Liveblogging the State of the Union

And so commences liveblogging. I'll probably focus mostly on the energy points (right, that didn't happen), but if history is made (e.g. "internets"), I'll try to immortalize that too.

9:15 Right now we're fighting terrrrism. Gotta make 'em all democratic. (Ed note: please take my tone to reflect only my own opinion.)

9:20 "America rejects the false comfort of isolationism." (now there's something to chew on in a relocalized world...)

9:22 "In less than three years, that nation [Iraq] has gone from dictatorship, to liberation, to sovereignty, to a constitution, to national elections." ('kay, so why isn't the oil flowing?)

9:24 "With so much in the balance, those of us in public office have a duty to speak with candor." (the irony drips, on today, the start of the Enron trials, the furor over FISA, Rove's role in Plamegate, etc...Again, I remind you that my opinions do not necessarily reflect those of the editors and participants of TOD)

9:30 "Saudi Arabia has taken the first steps of reform - now it can offer its people a better future by pressing forward with those efforts. Democracies in the Middle East will not look like our own, because they will reflect the traditions of their own citizens." (what, exactly, does that mean? Universal health care? Education for everyone? Maybe we Americans should reflect on our own "traditions". Sorry, that was a cheap one. We have no idea what a "democratic" Saudi Arabia would look like.)

9:35 "Previous presidents have used the same constitutional authority I have - and Federal courts have approved the use of that authority." (That's exactly the point! It's absolutely essential to our right to privacy that Federal courts approve the wiretap requests every time.)

9:37 "Our economy is healthy, and vigorous" (Really? 'Cuz that's not exactly what we reported the other day.)

9:39 "In a dynamic world economy, we are seeing new competitors like China and India." and "We hear claims that immigrants are somehow bad for the economy - even though this economy could not function without them." (True enough. I like to hear some reality interspersed in the SotU from time to time.)

9:41 "Every year of my presidency, we have reduced the growth of non-security discretionary spending" (who wants to get on how much security spending has exploded in the past 6 years? And how security spending has way overtaken the cuts in so-called discretionary spending?)

9:42 "This year, the first of about 78 million Baby Boomers turn 60, including two of my Dad's favorite people - me, and President Bill Clinton." (Hey guys! The joke! Did you laugh?)

9:44 "Keeping America competitive requires us to open more markets for all that Americans make and grow. One out of every five factory jobs in America is related to global trade, and we want people everywhere to buy American." (Oh my. Or is he including all of those factories that Dell and Nike open in other countries as "American factory jobs"?)

9:48 Here we go! Wheeee! "So tonight, I announce the Advanced Energy Initiative - a 22-percent increase in clean-energy research at the Department of Energy, to push for breakthroughs in two vital areas. To change how we power our homes and offices, we will invest more in zero-emission coal-fired plants; revolutionary solar and wind technologies; and clean, safe nuclear energy." (And another chance to say "nucular"! No, but seriously. Solar and wind = good. Nuclear, maybe. Are zero-emission coal-fired plants really possible? Zero emission?)

9:50 "We will also fund additional research in cutting-edge methods of producing ethanol, not just from corn but from wood chips, stalks, or switch grass. Our goal is to make this new kind of ethanol practical and competitive within six years. Breakthroughs on this and other new technologies will help us reach another great goal: to replace more than 75 percent of our oil imports from the Middle East by 2025." (Sweet! Biofuels with a 25:1 EROEI by 2025! Peak oil schmeak oil! Ok, he didn't say that. But as I've said so many times before, I'll believe it when I see it.)

9:52 "Tonight I propose to train 70,000 high school teachers, to lead advanced-placement courses in math and science ... bring 30,000 math and science professionals to teach in classrooms" (Hey, Super G was just talking about this kind of idea this morning. SG wants to see a program that gives unemployed PhDs [in science and all other fields] research time in trade for teaching in high schools. Maybe Bush will listen to his proposal!)

9:55 "They are concerned about unethical conduct by public officials, and discouraged by activist courts that try to redefine marriage." (Yeah, I'm discouraged by activist courts that try to take away my right to choose--again, my own opinion here)

9:57 "creating human-animal hybrids" (Seriously?!? Is someone trying to do that? I'm glad to see that Kevin Drum is just as incredulous.)

10:00 "As we recover from a disaster, let us also work for the day when all Americans are protected by justice, equal in hope, and rich in opportunity." (Yeah, seriously. I just hope that New Orleans residents get the good news.)

10:02 "We have entered a great ideological conflict we did nothing to invite." (OK, let's be serious for a moment here. Just as all other Americans, I was horrified by 9/11, but this statement is rather disingenuous. He means to say that we did nothing to invite violent attack, but what he actually says is that America the great superpower did nothing to cause a worldwide ideological gulf. I am profoundly uncomfortable by this type of simplification.)

Thanks to Raw Story for the advance copy that allowed for very quick liveblogging. And now for the Democratic Response.

10:20 Wow. I'm not even motivated to snark about this. It's so dry.

10:22 Blah blah Virginia blah blah. Is it really so good? Any VA residents among our readers?

10:24 "Democrats at both the state and national levels are leading the way on energy reforms, calling for greater public investments for alternative, advanced energy technologies." (Well, it seems we're all on the same page here. So when are we going to see real change on the energy front?!)

10:25 "The Administration is falling behind in other critical areas; preserving our environment, keeping our workplaces safe, protecting family farms, keeping jobs in America." (Indeed. Too bad the minority party response is necessarily so vacuous.)

I've been thinking about Jimmy Carter lately, kinda being in his head before giving this speech. It would not be the happy clappy crap of this one, it would be a sober and reasonable assessment, no scope for gratuitous applause in the body. When concluded it might be a stoney silence or a standing ovation, that would depend on the wisdom of the audience.

Oil bit starting, timing...

Official WhiteHouse.gov text of speech is here

Number of times mentioned:
"oil" =     3 times (3x)
"energy" =  8x
"ethanol"  = 2x

"terror" = 20x
"must" = 20x
"enem[y]"=  8x
"intelligence" = 1x ... hmm
"only" = 11x
"course" [stay the] = 0
"course" [math and that other fuzzy stuff] = 2x

Democracy fights terror? So how bout when HAMAS gets elected?
While I agree with your scepticism on Hamas etc I counsel we wait and see how that political reality plays out.
Bush uttered Iran and Palestine(hamas) in the same breath. Will this get ramped up in the future? Drawing weak connections between future war-hawk dream targets?!?
When terror becomes legitimized it wears a new uniform...um...something military like. Ok, try again, maybe this is better...its like blowing up a train station from 20,000 feet. Now those guys flying bombers aren't terrorists, no way, no way...
When terror becomes legitimized it wears a new uniform...

Speaking of uniforms, the TV cameras flashed at plenty of soldiers garbed in their pro-war and pro-killing costumes last night. Unfortunately for Cinderella Sheehan, she was out of fashion and out of luck at the Petro Prince's Ball. Probably the slippers didn't match with the message. Story with photos here.
I don't believe democracy is either a blanket cure for the world's ills nor even suitable for all. It was supposedly invented in Athens and has been traveling westward ever since, except for rather rare diversions from time to time. My opinion is that it is not well known nor well understood worldwide. If it were, there would be a hell of a lot less countries with the devision of rich and poor is so prominate. Evidence that democracy is not applied equally, or the poor would obviously vote themselves money. The concept is not clearly understood by millions that have had "democracy" imposed on them, democracy "given" to them, democracy taken away from them and democracy misapplied on them for centuries. Usually democracy means the strongest or richest tribe survives, as America well knows. Democracy requires discipline, education, idealizm and tradition to be successful. Be careful what you wish for, as it may come true.
all this freedom bullshit pisses me off when he arrested sandy sheehan so she couldn't go to the speech... yea, we're real free...
light 299,

We try to keep profanity off this blog.

Sheehan will be able to run against my senator, Feinstein, this June, so yes there is a lot of freedom here.

We are not perfect. But I recall when writing BLACK PRINCE that East Germany had 17,000,000 files on their own people and the democratic nation of Italy, in NATO, illegally, had 17,000 files on people in Italy.

Both were wrong, but there is an element of balance and perspective.

sorry, that was a quote quickly taken from an IM conversation I was having... will be more mindful in the future
Evidently, you have not had them use private information about you to try and screw with someone's life. Trust me, our snoops have plenty of files too.

Is being able to get your name on a ballot really very substantial evidence for the existence of freedom? Heck, the Caesars had a Senate. If Cindy had FREEDOM, she could probably get an audience with the Dear Leader. Even the much maligned (but as Dave would remind us, beloved and esteemed) Saudi Kings sometimes give subjects an audience.

I tend to fallback on the definition of freedom once put forth, on a 4th of July, by radio personality Travis T. Hipp. "If you have to ask permission, you ain't free."

So, we are not feudal serfs, yet. But, we are on our way.

Who did you have to ask for permission to post that comment?
Jack,

I considered posting an appropriate response to your comment, but it might have annoyed you. Therefore, in consideration of a recently adopted law, I decided just to acknowledge that I had read it.

Thank you very much.

That should be 6,000,000 files on a nations population of 17,000,000 - quite a record for any nation, but says it all about East Germany.
Why do they need the hundreds of millions files from Google? And who's we???
Huffington does a "freedom" count here.

Personally, I appree-she-ate-it that the President did not pronounciate "appreciate" even once. He did, as others note here, go the "nuke-you-Lear" route a couple of times. Obviously it was a subtle paying of homage to Shakespeare and his love for ambiguous messages.

Before I thought that if you were outside the US border, ie. Guantanamo and the rest of the world, it was obvious that the principles of the US Constitution were not applicable to any of us. Now I see that it doesn't matter where you are.
did you know, Iraq has become more radicalized since we invaded.
and your evidence to support this assertion is . . . .?
Saddam was a SECULAR leader. And, btw, Iraq was a REPUBLIC (just like America), not a dictatorship.
But the real mission was to destroy Iraq, hobble it, put it back in the dark ages and install a radical regime, Just like Kosovo....Mission Accomplised. I used to be a republican until I gave up voting because I felt ill going to the polls
"...Iraq was a REPUBLIC (just like America),..."

San Francisco was not given the same treatment as Dujail after an unsuccessful attempt to assassinate a president occurred there.  And while Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have occasionally (and rightly) disapproved of US practices, they were positively scathing toward the indemic torture and mass murder that occurred under the Saddam regime. (From the AI horse's mouth: http://tinyurl.com/3abxh)

More to the point, there were five US presidents between 1979 and 2003, but only one Iraqi president.  Those five US presidents had to contend with a Congress which often opposed their initiatives.  The sole Iraqi president did not.  Iraq may have been technically a republic, but it was far from democratic, and it was decidedly not "just like America".

Higher number of suicide bombings... maybe????
Here's what the text of the speech, given to the press ahead of time, says about energy:

Keeping America competitive requires affordable energy. Here we have a serious problem: America is addicted to oil, which is often imported from unstable parts of the world.

The best way to break this addiction is through technology. Since 2001, we have spent nearly 10 billion dollars to develop cleaner, cheaper, more reliable alternative energy sources - and we are on the threshold of incredible advances. So tonight, I announce the Advanced Energy Initiative - a 22-percent increase in clean-energy research at the Department of Energy, to push for breakthroughs in two vital areas. To change how we power our homes and offices, we will invest more in zero-emission coal-fired plants; revolutionary solar and wind technologies; and clean, safe nuclear energy.

We must also change how we power our automobiles. We will increase our research in better batteries for hybrid and electric cars, and in pollution-free cars that run on hydrogen. We will also fund additional research in cutting-edge methods of producing ethanol, not just from corn but from wood chips, stalks, or switch grass. Our goal is to make this new kind of ethanol practical and competitive within six years. Breakthroughs on this and other new technologies will help us reach another great goal: to replace more than 75 percent of our oil imports from the Middle East by 2025. By applying the talent and technology of America, this country can dramatically improve our environment ... move beyond a petroleum-based economy ... and make our dependence on Middle Eastern oil a thing of the past.

Well, I guess that answers the "conservation" question ... no mention.
As the Veep famously sneered: 'Conservation may be a personal virtue" or something to that effect.  After this must be how Bush has resolved all of his addictions.
There has been much pre-spin  on that, if it is the best he comes up with then I call him Nero.
It's about as much as can be expected, I think.  At least he's talking about being independent of the Middle East, instead of the "energy dividend" we could get by "liberating" them.  

What I wonder is how serious he is.  Remember the big new project from last year (or was it the year before)?  The manned mission to Mars.  NASA got all excited, but no one else did, and he pretty much dropped it.

LOL!  Talk certainly is cheap.

But hey, making our dependence on the Middle East a thing of the past seems like a quantum leap above merely being "less dependent."

Not that I think it's actually happening any time soon...

Does this sound to anyone like a cigarette company exec. admitting that cigarettes are addictive? "Now pay close attention to my right hand while my left sells cancer to children."  Please! I think he's sipping light sweet crude in that glass of his. Nothing wets an oilman's whistle like some "addictive" oil.
Completely, sneakpeak, well summarised
Were you perhaps referring to this?

http://www.exxposeexxon.com/movie

No Peaksqueek is into the pure ethanol again.
In fairness, as I scan the old SOTUs I can see that this is greatly expanded.  I suppose the next thing will be to see how the message "sticks" in the media.
Like with hydrogen cars two years ago it's all "more research".  It's just a way to do nothing without looking like it.  To become energy independent in twenty years someone would actually have to go out and spend some actual money right now.
I hope they'll take IOU's The checkbook's empty.

Bush: ". . .increased funding for alternative fuel. . ."

Cheney: " actually, George, it'll be cheaper to just invade Iran"

Remember that $10 billion spent on energy R&D since 2001 is about equal to the profit Exxon Mobil made in four months last year.
YES!!  it's alot of "do as I say, not as I do." If the oil companies put very VERY little money back into R&D and basic maintenance of existing equipment (as posted in earlier threads) shouldnt we scream FOUL!!!???  Rhetoric, anyone?
We should scream WINDFALL PROFITS TAX!
I'm impressed that GW has spoken coherently for 30 minutes, he's gone up one notch for me for that.