Hurricane Gustav, Energy Infrastructure, and Updated Damage Models - Thread #3 (updated 23:46 edt)
Posted by Nate Hagens on August 30, 2008 - 6:00pm
Topic: Supply/Production
Tags: chuck watson, henry hub, hurricane gustav, loop, louisiana offshore oil port, methaz, oil, oil infrastructure, original, peak oil, shut-in production [list all tags]
(Welcome: we are now on a later and more updated thread, which can be found here: http://www.theoildrum.com/node/4478 NB: you may want to just go the front page (it will be post #1 or #2) to get to the most recent thread: http://theoildrum.com ...)
Recent track shifts have Gustav consistently hitting near New Orleans, east of the majority of oil and gas rigs; though this could still change in either direction, the models have continued to converge.
There are many resources under the fold (by clicking "there's more" in this post), including details of the latest oil/infra damage estimates from Chuck Watson at KAC/UCF as well as lot of other resources including rig maps, models, google earth maps, and a lot more in the comments. Please help us find things that help convey the energy situation and problems created by this storm. Client-type readers should click on Chuck Watson's links - his long range Katrina forecasts were spot on and he has helped us -a website of volunteers - by volunteering a great deal of time and expertise.
UPDATE! 21:46 EST From Chuck Watson with respect to the LOOP:
Extensive damage and an extended recovery time probably measured in months. The pipelines to shore are probably in a lot of trouble on this trajectory due to scour.
Comment from Matthew Simmons 23:43 8/30:
LOOP is the only facility in the Gulf to unload VLCC tankers which carry over 2 million barrels of crude. They can in theory be "litered" by unloading onto smaller tankers that can make it into the Gulf Coast ports but this is very lenghty timing and the spare capacity of these smaller tankers is slim. We get about 1.2 million b/d of crude imports through Loop. (+/- 10%)
UPDATE: 21:00 EST - Graphic below - shut-in production estimates below fold
Sneak preview of the 11pm runs. This is from LBAR, which has been almost as good as GFDL on track (at 48 hrs, 156mi vs 136mi), and updates much faster.
(GRAPHICS MOVED UNDER THE FOLD FOR BANDWIDTH!)
(Welcome: we are now on a later and more updated thread, which can be found here: http://www.theoildrum.com/node/4478 NB: you may want to just go the front page (it will be post #1 or #2) to get to the most recent thread: http://theoildrum.com ...)

Damage estimates using LBAR 48 hour run 9pm EST-click twice to enlarge
For all graphics: Rigs/Platforms: Blue: evacuated only; Yellow will require inspection before restart; Red: damage requiring repair.
Refineries: Black: operational impact (partial shutdown) Green: Operational impact (full shutdown)
Red: Damage likelyPorts: standard hurricane flags for wind
We are not hurricane experts at theoildrum.com. Neither are we experts on damage forecasts to oil and gas infrastructure from weather events (though thankfully we do have an expert that helps us). What we try to do, and have been doing for over 3 years, is articulate the fragility and urgency of our nations, and our worlds, energy situation. As Hurricane Gustav moves nearer, and professional meteorologists and energy analysts gauge the impact it may have on our energy infrastructure, feel free to browse our archives of hundreds of empirically based analyses and perspectives on the myriad energy issues that are the backdrop not only for this hurricane, but for any exogenous event that disrupts the increasingly uneasy balance between energy supply and demand in our modern interconnected world.
We hope those in the path of this behemoth will get out of the way, prepare, and do everything they can to preserve human life. Let's hope this is all a waste of time and that this is not the human tragedy that it looks to be.
Click map to go to WUnderground
UPDATED: 20:53 EST 8/30
A note on our modeling process: we take the official NHC track, the raw computer model tracks like GFDL, HWRF, LBAR, etc, and even run our own in-house fast cycle track/intensity models. These track and intensity estimates are feed to our main hurricane model (TAOS), which computes the wind, waves, storm surge, currents, etc. at each point in our database of over 50,000 elements in the GoM like rigs, platforms, pipelines, pumping stations, refineries, etc. We then have engineering models for each type of infrastructure that calculates the damage and estimated down time for that element, as well as downstream impacts (eg if a pipeline is down, the upstream elements can't pump and the downstream elements don't get product)
Since the major models are converging on New Orleans, I asked Chuck Watson if his expertise extended to the impacts on the navigation, etc. of the Mississipi River, our nations most important port. His response:
Biggest problem for navigation in the lower river, as I understand it, is debris - trees, boats, houses, superdome parts, etc. If this thing stalls and upriver levees start to bust, then you get silt and more debris. LBAR track (one of the fairly good "quick" models) is now tracking "worst case" for NOLA. We're showing $80 Billion plus on-shore damage on that track just in lower LA.
I'm still skeptical this thing will maintain Cat4 all the way to landfall. Makes sense to plan for it, but the dynamics just don't feel right. More nervous about it than this morning, but still think it's less than 1 in 3 for Armageddon (which is bad enough).
Chuck Watson has created a table for us, showing expected production (vs original) for 14 day, 30 day, 60, 90 day, 6M, and 12M (updated 20:53 EST 8/30)
Early 00z (8pm ET) runs have shifted towards NOLA again. Will be
interesting to see if the big global runs like GFDL and HWRF shift as well.
Forecast GOM Production Estimates based on various track models (updated 21:00 est)
Official Forecast Track
OFCL ATCF Forecast Time: 2008083018 14 day: 6.99 MMBBL ( 43.42% normal), gas 51.21 BCF ( 57.15% normal) 30 day: 19.89 MMBBL ( 57.65% normal), gas 137.55 BCF ( 71.64% normal) 60 day: 44.88 MMBBL ( 65.04% normal), gas 306.38 BCF ( 79.79% normal) 90 day: 70.56 MMBBL ( 68.17% normal), gas 485.33 BCF ( 84.26% normal) 6 mon : 152.45 MMBBL ( 73.65% normal), gas 1040.40 BCF ( 90.31% normal) 1 year: 341.75 MMBBL ( 81.42% normal), gas 2279.55 BCF ( 97.58% normal)
Best Objective Track
BOTR ATCF Forecast Time: 2008083012 14 day: 6.44 MMBBL ( 40.00% normal), gas 48.65 BCF ( 54.29% normal) 30 day: 17.96 MMBBL ( 52.06% normal), gas 127.77 BCF ( 66.55% normal) 60 day: 45.40 MMBBL ( 65.80% normal), gas 290.50 BCF ( 75.65% normal) 90 day: 74.66 MMBBL ( 72.14% normal), gas 461.18 BCF ( 80.07% normal) 6 mon : 166.36 MMBBL ( 80.37% normal), gas 1013.94 BCF ( 88.02% normal) 1 year: 370.11 MMBBL ( 88.17% normal), gas 2275.52 BCF ( 97.41% normal)
Alternate Scenario 1 Track
LBAR ATCF Forecast Time: 2008083100 14 day: 6.50 MMBBL ( 40.37% normal), gas 52.09 BCF ( 58.14% normal) 30 day: 16.97 MMBBL ( 49.19% normal), gas 132.66 BCF ( 69.10% normal) 60 day: 38.89 MMBBL ( 56.36% normal), gas 292.30 BCF ( 76.12% normal) 90 day: 61.88 MMBBL ( 59.79% normal), gas 454.79 BCF ( 78.96% normal) 6 mon : 145.78 MMBBL ( 70.43% normal), gas 974.89 BCF ( 84.63% normal) 1 year: 358.24 MMBBL ( 85.35% normal), gas 2149.43 BCF ( 92.01% normal)
17:15 EST 8/30 Current track has LOOP out for extended period of time as well as some extensive refinery shutdowns.
Chuck comments:
The current tracks, both official and objective, are showing serious damage to the LOOP terminal as well as Southwest Pass. About a dozen refineries, including the big Baton Rouge Refinery (~500,000BPD), are showing at least week-long shutdowns and various levels of damage. Long term power and pipeline disruption is forecast in the target area, with extended rain (due to the storm stalling inland) making repairs difficult. It's not a good forecast - in some ways, worse than Katrina.However, one thing folks should keep in mind: right now the major track models are abnormally closely clustered in space if not in time. That (obviously!) means that they are either all right or all wrong. I've done this long enough to suspect the former . . .
Chuck Watson update 17:00 EST 8/30: The tables show the expected and forecast cumulative production from the GOM at the end of each period. So according to the runs based on the Official NHC forecast, at the end of 90 days the GOM would have produced only 70 MMBBL as opposed to the normal 103 MMBBL, a 30% cumulative shut in.
Little wobbles matter a lot. It's important to realize just how sensitive losses are to the exact track and geometry of the storm. As you're probably aware, a few leases are responsible for the majority of production (I should do a map of that some time). The critical damage width, even for a strong storm, is really quite small - 30 miles wide or so. So a 10 mile wobble or a 20 degree change of approach can make a huge difference in impacts. The expected shear means greater asymmetry in the storm, which also changes the geometry. As I've said all along, the numbers tend to be all over the place until we get to about 2-3 days out.
Chuck has put together a dynamically updating page that will reflect the latest damage models/forecasts at this link: KAC/UCF models.

Rain estimates using GFS forecast
Rain forecast from GFS - over 1 foot of rain immediately post storm, another 10" on day 2, 8" day 3. Wow.
UPDATED
PRODUCTION/INFRASTRUCTURE MAPS AND REFINERY INFORMATION
Here's a link to a really good map of oil refining/SPR storage facilities in respect to the path of Katrina (NB: OLD TRACK MAP!) and here is a listing of production and refining capability for the state of LA.

Just to give you a rough idea of where things are, the map above is a probability swath for Katrina (OLD TRACK MAP!) with the Thunder Horse platform as the red dot, and the other purple dot represents the Mad Dog development (100,000 bd); the Holstein development that produces at peak, around 100,000 bd of oil; and the Atlantis field that may have ramped up to around 200,000 bd in all. Put together these projects have the potential of around 650,000 bd, but as can be seen, they were sitting in an uncomfortable spot relative to the track of the Katrina.The white dot is where Port Fourchon is. This is where the Louisiana Offshore Oil Port, or LOOP, is located. Rigzone pointed out that this is where the foreign tankers offload, Google and Terraserve maps you can see that the area is very low-lying. One of the big concerns is that there will be sub-sea landslides or other ground movement that might affect the LOOP. Were this to be disrupted, then foreign tankers would need to be diverted elsewhere, with the likely port being Houston.
We have accumulated resources from previous hurricans below, but we'd like to find updated materials if you know of them. Recent refinery maps, recent rig maps in the gulf, recent gas fields, SPR facilities, the Intercoastal Canal, pipeline stations and transfer points, etc., etc. Leave links in the comments please.
Also, here's the EIA's Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas Resources pages. They will also likely come in handy. Also, here's a link to the national page.
Here's another good resource for infrastructure maps and such. (scroll down a bit)
Here's a map from CNN with large and small refineries laid out. (though it is an old storm track)
Very detailed piece by RIGZONE on rigs and other infrastructure in the area. (thanks mw)
Here's a flash graphic of the oil refineries and rig maps from Hurricane Rita, it emphasizes Beaumont and Galveston's importance. Click on oil production in the tab. Note the many rigs on the east side of the storm that will get the brunt of the damage from the NE quad of the storm...hence the high long-term GOMEX oil production damage estimates below.
Here's a link to Rigzone's coverage of Gustav.
You want a detailed map? Well here's the probably the best MMS map I could find. Very detailed and lots of interesting stuff. (VERY big .pdf warning)
Also, Scott Wilmoth at Simmons & Co was kind enough to send us this map. The map below captures only deepwater infrastructure. For a complete list of deepwater development systems (includes operator, depth, location): http://www.gomr.mms.gov/homepg/offshore/deepwatr/dpstruct.html

(Please deposit new relevant links, graphs, and comments in this new thread...we have updated the resources part of this post with new maps and some more old maps and articles from Katrina on the LOOP and Port Fourchon--important parts of the infrastructure, as we learned about three years ago. We will start a third thread when we get new info or Sat pm)



It's time to leave New Orleans.
Go to I 20 to guarantee electricity.
Some history:
Storm FELIX: Observed by N #0
Storm #06 In Atlantic Ocean
Total Flights For Storm #06: 09
Date/Time of Recon Report: September 02, 2007 23:07 Zulu
Position Of The Center: 13 40 ' N 72 43 ' W (13.67 N 72.72 W)
Minimum Height Measured At Standard Level Of 700 Millibars: 2601 Meters (Normal: 3011 Meters)
Maximum Surface Winds Were Estimated At: 163 Knots (187.45 MPH)
Estimated Surface Winds Were Measured At: 12 Nautical Miles (13.8 miles) From Center At Bearing 45
Maximum Flight Level Winds Near Center Were 152 Knots (174.8 MPH) From 142
Maximum Flight Level Winds Were Measured 12 Nautical Miles (13.8 Miles) From Center At Bearing 056
Minimum Pressure: 936 Millibars (27.639 Inches)
Maxium Flight Level Temperature / Pressure Altitude Outside The Eye: 25 C (77 F) / 2745 Meters
Maximum Flight Level Temperature / Pressure Altitude Inside The Eye: 26 C (78.8 F) / 2806 Meters
Dewpoint Temperature / Sea Surface Temperature Inside The Eye: 4 C (39.2 F) / NA C (NA F)
Eye Wall Was Characterized As Being: CLOSED WALL
Eye Form Was Characterized As Being: C15
Center Fix Established Using: Penetration Radar Wind Pressure Temperature
Center Fix Established At Level(s): 700 Millibars
Navigational Accuracy Measured At: 1 Nautical Miles
Meteorological Accuracy Measured At: 1 Nautical Miles
Other Information:
1: Maximum Flight Level Winds Were 152 KT NE Quadrant at 2252Z
2: Maximum SFC WND 163 FROM SFMR NE QUAD
3: EXTREME TURB NE EYEWALL
This pass was shortly followed by..
REPORTS FROM A NOAA HURRICANE HUNTER AIRCRAFT INDICATE THAT FELIX HAS INTENSIFIED AND IS NOW A CATEGORY FIVE HURRICANE. THE AIRCRAFT REPORTED PEAK FLIGHT-LEVEL WINDS OF 152 KT...WITH PEAK SFMR WINDS OF 142 KT IN THE SOUTHWEST QUADRANT. HIGHER SFMR WINDS WERE FOUND IN THE NORTHEAST QUADRANT...UP TO 163 KT...BUT THESE MAY HAVE BEEN CONTAMINATED BY GROUPEL. A DROPSONDE RELEASED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUADRANT LANDED IN THE NORTHEAST QUADRANT...AND THIS DROP YIELDED A SURFACE ESTIMATE OF 139 KT BASED ON THE LOWEST 150 M LAYER AVERAGE. BASED ON THESE DATA...THE PEAK SURFACE WINDS ARE ESTIMATED TO BE AT LEAST 145 KT. AN EYE SONDE MEASURED A SURFACE PRESSURE OF 936 MB WITH SURFACE WINDS OF 24 KT. BECAUSE OF THE EXTREME TURBULENCE AND GROUPEL THAT THE AIRCRAFT EXPERIENCED...THE MISSION IS BEING ABORTED AND THE AIRCRAFT IS RETURNING TO ST. CROIX
From Sep 2, 2007. The key was 936 MB.
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/hur_nested/storm_1/00/i...
GFDL plot resolution: 26N 87 W has Gustav at 936 MB
If Gustav stalls/explodes North of Houma, gasoline will be $5
in a week.
Jeff Masters' advice from yesterday:
A BTW-
If I remember correctly, the first thing Wal Mart in NW AR ran out of in the week after Katrina
was water, limes, tortillas, sugar.
And Shell stations were the first to have plastic bags over the
pump handles.
Good t'hear y'all were prepared in the tequila department! :)
I may buy a bicycle ...
Deeper water means greater wind intensity.
Side by side view of Gustav & Hannah:
http://hurricane.accuweather.com/hurricane/satellite.asp?region=car&anim...
WOW!
One of the models that someone posted showed four storms hitting the Gulf Coast by mid-September.
I think that the big problem nationwide, if we get a succession of storms hitting across a wide area, even if they all don't hit the Gulf Coast, is a very long delay in getting all of the powerlines repaired, which will also of course affect gasoline stations.
Track for Hanna:
http://www.cbs12.com/news/hanna_4709331___article.html/northwest_west.ht...
Well isn't this just a fine how-do-ya-do. Hanna looks to be 10 to 15 days behind Gus. If she dances her way into the gulf and hooks, she could take out any platforms Gus missed, and keep every thing shut in for quite awhile. If the 2 to 3 storms currently bringing up the rear follow similar paths into the GOM...I shudder to think. Say hello to $4.50-$5.00 gas.
Jeff
Drill, drill, drill?!
RE: "Drill, drill, drill?!"
When, when, when??? Would you like to start on that drilling Monday at about 10 AM? Bring your lunch, and a life vest - I'll be there as soon as I can, just to watch. Bring your rig, of course, since mine's tied up for the next couple of years.
It would seem to me that this group of potential storms would demonstrate the folly of the drill, drill, drill part of our malleable Senator from Arizpona's platform. And likewise the folly of McSame's claim that new leases could be producing within one year, but not those other ones (the 68 million acres under lease.) These leases are different - not like those other leases.
I just don't accept the 1 year claim - I'm not like those other people.
Ummmm...why isn't Hanna turning southwest like they are modelling? If nothing turns her...she is going to hit the upper northeast US. That is a friggin scary thought.
No comments about scary, but certainly within normal limits - the East Coast (mid-Atlantic and up to Nova Scotia) has been spared for a while, but it too is part of a normal hurricane path.
A great link is here - http://www.geocities.com/hurricanene/Majorne.htm (though America-centric - I am pretty certain Nova Scotia has been hit too)
'Since 1900 six major hurricanes have made landfall between Virginia and Massachusetts. No major hurricanes have struck the Atlantic Coast north of southern Massachusetts. There is no record of a category 4 or 5 hurricane landfall in the north Atlantic states. Most of the major hurricanes to strike the northeast coast were moving at greater than 30-mph at landfall. The combination of wind speed and forward motion - increases the destructive potential of the wind and ocean surge on the right hand side of the storm. This is a critical and especially dangerous aspect of hurricanes that strike this region. Eastern Long Island, eastern Connecticut, and Rhode Island have suffered very heavy wind and storm surge damages several times since 1900. The period from 1938 to 1960 were very active in the north Atlantic states - four major hurricanes struck in just 22 years. Since 1991 (Bob) - there has not been a hurricane landfall in the north Atlantic states.'
A bit of local color from Ocean City MD -
'Described in the American Meteorological Society's August 1933 weather review as "one of the most severe storms that has ever visited the Middle Atlantic Coast," the slow-moving weather mass dumped 10 inches of rain a day for nearly a week, even before wind gusts as high as 80 mph and a 7-foot tide arrived.
......................................
The Great Hurricane of 1933, which struck 75 years ago tomorrow, wreaked havoc from Norfolk to Atlantic City and killed 13 people in Maryland. It wrecked Ocean City's boardwalk, flooded the town, demolished whole blocks and cut off its rail and road links to the mainland.'
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/easternshore/bal-75anniversarysto...
Read the whole article - the moral, such as it is, is perfect for TOD.
The models for Hanna are now showing a stall and a turn toward the North. Round and round it goes, where it stops, no one knows.
Yup, just checked out weather underground. All the track forecasters have that big girl taking a right at the Bahamas. Florida getting slapped on both cheeks at virtually the same time. And the Gator State is still under water from Aunt Faye. With luck, if you can call it that, Hanna will have mercy on FLA and save it for further north. I doubt FEMA is ready for that scenario. Blackwater's going to be very busy in Sept. Wow.
Jeff
delay the election?
Hi Expat,
Halifax took a direct hit from Hurricane Juan back in September 2003 (see: http://www.atl.ec.gc.ca/weather/hurricane/juan/#photo). A large sail boat was literally tossed through my neighbour's living room window. I lost thirteen trees on my property but, thankfully, no significant damage to my home. No power for about a week, but others were without electricity for much longer.
We also had a minor run-in with Hurricane Noel in November 2007, but other than localized damage due to the accompanying storm surge and loss of power, nothing too serious.
Cheers,
Paul
Thanks - I simply didn't take the time to search for the information, in part, because 'hurricane' is a bit of an ambiguous term.
We experienced an 'Orkan' where I live in Germany in December 1999, and for all intents and purposes, it was a hurricane. However, technically, it didn't have an eye, didn't involve much in the way of rain or lightning (though the thaw a few days preceding the rain led to very wet soil conditions contributing to the massive number of trees knocked down), and essentially did all its damage over land, more or less intensifying as it went along, not weakening until hundreds of kilometers inland.
For some strange reason, Nova Scotia is never considered by Americans when discussing the Atlantic coast, even though it has the warmest water north of Cape Hatteras, and a maritime tradition as old as any in New England.
I think this is an interesting point. If the projections were actually for a series of storms, each of which could warrant shutting in production, how great would the spacing between storms need to be in order to justify bringing the platforms back on-line, knowing that a new shutdown might be only a few days away? It would seem that there would be costs involved that would have to be balanced against the likelihood of the next storm's impact and current production revenue.
Regardless of any damage, this might stretch the shut-in period to weeks.
That's what I was thinking. A long shut in. I was wondering, if someone more knowledgeable knows, do the warmer surface temps "pull" the storms into the warmer zones, where they then strengthen even more? If so, google "GOM surface temps" and note the warmer temps in the Gulf v. the Atlantic. Even if Hanna runs up the the Atlantic coast, chances are good one of them will visit the Gulf. Either way, Gus is now cat.4 and headed for you know where. That's gonna be bad enough. If you're the praying type, keep NOLA in your thoughts. Could be a last gasp. Good luck Alan FBE. Best hopes.
Jeff
My son just had a pretty decent observation: "If they join together, it'll be like a Category 10!"
I deleted a series of large (old) images below. This comment by Doug Fir was nested in and am copying it here:
"These images of impending doom for Cuba and our discussion remind me of the link on Jeff Masters blog a few days ago.
http://www.theonion.com/content/video/hurricane_bound_for_texas_slowed
What is going on with Cuba with damage projections, how are they prepared?"
Current Key West long range (not large only 40k) live image
Click above for latest loop
Northern eyewall close to clearing Cuba at time of posting.
Cuban weather radar at http://www.insmet.cu/asp/genesis.asp?TB0=PLANTILLAS&TB1=RADARES
The MMS (Minerals Management Service) has started their GOM Newsroom service, which tracks shut in Oil and Gas production before, during, after hurricanes. For those of you who recall previous hurricanes like Ivan and Katrina, the weekly/bi-weekly/daily updates from the MMS after the storm are closely watched by those tracking the GOM's ability to build back production.
MMS Gulf of Mexico Press Releases/Reports Page Page: http://www.gomr.mms.gov/homepg/whatsnew/newsreal/newsreal.html
MMS Tropical Storm Gustav Activity Statistics Update as of Friday, August 29, 2008: http://www.mms.gov/ooc/press/2008/press0829.htm
Bottom line for Oil and NG price movements: after large hurricanes, the weekly/daily MMS report becomes a significant piece of news, in conjunction with the weekly Oil inventory and NG Storage reports.
G
ROCKMAN - in the previous storm thread, you had a comment about the outflow of Hanna appearing to rotate clockwise. I had to go read the Wikipedia Coriolis Effect article about ten times before I got it, but in short, your eyes were not deceiving you. The Coriolis Effect tends to deflect moving air to the right (in our rotating frame of reference here on earth). At the base of the hurricane, air is flowing inwards towards the low pressure, gets deflected right, and thus rotates counterclockwise. It flows up the 'chimney' in the center of the storm, and flows outward in the upper atmosphere, again deflected to the right, but since it's flowing outward from a central point instead of inward towards it, the deflection rightward makes it rotate clockwise. Ain't science wonderful?
Only in the N hemisphere - on the other side of the equator, then everything gets deflected to the left, and so cyclones rotate counter-clockwise.
This indecently is the source of the myth that water goes down a plughole in the opposite direction in the other hemisphere but unfortunately you need a rotating object several (15 iirc) kilometres in size before the Coriolis effect dominates, and not many plug holes are that big (cyclones being the obvoious exception).
You're absolutely correct - the Coriolis Effect works to the left in the southern hemisphere. Based on the Wikipedia article on tornadoes, 99% of tornadoes rotate in compliance with the Coriolis Effect....tornadoes are typically spawned by a rotating supercell thunderstorm.....or "mesocyclone".....so I think we can assume that a scale of a few miles or kilometers is where the Coriolis Effect begins to become significant for atmospheric phenomena.
Thank you for pointing out the Northern-Hemisphere centric fallacy in my original post. This is a great blog, but it is normally dominated by Americans and Europeans. I particularly appreciate contributions from the wider world.
-BK
The current models and myriad track analysis are currently converging on a point of landfall between Houma, LA and Lake Charles, LA. Directly in the center of those two cities is the Henry Hub in Erath, LA , the delivery point for the NG contract that trades on the NYMEX.
Map of Erath, LA
The Henry Hub was flooded in the 2005 hurricane season, but re-opened fairly quickly.
G
So help me understand the engineering and market dynamics of this. IF Henry Hub were to be shut down for a week or longer, what would that do to nat gas flows and prices? (remember force majeure?)
No impact in Texas and points west.
Elsewhere, many users would have to withdraw from their injected reserves.
Alan
Injected reserves?
Could you expand on this? I don't know that I've seen any reporting here on how, and when, and where we keep natgas reserves.
EIA Report:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/natural_gas/ngs/ngs.html
Well, the models are converging on central LA. The storm chasers are all heading there (so fewer updates than usual, because they're on the road).
The 11am update showed the models converging even more, and also showing that hook that could be part of the "nightmare scenario" (depending on where it starts).
The Northwest Hemisphere Hurricane Center thinks it won't start hooking until it's well inland.
The 2pm update is looking pretty nightmarish.
Possibly a Cat 5 (or high end Cat 4) with the eastern eye wall coming very close to BP Thunderhorse...
The 8pm update looks likes the tracks are shifting east a bit.