email This Article
(2)
(03-27) 07:01 PDT BAGHDAD, (AP) --
An Interior Ministry official says the civilian spokesman for the Baghdad security operation has been kidnapped and three bodyguards killed.
Tahseen Sheikhly is a Sunni who often appeared with U.S. military and embassy officials at news conferences to tout the successes of the crackdown that began in Baghdad and surrounding areas more than a year ago.
The official says gunmen stormed Sheikhly's house Thursday in a Mahdi Army stronghold in southeastern Baghdad and torched it. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to release the information.

Good luck to them finding someone to take his place.

It's probably telling that old Baghdad Bob never had to worry about being kidnapped by gunmen.

About a year (?) ago the tourisim minister was kidnapped. Sorry, I had to laugh when I heard that one. Somehow Iraq doesn't strike me as a big tourist destination.

Lots of Iranians visit the Shia Shrines and mosques (including the blown up one) in Iraq. And assorted Senators. And that is about it.

Alan

Don't forget the contractors (mercenaries). I've heard stories (i.e. Rolling Stone a year or so ago) some got over there with little more than the clothes on their back and ended up with large government contracts.

Of course that may not count as 'tourism' in the traditional sense...

The case of Baghdad Bob (aka Muhammad Saeed al-Sahhaf, "Comical Ali") http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baghdad_Bob has always struck me as particularly curious.

Amid all the vindictive, recriminatory, and downright illegal behaviour of the Bush regime towards top-level Saddam-era Baathists, he was apparently let off the hook for no other reason than his humour value. According to the Wiki entry, "He is now living in the United Arab Emirates with his family."

Bush was known to stop everything in order to watch al-Sahhaf's apearances on TV in the immediate aftermath of the invasion - and they certainly had a blackly humorous aspect to them. It really seems like his entertainment value have led to his continued freedom. Kinda uplifting, as well as bizarre.

Regards Chris

Yes Bob was almost as entertaining and delusional as Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and all the various spokesman for the Bush White House and the Pentagon. Oh, and it continues even today as Bush is saying that this latest chaos in Iraq shows that the surge is working. But Bob was a harmless comedian. These guys and gals are another story.

"Bush is saying that this latest chaos in Iraq shows that the surge is working."

i think he means it is "working" to facilitate the looting of the treasury.

Good point - Was he really any more preposterous, any more absolutely, totally wrong?

Chris,
That is quite interesting, thanks.
Take care,
Chris

"As I have warned before, every American ground unit in Iraq needs its own plan to get itself out of the country using only its own resources and whatever it can scrounge locally. Retreat to the north, through Kurdistan into Turkey, will be the only alternative open to most U.S. Army units, other than ending up in an Iranian POW camp."

Gen. Petraeus calls President Bush and repeats the famous words of Ducrot at Sedan: Nous sommes dans un pot de chambre, et nous y serons emmerdés. Bush thinks he's overheard Petraeus ordering dinner – as, for Bush, he has.

http://www.antiwar.com/lind/?articleid=12583

With the British still holed up.

And I think two pipelines, the other West of Baghdad, have been blown.

They should all be issued copies of Xenophon's Anabasis as required reading

After the generals had been seized, and the captains and soldiers who formed their escort had been killed, the Hellenes lay in deep perplexity--a prey to painful reflections. Here were they at the king's gates, and on every side environing them were many hostile cities and tribes of men. Who was there now to furnish them with a market? Separated from Hellas by more than a thousand miles, they had not even a guide to point the way. Impassable rivers lay athwart their homeward route, and hemmed them in. Betrayed even by the Asiatics, at whose side they had marched with Cyrus to the attack, they were left in isolation. Without a single mounted trooper to aid them in pursuit: was it not perfectly plain that if they won a battle, their enemies would escape to a man, but if they were beaten themselves, not one soul of them would survive? (Anabasis, Book III. 1)

"Let us look another matter in the face. How are we to march most safely? or where blows are needed, how are we to fight to the best advantage? That is the question.

"The first thing which I recommend is to burn the wagons we have got, so that we may be free to march wherever the army needs, and not, practically, make our baggage train our general. And, next, we should throw our tents into the bonfire also: for these again are only a trouble to carry, and do not contribute one grain of good either for fighting or getting provisions. Further, let us get rid of all superfluous baggage, save only what we require for the sake of war, or meat and drink, so that as many of us as possible may be under arms, and as few as possible doing porterage. I need not remind you that, in case of defeat, the owners' goods are not their own; but if we master our foes, we will make them our baggage bearers. Anabasis, Book III.2

But as the shout became louder and nearer, and those who from time to time came up, began racing at the top of their speed towards the shouters, and the shouting continually recommenced with yet greater volume as the numbers increased, Xenophon settled in his mind that something extraordinary must have happened, so he mounted his horse, and taking with him Lycius and the cavalry, he galloped to the rescue. Presently they could hear the soldiers shouting and passing on the joyful word, "The sea! the sea!"

Thereupon they began running, rearguard and all, and the baggage animals and horses came galloping up. But when they had reached the summit, then indeed they fell to embracing one another--generals and officers and all--and the tears trickled down their cheeks. Anabasis, Book IV.7

You could be correct.

US deploys nuclear sub to Persian Gulf

An American nuclear submarine has crossed the Suez Canal to join the US fleet stationed in the Persian Gulf, Egyptian sources say.

Egyptian officials reported that the nuclear submarine crossed the canal along with a destroyer on Friday and Egyptian forces were put on high alert when the navy convoy was passing through the canal. An American destroyer recently left the Persian Gulf, heading towards the Mediterranean Sea; earlier Thursday, a US Navy rescue ship crossed the canal to enter the Red Sea.

The deployment comes as recent reports allege that US Vice President Dick Cheney is seeking to rally the support of Middle Eastern states for launching an attack on Iran. This is while US officials deny that Cheney's Mideast tour is linked to a possible military attack on Iran.

According to the latest reports, in recent months a major part of the US Navy has been deployed in and around the Persian Gulf. The fleet is armed with nuclear weapons and cruise missiles and carries hundreds of aircraft and rapid reaction forces.

http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=48682&ionid=351020205

They are concentrating on supply lines.

Fuel supplies for US troops hit

Some 40 road tankers supplying fuel to American troops in Afghanistan have been destroyed by suspected pro-Taleban militants on the border with Pakistan.

The attack on the fuel tankers took place at about 2000 local time on Sunday.

Local officials said two explosions were heard in an area where more than 100 fuel lorries had been parked for the night, waiting to cross the border and deliver fuel to US forces in Afghanistan.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7311064.stm

Ahh, that's how the US/Allies fought WWII. Cutting off supply lines. Subs in the Pacific were tasked with sinking oil tankers, and in Europe a major turn in the war was Hitler's not reaching oil fields in eastern Europe.

Hitler's war machine was the biggest and baddest on the planet. Japan was no slouch too.

The way to defeat a big, bad war machine you can't take on head-on, is to slowly squeeze it to death.

I'm not saying an attack on Iran won't happen, but I have been reading 'attack on Iran imminent' reports almost weekly since 2002.
It might happen, and somebody is bound to call it correctly sheer chance, but that is all it will be - chance. If and when it happens, there will be no more or less chatter on the web in the days before.

I disagree. To fly enough sorties against Iran, the bastards will want to move USAF squadrons closer, and someone will spot it.

However, if you're talking about a nuclear attack, you're absolutely right. It would be done without warning, a fait accompli to smear the hands of the American people with so much blood that they will fear the vengeance of the outside world and cling closer to their GOP-designated tyrant for protection. I must admit, nothing less than a nuclear attack can change the facts on the ground and the neocons love changing facts.

Largest single-unit deployment of Army National Guard soldiers since World War II

It was about 80 days ago that the 37th Infantry Brigade Combat Team mobilized and began training at North Fort Hood, preparing for the largest single-unit deployment of Army National Guard soldiers since World War II.

On Thursday, March 27, nearly a week after their training ended, the brigade held a deployment ceremony and began shipping troops to Kuwait.

http://www.springfieldnewssun.com/news/content/oh/story/news/local/2008/...

There has always been a danger of this. However, in its corrupt fashion the US has given itself a way out recently. A popular uprising would drive us out of the cities, but we could hole up in our desert bases and patch things up with the Reawakening Councils by actually paying them (get 'em some Bear Stearns stock - it seems to be worth whatever the Fed says it is). The desert Sunni tribes would love for the Sadrists to try to project power across open ground. I believe the "councils" really take their orders from the House of Saud and Afghan War mastermind Turki al-Faisal anyway, so it comes down to: do the Sauds want America to be utterly crushed, or merely to be knocked down a few pegs? If the Sauds want our forces to remain as a tripwire against a larger future Iranian incursion, then they will find a way to get us enough supplies from the West and South. As for our Iraqi allies and foreign contractors, well, the videos of their mutilation by the victorious rebels will serve Bush's purposes.

Bush has never hesitated to sacrifice American troops for political ends, and if he doesn't mind the colossal expense he can keep those bases supplied by air for months and ramp up the fear in America. At least one of the presidential candidates isn't afraid to babble about "100 years".

We're still in Guantanamo after 50 years of Castro.

The author of that article fails to understand the Bush administration and DOD's attitude towards the kind of scenario that he paints. In short, the response would be massive nuclear tactical warheads against Iranian forces, even those in Iraq. Tactical nukes would even be employed against Iranian militias in that event. The US would not allow its forces to go down without using every tool at its disposal and if this meant turning Tehran into green glass, they would do exactly that.

Note that I am not supporting or advocating this. Note that I do not want this to happen. But as someone who is ex-military, I can assure you that it will occur if Iran gets the upper hand in such a scenario. The Bush administration will risk nuclear war before they will accept defeat.

The Bush administration will risk nuclear war before they will accept defeat.

*shudder*

Why do I fear this as a truth?

As I have warned before, every American ground unit in Iraq needs its own plan to get itself out of the country using only its own resources and whatever it can scrounge locally.

Guess they need to figure it out fast.

US-backed Iraq Government may fall

Iraq’s Prime Minister was staring into the abyss today after his operation to crush militia strongholds in Basra failed, members of his own security forces defected and district after district of his own capital fell to Shia militia gunmen.

While the Mahdi Army has not officially renounced its six-month ceasefire, which has been a key component in the recent security gains, on the ground its fighters were chasing police and soldiers from their positions across Baghdad.

In Baghdad, the Mahdi Army took over neighbourhood after neighbourhood, some amid heavy fighting, others without firing a shot.

In New Baghdad, militiamen simply ordered the police to leave their checkpoints: the officers complied en masse and the guerrillas stepped out of the shadows to take over their checkpoints.

In Baghdad, thousands of people marched in demonstrations, burning effigies of Mr al-Maliki, whom they branded a new dictator, and carrying coffins with his image on it.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article3631718.ece?toke...

Baghdad's Green Zone is red hot target

On Thursday, the State Department instructed all Embassy personnel not to leave reinforced structures. A memo sent to embassy staff and obtained by The Associated Press says employees are required to wear helmets and other protective gear if they must venture outside and strongly advises them to sleep in blast-resistant locations instead of trailers.

For the fourth day this week, suspected Shiite militiamen sent rockets and mortars into the Green Zone in central Baghdad. The volleys on Thursday began in the morning and came in about once an hour well into nightfall.

The first wave of rockets this week came on Easter Sunday. The Green Zone -- and areas nearby -- have barely had a breather since.

The attacks on the Green Zone are being carried out in tandem with growing clashes between Iraqi government forces and the Mahdi Army militia led by anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.

By bombarding the Green Zone, the followers of al-Sadr are not only targeting the Iraqi government, but also the hub of the American political mission and its influence on the Iraqi government.

At least one death was reported inside the Green Zone in the latest attacks. Embassy spokeswoman Mirembe Nantongo said a U.S. government employee was killed, but would give no further details until relatives are notified.

A U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of security concerns, said one round earlier this week hit a main helicopter landing zone used by the U.S. forces, putting it temporarily out of commission. Housing used by some U.S. officials and contractors was also hit, the official said.

"All personnel are required to wear body armor, helmet and protective eye wear any time they are outside of building structures in the International Zone," said embassy spokeswoman Nantongo, using the official name of the area. "Beyond that, we don't discuss our security posture."

The official -- who has been through other attacks -- described the recent barrages as "qualitatively different."

Another U.S. official said that personnel -- who usually sleep two to a trailer on the embassy grounds -- are now sleeping inside the former Saddam palace where their offices are located. "There are cots everywhere," the U.S. official said. "People are scouting out free couches."

"There is a sense of hunkering down for a sustained period of time," the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because of security restrictions.

http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/national_world&id=6046932

Reminds one a bit of the Tet offensive in the Nam...

Then there is the timing of this operation to consider. If Malaki's intention was to suppress the Mahdi Army prior to an attack on Iran he has instead shown how weak his government and control are. Now the world realizes that Malaki is a paper tiger, something only suspected before. This is a very important event.

On the other side of the coin, the Mahdi Army might have wanted to show their strength in Iraq to forestall an attack on Iran. The US does not want to attack Iran and lose their whole ground force, or lots of it, in Iraq.

In any case this does not look good for the surge, especially since Cheney has been making the rounds in the ME, beating his chest.

The chess match continues...the Persians invented the game.

Reminds one a bit of the Tet offensive in the Nam...

or the '72 Easter Offensive.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easter_Offensive

The chess match continues...the Persians invented the game.

No, the Indians did.

don't forget the chinese, they're playing too. except they're playing go.

"The official -- who has been through other attacks -- described the recent barrages as "qualitatively different."

Another U.S. official said that personnel -- who usually sleep two to a trailer on the embassy grounds -- are now sleeping inside the former Saddam palace where their offices are located. "There are cots everywhere," the U.S. official said. "People are scouting out free couches."

"There is a sense of hunkering down for a sustained period of time," the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because of security restrictions."

This is not Tet. Tet was a frontal assault. Almost the entire
SVietNamese Cadre was wiped out.

IMHO, we're at Pleiku, February 1975.

With US Forces palying advisor to Maliki's SCIRI/Badr Brigades
being ARVN.

"Power cuts and shift workers unable to reach their work places in oil fields and pumping stations have reduced Iraq's crude oil production and exports," the official said by telephone from Basra. "If the government doesn't take necessary measures to reduce power cuts and help oil workers reach their work places and transport food to workers in these work places, production would be suspended as soon as tomorrow (Friday)," the SOC official said, adding workers cannot reach their work places and there is a lack of food because of the curfew imposed by the government in and around Basra province.

Basra produces more than 80% of Iraq's total output of 2.4 million barrels a day. In Baghdad, a senior Iraqi oil official said military operations in Basra could halt Iraq's crude oil exports from southern terminals for a few days. "The military operations in Basra could suspend Iraqi crude oil exports for a few days," the official said by telephone from Baghdad.

I recall that the Fadhila (Virtue) party, who control the local Basra government, claimed credit for a brief oil production strike last year, which would mean that Fadhila has good connections with the powerful Iraqi oil employees' union.
Fadhila shares ideology with Sadr, but was created by a rival lieutenant of Sadr's father or uncle. Has anyone heard Fadhila's position on Maliki's massive invasion of its turf? Do its leaders foolishly believe that what is done to destroy one opposition party will not be done to another opposition party?

Long before the Iraq War, I heard something by a British military historian about insurgencies in general. He said that for an insurgency to be successful, it needed 3 things: (1) a numerical force equal to more than 1/4 of the occupying force (it needs to not be outnumbered 3-1) (2) A deep rear support base, and (3) support from the local populace.

It is useful to think of the current Iraq conflict in these terms. For item (1), the potential number of insurgents is certainly much larger than 1/4 of the U.S. and coalition force. For item (2), the insurgents have a number of potential deep support bases, in Syria, Iran, and even other areas in countries more friendly to the U.S. However, the surge has had some success largely due to (3), since in Iraq's large Sunni Anbar province the local population has turned against the insurgents. The remaining issue will be the disposition of the majority Shiite population; there the eventual attitude of the population is still uncertain.

"since in Iraq's large Sunni Anbar province the local population has turned against the insurgents."

You source for this is what?

Anything other than US/UK Mil, Maliki Puppet Gov't will be accepted.

I didn't come up with recent info immediately, so I offer this:

I read Pat Lang regularly for info
in this area at Sic Semper Tyrannis 2007.

Read his bio ( I won't post it here )as it's extensive in the ME and he has consistently critical of the administration in ways that only a 'soldier's soldier' can be.

He has touched on this aspect
before ('07):
http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2007/08/iraq-tribal-s...

Thank you.

I also read Pat Lang. But he's off base here.

First, as he sources Pincus on Al Qaeda.

Pincus is CIA. CIA started Al Qaeda. And has infiltrated it from top to bottom.

BBC NEWS | UK | Spy lifts lid on al-Qaeda
Nov 16, 2006 ... It is rare to get an insider's perspective on the emergence of al-Qaeda. It is also rare to get a glimpse of the world of spies and agents. ...
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6156180.stm - 51k - Cached - Similar pages
FOXNews.com - Report: Al Qaeda Spies Believed to Have Infiltrated ...
Mar 9, 2008 ... Report: Al Qaeda Spies Believed to Have Infiltrated British Police Force, ... SEE MORE, - United Nations, - The Americas, - Europe, - Asia ...
www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,336261,00.html - 46k - Cached - Similar pages
Terror moles at the Met | News | News of the World
A NEST of Al-Qaeda terror spies has been uncovered in Britain's top police force. MI5 agents have identified FOUR London Met officers after searching for a ...
www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/0903_alqaeda.shtml - 47k - Cached - Similar pages
MI5 targets four Met police officers 'working as Al Qaeda spies ...
Warning: Terror moles reportedly work in the Met Four police officers in Britain's top force are reportedly under close secret service surveillance after ...
www.thisislondon.co.uk/.../article.do - Similar pages
Islamist sleeper cell in Scotland Yard: report - World - smh.com.au
Mar 10, 2008 ... Scotland Yard refuses to comment on a report that an al-Qaeda sleeper cell has infiltrated London's police HQ.
www.smh.com.au/news/world/alqaeda-spies-in-scotland-yard/2008/03/10/1204...

When, in actuality, the opposite is true (whicih is how you know that all of the sourcing above is totally untrue!).

" U.S. and Allied Intelligence Services Had Penetrated The Very Highest Levels of Al Qaeda Prior to 9/11

I linked to an in-depth profile of the police chief for Fallijuh (sp) in Anbar Province in the Washington Post last week.

Former Republican Guard officer, former insurgent, nasty character, now on "our side" (but he wants us to leave, so he doesn't have to be so nice). $190/month for those that change sides. Allies of convenience.

Not Much Hope,

Alan

I recently purchased and installed an electric motor kit for my older bike, for the purpose of daily commuting. My workplace has no shower facility, so this eliminates a major obstacle to ditching the car in the mornings.

In the research before buying, I read a claim by one seller that riding an electric bike is even better for the environment than actually pedaling with your own power, since the food energy used would be greater than the electrical energy to charge the batteries. I scoffed when I read this, but now I wonder if that's true.

My round-trip commute uses most of a full charge to the battery pack, and to recharge takes about 0.5 KWH. Using an energy conversion table, this equates to about 430 nutritional calories (kilocalories). I estimate that slow pedaling alone would burn about 250 to 300 calories. If one considers that one calorie of food energy is underpinned by ten calories of hydrocarbon energy, then the claim that the electric is better looks pretty convincing.

Lastly, I know that the energy spent to generate the electricity at a central plant is greater than the actual power coming from the outlet due to transmission loss and other factors, plus there is the embodied energy in the manufacture of the wheel hub motor and battery pack.

Any thoughts on how this pedal vs electric equation balances?

Interesting!

In the UK it is estimated that electricity generation from fossil sources is about 30% efficient overall, by the time it reaches the wall socket. but of course some electricity comes from nuclear and some from renewables. However the fossil input to food on the table is very variable, the 10 to 1 figure was for typical US distribution network. Most of those 10 calories is for final delivery and cooking.

If the choice was between organically grown food from your own yard, verses electricity generated by your own local wind turbine (or biowaste fueled generator), then I think the human powered bicycle would win, because the low tech system as less embedded energy.

The question 'what is good for the environment' is itself not easy to answer, but both options are much better than an SUV!

That's something I was running into also. I was considering, while still out in the SF Bay Area, whether to go back to bike-only. I realized that between the extra food, which I may not have NEEDED but I WANTED extremely badly, and the loss of some swapmeet income, I'd not come out ahead.

But I'd not have come out behind, either.

Still, keep things scale-able. Keep a paid-for car if you need one, keep a bike too and get out and ride it for exercise and fun once in a while if not often. If you're in a large place because you need it to store you and your "stuff', think about reducing the stuff, moving to a smaller place. Stuff can always go into a storage unit. Have things set up so when your own personal financial breakdown happens - and it will happen - you can fail gracefully instead of everything being leveraged together and your whole life doing down in a smoking heap.

That's something I was running into also. I was considering, while still out in the SF Bay Area, whether to go back to bike-only. I realized that between the extra food, which I may not have NEEDED but I WANTED extremely badly, and the loss of some swapmeet income, I'd not come out ahead.

Still, keep things scale-able. Keep a paid-for car if you need one, keep a bike too and get out and ride it for exercise and fun once in a while if not often. If you're in a large place because you need it to store you and your "stuff', think about reducing the stuff, moving to a smaller place. Stuff can always go into a storage unit. Have things set up so when your own personal financial breakdown happens - and it will happen - you can fail gracefully instead of everything being leveraged together and your whole life doing down in a smoking heap.

Try telling that to your significant other. Seriously, I need some good reasons. I've been wanting to move into an apartment and then buy land and a cabin outside of town (a couple hours).

It seems to me that if you job requires you be in the city then you get the smallest/cheapest apartment you can find within reasonable proximity to both jobs (mine and the significant other's). Then the land and house you buy externally needs to be relatively close (how close?) and have all the basic requirements of food growing and perhaps some alternate job(s) nearby.

Is this general concept a good idea or a bad idea. I realize it depends. But I think that it can be quite doable, even with _some_ debt.

Any thoughts?

I think this is a very good idea, especially if you can get cheap land in an area with reasonable rain fall (20-30 inches per year). You could go out on the weekends and farm it, then move there if you (or the country, or the world) hit a financial crisis.

Steven Solomon's book Gardening When It Counts provides a step by step method for creating a fantastic garden with hand tools and with minimal effort. It's an excellent book. You don't even have to water if you do it right. It only requires a few hours of work once you get it set up. I've incorporated some of his methods in my own garden this year. Here's a review.

Yeah, I like that book because he also deals with getting the nutrition you need out of your garden, not just fancy-looking produce.

Are you a carnivore or vegetarian? Do you grow organically a significant portion of the food you eat? Are you going to take into consideration the solar energy that produced the coal or natural gas the electricity that charges the bike's battery is produced from, or disregard it? Will you drive the electric bike at the same speed you would if you pedaled it?

The answer to your comparative efficiency question is: "It depends..."

The embedded energy in the batteries is probably much higher than the energy to recharge the batteries (totalled over their life). Seems to be true for my e-bike. Battery pack is about $390 (24V 6.5AH NiMH), electricity about $0.13/KWH, thus the battery cost is equivalent to 3000 KWH. It takes about 300 watt-hours to recharge the battery (including some inefficiency in that process) so those 3000 KWH are equivalent to 10,000 recharge cycles - there is no way the battery will last that long.

In real life, I use the e-bike about 30 times per year, if the battery lasts 5 years under that regime that's $2.60 per use, about the same as the cost of gasoline to run the car (that I own anyway) over the same distance.

But I use the e-bike anyway. To set an example. And gasoline is not the only expense (in money and energy) to run the car. And if I keep in reasonable shape (by riding it) I can switch to a non-motorized bicycle if and when that become necessary. (Can also make my own battery pack using lower-tech components.)

There was a similar calculation a few months ago about using cars for short journeys versus walking.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article2195538.ece

However in both cases the assumption is that you have to eat extra calories for the journey. There is apparently no chance that some people (esp. those making short journeys by car) are already eating too many calories or have some calories "on board" that they could use.

1. The bicyclist's body is using calories even when riding an electric bike. The University of South Carolina's Compendium of Physical Activities is an authoritative source on calorie expenditures for various activities.

Riding a vehicle similar to a motorized bike, such as a riding mower or tractor, requires a bodily expenditure of 2.5-3.0 kcal/kg/hour.

Bicycling without a motor requires a bodily expenditure of 4 kcal/kg/hour for slow pedaling at less than 10 mph.

2. In 2006, the average efficiency of U.S. fossil electricity generating stations was about 34 percent. In other words, about 66 percent was wasted. See the Annual Energy Review and in particular the table of Approximate Heat Rates for Electricity.

Because of these two factors, electric bikes are likely not more energy efficient than standard bikes. But still, both are very efficient travel options. Electric bikes enable many people -- who would otherwise not be willing or able to ride a standard bike -- to travel in an extremely efficient, relatively comfortable and often fun way. So, considering the cultural realities, electric bikes could have a greater total positive impact on the environment than standard bikes, even if they're not quite as energy efficient.

Exactly. I find riding the e-bike on my daily commute (18 hilly miles round trip) to be doable and even pleasant. With a regular bike I find it a time-consuming chore that leaves me quite tired by the time I get home. OK, I'm not in as good a shape as some, although probably better than average for middle age.

As for eating: I find that I definitely get hungrier on the days that I ride the e-bike (rather than drive a car). I pack two sandwiches on those days (rather than one). It may use some energy (to grow the food) but the benefit to my health is probably worth every calorie! (And then I use my healthy body to cut firewood, etc...)

I should explain that my e-bike (a Giant Lite) requires pedaling, about a half of the energy comes from my legs despite the e-assist. And I don't get the high speeds mentioned below - the assist peters out at about 16 mph, and it takes me about 40 minutes to go 9 somewhat-hilly miles. Somewhat slower than driving, but I get fresh air and exercise, without the time and money to go to the gym. And I am not subjected to the stress of traffic jams etc. Get to work in a much better mood!

Are you including the energy required to replace the battery pack in your bike in your calculations?

Depending on the type and size of battery used you may find that this is as much or more than the energy required to do the travel itself, at any rate it needs to be specified for any meaningful calculations of the type you suggest I'd say...

I converted my clunker mountain bike to an electric using a hub motor and commute 9 miles each way to work and back. Takes me about 20 minutes door to door, which is only a couple more minutes than by car.

I've metered the power to recharge the batteries (including standby losses) and calculate that I'm getting ~ 2,000mph equivalent.

And I feel better, and look better.

It probably cost me $800 to do the whole thing. Though I cheaped out on the batteries and it's a little heavier than I'd like. When it comes to replacement time, I'll get NimH's and shed weight.

Wicked fun. Fastest I've gone was 34 mph on the flat.

Headwinds and hills are no longer an issue.

Joe

2000 mph.. whew, I gotta get one of those! (oh, you mean MPG, I guess.. darn!)

Who did you get the kit from?

Bob

Oops! yes gallons.

2000 miles per hour indeed!

the kit is a Crystalyte hub motor kit. I like the new controllers : variable input voltage bet. 36 and 72 vdc nominal. I'm running 60vdc. (5 sealed lead acid batteries.) strapped on the back rack.

I got it online at http://www.poweridestore.com/ ; but there are lots of other.

All you need to compute the efficiency of your system is a dc meter like: http://www.powerwerx.com/product.asp?ProdID=3809&CtgID=3575 and a typical cyclocomputer to give you distance traveled.

Nice.

Thanks.

Gotta picture of your bike?

Fastest I've gone was 34 mph on the flat
what is the max. rpm of the hub motor with how many N.m of torque?

PedalPower;

I think the question is aiming at the wrong targets. I agree with the poster who pointed out how many drivers on the road are already eating enough calories to bike or walk, but that food energy just gets flushed.. or whatever happens.

These questions that set a ridiculously high bar for Cycling or 'EV Moped-ing', or for the Absolute Universal EROEI for PV production seem to me to be the extension of the 'Oh Yeah?' stance that people who want to resist making serious changes have put up against these incremental moves towards more responsible lifestyles. We've had to justify the minutiae of WindTurbines and Recycling to the N-th degree so often that we end up doing it to ourselves as well.

My planning around an Electric Bike/Trike idea keeps looking more at the balance between what is a comfortable weight to move with JUST pedals, up through how much battery and motor weight would get me either up to a decent road speed so I could function in our local traffic, and how far I might hope to travel in this setup, with the ironies at the top end always being that the additional weight is increasingly there to move itself, not me. My current favorite is to have a plain bike, and a cargo trailer option that has a 'Range Extender' system that can be snapped onto it, in the form of a Motor and batts. The roof of the Trailer would have some PV and the motors would ideally have regen-braking, and a little cage for the 'Guard-Python' to keep this tasty nugget from getting tossed into a passing pickup. The design is evolving. For now, I have a couple regular bikes.

Bob

I had this argument with a user called "infinitepossibilities" about a year ago. I suggest searching the archive for it. Basically, if you assume a standard US diet and don't need any exercise, an electric bike powered by solar power requires about half the land required to feed the person the extra calories. The less meat in your diet, or the less energy you require to obtain the food, the closer it is to even.

Of course, if you are human, you need exercise, and riding an electric bike isn't much exercise, whereas riding a standard bike is top-notch exercise. If you're using the electric bike to extend your range, so you're getting the exercise as well, depending on the quality of the electric bike you may end up being more efficient on the electric bike.

Personally, I grow about half my food in the back yard, transport most of the rest by bike, and bike a short enough distance to work that it falls within my needed exercise for the day. Besides, solar sucks in my part of the country, but this is a good region for growing food.

If one considers that one calorie of food energy is underpinned by ten calories of hydrocarbon energy, then the claim that the electric is better looks pretty convincing.

While 10 cal FF per 1 cal of food is an average (and I've heard a little lower than that as well) there is incredible variation. You can help the efficiency by eating more whole raw food, more local food, less processed food, and less meat. For example, it takes 35 FF calories to produce one calorie of factory farmed beef, 68 FF calories for each calorie of pork. From The Oil We Eat. On the other hand, other foods are much more efficient:

For every calorie of fossil fuel used to grow oats in the United States, 2.5 calories of food are yielded. Similarly, potatoes yield just over 2 calories of food per calorie of fossil fuel input, and for wheat and soybeans the number is 1.5.

From this article.

So, it might be most efficient to eat oats for breakfast and pedal your bike, but either way you get to work by bicycle is orders of magnitude better than driving your car.

pedalpower

Going agnostic here. Both pedal and electric/assist have got to be orders of magnitude better than the alternative (even powered by coal and hamburgers):-)

Norway's underwater 'guinea pigs'

In the early 1970s, the North Sea was a watery Wild West.

The world's economies were being pushed towards recession by astronomical oil prices.

In the relentless pursuit of oil, untapped sources under the ocean floor became the new panacea for Western governments.

Tempted by the high rewards - some would say greed - hundreds of British deep-sea divers took part in the exploration of the North Sea oil fields in British and Norwegian territorial waters.

They were the aquatic equivalent of the prospectors who had, a century earlier, searched the deserts and canyons of North America for 'black gold'.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7314283.stm

Good article on the developing banking crisis - how we got there, and what we might do about it:

Economic Meltdown: The Consequences of Legal Bribery

US Home prices down -10.7% in Twelve Months

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/25/AR200803...

Alan

How are things down there in the Big Easy, Alan?

How are prices, the economy, etc? I see that place as one of the more promising areas in the US, because it's fertile, temperate if not actually tropical, and was thriving before oil use just fine.

How are rents, prices, the job market, etc?

I'm watching the decline of the arid Southwest before my eyes, slow and horrible, and it's not pretty. I'm beginning to contemplate getting out of here.

Rent is the biggest deal. I am helping out a lady who opened her house after Katrina and asks (but does not demand) $4/day for food, utilities, etc. Most of the otherwise homeless work.

LOTS of construction workers showing up because they lost work elsewhere and all they know about New Orleans is that we still have (re) construction work here.

Still not easy, but more is normal than before.

I would have to find out more to truly advise you.

Best Hopes,

Alan

Alan - Housing is collapsing out here like everywhere else, and there are tons of painters and carpenters, handymen, out of work here. Bet some are headed your way!

This place is a Kunstler poster child. It's too dry and hostile (heat, cold, wind) to grow much of anything, and houses are on top of the good growing areas now. Everything here and I mean everything, is 25 or more miles away. I've made a grand total of $5 since I moved here 8 months ago, and that was hustling a tourist after giving them a bunch of directions. I'm going to practice my hustling skills more, too!

I'm in a financial trap, limited to $154 a month income, and will have to sell everything I have to get out. Getting out will be done on my little 250cc motorcycle because that's what I have. If I stay here for any real length of time, the only option will be hitchhiking to get out. I thought I'd find a job, or be able to go to the college here, but I can't do either.

It will take me a month or so to sell my stuff, and prepare an escape plan. So far my plan is to go back to the SF Bay Area because I know it, and I know I can make money out there. I also need to work on my skills (caricature drawing, panhandling) out here so I have some experience when I go out there.

The SF Bay Area can be very self-sustaining. So can the NO delta.

I actually think I can make enough in the bay area to live in motels. What do you think are the chances I'd be homeless and dead within a year or two if I moved to NO? I understand the crime rate is high there, so that has me concerned. I'm thinking NO has a bit of an edge with regards to climate, and it may be a really neat place to live. Then again, I think I can do alright in the Bay Area again, even if I'm homeless for a while - there are SO many places for a caricaturist and general hustler/panhandler to work, that lack one.

Catch me with an eMail. Link to my name.

Alan

DC Metro needs cash for Repairs and Improvement

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/25/AR200803...

The most interesting note was that the transformers will need to be replaced to accommodate 8 car trains, to handle growing #s of rush hour commuters.

I saw track crews working on the Orange Line when in DC, and saw that the Red Line was bifurcated on Sunday to replace a switch, so work is on-going, but the short lived infrastructure (~30 years) and poorly designed infrastructure is wearing out.

Last year was the first year since WW II that public transit carried more people to work in Washington DC than single occupancy cars, a true Urban Revolution since 1973 !

With modest improvements (bigger transformers, more cars, better signals to allow 2 minute headways) and staggered work day hours, DC Metro could almost double it's rush hour ridership in an oil supply emergency.

Instead the Bush Administration spent $1 billion on "Lexus Lanes", allowing single occupancy cars on HOV lanes if they paid a high enough toll.

Best Hopes for the next 299 days,

Alan

Alan, the DC Metro doesnt need better signals. WMATA trains run in 'assigned blocks'. IE, as one train approaches another or a station, speed commands to the train approaching begin to drop. When the approaching train is very near another, speed command drops to zero, which brings the approaching train to a smooth and safe stop. That was the system we installed and tested. I doubt it has been changed for it is a very safe, although relatively complex, system. When HS rail travels at truly high speeds, there is little time for a driver/engineer to react to a train stopped ahead.

Since DC Metro only built 8 car length stations (who could have guessed in the 1970s that more might be needed), once DC Metro runs 8 car trains (already started on Red and Orange lines AFAIK), the best option to expand capacity is to run shorter headways.

Ed Tennyson has suggested 2,2,2,2.5 minute headways with the extra 30 seconds to catch up for delays.

There is debate as to whether existing signals can support 2 minute headways (DC Metro says no, others say yes).

Moscow runs 90 second headways, which is remarkable !

Fares on DC Metro outside rush hour are low ($1.35), so price is being used to shift demand a bit. Staggered work hours are another option.

Best Hopes for more DC Metro Lines,

Alan

'There is debate as to whether existing signals can support 2 minute headways (DC Metro says no, others say yes).'

Question: What did General Railway Signal Co say? They are the people that designed and installed the Metro ATC system...and, I guarantee that GRS knows a lot more about the system than anyone at Metro.

By 'existing signals' you must mean the entire ATC (Automatic Train Control) system. Actual physical signals, displaying a red or white aspect to the operator of the train, are a part of the ATC system at Metro. Actual 'Train Control' is located centrally in the basement of WMATA headquarters, 6th & F St, DC. Physical signals have limited use to train operators running at high speed but are needed at cross overs, interlockings, etc. Trains get speed commands based on how far away the next train is in front of them and how close they are to the next station...or, if debris is on the tracks shunting the speed command signal. A broken rail will also shunt the signal.

What has to be considered when running tighter headways are the speed command assigned block lengths, distance between stations, and electronically transmitted speed commands given to trains in different sections of the system. In order to run tighter headways some changes would be required to assigned block lengths and speed commands. Obviously distance between stations would remain the same. Changing two parameters would require considerable re-engineering and physical changes to the A, D and J relay systems but it could be accomplished. As always the work would be done at off peak hours. Once completed a series of tests are performed by the contractor and then the same series of tests are accomplished by WMATA employees using test trains, all for safety. The tests are designed to fail-safe every possible scenario.

I know that the modifications could be accomplished...it would be expensive. To run tighter headways without changing speed commands issued and modifying assigned blocks could be dangerous. Remember, the operators of Metro Trains came from the ranks of WMATA bus drivers when the system began...these people are not trained in the sense of professional railroad engineers. Most operations are out of the hands of the train operators, especially speed and braking. To do away with the ATC system is scary to contemplate if high speeds are to continue.

BTW, I know nothing of the Moscow system. Never worked on that one. Does the Moscow system use ATC? If the Russians are running strictly a manual system with ninety second headways and truly high speeds they will have serious loss of life and inventory sooner or later.

***BOOK REVIEW***

World Made By Hand - James Howard Kunstler

I chose to read this with some trepidation, as JHK is not known for his novels. I am a big fan of his weekly rants and very much liked his architectural non-fiction stuff. As I feared, the reader is gratuitously clubbed over the head initially with lots of references to the 'old days'. But, the book very quickly settles into a nice read. I also feared it would be full of sickly vegans squatting in the dark. But this is an action tale of manly men and women and sex and violence. It was a bit Jim Harrison-esque (one of my favorites), and if I were writing a book and got to create sexy characters and then sleep with them... well, I probably would.

If this book does well, the set-up could allow it to become a series. It's interesting to see everyday living, post-peak, from JHK's point of view. And it has real literary elements - big themes of good vs evil, security, love, loss, all that stuff. All in all it's a pretty feel-good, easy, engrossing read.

re "sickly vegans": Is there any such thing?

Oh, absolutely. The thing is that to be truly vegan requires much more awareness of what to eat.

People that go vegetarian/vegan without paying adequate attention to nutrition frequently end up undernourished in one way or another.

For lazy folks like me fresh vegetables, whole grains, and meat in variety and moderation is the way to go.

You can easily spot them they get a yellow skin from serious deficiencies.

Yes, I've met a few. Also met plenty of very healthy ones. The human species evolved to be an omnivore. It is perfectly possible to get a reasonably balanced diet from purely vegetarian sources, but you do need to plan a little. If you compromise and allow dairy/egg in your diet, staying healthy is extremely easy. The average US diet with very high animal protein, saturated (or worse artificially saturated) fat, high refined carbohydrates (especially fructose) and all sorts of additives, preservatives etc. is a guaranteed early grave. Of course diet is only one ingredient of a long , health life, but it is an important one.

The average US diet with very high animal protein, saturated (or worse artificially saturated) fat, high refined carbohydrates (especially fructose) and all sorts of additives, preservatives etc. is a guaranteed early grave.

Have to plug the book 'Good Calories, Bad Calories' once again. Fat (both saturated and unsaturated) and protein are nature's premium foods, both good for you. You are right, however, about the sugars and refined carbs. They are the real culprits.

Personally, I am eating more meat than ever and have cut sugar and refined carbs to almost nil.

Read the book. It is a real paradigm shifter.

Personally, I've never met a physically robust vegan.

Well then you've never met this guy.

One of the growers I work with is "done with vegans". Said they don't have the energy to do the work even when they are constantly eating.

BTW I know this guy well and he is not a slave driver.

I'm a 28 yo vegan and I play coed soccer - I have yet to meet someone on my soccer team or an opposing soccer team that can outsprint me on the field with or without the ball. Further, my food intake is much smaller than most people I know. 5'11", 175-180 lbs.

There is the definite possibility that I am not the norm, because I have seen other vegans that are perhaps way too thin or small, but also my wife and I are heavy seitan & tofu eaters. Further, I weightlift several times a week.

Once again, perhaps not the norm, although I know plenty of meat eaters with little to no energy.

This is all such nonsense. I became a Vegan when I was 53 and ran two marathons shortly thereafter. I am much healthier and stronger now than when I was a meateater and the same thing applies to my wife. There is absolutely no reason one cannot be strong and healthy as a vegan and I suspect that these vegans you refer to don't know or don't practice proper nutrition and protein balancing.

What you say about vegans and energy is bizarre - of course I guess it's possible that the people your grower was hiring were just a bad bunch.

Look at Scott Jurek, the only person to have won the Badwater Ultramarathon more than once: http://soulveggie.blogs.com/my_weblog/2006/08/vegan_wins_utra.html

He's also won seven Western States 100-milers in a row.

Dave Scott won six Hawaiian Ironman triathlons as a vegan.

And as a vegan myself, I cycled 4,000 km around Europe in 54 days with a fully-loaded touring bike, carrying my own tent, cooker, food, etc. Having announced that though, for the time being, I'm am omnivorous 'freegan' because there is so much food wasted in this city. When I leave the city it'll be back to a plant-based diet. I do not knowingly buy any animal products, but when they are available from the rubbish and not unhygienic then I will eat them and share with my friends.

Well, as I posted before, the book is a waste of money. I don't even think it's particularly good fiction. In fact on my post a few weeks ago, I said it sucks and I stand by that. For a better story line and information you can actually use, buy Jim Rawles' book Patriots:Surviving the Coming Collapse available at http://www.survivalblog.com

I think one of the problems is that few people read survivalist fiction so they have no basis for comparison. This isn't meant as a personal attack against you Got2Surf but rather how the book has been generally reviewed.

Todd

Per Todd's recommendation a while back, I purchased the book and am about halfway through. And I'm thankful I did! The first part of the book is chock full of insightful little tidbits and observations, which serve to complement all the practical information about how to survive the collapse.

I don't have the book in front of me, but one such observation states something to the effect of: 'as more and more colorful versions of the greenback were introduced, U.S. citizens became increasingly skeptical about the future value of the currency. And their concerns turned out to be well-founded.'

A personal note. I was at the grocery store yesterday, and payed in cash. I handed the clerk a $5 bill. After fumbling around in my wallet, I looked up to see him scrutinizing the bill. Eventually, he called for his manager. Neither of them recognized the bill; it was yet another 'upgraded' version. Part of this $5 bill is distinctly purple (much more so than prior versions).

Anyway, two thumbs up so far.

Matthew,

Glad you are enjoying it!

For those with the survival itch who like DVDs, I'd suggest these two:

Testament, 1983 - The story of a small town in Marin County (It's north of SF.) after SF gets nuked. No gore. No destruction. No special effects. Just unrelentingly depressing. The town's folk try but make a lot of mistakes you can learn from. One important mistake they made that people who aren't familiar with the area wouldn't know, is that Marin's western border is the Pacific Ocean and the wind typically blows west to east. Rather than heading for the shore where there is likely to less fallout, they stay put and slowly die from radiation poisoning.

The Edge, 1997 - A really hokey plot with little redeeming value. What makes it worthwhile is the comparison between the guy who wants to survive and the one who doesn't after a plane crash. I think this kind of psychology will be important as things unwind. There are also a few survival tips...plus a few major technical gaffes.

Todd

"Just unrelentingly depressing."

You got that right!

My wife will NOT EVER watch it a second time - and I have to be in "the mood". It comes on cable from time-to-time.

Pete

Well, I bet it's not as depressing as Isao Takahata's
"Graveyard of the Fireflies", about two orphaned children trying (and failing) to survive social collapse during the firebombings of Tokyo.

There's a movie on a related theme, from the 1980's, "When the wind blows". Featuring an elderly couple who tries to survive a nuclear attack on Britain, having only a handful of government pamphlets rudimentary describing how to act.
http://imdb.com/title/tt0090315/
It also has the sense of utter hopelessness and I have yet to speak to anyone who has seen this movie and not cried. Truly depressing and sad.

Threads, 108 minutes, on Google video. 1984 documentary about nuclear war and its aftermath in the UK.

Never seen Testament, now siphoning it off of filesharing.

I've seen The Edge, but it was years ago. Enjoyed it, in spite of its hokeyness. Probably worth a second viewing, now that I know what I know.

Once I finish up with school (or possibly sooner...) I'll more than likely return to the Pacific Northwest, which is where my family lives. Hadn't heard of The Testament, but just added it to my 'to-buy list'. The film is a little pricey over at Amazon, running about $35+. I'll browse around and see if I can locate a cheaper copy.

Thanks again for the help.

Matthew,

It is just plain Testament.

Todd

I was going to do an edit but I want this to stand out...

Anyone who has problems with depression should NOT watch this movie or even mature teenagers. It is too real and ordinary. There isn't any way like Mad Max to turn it into fiction. It could be your neighborhood. The high point is at the end where the mother chooses not to kill herself, her son and a boy whose parents died by letting the station wagon run with the garage door shut.

Watch it before you buy it.

Todd

I just read the plot summary on wikipedia and felt glum.

No way I'm watching this!

Howdy Todd -

I'm ALWAYS looking for book recommendations. I'm completely out of books to read. I got JHK from the library, as I do with almost all my books, so I wasted no money. I will try to track down 'Patriots:...'.

I read 'World...' as fiction, and certainly did not see it as any sort of guide. I loved the Tom Brown books I read years ago, I just watched 'Into the Wild' - I liked the book (I like Krakauer a lot) - but I thought the movie had a strange, depressing tone. I've never really sought out 'survivalist fiction'. I thought 'The Road' by McCarthy was an A1 masterpiece. 'World..' was rather simplistic but still an enjoyable page turner, IMHO.

It's interesting how posters' personalities come thru in their posts; I very much appreciate your 'good-natured, helpful crankiness'. I'd love to have you as a neighbor. I passed my formative years on the coast North of San Francisco. If the sh** really hits the fan, that's where I'll go. Cows and sheep outnumber people, I know where to find food, and there's surf.

Hi G2S,

I've got some Tom Brown books too. Good reads. If you like that kind of book, you should try to find a copy of Last of the Mountain Men by Harold Peterson. I bought mine in 1969! It's about Sylvan Hart who lived on The River of No Return. There's now a lot of controversy as to how much he was really isolated from civilization but he was still amazing.

Another book I like (and I think some women will like) is Wilderness Wife by Brad and Vena Angier, 1976. It's about their time on the Peace River in BC.

There's more but why overdo it.

Todd

Todd, if you enjoyed "Patriots", then you'll surely like "Lights Out" by Halffast, as well or better. It's downloadable/readable online, here's a link to a source:
http://survivalmonkey.com/Lights%20Out.htm

Btw, are you near Wellspring?

Dunewalker,

I actually printed out all 600+ pages of Lights Out about a year or more ago. It has excellent information! Right now it's loaned out to a neighbor. Two other great online "books" were by Tom Sherry that were available on Timebomb 2000 until he asked that they be pulled (He wants to make some money on his efforts.) were Dark Winter and Shatter. I printed those out too - also about 600 pages total. They were great. He now appears to be involved with http://www.ar15.com. BTW, David Crawford (Half Fast) who wrote Lights Out has started a new one at ar15.

As far as Wellspring goes, I'm probably 15+ miles south on B.S. road. Are you in the area? My email addy is detzel at mcn dot org. I'm always interested in people who have similar interests.

Todd

I found a copy at B&N in the fiction section but not on display. It was very well done. I will probably retain some haunting memories. It reminded me of Ape and Essence by Aldous Huxley which among other things featured a new fuel supply, buried books at what had once been the Los Angeles library.

http://tinyurl.com/2x72hj

The New York Times today listed the five stages of mourning for technology:

1. Denial
2. Anger
3. Bargaining
4. Depression
5. Moving to Amish country

Article link?

where is Amish country these days? i was leafing through "Adventure Capitalist" yesterday and noticed Rogers talked about Amish moving to south america - Paraguay in particular and you may recall someone else bought huge tract of land there, too.

Manly men and brain dead, powerless women who want nothing more than have sex with our hero ;-).

Sharon

Sharon: Q: Why do women always watch pornos right to the very end? A: They want to see if they get married.

I read that as an insight into the author's frame of mind. I couldn't help conflating the protagonist of the novel with JHK himself. I think he had the same problem.

Gee, you think that Kunstler might have let his fantasies get involved here ;-)?

He's a smart guy, but there's a real Portnoy thing going on in this book. Add that its rather deep dullness and it qualifies as a serious disappointment - he should stick to nonfiction.

Sharon

ENVIRONMENT The Wheel World

Dieter Zetsche of Daimler and Robert Lutz of GM talk about how to reduce the thirst for gasoline -- and how not to
The Wall Street Journal, March 24, 2008; Page R4

A recent test of gasoline consumption at various speeds. I enjoyed the old 55 mph speed limit. It was quite relaxing to slow down a little.

http://money.cnn.com/2008/03/26/autos/slow_down_save_gas/index.htm?postv...

or http://tinyurl.com/23xzpf

I'm all for 55 MPH, I really don't push my little 250cc motorcycle past 60MPH and would rather go 55 or 50 really.

Since I may be using it to get out of here (it's what I've got) this has been on my mind lately.

Fleam - If you are planning on a road trip on your 250 you should switch out your sprocket to keep your Rs down.

Souperman - that's actually a pretty good idea, in fact I'd like to raise the gear a little anyway.

The plan as it stands now is to wend my way back to the SF Bay Area, by whichever route is easiest on the bike.

It would be cool to get out to the coast, then wend my way up the coast, maybe stopping and doing sketches for odd money along the way. It would make getting out of here kind of a fun adventure. I *really* don't want to spend another winter here!

My friend here has been loaning me money for stuff like the bike, but the problem is, it looks like my income out here is limited to that $154 a month on food stamps, until the death of myself or the US Gov't. That's depressing. I see a bigger and bigger trap here. I really thought there would be work out here, there isn't. The college is too far away to go to, and sitting around doing nothing is driving me nuts. I'll have to put everything I can on Craig's List and get things down to one bike-load.

Once I get back to the Bay Area I'd probably sell the bike, since the idea is to survive and be pretty much undetectable. A bike is too high-profile. A bicycle, great. But not anything motorized.

Of course "55" really means 62 or 63...

Hello TODers,

http://business.scotsman.com/fooddrinkagriculture/Prices-climb-as-fertil...
-----------------------------------
Prices climb as fertiliser famine looms

SUPPLIES of fertiliser are extremely tight and look set to become even shorter with world demand exceeding production.

This time last year UK manufacturers had large stocks of ammonium nitrate (AN) in store and were working flat out using relatively cheap gas to build up stocks of fertilisers in advance. This year there are virtually no stocks of AN and gas is much more expensive.

Global nitrogen is currently in deficit, a situation that is unlikely to change for at least three years. There has been a recent increase in the price of AN and a further rise is forecast for May. The annual requirement for AN in the UK is in the region of two million tonnes, but following the closure of several plants, domestic production now meets for only 50 per cent of demand.
-----------------------------------------
I would like to emphasize that these are the words of this reporter, NOT MINE! His editor obviously had the go/no-go decision of using the words, 'fertilizer famine'. Could harvest yields drop precipitiously with insufficient AN for the next three years? Have you hugged your bag of NPK today?

Bob Shaw in Phx,Az Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?

I find your exploration of the NPK story interesting, and important.

But if you don't mind I will not hug the pile of cowshit ready to be applied to our veggie garden.

Hello PaulusP,

Thxs for responding. I was googling around and came across this Bangladeshi link that said London, at one time had a profitable Humanure Recycling System. In light of potential shortages from my link above: it would be interesting to read about this old O-NPK system, and if it could be quickly reinstituted to dampen I-NPK price increases:

http://nation.ittefaq.com/issues/2008/03/28/news0667.htm
-------------------------------------
Ecological sanitation urged for hygiene, natural manure

...Paul Edward outlined the history of waste management in the city of London over the centuries and said at one point of time collection and use of organic wastes for agricultural purposes had turned into a profitable activity, as has been mentioned by the speakers at the workshop.
---------------------------------
I have TOD-posted links before about London's sewage history, but I never encountered any documentation that talked about Profitable Recycling.

How sad (and silly).

But perhaps we could try economics to solve this problem :

- demand for water will never outstrip supply
- if the price for water becomes too expensive, people will switch to something else, cheaper as an alternative to water ...

Good idea! People will switch to something else: b-l-o-o-d.

See, economics work.

Sucking the blood out of economists? If there's a demand for economists, then supply will magically occur.

- demand for water will never outstrip supply
- if the price for water becomes too expensive, people will switch to something else, cheaper as an alternative to water ...

Believe it or not, I actually heard an economist once discussing the situation with coal and water demand in China. He blathered on a while and said something about how they would obviously have to develop alternatives. It was't a Sci-Fi channel either.

The Malthusian point of that piece is that national sovereignty trumps the needs of an expanding population. The UN can not require Canada, which has an excess of water, to export it to other nations, just as it can not require Saudi Arabia to export more of its oil. In wildlife management textbooks, there are examples of efforts to stabilize deer or elk populations by winter feeding. These efforts inevitably resulted in more starvation in the long run. Is this a valid analogy for the human population? Maybe...

FRANCE AND BRITAIN TO STEP UP NUCLEAR POWER CO-OPERATION

A two-day bilateral summit is to culminate today (27 March) with the signing of a new accord that will see France help the UK develop a new generation of nuclear power stations.

DAWN OF A NEW NUCLEAR AGE

Bullish statements from the government over recent weeks about the desirability of building a new generation of atomic power stations - and perhaps even more than before - has caused its own nuclear reaction.

WE NEED MORE NUCLEAR PLANTS TO AVOID BLACKOUTS, SAY GERMAN POWER CHIEFS

Senior German energy executives warned yesterday that Europe's biggest economy faces growing blackouts unless it follows the Franco-British lead in promoting new nuclear power stations.

MIT tests unique approach to fusion power

http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2008/ldx-tt0319.html

So far, numerous experimental reactors using different methods have managed to produce some fusion reactions, but none has yet achieved the elusive goal of "breakeven," in which a reactor produces as much energy as it consumes. To be a practical power source, of course, will require it to put out more than it consumes. If that can be achieved, many people think it could provide an abundant source of energy with no carbon emissions. The deuterium fuel can be obtained from seawater and there is a virtually limitless supply.

Scientists move a step closer in artificially mimicking photosynthesis

http://www.thecheers.org/news/Science/news_17511_Scientists-move-a-step-...

Scientists have moved a step closer in artificially mimicking photosynthesis by synthesizing a stable inorganic metal oxide cluster, which enables the fast and effective oxidation of water to oxygen.

Dimatix Technology Used to Pioneer Inkjet Fabrication of Highly Efficient Solar

http://www.designtaxi.com/news.jsp?id=17180&monthview=0&month=3&year=2008

The use of inkjet technology to fabricate the highly efficient solar energy cells has been called a “breakthrough” by Konarka Technologies, Inc. of Lowell, Massachusetts, which innovated the development and commercialization of Power Plastic®, a material that converts light to energy.

MN scientists create new biodiesel manufacturing process

http://www.biodieselmagazine.com/article.jsp?article_id=2231

Gyberg said the feedstock will have up to 20 percent free fatty acids, which renders it almost useless for traditional biodiesel production, however, the Mcgyan process converts free fatty acids to biodiesel as easily as virgin vegetable oil. “The process converts it 100 percent to biodiesel with essentially no waste,” Gyberg said. At the end of the process, the finished biodiesel doesn’t need to be washed. And he added, the use of feedstocks from a nearby ethanol plant, will make Ever Cat Fuels' cost of production nearly $2 per gallon lower than other biodiesel plants.

man, where did the laws of thermodynamics, volume and mass take off ?

Building Urban Rail in Iran (emphasis on Tehran)

An interesting and informative pdf. Quite low costs (using Chinese expertise).

http://www.tehranmetro.com/present/HelsinkiUITPGeneralAssembly-052207.pdf

Someone is serious about reducing Oil Use,

Best Hopes for Building Urban Rail with the Speed and Efficiency of Iranians,

Alan

It's very sensible to do this if you have not enough refineries and have to ration fuel. Best hopes for them having plenty of nuclear generated electricity to run it.

The Iranians also have the largest hydroelectric building boom in the world ATM (despite limited resources, they are building everything that they have) and have recently started their first wind and geothermal power plants.

Alan

Question Alan. What is China getting in return? More access to Iranian oil fields?

The Chinese are routinely turning themselves into the good guys (a strategy once used by the USA to good effect.

The pdf has a table for different subway components (rolling stock, signals, tunneling, etc.) and the percentages from Iran, China and unnamed 3rd countries (remember embargo) for each type.

Chinese design subway cars are being assembled in Iran with a mix of components and technical aid. All paid for, of course, but at "reasonable" prices.

Will this help access to Iranian oil ?

It cannot hurt,

Alan

What do the Chinese get in return? I believe it's called "payment" - probably in cash, but they may well be prepared to accept oil-for barter deals as an alternative.

The point on my part is that China is going all over the world making deals in return for oil supply. Including selling guns to African nations. This "deal" for China is just another ploy on their part to secure more oil.

"Ploy"? Or honest labor?

As opposed to the trash Wall Street has been exporting.

"This "deal" for China is just another ploy.."

?!

Their 'Ploy' to secure oil contracts or access looks a lot more broadly beneficial than what the US leadership is trying right now. Why in the world would you put that into such a malicious and negative context?

What ever oil China secures is time shaven from the onsent of oil depletion in the US, bring peak oil here sooner. If you dislike the US's attempts to secure oil through its foriegn policy, I would find it hard to accept that you would like China shipping arms to Africa for oil. China does not give a rat's ass about the African people, just let them continue to kill each other, more so, as long as China get the oil in the ground.

There's an excellent 1 hour movie about this phenomena, with China going all over the world searching for oil deals and helping countries out..
"China vs. US - The battle for oil"
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2265311178152287610

I like the Iranian guy about two minutes in.. "but with China it's.. easy"

"Best hopes for them having plenty of nuclear generated electricity to run it."

Since their Solar potential is so poor..

..for those inevitable "Ahem, NIGHTTIME" replies, see; 'Thermal Storage', 'Pumped Storage', and 'at the very least, you only have to resort to burnable sources for HALF the day' ( and I say half the day because I would tend to assume that the nighttime trains would probably drop away from 8pm-5am, balancing for the Peak Sun hours.)

Bob

Their solar potential is mediocre if it's cloudy where the most people live. I've lived in the Philippines and spent two (sunless) weeks in Singapore, so I have a pretty good idea what the solar exposure of China's coast is like even without a permanent pall of brown coal soot. They could move massive numbers of colonists to their cloudless deserts, but - oops, that's Tibet and Moslem Sinkiang. That leaves a high-voltage DC grid as a solution, but it would say a lot if China undertook that burden before America did.

Despite the references to China, the thread began with issues of Renewable Energy systems being built with Chinese assistance in Iran, which I have to imagine has some solar potential. It was a snarky guess, I admit.. but I did just find this..

(First comment..)
"I'm an engineer, and knowing the already existing technologies for the efficient use of Solar Energy, considering the vast desert areas of Kavir and Lut in Iran, I can see some amazing potential Iran has for spearheading quite grand-scale projects in the field of renewable energy, in the future!"

http://ebtekarm.blogspot.com/2008/01/tehran-city-hall-and-gaza-inside.html
Blogsite for Dr. "Massoumeh Ebtekar - Tehran, Iran
Professor of Immunology, Former Vice President of Iran, Fomer Head of Department of Environment, 2006 UNEP Champion of the Earth, Tehran City Councilor Elected by the people in 2007 & President of Center for Peace and Environment (NGO ,Tehran). "

Here's another interesting bit from that blog.. (Quoting Dr Ebtekar herself..)

"..Fallon probably realized that any attack against Iran would ignite the whole region , destablize many other states and thereby begin a chain reaction. He was also aware of the military preparedness of Iran and the fact that the Iranian administration is very very different from Sadam or the Taliban. In any case I told Aljazeera that when these things come up before national elections they negatively influence the democratic processes in our country. If America is true in its claim to support democracy and freedom in the world it should change its antagonistic and arrogant approach on Iran, since that approach has made things more difficult for the democratic movement in Iran."
http://ebtekarm.blogspot.com/2008/03/americans-and-democracy-in-iran.html

No wonder the US has to blow it up.

A day at Japan's new mall: Buy clothes, a few CDs ... maybe a new Lexus

A study last year by The Nikkei, Japan's top business daily, found that some people in their 20s said they didn't want a car, even if it were free. Others said they didn't find the idea of going for a drive with a date or zipping around in a sports car as particularly appealing.

The goal of owning a car - taken for granted during the modernization that followed the Second World War - is no longer true, the report said.

Other factors, including Japan's declining population, are behind the falling sales. Japan has excellent public transportation, including trains and subways, and so many feel they don't need a car.

Also, parking is often expensive, with many apartment buildings charging about $100 (U.S.) a month. And traffic can be congested.

Amazing what an 18-year-long recession can do to people's values. Maybe young Japanese are comfortable living in cyberspace?

you must be american, by the sarcasm of your comment
if that's true, you can't possibly understand what public transportation means in japan, and having eveything you need within 15 minutes from your home

Maybe young Japanese are comfortable living in cyberspace?

What do you mean by that? B/c they don't want to own cars, they won't be able to get to a place to live?

I lived in Japan for six years, and I never owned a car. NO insurance, no repairs, no accidents, no parking, etc. etc. If I wanted to go to the deep country, I rented one, but even the countryside has plenty of trains. And they're cheap, a few dollars a day for commuting, maybe $10 or $20 to get to the countryside (Ah, I miss the hot springs...)

Japanese cities, towns, and villages are all compact and very easy to walk or bike around.

Come on man!! I'm looking forward to getting out of Sprawlville on my bike or in this POS toyota van I got, if I can get it roadworthy, and as soon as I arrive, selling the sucker.

I love the bay area, you don't need a car to get around! Even areas I thought were hard to get to by bike, like SLAC, nope! Just go one station past Palo Alto, get off, and ride up the hill. Easy peasy!!

Your transportation costs are effectively limited by the cost of a monthly transit pass, and a lot of companies (and colleges) give them out.

Transit pass ranges from $60-odd to free.

Compare and contrast a minimum of $300 a month if I had a job here, in Sprawlville, and that's assuming a job (which would pay federal minimum and no health benefits) is available, which they sure aren't.

Oh, and Japan beats us thoroughly just in the area of bento. Most Americans don't even know what bento is, so I rest my case.

Anybody have a link to Screamin' Jim Cramer's blog? I just caught the headline, "Misinformed Traders Send Crude Prices Higher". After publicly soiling himself with his Bear Stearns call, to say that crude traders are 'misinformed' takes some chutzpah.

Report: US now a steal for businesses compared with other large industrial nations

http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/03/27/business/NA-FIN-US-Study-Cheap...

A new study released Thursday by the auditing and consulting firm KPMG shows that the U.S. moved up on the list of most cost-efficient places around the world. Researchers compared 136 cities in 10 countries in North America, Europe and Asia, but did not include fast-growing China.

Yes, the thing is that the US no longer has much of a manufacturing base. Rather, our economy runs on "services."

I sense an opportunity here - the USA can open call centers to serve wealthy consumers in China and India.

Easy there Chairman Mao.

That report you posted is pretty worthless. They compared the U.S. only against a lot of other expensive places to do business.

The U.S.'s problem has not been losing factories to London. It's been losing to China and many other places the study deliberately left off the list.

It would be nice to see hopeful news about the U.S., but why put up phony blather, and then insult someone else for pointing out the truth?

Weak.

Right because he wasn't being snarky with his US can host call centers to rich folk in china line. Give me a break.

Look, I know how you feel. I just watched three episodes of John Adams. When they read the Declaration of Independence, I felt elated.

But what we need is some genuinely good news, like some U.S. power company building a solar plant. With that kind of storage thing they are trying in Australia. Or an electric train line being planned somewhere. Or even an upsurge in U.S. sales of Chinese electric cars.

On the other hand, why should you have to do all the heavy lifting when it comes to good news?

Here is some good news for you, antidoomer: http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/02/25/world%E2%80%99s-largest-solar-power-...

Headline: World's Largest Solar Power Plant Coming to Arizona in 2011

The article says this would be the first major utility in the U.S. to get the majority of its power from solar.

Long shot, but in right direction :-)

See my DB post yesterday.

Alan

Thanks

With trains and bicycles there is hope, thanks Alan.

On Lou Dobbs last night he was riled up about the US offshoring the making of US passports. No US company could make them. Some parts are made in Indochina. Say Good-bye to your sovereignty.

I think it's entirely appropriate that passports that contain radio tracking chips be manufactured in a Communist country. The passport itself is the threat, not Vietnam.

Bet it gets easier to buy fake U.S. passports.

You're calling him a Communist for pointing out that America is on a disastrous economic course - made possible by unregulated criminals on Wall Street? Your interest in "change" only comes from your desire for a techno-Bandaid to protect the status quo from radical reform. Maybe the reason for all the problems is that there was something really wrong with America.

More on housing sales...er, make that housing non-sales, and effects on consumer spending...er, non-spending...and ignoring of deflationary pressure caused by rapidly declining property values.

'Kudlow's show last night had a guest on who put things in the proper perspective - the market will clear when buyers and sellers find price equilibrium. That hasn't happened yet, and the claim that all these "auctions" will clear the backlog are false - nearly all of these auctions aren't really a price-discovery mechanism as they are not absolute auctions, and the banks are bidding on their own properties. Until that stops and properties sell for the highest bid price discovery has not taken place.

Further, as was pointed out last night on Kudlow (correctly), the wealth destruction is real and you can't ignore it. The same people who claim that "home price appreciation has fueled consumer spending" over the last six years are now arguing that home price declines won't translate into consumer behavior on the way down. This is outrageously duplicitous, but you rarely hear anyone get called on it - and never on Bubble Television.'

http://market-ticker.denninger.net/

On BNN the other day they interviewed this housing expert in the US who said that even if not one new home was built it would take 2 years to clear out the backlog of resale homes. He also said April and May we will see a dramatic increase in defaults as some mortgages come due.

... the wealth destruction is real and you can't ignore it.

This raises an interesting philosophical question - what do we mean by "wealth" (or value)? It's not clear to me that there was ever wealth there to destroy. If the only notion that there is wealth is that someone else recognizes it as such, does changing one's mind about that notion actually destroy anything real? I should probably ask my bean-counter-in-training son about this one...

The practical aspect is this...When a family owns a home that can be sold for $400,000 and the family owes $300,000 on the home mortgage, said family could secure a line of credit on the home because the market value of the home is $100,000 greater than the mortgage amount.

If the home drops in market value to $300,000 or less, the family will no longer be able to secure a line of credit on the home because now the market value and home mortgage are the same.

The crux is that the family had excess collateral in their home that could be borrowed against when their home had a market value of $400K but none at $300K. So, I think it is safe to say that the family had potential wealth of $100,000 and could have accessed it by using a line of credit (second mortgage). But, at a market value of $300,000 the potential wealth of the family (excess collateral) has disappeared.

I hope I have stated this clearly and that it helps.

They had the ability to increase their liabilities, which is not the same thing as wealth. To determine net wealth, one needs to subtract liabilities from assets. Some are now learning that lesson to their dismay. If this was the way to wealth, I could increase it right now by refusing to pay my credit card this month.

My house has probably decreased in value but my well being has not decreased one iota since I still have my house and had not intention of using it as a cash machine in the first place.

It seems to be somehow wrong in America to do the old fashioned thing, live within your means.

I said 'practical aspects' not a symantics duel...

If the above family had sold their house with a $300K mortgage when the market value was $400K they would have realized a profit of $100k and booked it as an asset. The family would have rid themselves of a $300K debit. This might have meant some time under a bridge but what the hay...this is all an example.

I have never asked a bank for a second mortage on my home or my two rentals.

I don't owe anyone anything...except taxes and utilities. Maintenance is paid for out of pocket and I do the work.

I live within my means and my wife and I are savers...a rare breed now. At age 63 we are definitely old fashioned. I wish our kids would have listened when we attempted to explain the good and bad aspects of credit. Our oldest daughter took a second to add a large pool to her home about 4 years ago...duh. The other two have done equally foolish things. I don't try to tell them anything any longer. I just smile when they show me or tell me about their new stuff. :)

For him to show his face in public takes some chutzpah.

For all those that think that the Fed can inflate the US out of the current down-turn...read this...

http://market-ticker.denninger.net/

'TRICHET (the head of the ECB) said today, in effect, that to lower rates now would be the same thing as taxing citizens to bail out the banks! He is not going to go along with what we're doing and his message is clear - eat your sandwiches boyz, no matter what's in them, because we're NOT going to bail you out!

BERNANKE, PAULSON, AND OUR CURRENCY have been thrown under the bus by the European Central Bank!

And let's be clear - The Fed has thrown roughly half of its balance sheet at this problem and now the European Central Bank has said "no mas!" to standing with us in the most clear terms possible!

Further, we're not done and real stress, as determined by the "higher risk" yield spreads, has not come in to any material degree, and in fact right now is way above the levels where it sat during the height of the August meltdown!

Ben and Hank are being forced to choose between destroying our currency and economy (and if the "Dollar Carry" gets legs, that's exactly what will happen) or abandoning their attempt to play "hide the sausage."

Here's the problem, in a nutshell:

We are no longer the center of the universe in the United States, despite the raw arrogance of those in our government and banking system who think we are.

Other Central Banks are now able to tell us to get stuffed, and we have no choice but to listen. We cut off our internal energy supply capability and as a consequence we have no defense to such a coordinated attack; we cannot "close up and run internally" any more, as we are required to import huge percentages of our energy supply.

The result of this is that Trichet (the ECB), Australia, Iceland and others can effectively tell Ben to get stuffed and stop with the crap and games or they will simply sit back and shove price inflation at us until we crack, while at the same time the carry folks show up and start treating us as a funding currency and evicerating our financial institutions at the same time, and there's not a damn thing the United States can do about it.'

By 'funding currency' the author means 'carry trade'. See: currency carry trade link below. Near ZIRP foreign dealers would purchase dollars to invest abroad, turning our financial institutions into zombies. Hey, they are the next thing to zombies now!

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/currencycarrytrade.asp

Good links and discussion, but I think it is "we" who threw ourselves under the bus and not the guys in Europe. So hang on and get your house in order as best as it can be done for the circumstances that are at hand. AS Westexas has urged so many times, ELP, ELP. And oil is back up at $107. John

It is possible that Bernanke had a handshake deal with Trichet before Bernanke began cutting rates. If so, then 'Trichet throwing US Dollar under a train' would make some sense.

I agree that we have been our own worst enemy. We should not have to rely on the ECB for help with our currency.

River; IMO re-inflating the RE bubble economy is impossible, but destroying the US dollar (and in the process helping commodity and oil investors) is quite doable. At this point, a relatively small % of Americans understand what is being done to their currency (all three Presidential candidates are silent on the topic) so the reverse carry trade will be fun for the connected for quite a while. Peter Schiff advocates this on a smaller scale in his book for Americans-borrow as much as you can in US dollars and invest abroad-it is a bet on continual weakness of the currency. IMO Americans should start thinking like Argentinians-re RE, the only RE with long term value is the RE that foreign investors might crave (NYC, Hawaii, SF) or farm land, IMO. There is no way suburban sprawl is returning.

...so the reverse carry trade will be fun for the connected for quite a while. Peter Schiff advocates this on a smaller scale in his book for Americans-borrow as much as you can in US dollars and invest abroad-it is a bet on continual weakness of the currency.

I'm not sure how the financially non-connected 'little' guy can borrow at low interest rates. It is extremely difficult now to borrow anything even at the banks' rates that are inflated in comparison to the Fed discount rate. Where and how does one get 'cheap' dollars to borrow?

Re: Where and how does one get "cheap" dollars to borrow?

They are all over the place. First remember that the real inflation rate is probably at least 6-7 percent. Some things like energy are going up faster than that. Last year in January gas was about $2.00. January 2008 it was about $2.70 or an increase of 35 percent.

Now suppose you use my favorite source of cheap dollars: credit cards. Suppose in January of 2007 you bought gas and paid only the minimum payment. Then suppose you have a high rate card (I get offers much lower, but for sake of argument) with a 24 percent interest rate. Paying the minimum balance can result in it taking many years to pay off the debt. But for the first year at least if not paid off there was a gain on the gas purchases of 11 percent in this example. In my case the gain is much higher because I would never pay more than 4 percent interest.

I loaded up on credit card debt a couple years back at around 4 percent until paid in full. Paying the minimum it will take 25 to 28 years to pay off the debt. I'm sure my credit rating has fallen, but what good is a credit rating when you're dead. I'm 65 and will be long dead by the time those cards are paid off. They will be paid from my estate. I still get some offers, but not as good as back in 2004-6.

My point here is when you get a good interest rate until paid in full credit card offer: grab it. A local building supply chain has no interest, no payment until January 2009 on purchases over $299 when using their in house credit card. I buy $300 worth of gift cards and use them to make purchases of the piddly stuff I usually buy there. I still get the no interest, no payment benefit.

Be imaginative and use your brain. Free money is just waiting to be picked up by those who can see it.

BrianT, I agree with what you say. Sadly, most Americans don't have a clue about the train wreck in progress.

I have a friend in Boston, stock broker, that told me in 2000, when shrub was elected, that he would literally destroy the economy. At the time I didn't believe him, I thought he was exagerating. Now I believe him.

http://www.technologyreview.com/Energy/20476/

A new kind of solar cell is 27 percent more efficient without being more expensive to make.

1366 Technologies claims that it improves the efficiency--a measure of the electricity generated from a given amount of light--of multicrystalline silicon solar cells by 27 percent compared with conventional ones. The company's efficiency and cost claims are based on results from small solar cells (about two centimeters across) made in the lab of Emanuel Sachs, a professor of mechanical engineering at MIT, who is one of the company's founders. 1366 Technologies is building a pilot-scale manufacturing plant that will make full-sized solar cells (about 15 centimeters across). Within a year, the company will decide whether its pilot-plant results justify building a factory for commercial production, Sachs says.

There certainly seems to be a steady movement of intelligent people into this kind of thing.

I hope this works out but many times these new discoveries do not scale.

I built a solar powered helicopter that was about 2 centimeters across and it worked well. When I test flew the scaled up version it crashed on take off resulting in a serious head injury...I never fully recovered but they let me out anyway.

If I had a degree from MIT the helicopter might not have flown but at least it would have been easier to find start up funding...and medical insurance.

lol!

I wish I understood engineering. I can't understand why nothing ever seems to scale.

Hi Moe...Is it time to go long oil based on comments made on Squeek Blab this am?

I have no stock left but GE. That is a partially sentimental play that will probably cost me in the long run. I do have some cash parked and waiting for...??? something ???

Got any ideas? wink hint wink. :)

Here's the thing, River. We've had three buy signals on oil since the correction bottom on 3/20, including a buy signal yesterday. But we're also closing in on significant resistance now, and we're farther from strong support, so I don't like the risk reward equation as much up here. I'm not selling though.

I do think oil is going up, but not in a perfect straight line. It's going to take strong fundamentals to get us through the recent highs.

So, I would probably wait for a stronger set-up if you're not already in. You might end up paying more, but you want to buy in with less risk.

Regarding stocks, we had a decent short-term buy signal on 3/17. But again, if you're not already in, I'd wait a bit for a stronger set-up. It could happen any day, or maybe not for a long time. I don't know yet.

I'd want as pure a bet on oil prices as possible. I've also got long-term bets on natural gas. Things like royalty trusts with good reserves and low decline rates, or stocks that mimic good royalty trusts as closely as possible. The stocks I'd be looking for would be stocks with strong earnings, good reserves and low overhead. If you want a clean long-term bet on energy prices without a lot of trading, I like DBO and DBE. I would look at the energy stocks here if you want stocks: http://online.wsj.com/mdc/public/page/2_3022-mfgppl-moneyflow.html?mod=t...

There was also a buy signal on corn and soybeans, but if you're not already in, wait for a better set-up, especially on soybeans, which look dangerous at the moment. Wheat looks sucky.

suyog asked yesterday about options on oil futures, and I like those too. The answer to your question, suyog, was yes.

But as of today I would do my homework and wait for a better set-up to buy anything.

I don't know, for the S&P, the 20W MA just crossed the 50W MA to the negative, which, if you look at it over the last 50 years, is a major bear signal. That being said, signals are not 100%, there was once where the crossover occurred and not much happened, however, I think that we will see some major problems if the rest of the nation catches up with my native ohio in foreclosure rates (3.88%).

I do agree with PaulIT that we're in a long-term bear market for stocks and all kinds of paper. There should eventually be some kind of rally to play intermediate-term. But I wouldn't be buying SPY, for example, for buy and hold unless you're a real masochist.

With anything you buy, you want as pure a bet on an underlying commodity price as possible. And I wouldn't just bet indiscriminately on commodities either.

I know virtually nothing about alternative energy stocks.

Note, the stock market looked hopeful all day and then closed badly. Technically, I have an overall S&P sell signal today.

If you narrow it down to energy or energy service stocks, I don't have a sell signal. But you still have the problem that the risk is a bit too high. You want to wait to buy even good stocks at this point until we see a better set-up.

Make that close to an overall S&P sell signal. Want to see what happens tomorrow.

By the way, if you find some alternative energy stocks that you really believe in, the way to play them would be to play promising long shots with very small bets. You want very small risk with a chance at a giant payout (think Taleb's Black Swans). Wait to buy until we get an intermediate buy signal on the overall market.

Thanks for the info, Moe. I like the out of the money puts for chump change and a shot at the big payoff. A one time hit is all that is necessary. :)

BTW, does Binion's still have a 50 cent craps table? I used to frequent that place a lot...and the old Union Plaza when the UP Railroad workers came in on Friday nights. We would play Black Jack from about dark to dawn the next day at the 50 cent table. The pit boss would gives us Niles, an oriental dealer, and leave us alone all night. Lotta laughs for a few bucks.

I had to say one more thing to anyone who reads these posts: Remember, I'm not a financial advisor. In order for me to determine whether any particular investment or bet was a good idea for you, I'd have to know how much money you had, whether you have another source of income besides your investments and whether it's likely to last, how old you are, etc. I'm saying whether bets and investments are good in terms of risk and reward, but even good bets can wipe you out if you overbet your bankroll.

River, I don't know about that craps table since they went to new owners a year or two ago. I used to shuffle track the blackjack games at Binion's and the Plaza though, until they just couldn't take it any more.

Put it all in neodymium. Gold is so last-millennium.

Compressed air car coming with 2010 Breeze

"Electricity powers an onboard compressor to compress air to 4,500 pounds per square inch into a pressure tank contained in the vehicle," ZPM communications director Kevin Haydon told the Daily News from New Paltz. "This can be done in a garage overnight and it will take 1-2 hours. The compressed air is then used to power the engine."

Their car will travel about 1,000 miles at up to 96 mph on one fill-up.

4,500 psi air tank in a car? I don't think that it would be a safe car to have an accident in. Air bags for the air tank? Construct the tank from 1/2 inch armor plate? Pull tank in small trailer waaaay behind the vehicle? Buy one for a second car and let mommy and the kids drive it?...after increasing their life insurance, of course.

http://www.allianz.com/migration/images/jpg/saobj_216154_autobrand_im_fi...

Nothing like the comforting feeling of driving around on 15-30 gallons of inert gasoline eh river? :P

Yeah, that darn gas will probably blow up on me any day now. I have been exposed to it for 63 years without mishap...much of that time the gas was/is between my legs in mc gastanks.

Point is gas is a known danger that we have learned to deal with. Compressed air? Personally, I have little experience with it except oxygen containers for welding/brazing.

If the technology works out I will use it. I am not going to be the first on my block to try it. :)

Scuba Tanks hold at least around 3500 psi these days.

"Electricity powers an onboard compressor to compress air to 4,500 pounds per square inch into a pressure tank contained in the vehicle," ZPM communications director Kevin Haydon told the Daily News from New Paltz. "This can be done in a garage overnight and it will take 1-2 hours. The compressed air is then used to power the engine."

Their car will travel about 1,000 miles at up to 96 mph on one fill-up.

Oh COME on... they're gonna put enough energy into a compressed air tank in that little car to go 1000 miles at up to 96mph? And this takes less than 2 hours in your garage? With an onboard compressor?

Nah.

If it had that kind of capability than they could have easily made it a sedan and improved performance even further.

a 9 min. feel good video on the tech.
The Future is here, The Air Car

I note they make much more modest claims in the video: 4 hours to refill, 110kph top speed, and 200km range. That's not as egregiously unreasonable. And it's cute, but....

I'm still skeptical. A lot of the energy put into compressing air to 300atm is gonna be shed as heat, though I suppose you could suck heat out of the car interior during summers for 'free air conditioning'. And the carbon fiber tanks may "split, instead of exploding", but I wouldn't want to be sitting over a 300atm tank that "split".

I like the idea of a little compressed-air cruiser, I just doubt they'll make those target numbers work.... and the numbers originally posted were just preposterous....

(and the hybrid version will go LA-NY on a single tank of petrol by adding a step of pressurizing air rather than using the engine output directly? Methinks thermodynamics will have to weigh in on that...)

but I wouldn't want to be sitting over a 300atm tank that "split".

Imagine that sound of the air escaping 'trapped' inside the cabin. I question if the db level is enough for hearing damage.

Do we know whether the industry as a whole is actually growing, as opposed to different companies within it growing market share?

It all comes down to how much the materials cost and which company has the better lobbyist. Right now it seems that the nuclear types are winning. Solar does not get alot of airtime on BNN and Bloomberg. I have heard of some solar companies that are getting away from silicon based technology. Here is one. http://www.sustainableindustries.com/technology/16076607.html

Thank you. I'm very interested in this type of company.

We need to declare an energy emergency. Reduce all posted speed limits by 20%.

The government should embark on a massive introduction of plug in battery electric vehicles while upgrading the grid. Renewable energy could be plugged right in to the grid. The government should let it be known that gas taxes would be going up at first gradually but then steeply to cut our reliance on imported oil.

BEVs are cheaper to own (-50%), cheaper to maintain (-90%) and cheaper to fuel (-60%). This would free up income to support the rest of the economy. This would cut the trade deficit and strenghthen our ability to withstand oil shortages thus our security domesticallly and internationally.

Hi Folks,

For those interested there are a lot of stories today at:

http://energyshortage.org/

Keep you all busy until Leanan returns!

The new Monthly Energy Review is out from the EIA (this is the one that I use to keep up my charts on global production and by whom). It lags behind the preliminary values of the IPM, but the values in the MER are the same that ultimately end up in the IPM but it takes a little cross checking to be sure that everything is updated correctly. A recent change to the MER spreadsheet eliminates a significant quantity of old monthly data (I'm glad I don't so wholesale replacements of the data). So, the graphic is based upon the old and the new, though I use a different graphic to follow individual countries.

December,as we've noted earlier, comes close to the May 2005 peak production (74.202 MMBPD vs 74.298 MMBPD). But it falls just short. The 13-month, single recursive peak occurred in December 2005 (not shown on the graphic, yet). I run the calculation forward a bit beyond the data to show the recent trend only.

Here's the graph of it posted outside my office door (note that this is the same recursive calculation that Stuart Staniford uses, it just goes back to 1973)...

Awesome!

Can you email me graph at rkaiser (at) paretoenergy(dot)com?

Thank you.

available here for saving
or right click nice chart

Hello TODers,

http://pib.nic.in/release/release.asp?relid=36923
-----------------------
Morocco will significantly enhance the supply of rock phosphate and phosphoric acid to India required for manufacture of DAP and other complex fertilizers.
----------------------

In conjunction with this phosphate announcement:

http://en.afrik.com/news11572.html
--------------------------------------
Construction of Naval base launched in Morocco
------------------------------------
IMO, Morocco is beginning to realize that the combo of Life's Bottleneck [phosphate] and Atlantic & Mediterranean sealanes are a powerful one-two strategic punch.

Can they remain independent, or will they be a helpless postPeak pawn of global control?

Bob Shaw in Phx,Az Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?

Electric cars powered by wind set for Denmark

COPENHAGEN, Denmark - Denmark's DONG Energy A/S and a Silicon Valley-based startup firm said Thursday they would install an electric car network that includes about 20,000 recharging stations in the Scandinavian nation.

The grid, expected to be ready by 2011, will be operated by Project Better Place, an initiative by Israeli-American entrepreneur Shai Agassi, using excess power from DONG Energy's wind turbines.

Now that sounds ambitious!

Areas of Baghdad fall to militias as Iraqi Army falters in Basra
James Hider, of The Times, in Baghdad
Analysis: Zubair 1 is crucial pipeline

Iraq’s Prime Minister was staring into the abyss today after his operation to crush militia strongholds in Basra stalled, members of his own security forces defected and district after district of his own capital fell to Shia militia gunmen.

With the threat of a civil war looming in the south, Nouri al-Maliki’s police chief in Basra narrowly escaped assassination in the crucial port city, while in Baghdad, the spokesman for the Iraqi side of the US military surge was kidnapped by gunmen and his house burnt to the ground.

Saboteurs also blew up one of Iraq's two main oil pipelines from Basra, cutting at least a third of the exports from the city which provides 80 per cent of government revenue, a clear sign that the militias — who siphon significant sums off the oil smuggling trade — would not stop at mere insurrection.

In Baghdad, thick black smoke hung over the city centre tonight and gunfire echoed across the city.

The most secure area of the capital, Karrada, was placed under curfew amid fears the Mahdi Army of Hojetoleslam Moqtada al-Sadr could launch an assault on the residence of Abdelaziz al-Hakim, the head of a powerful rival Shia governing party.

While the Mahdi Army has not officially renounced its six-month ceasefire, which has been a key component in the recent security gains, on the ground its fighters were chasing police and soldiers from their positions across Baghdad.

Rockets from Sadr City slammed into the governmental Green Zone compound in the city centre, killing one person and wounding several more.

Mr al-Maliki has gambled everything on the success of Operation Saulat al-Fursan, or Charge of the Knights, to sweep illegal militias out of Basra.

It has targeted neighbourhoods where the Mahdi Army dominates, prompting intense fighting with mortars, rocket-grenades and machineguns in the narrow, fetid alleyways of Basra.

In Baghdad, the Mahdi Army took over neighbourhood after neighbourhood, some amid heavy fighting, others without firing a shot.

In New Baghdad, militiamen simply ordered the police to leave their checkpoints: the officers complied en masse and the guerrillas stepped out of the shadows to take over their checkpoints.

After having remained stable for about a month, US commercial banks' 'non-borrowed reserves' have fallen to -62 billion from -20 billion. See:
http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h3/Current/

Smith and UralSib's Chris Weafer are among analysts predicting the [Russian] government will be forced to cut taxes on the industry, its biggest source of income, to revive production.

Wow! Who knew? All we have to do is give Exxon/Mobile more tax breaks, and we can revive US production.

And on this date-----
1951 -- Iran: Mossadeq nationalizes Anglo-Iranian Oil Company.

The story above in Drumbeat about Russia confirms that its production is in decline now.

"Now we're saying the production rate is falling this year. This is not a bogeyman, unfortunately, this is real," says Yuri Trutnev, Russia's Natural Resources Minister.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601072&sid=arXTpOY4omL4&refer=e...

The chart below is sourced from Khebab's analysis on Russia:
http://graphoilogy.blogspot.com/search/label/Russia

I have added my own forecast, shown by the blue line, which assumes ultimate recoverable reserves of 235 Gb. This forecast is based on a bottom up project forecast until 2015. Afterwards, it is an exponential fit to the assumed URR of 235 Gb. This assumed URR may be optimistic as Khebab has a max URR of 211 Gb and Colin Campbell has assumed a URR of 200 Gb for Russia's regular oil (excludes natural gas liquids URR). The blue line forecast shows a forecast production of 2 mbd in 2050 which is about double that of Campbell's forecast of Russian oil production of 1 mbd, excluding NGLs, in 2050.
http://www.energiekrise.de/e/aspo_news/aspo/Newsletter031.pdf

Russia Crude, Condensate and Natural Gas Liquids Production - click to enlarge

On Mar 18, 2008, Sonangol director Syanga Abilio said that "We are doing our best to maintain our plateau of 2 million barrels, probably until 2014. Our production profile does indicate normal decline (after 2014) which we will be fulfilling with our exploration programme" which indicates the forecast production for Angola in the chart below.
http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssEnergyNews/idUSL1883291720080318

Angola Production - click to enlarge

Russia and Angola are highly unlikely to increase their production. Iraq, Brazil, Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan may increase production. Saudi Arabia may have some surplus capacity. However, there are now far too many countries whose production is declining which is becoming harder to offset by those countries which can increase production. Consequently, it is appearing more and more likely that the 2005 world crude oil and lease condensate production rate is the historic peak.

World Production - click to enlarge

sourced from
World Oil Forecasts Including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the UAE - Update Feb 2008
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/3623

Iraq, Brazil, Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan may increase production.

It looks like Azerbaijan will go over the cusp once Gunashli, the last stage of the ACG field development (which represents the bulk of Azerbaijanian oil production) comes on-stream later this year.

Dated material, but new to me:

Succint summary of impossibility of 'hydrogen economy'

“I think that it was a mistake to start with a ‘Presidential Initiative’ rather with a thorough analysis like this one. Huge sums of money were committed too soon, and now even good scientists prostitute themselves to obtain research money for their students or laboratories—otherwise, they risk being fired. But the laws of physics are eternal and cannot be changed with additional research, venture capital or majority votes.”

Not news on this board, but a particularly succinct refutation of our folly. Very nice diagram at the top, simple enough for anyone brighter than the Prez...

Compressed air storage under the ocean

Energy would instead be used to compress and pump air into underwater bags, anchored to the seabed.

When energy demand is highest, the air would be released through a turbine, converting it to electricty.

A new spin on "pumped storage" for renewables.

That's a cool idea.

I keep thinking about the inverse solution, taking supertankers and building in flood-valve/turbines, so that you are filling the ship with seawater and partially sinking it when you want energy, and pumping it out to store energy.. It might make more sense (if it makes sense at all) with forms like those floating Concrete Barge/Barriers.

It might make more sense (if it makes sense at all) with forms like those floating Concrete Barge/Barriers.


Compressed air is inefficient due to heat loss during compression.

You'd be better off building a bunch of floating Hoover Dams.

Basically: each floating barge would have a large pool area on deck. You pump seawater into the pool area to partially sink the boat. Release the water through a turbine to recoup your stored hydro energy. A floating Hoover Dam.

You basically got it. Yes, this wasn't to use the holds for air pressure, but for water. The weight of the Ship, though, not the water, is what is being stored at a higher level when the water has been pumped out, while the water flowing back IN is what powers the turbines and exports electricity.

This could even be augmented with the use of lever-pumps driven by waves and ripples (scaled to a range of sizes..) to contribute to the ongoing bilge pumping of the vessel. Solar Atop the decks, etc..

Bob

Solar atop the decks, etc. ...

Good ideas ... keep them coming.

I was looking for a picture of an offshore windmill with a ship moored by. Excess energy from a wind farm can be stored as hydrostatic energy by partially sinking the flotation devices.

Asia faces a rice supply crisis
http://edition.cnn.com/2008/BUSINESS/03/27/asia.food.ap/index.html

Part of a surge in global food costs, rice prices on world markets have jumped 50 percent in the past two months and at least doubled since 2004. Experts blame rising fuel and fertilizer expenses as well as crops curtailed by disease, pests and climate change. There are concerns prices could rise a further 40 percent in coming months.

Hello Rethin,

Another link about grain shortages:

http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0327/p01s02-woap.html
--------------------------------
Grain prices soar globally

Bangkok, Thailand - - Rice farmers here are staying awake in shifts at night to guard their fields from thieves...
------------------------------