DrumBeat: October 4, 2006

[Update by Leanan on 10/04/06 at 10:15 AM EDT]

CERA's Quarterly Report (PDF) sees three possible futures:

● Asian Phoenix assumes that current trends continue (no major disruptions in supply and relative economic and political stability). By 2009 overall costs will rise. The biggest increases will be in steel and engineering/project management (25 percent); smallest increases will be in equipment, bulk materials, yard capacity/fabrication, and land rigs (10 to 15 percent).

● Break Point assumes that oil supply difficulties limit production growth and that oil prices could go as high as $120 per barrel. Overall, by 2009 costs will rise even more. The biggest increases will be in offshore installation, offshore rigs, engineering/project management, and construction labor (30 to 35 percent); smallest increases will be in steel, equipment, and land rigs (10 to 15 percent).

● Global Fissures posits that widespread political backlash against free trade and globalization, combined with global trade and political disputes, lowers economic growth and weakens energy prices. Overall, costs will fall by 2009. The biggest cost decreases will be offshore rigs and offshore installation (-35 to -50 percent); the smallest decreases will be in engineering/project management, equipment, bulk materials, and land rigs (-15 to -20 percent).

Oil rises above $59, Kuwait supports

LONDON (Reuters) - Oil rose above $59 a barrel on Wednesday after Kuwait said it may join other OPEC countries in cutting output if prices continue their three-month slide.

Kuwait's announcement offset expectations for a further rise in U.S. distillate and gasoline stockpiles, which helped prices dip to an eight-month low earlier in the session.


Chavez says oil should not fall below $60 a barrel


Pickup, SUV sales bounce back

Pickup and SUV sales staged a September comeback amid falling gasoline prices and bigger incentives, automakers said Tuesday.


Qatar GTL projects face delays

General manager Lean Strauss said that Oryx’s operating costs were expected to soar between 50% to 60% due to the rise in commodity prices. Davies said other Sasol projects had also been delayed or hit by cost overruns, which was a global phenomenon.

Spokesperson Johann van Rheede said: “The phenomena of commodity price increases, and engineering and construction skill shortages, is global and not limited to South Africa or Sasol.”

Davies said that an energy company, which he declined to name, had cost overruns of between 30% and 110% on capital projects.


Shell chief: Access to resources key

“You may find it remarkable to hear someone like me say this, but prices have been pushed to what we in the industry consider to be ridiculous levels,” Hofmeister said. “Not necessarily because oil reached $60 or $70 a barrel, but because it’s driven at a psychological level rather than supply and demand.”


BP production falls in Q3 as Alaska losses bite

LONDON (Reuters) - BP Plc expects its oil and gas production to have fallen 0.6 percent in the third quarter as losses at its Alaska operations and sales of oil fields outweighed gains from new start-ups and a benign hurricane season.


US, world reserves can offset Iran oil for 18 months

U.S. and world emergency crude oil reserves could replace a complete shut-off of Iranian oil exports for 18 months, avoiding an estimated $201 billion in damage to the American economy, the Government Accountability Office said on Tuesday.


Mexico leftist threatens energy reform protests

Mexico's leftist opposition leader threatened on Tuesday to launch protests against any attempt by President-elect Felipe Calderon to privatize the country's energy industry.

"We are not going to allow the privatization of the electricity or oil industry in any form," Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, who narrowly lost July's presidential election, told Mexican radio.


Russia's Rising Oil Star

“Japan’s overall energy approach lags behind the changes occurring in the world. The strategic importance of energy has a far greater importance than is appreciated in Japan,” the report noted. The report went on to say that the country’s very “existence as a state” could be jeopardized if it does not develop a more strategic approach to energy security.


Canada: Tories to regulate industries for CO2

Time for asking politely 'is over'

OTTAWA - The oil and gas sectors, along with other greenhouse-gas-emitting industries, are to be regulated by the Conservative government under its widely anticipated plan to fight air pollution and climate change, Environment Minister Rona Ambrose said yesterday.


Kiwis create website that pays you to save energy


New security fears after kidnapping raid in Nigeria

Militants freed around 25 kidnapped Nigerian oil workers on Wednesday but five abducted expatriates were still missing in another part of the Niger Delta after an unprecedented attack on a residential compound.


Major Hurricane Danger Over for Year, Forecasters Say


Cut emissions now or pay, UK tells climate talks

MONTERREY, Mexico - Britain told the world's worst polluting nations on Tuesday that acting now to cut emissions of heat-trapping greenhouse gases would be vastly cheaper in the long run than doing nothing.


Global warming will threaten millions say climate scientists

Extreme drought, in which agriculture is effectively impossible, will affect nearly a third of the planet, according to the study from the Met Office's Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research.


Coal-Based Jet Fuel Approaches Ready Ramp

University researchers have successfully powered a helicopter jet engine with fuel derived from at least 50 percent bituminous coal, a percentage that could go half again as high.
Richard Branson interview
The British entrepreneur and Chairman of the Virgin Group Sir Richard Branson recently announced that the next ten years of profits from his transport business will be used to fight climate change. That will amount to something in the region of 3 billion US Dollars. And with his new Virgin Fuels business he hopes to improve and making new fuels such as ethanol and butanol.


The Axis of Diesel: Mercedes, GM and even Honda, are betting on a new breed of green diesels. The goal? To leave hybrids in the dust.


Business Week predicts The Future of Cars


[Update by Leanan on 10/04/06 at 11:23 AM EDT]

Summary of Weekly Petroleum Data for the Week Ending September 29, 2006: crude oil and gasoline higher than expected, distillates lower than expected.

Darwin:  To continue from yesterday, first let me say, I share much of my time with my Wife, and my fishing poles, and the garden. I must also share time at the computer station with my Wife, and she has become a little testie lately over the time I spend reading TOD.  Darwinism is more or less my religion, however all religions share differing ideas, consider the Shia and Sunni. As far as PO, I consider the slow squeeze the most likely to evolve. I have often been accused of being wrong and silly for most of my life, however many of those silly ideas are currently being used in the search for more oil. Many times I have been proven wrong, but by facts and time not opinions. I will concede one reason that the KSA may have supported Bush, they considered him the least competent and most likely to fail, however I still believe demand drove KSA production. I am also well aware of Saudi history, geology, geography, population growth, and the history concerning FDR and the American oil Co's. The leading nation in the Middle East is that nation with the greatest potential to increase oil production, increase their literacy and intellect, and acquire western arms. IMO if Bush were to succeed  in Iraq, all of the needs for Saudi relations with the US would shift to Iraq. BTW both nations have a pop. of 26 million and the literacy rate of Saudi is nearly double that of Iraq 78% vs 40%.

Shia are a minority in Saudi Arabia, probably constituting about 5 percent of the total population, their number being estimated from a low of 200,000 to as many as 1 million. Shia are concentrated primarily in the Eastern Province, where they constituted perhaps 33 percent of the population, being concentrated in the oases of Qatif and Al Ahsa. Saudi Shia belong to the sect of the Twelvers, the same sect to which the Shia of Iran and Bahrain belong. The Twelvers believe that the leadership of the Muslim community rightfully belongs to the descendants of Ali, the son-in-law of the Prophet, through Ali's son Husayn. There were twelve such rightful rulers, known as Imams, the last of whom, according to the Twelvers, did not die but went into hiding in the ninth century, to return in the fullness of time as the messiah (mahdi) to create the just and perfect Muslim society.

Dipchip, you have strange ideas as to what our the US's interest in Saudi Arabia and I simply am not going to argue with them. Yes, we are very much interested in the oil in Saudi Arabia and Iraq, along with the oil everywhere else in the world. Saudi Arabia is very stable, albeit because of the iron hand of the monarchy. The US would very much like to keep it that way.

I simply do not agree with you about Iraq. They could increase their oil production but nothing like the numbers you seem to suggest.

You wrote:

Shia are a minority in Saudi Arabia, probably constituting about 5 percent of the total population, their number being estimated from a low of 200,000 to as many as 1 million.

200,000? That is so far off it is silly. The Shiite population of Saudi Arabia is today probably around 4 million, virtually all of them in the Eastern Province where they constitute a heavy majority. I lived there for five years working for ARAMCO. Virtually all the management is Sunni and about 60 to 80 percent of the workforce is Shiite. Virtually all promotions to management go to the Sunni because of wasta.

I will not comment on this paticular thread further but I hope to have a lot more to say about Saudi Arabia in the future. The below link was written when the estimated population of Saudi Arabia was 20 million. It is now better than 25 million or more. Both links put the Shiite population at 15%. That is about right but it is about 70 percent in the Eastern Provience where all the oil is. Remember none of the very large cities are located in the Eastern Province. Therefore 3.5 million Shiites located there would constitute an overwhelming majority.

Officially, they do not exist. In reality, however, Saudi Arabia's Shiites account for 15 percent of the kingdom's population of 20 million.
And here:

Saudi Shia are only five percent of the total population, but Saudi Shia are twenty percent of the native population and eighty percent of the native population of the area with the oil.
These numbers are what has leaked out of Saudi Arabia and you should treat them with as much respect as you treat their oil reserve estimates. In truth, only the gods know the true numbers.
Sorry, I should have read farther along the post before taking up space.
For all the negative things said about Yergin and CERA, you've got to admit that this crew is great at packaging.  Their labeling of future energy scenarios as 'Asian Pheonix', Break Point', and Global Fissures' is a fine example of the sort of management consulting cuteness that CEOs can't get enough of. (I suspect they must have hired the guy in the Pentagon who dreams up the inspiring names for our various military operations: e.g., Rolling Thunder, Freedom Sword, etc.)

Having worked for a very well-known management consulting firm about a 100 years ago, I think it is not too much of an exaggeration to describe them as intellectual massage parlors, a chief purpose of which is to make the client feel good about what he is already doing while at the same time giving him the illusion that he is participating in a rigorous objective analysis.  It's not easy to pull this off, and Yergin et al are world-class masters of this art.

No way.  The Pentagon ought to hire a PR guy.  Remember "Operation Infinite Justice"?  Hastily changed to "Enduring Freedom."  Which makes it sound like freedom is something burdonsome and unpleasant, which must be endured.  

They've got a bunch of tin ears there.

As for the CERA report...I actually thought it was remarkably pessimistic.  For them, I mean.

Leanan,

It was changed due to cultural sensitivites.  Only Allah is capable of infinite justice.  One interesting quote from this source (Naval War College Review, Autumn 2002, Vol. LV, No. 4) says,


Western public diplomacy in the Middle East also entails great care in uncharted waters. As an Oxford University social linguist, Clive Holes, has pointed out, the linguistic genius who thought up the original name for the campaign to oust the Taliban, "Operation INFINITE JUSTICE," did a major disservice to the Western goal. The expression was literally and accurately translated into Arabic as adala ghayr mutanahiya connoting an earthly power arrogating to itself the task of divine retribution. Likewise, President George W. Bush's inadvertent and unscripted use of the word crusade gave al-Qa`ida spokesmen--and many others--an opportunity to attack the intentions of Bush and the West.

On another topic, I'm reviewing a PO novel for an old friend.  You would appreciate his treatment (albeit only one  scenario among many possible) of how our very complex, JIT system might unravel when the BTU's / day drop below some critical threshold.

What is that threshold?  How severe will the positive feedback be as one broken economic connection (JIT gloabl parts delivery to a small business, e.g.) causes 2 or more new ruptures, and so on?  Will it look like a slumping process (slow) or a brittle fracturing event (rapid)?

I suppose that the answer to the last is based on one's vantage point.  Also, I'm convinced by WT that the depltion rate, as measured by net exports, will have a strong bearing on the rate of de-complexification (sheesh, what a word!).

Ed

It was changed due to cultural sensitivites.

I know.  Like I said, a bunch of tin ears.  At the very least, you'd think they'd have someone research it before rolling it out.

And remember Dubya announcing his "crusade"?  Oy.

You would appreciate his treatment (albeit only one  scenario among many possible) of how our very complex, JIT system might unravel when the BTU's / day drop below some critical threshold.

I probably would.  I do think that failure, when it comes, will be of the systemic variety.

Like Scotty said, "The more complicated the plumbing, the easier it is to stop up the drain."

oh god that is sad. I'm hopiong the next slogan they come up with translates something along the lines of "closeted queers coming to steal the oil!"
Shut the fuck up. Go have another pill.

Oh! I'm just goofin' - Pretty Boy.

Leanan -

Either I wasn't clear enough, or you take me too literally. The message I was trying to convey is that the naming of Yergin's three energy scenarios is just as BAD as the Pentagon's naming of it's various operations in Iraq and Afganistan.  For some time now, I've been quite amused (and disturbed) by how surreal these names have become.

I don't mind surreal.  But the Bush adminstration's names are just plain bad.  
RE: "you've got to admit that this crew is great at packaging"

Someone once said:

"Advertising may be described as the science of arresting the human intelligence long enough to get money from it."

RE: "Yergin et al are world-class masters of this art"

John Locke (1632-1704):

"How many men have no other ground for their tenets than the supposed honesty or learning, or number of those of the same profession?  As if honest or bookish men could not err, or truth were to be established by vote of the multitude; yet this with most men serves the turn.  If we could but see the secret motives that influenced the men of name and learning in the world, we should not always find that it was the embracing of truth for its own sake that made them espouse the doctrines they owned and maintained."

Funny...wheres that cartoon someone posted a few weeks ago about falling gas prices?  Literally people forgot that it's still going up in the next 5 years that they are locked into that payment.  Oh wait, no they did forget since the #'s don't lie.
http://money.cnn.com/2006/10/04/autos/fortune_diesels.fortune/index.htm

Other than higher costs right now, what's the downfall to these new diesels?  Kind of makes me want one of these bad boys, but I know the fuel is much more xpensive right now to justify my tradeoff since I already drive a 4 banger.

Is diesel more much expensive that regular gas where you live?  For me gas is 2.37/3.47/2.57, and diesel is 2.59.  My car currently requires premium, but even if I could use regular, diesel is only 10% more expensive, and the improvement in mileage is much more than that.  Maybe the difference is that I am in a reformulated gas region, which drives up the gas cost.  

Yesterday I read another article on the new diesels, and VW is expecting their new Jetta diesel to achieve 40 city & 60 highway.

I've got 190k miles on my '96, and hope to eek out a couple of more years to see what Honda, VW, & BMW have to offer.  A 4 door civic hatchback with a diesel-hybrid would be just about perfect.

Gas just shot up yesterday from $1.98 to 2.19/gal.  Diesel remains almost unfazed as it hovers at $2.50 and isn't budging.  So it's .50/gal difference b/c it didnt move with gas, matter of fact it hasn't been here locally.  It moves totally independent of the price of gas.  I could making all of this up, but as an astute observer of my surroundings (more so lately), I wonder where this is coming from.  I guess we've already got this ultra low diesel in the local area?  RR, do you know?
I can give you some hints, at least. You realize that European manufacturers are producing highly efficient diesel motors, often in cars too small to export to the American market, or by companies with no presence in North America at all (the French carmakers, for example).

And you may have noticed that in a few European countries, population ca. 150 million, gasoline consumption has been declining over the past year. And that gasoline and diesel are both part of the refining process (in the sense that, as I recall, though the fraction may vary, both are always produced even if you only desire one).

To put this together - Europe has been exporting excess gasoline to the United States, helping to keep the price of gasoline lower there, while keeping its diesel for the home market.

The result is that Europe is making money off American SUV drivers. Yes, those cynical Europeans have figured out how to make conservation pay - lucky Cheny and the other members of the Bush league are so generous.

Of course there are a large number of other factors, including the new sulfur requirements, but since gasoline is a fungible enough product - as was witnessed with Katrina - this seems plausible, and is possible to support factually.

I agree it's factually supported.  This is interesting and quite logical.  Thanks for the insight.
Right now, diesel price is fairly seasonal. It tends to go up in the winter when heating oil demand (#2 diesel = heating oil) rises.
Obviously, as diesel cars achieve greater market penetration the relative price of diesel will likely rise year round.
Re:US, World Reserves Can Offset Iranian Oil for 18 months

Okay, let me see: there are 688 million barrels of oil in the SPR (supposedly). We use almost 25 million barrels of oil a day in this country. By my caluclations, thanks to Excel, that's about 27 days of supply, not 18 months. Somehow I don't think other countries and the EIA would be happy to lend us their reserves, despite what this article says.

So, if we had Iranian oil supplies cut off for 18 months and wanted to make that oil last, even with our domestic oil supplies and other imports, that still spells serious rationing to me. And where is that oil going to go? Here's a hint: it ain't going to be into the gas tank of your SUV.

bonk

What they are referring to is the fact that global reserves could make up the 4 million bbd shortfall from Iran for 18 months.  Stop trying to equate 18 month supply with 0 oil imports.  Also, we use 21 million barrels a day, and produce about 7.5-8 million a day domestically.  At least get your facts right.

RING-RING-RING-aling-ding

"that still spells serious rationing to me.

Bushe et. al. says, "How on Earth do we get the American Titbabies to accept Peak Oil and the necessity of change... hmmm, no, we cannot 'splain it to them like they are three year-olds because the population has the attention span of two year-olds..."

A Necessary War and Fuel Rationing... that's the ticket.  And regardless of the outcome, the rationing will continue indefinately.

A Necessary War and Fuel rationing... that's the ticket.  And regardless of the outcome, the rationing will continue indefinitely.

FWIW This is more possible than we think !!

Does that give a green light for the neocons to attack Iran? I still don't think they will though. The are not that mad surely?
I don't think we'll invade.  I do think air strikes are a possibility.
Still waiting on that "October Surprise"...

That has also been in the back of my conspiratorial mind.

What if the price of oil is being forced down somehow to allow room for it to spike upwards due to an attack and not be overburdening?

Turn it around.  The attack was supposed to have already happened, and there just waiting for the minimum oil price before they launch.
I too fear for this month.  This Halloween might be one to remember for the wrong reasons.  
Not that I put stock in conspiracy theories, but what if Iran was just a distraction.

What if the October surprise comes from N Korea.  Want the Dems to get in trouble real quick in the polls...  Have Kim Jung Mentally Il proceed with a live nuclear test.

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/061004/4korea.htm

Im more worried for a financial fart before the elections.  If that happens it will be in spite of engineering.  Maybe a hedge fund that is also a clearing house?  Hmmm...
Dragon,

The October surprise was a Democratic one. It is clearly the Foley thing. Are you not catching this?

Only Elephants pull scams, not Donkeys? Maybe I got my animals mixed up. Forgive me.

Sincerely,
The Shark

Oh ya...I forgot about the clandenstine Democrat program entitled "Operation Pretty Page Boy" used to entice innocent little Republican Congressmen.
Not defending Foley because I think he fascination with 16 year olds is disgusting, but the timing of the release of this information is highly suspect.  Especially as its coming out that this was known by democratic operatives almost 9 months ago?

They saved this for the right time, and are trying to exploit it to the maximum.  Not that I would expect differently, it IS politics, but don't fool yourself that they are going after this man for altruistic reasons.  That goes double for the fact that boy (now a man) did not want this to be released, that somehow someone obtained these electronic messages against the will of both the boy and Foley (possible hacking and illegal computer crimes involved?).  

What will be interesting to me will be the legal snafu surrounding this.  If the age of 16 is legal in Washington and Virginia and he technically didn't break the law, well then the democrats just sold out a gay man because he didn't share their politics.  Equal rights and all that only applies when you agree with them I take it?

Sorry but while Foley and any republicans who knew about this are culpable for what they did, the Democrats have managed to sink just as low by using the exploitation of a child for political gains when it could have been handled months ago, and in a quiet and civil way so as to spare the boy(who was identified on ABC) from a situation that will likely make the rest of his life all the more difficult.

But hey... getting power back to the democrats is worth smearing the lives of not only a republican congressman, but also a few children too.

Such is the state of US politics in the modern world.  

People wasting time scheming, undercutting, BSing instead of taking care of business.

Nero fiddling....


 ...but don't fool yourself that they are going after this man for altruistic reasons.

Is anything in politics done for altruistic reasons?

...Oh, I forgot the vaunted 'spirit of bi-partisanship.'
'I'll hug your elephant if you'll kiss my...donkey.'

Hard policy decisions based on such considerations as: Do we have leaders who are bonkers or do we have leaders who are stark staring mad?
That your question needs to be asked is a guarantee this shall end badly,
  1. US imports no oil from Iran
  2. US uses almost 21MMBl's/d not 25
  3. US imports about 2.2 MMBls's/d from Persian Gulf;  SA, Kuwait, Iraq, and UAE thru straights of Hormus.
688/2.2=312 days:  If US lost PG imports, Price would go up, consumption down and the reserve would be good for about 18 months.
In regards to a shutoff of imports from the Mideast - Unless other oil importers around the world decide to voluntarily to cut back there standard of living (doubtful), the loss of MIdeast supplies will cause them to bid for the supplies US currently gets.  

If oil were an entirely sold in the free market (which it isn't), remaining supply would be allocated by price.  With US currently consu