Is a Net Oil Export Hurricane Hitting the US Gulf Coast?

This is a guest post by Jeffrey J. Brown, known on TOD as westexas. Jeff is an independent petroleum geologist in the Dallas, Texas area. His e-mail address is westexas@aol.com.

Building on prior work by many people, including Matt Simmons and Kenneth Deffeyes, and largely based on great technical work by Khebab, I have been intensively studying the Net Oil Export issue for more than two years.

The simple mathematical model I have been using to talk about our export situation is called the Export Land Model (ELM). Recently, data and media reports have shown that the concerns I have expressed about our export situation are growing more valid each day.

Venezuela and Mexico are critically important to the US because of their proximity to the refineries on the Gulf Coast. From what I have been able to discern, it takes an average of about five days for a tanker to get to the US from Venezuela and Mexico versus about 30 days from the Persian Gulf. Based on recent news reports, it certainly appears that the overall net export decline from Venezuela and Mexico is continuing into 2008.

So, what has happened to net oil exports from Venezuela & Mexico to the US and what effect has had this had on Gulf Coast crude oil inventories, and why am I concerned?

First, let's talk a bit about the ELM model. As an aid to understanding how rate of production declines and rates of changes in consumption affect net oil exports I proposed a simple mathematical model, the Export Land Model (ELM), which assumes a country producing two mbpd at peak, with a subsequent production decline of 5%/year, and consuming one mbpd, with a consumption increase of +2.5%/year. This results in net oil exports going to zero in nine years, with only about 10% of post-peak production being exported. Here is a graphical image:

Once an exporting region hits peak production and starts declining, the net export decline rate is a function of consumption as a percentage of production at peak, the rate of change in production and the rate of change in consumption. However, net export declines tend to consistently show an accelerating decline rate with time. As Khebab and I warned in a recent paper on the top five net oil exporters, recent EIA data showed an accelerating top five net export decline rate in 2007, continuing a trend that began in 2006. Our middle case has the top five—Saudi Arabia, Russia, Norway, Iran and the UAE—collectively approaching zero net oil exports around 2031.

Recently, there has been increasing attention paid to the declining net oil exports worldwide, and last week the Wall Street Journal published a very important article, “Net Oil Exporters Unable to Keep Up With Demand.” Neil King, the lead writer for this article, recently obtained updated 2007 net oil export numbers from the EIA. I was particularly struck by the net oil export decline rates for Venezuela (-7.6%/year) and for Mexico (-16%/year).

This EIA website has net oil imports into the US by country of origin, through March, 2008.

http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_move_impcus_a2_nus_ep00_im0_mbblpd...

The data show that combined net oil exports from Venezuela & Mexico to the US have dropped by 414,000 bpd from 10/07 to 3/08, an astounding annual decline rate of -32%/year. This decline was at least partially offset by increases in imports from the Persian Gulf.

However, as the decline in net oil exports from Venezuela & Mexico (and elsewhere) has increased, it’s quite likely that the Persian Gulf has not been able to sufficiently offset the decline.

The EIA has recently reported a large drop in US oil imports and fairly large crude oil inventory declines, with almost all of the decline concentrated in the Gulf Coast area. Gulf Coast crude oil inventories have dropped by 15.6 million barrels (9%) in two weeks.

The last four weeks (ending May 23rd) of crude oil imports from all sources into the US Gulf Coast are as follows:

6.683 mbpd
6.130
5.173
4.996

So, in looking at those numbers it seems quite possible that we are seeing some real, tangible near term effects from the ongoing net export declines from Venezuela and Mexico, and it's possible that we could see some problems with refined product deliveries in the Gulf Coast area in the very near future, perhaps in a matter of weeks if the trend were to continue, and there seems no reason to expect it not to.

What would result from this? Well, first we would then almost certainly see calls to release oil from the SPR. The problem of course is using emergency reserves to offset a long term decline in oil exports from two key nearby oil exporters. Venezuela is showing a long term net export decline, and Mexico is on track to approach zero net oil exports by 2014. In October, 2007 these two countries accounted for more than 20% of total US petroleum (crude + product) imports.

At the very least, this situation may force an earlier recognition of our long term problem with net oil exports. One risk is that oil from the SPR will be used to perpetuate the myth, for a little while longer, that we can have an infinite rate of increase in our consumption of a finite energy supply.

Datamunger, in a comment yesterday, has just compiled a data table showing the last three years of total world net oil exports, showing a slow, but accelerating net export decline rate:

original location: http://www.theoildrum.com/node/4082#comment-353705

This seems to further edify my reasoning above. All of these factors seem to provide evidence that we face a problem with our export situation.

Two recent Khebab and/or Brown net export articles:

Declining Net Oil Exports Versus “Near Record High” Crude Oil Inventories: What is going on? (September, 2007): http://www.theoildrum.com/node/2975

A quantitative assessment of future net oil exports by the top five net oil exporters
(January, 2008): http://graphoilogy.blogspot.com/2008/01/quantitative-assessment-of-futur...

And a big thank you to PG for some Sunday night editing work (this should really be listed as a joint article by Brown & PG). BTW, it's kind of tedious to keep typing Venezuela & Mexico. I suggest V&M.

Nice analysis as usual WT.
BTW - VenMex may be a bit more self descriptive than V&M...

Hmmm. V&M versus VenMex. I think we should let PG decide.

VenMex you immediately understand. V&M sounds like a medicated salve, or a low ranked technical college.

Just my two centavos.

Indeed, VenMex seems an intuitive shortening for a pair of LatAm countries..

VenMex gets my vote.

2008 looks quite different in Q2. Katrina in red.

Source: EIA.

Enjoy.

The table may be incomplete.

Both (AFAIK) Indonesia and the UK were oil exporters in 2006 or 2007. Both are now competing with the rest of us for oil imports (in small but rapidly growing volumes).

Alan

Indonesia stopped being a net exporter in 2004 and UK in 2006, which is probably why neither of them are on the list. IIRC, 2005 was the last year UK was a net exporter.

Interesting - who would have thought that transit times could also be such a major factor?

It seems like the oil fairy is not only limited by the fact that oil is finite, but that it actually takes time to transport.

And this just might explain the tanker rates - it isn't about increasing production, it is about increasing distance. After all, instead of one tanker making a round trip in a dozen days, it is now a tanker making a round trip in five dozen days. Which means that you now need 4 extra tankers to maintain the same flow of crude.

I think a lot of signals are starting to get crossed, meaning that a lot of people are taking comfort in the wrong things. Much like how a truly hot burn on the skin feels cool at first contact.

The reality of dissonance will not be easy to master - I still remain amazed at how the price of diesel has overtaken the price of gasoline, even in Germany, where it gets a 20 euro cent tax break compared to gasoline.

As usual, Matt Simmons pointed out the difference in transit time, long before I did.

When I read that part above, the thought that struck me was hurricanes and not just from the title. That is, if V&M are not exporting as much to the U.S. and more is coming from the Persian Gulf, does this mean the effects from some sorts of of unplanned refinery shut-downs are going to have a bigger lag time before things are running smoothly again? I live in Atlanta and can remember after hurricane Katrina that a few people didn't come into work for a day or two because of short-term shortages in gasoline.

As far as transit rates go slow steaming is becoming increasingly common where ships slow down to conserve bunker fuel. Its easier to find info for container shipping but we would assume that oil tankers are also using the practice. This would work to increase transit times.

Dated but its the problem we face.

http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0160-5682(198211)33%3A11%3C1035%3ATEOOPO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Z

http://seekingalpha.com/article/77472-teekay-tankers-limited-q1-2008-ear...

http://www.istockanalyst.com/article/viewarticle+articleid_1980755~zonei...

In any case this would put some pressure on tanker rates and show a bit higher amount of oil in transit.
But the truth is less oil is actually moving since all voyages are probably taking longer.

Interesting - who would have thought that transit times could also be such a major factor?

Well, let's consider our happy friend the oil tanker.

If he can make 4 trips from Mexico or Venezuela in 20 days, he hauls 4x his holding capacity in those 20 days.

If he can only make 1 trip from the ME in thise 20 days, then he can only haul 1x his holding capacity.

Now... If the company that owns him wants to maintain the same rate (4x in 20 days) then the company needs to have 4x as many tankers. This drives up the overall cost of shipping by 4x as well.

I think that it would be an interesting article to post that asks 'What if we only got oil from one or two parts of the world that were far from us?' i.e. for the US, if we could only get oil from the ME and not Mexico or Venezuela; For Europe, if we could only get oil from the ME (again) and not the North Sea. What does the supply chain look like? How vulnerable is it to natural or man-made disruptions? How expensive is it?

Good stuff...

Diesel and kerosene are the "essential" fuels, providing third world cooking and military, truck, farming and aviation fuel. They are very close together in the distillate column and I guess interchangeable to some degree at a refining level; and a greater degree when used. Gasoline is rediscovering its status as a by-product, albeit one that doesn't suffer any lack of demand.

An interesting analysis could be made of the worlds diesel/kerosene capacity. I bet it would provide a fascinating twist to the ELM model and governments are likely to exert some form of control over these supplies before gasoline. For instance, the US military recently standardized all its equipment on JP8. Diesel can be used too in many/most road vehicles, but in theatre they only need JP8. Guess who will get the last drops of the stuff?

Which means that you now need 4 extra tankers to maintain the same flow of crude.

Who exactly is building ships these days. Korea, China, India?

The big three constructing countries are South Korea, Japan, China.

This post is a magnificent insight. Westexas has explained what the shipping people are calling, "The tanker spike that came out of the blue".

http://www.bimco.org/Members%20Area/News/General_News/2008/04/09_Feature...

So $140 oil is a result of a 2.5% lull in supply + 2 years growth of demand.

Next year we'll have 3 years growth of demand, and is decline is indeed percentual will be > 5% drop since 2005.

But how many next years do we have left before us?

Note that oil prices and the dollar are both going up this morning.

Actually that is incorrect:

http://finance.yahoo.com/currency/convert?from=EUR&to=USD&amt=1&t=1d

as you can see by today's chart, the dollar got stronger overnight (oil was steady and fell slightly) then in the past 4-6 hours the dollar has gotten weaker and the price of oil has risen.

So, oil was up this morning while the dollar was up against the Euro, but not as much as it was previously up? Well, that is certainly an important point.

Hes the AntiDoomer, he thinks plug in hybrids are going to save the world along with the tooth fairy and santa claus, just let him pretend it's all going to be ok so he can remain sane. No matter how much we dispel the myth of the falling dollar causing rising oil prices some people are going to keep refilling their kool-aid. On another note, I think theoildrum is starting to become over-run lobbyist types that are paid to put out disinformation. I mean Kdolliso was a perfect example of that, makes me wonder how many others there are.

The work has already been demonstrated in multiple previous TOD articles which you apparently either refuse to understand or are incapable of understanding. Oil price has been increased by some small percentage by the drop in the dollar but the change in the dollar does not explain the correspondingly far larger rise in oil price.

The supply-demand shortfall between actual production and growing developing nation consumption does explain the price rise, however. And no matter how much you refuse to accept that, it is still the truth.

Greyzone, I only pointed out that today the price of oil has followed the Dollar/Euro chart today:

http://finance.yahoo.com/currency/convert?from=EUR&to=USD&amt=1&t=1d

Hell, look at this link then look at the oil ticker on the right hand side of TOD, for the last 12 hours they are almost Exactly the same.

Any Statisticians in the house?

Do a regression!

Use the price of oil as the dependant variable, and the exchange rate of Euros to Dollars as an independant variable. Throw other things to boot (production rates, etc.) and find out if they're related.

Once you have these factors, and run the regression in a nice Stats package (Thinking Minitab) then you can truly see if the relationship is statistically significant and put the debate to rest...

Sheesh....

Somebody put together the data and I can do it in about ten seconds. Send it to me at the eds box.

Of course, it will be without the lags, etc., that are probably accepted in the literature, etc., etc. But I can crunch the hell out of it whatever it is.

Hey- throw in the speculator stuff too. See if someone can get the trading volume of short and long sales of Oil.

So-

Your Y is the price of Oil

X1 is the exchange rate of the dollar to Euros
X2 is the production rate (Mb/day)
X3 is the volume of short sales of Oil
X4 is the volume of long sales of Oil
And so forth... What other theories are there for the price of oil to go up?... Heck, throw 'em in as long as we can get data.

Think it would make a great article.

I think all one would have to do is just show the graphical results (Scatterplot of each X vs. Oil Price with a regression line) and statistical results from Minitab, and P-Values.

Like so for the graphical (one for each X of course):

and like so for the statistical:

And if there are other good packages than Minitab, fine, they'll do the job too..

I think one would just have to explain the concept to P-Values for the 80% of the population that hasn't had staticstics and just show which variables are significant and which aren't.

I think the data will speak volumes.... :)

I posted this below, but thought I would put it up here too. The correlation between the Exchange rate of US Dollar to Euro and the price of a barrell of oil is

.83 for 1/4/99 -- 5/28/08
.79 for 1/4/08 -- 5/28/08

Both are highly significant (p-values < .00001). It is important to remember that the maximum correlation is 1. This indicates that these two processes share somwhare between 63% and 69% of their variance. All in all that is pretty high as far as most social/behavioral data goes.

I expect you will find that on short term data (over a longish time period) you will find intervals of very high correlation and periods of nearly zero correlation which in the total sample will show a small positive correlation.

But in truth there are 2 different situations: 1)periods when oil moves with dollar due to commodity funds, etc. 2) periods when oil moves on its own underlying fundamentals.

If we knew 'when' these switches happened, we would all be millionaires (and then they would happen earlier and earlier or not at all)

I keep hearing this whole the value of oil hasn't changed at all if you look at it's value compared to gold..

http://www.thedailygreen.com/environmental-news/latest/oil-gold-commodit...

Why is this, or is this legit?

Oil is used for transportation fuel, pesticides, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, lubricants, heating, and plastics.

Gold is used for a "store of value", jewelry, dental fillings, and electrical contacts.

In our current system, oil's value is exceedingly intrinsic, and gold's value is exceeding extrinsic. We may want gold, but we need petroleum.

I would also argue that gold is another kind of money, in that its only value is the value we assign to it; gold has almost no inherent value.

Why would you want to compare the value of oil to only gold and not also to wheat, uranium, the NASDAQ, copper, consumer goods, median wages?

This is less than legit because the comparison extends back only until 2001.

Thanks, that makes sense...

And according to this wikipedia graph, global gold production has been on a decline since 2000 as well.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold

I keep hearing this whole the value of oil hasn't changed at all if you look at it's value compared to gold

The graph in the article is misleading. By placing the oil Gold ratio on the same SCALE as the price it compresses the variation in the ratio. The price of oil has nearly doubled in Gold terms since 2007.

At the beginning of 2007 an ounce of gold would buy over 12 barrels of Oil on the NYMEX or a 0.08 ounces of Gold per barrel of oil. Now it's down to 7 barrels of oil per ounce or 0.142 ounces of gold to buy one barbell of oil.

If an export supply crunch is about to hit the US shortly then I would expect US $ to suffer a hyperinflationary collapse within 6-12 months. Possibly followed by every other currency. It follows that even before that point physical Gold will become unavailable as it always has during times of financial crisis.

So then you will quickly see Gold at $50,000 per an ounce in 2008 $ and maybe 50,000,000,000,000 $ in nominal fiat currency $. The Gold to oil ratio is any one's guess at that point :)

Just to note--the moves in the stock market have been having a bigger effect on the dollar lately (over the past couple of months) than moves in oil prices.

Not to say that oil prices don't affect the dollar, but the primary movers are constantly shifting.

Westexas,

The people with whom I am able to intelligently discuss PO with came to the same conclusion last week when they heard about the tanker "unloading" problem. However, there is a difference of opinion as to cause. While it seems clear that Mexico is facing geological realities, what is the story with Venezuela? Is it more of a petroleum industry infrastructure problem? I couldn't walk away from discussions with any clear opinion on the cause.

Has Venezuela peaked geologically?.. or is it more of an "investment" problem?.. or just mismanagement?

Has Venezuela peaked geologically?.. or is it more of an "investment" problem?.. or just mismanagement?

Probably all three (regarding at least conventional production), however, a key point (that Ron has pointed out before), oil production in Venezuela started declining prior to Chavez coming to power.

In any case, the EIA data show a 10 year net export decline that has been recently accelerating. Trying to model unconventional production is a problem, but the current trend suggests that Venezuela may be on track to approach zero net oil exports within 15 to 20 years.

Venezuela, like Canada, has massive unconventional oil resources. Orinoco bitumen is a better resource than Alberta tar sands.

China has signed a deal for 400,000 b.day in 2013 (China will build a special refinery to process this tar).

Galp Oil (of Portugal) has come in to replace COP and other US oil companies in one block of Orinoco oil.

I think conventional oil is in decline (like Canada) but they have a viable alternative (like Canada).

Best Hopes for Orinoco "oil",

Alan

Here are the 10 year EIA numbers for Venezuela (total liquids):

Production: -2.8%/year
Consumption: +3.5%/year
Net Oil Exports: -4.4%/year

And as we would expect, the net export decline rate is accelerating. It's going to take a pretty big effort to turn the net export trend around.

Looks like Indonesia might pull it off:

Indonesia\'s Oil Production Might Exceed One Mln Barrel a Day: 2010: VP

Kalla said that there are some other oil fields which will start production in the years.These oil fields are located in Sumatra, Sulawesi and Kalimantan Islands.These productions could make Indonesia, which has been net oil importer since 2003, become net exporter, said Kalla.