DrumBeat: July 5, 2006

Update [2006-7-5 9:41:48 by Leanan]: Opposition demands "true" reserve figures in Kuwait
Kuwait’s opposition alliance, which swept to victory in parliamentary elections on June 30th, will reject a government plan to raise oil production capacity in the light of reports that the country’s reserves are half the official figure, a leading opposition MP said.

“We will work to introduce key changes to the government oil policy in a bid to halt plans that aim to raise oil production, because such plans are unnecessary,” liberal MP Abdullah Al Nibari said.

A group of lawmakers in the previous parliament had submitted a bill that would limit Kuwait’s annual production to 1% of proven reserves.

Based on official reserve figures this would freeze Kuwait’s production at 2.5 million barrels per day (bpd), scuppering its plans for a massive production increase.

But if lower, more conservative figures are taken into account—as some opposition leaders want to—then Kuwait would have to halve its current production, which would drive world prices higher.

Jesse Jackson Leads Anti-BP March

High energy costs hurting industry in the U.K.

Mayo Clinic collides with coal trains.

The search for alternatives is heating up...

In the U.S.: Search for New Oil Sources Leads to Processed Coal

In Indonesia, they're making biodiesel out of palm oil. But it can't compete with subsidized petroleum, and environmentalists see it as an excuse to log the rainforest.

In Vietnam, they're making biodiesel out of catfish.

The U.S. is soon to be a A nation of 300 million.

The USA is closing in on a milestone that seemed unthinkable 25 years ago. Sometime in mid-October, we will become a nation of 300 million Americans.

We will then embark on a relatively quick journey to 400 million. Target date: around 2040.

How did this young country get so big so quickly? Immigration, longevity, a relatively high birth rate and economic stability all have propelled the phenomenal growth. The nation has added 100 million people since 1967 to become the world's third-most populous country after China and India. It's growing faster than any other industrialized nation.

Update [2006-7-5 10:12:46 by Leanan]: Ex-Enron chief Kenneth Lay dead of heart attack.

Update [2006-7-5 11:51:52 by Leanan]: Oil rigs leaving Gulf of Mexico, driving up prices

Oil rigs are leaving the Gulf of Mexico in record numbers, threatening to put upward pressure on U.S. oil and natural gas prices, according to a report published Wednesday.

Drilling companies are increasingly signing long-term deals with oil firms to send their rigs to more promising drilling regions overseas, said the Wall Street Journal.

Go north, young man: Canada taps tough-to-obtain oil

Oil sands development is both more difficult and labor intensive than conventional oil drilling.

...As development accelerates, Canadian companies expect to exhaust domestic supplies of trained oil-industry craftsmen.

"I believe we will be drawing on the American workforce. Americans have the skills to build these projects," says Camarta.

Update [2006-7-5 13:56:20 by Leanan]: Oil jumps to record trading high of $75.40 on worries about Iran, North Korea.

Note to self:  Buy oil futures, launch missle.

July 5 (Bloomberg) -- Oil rose in London after North Korea fired missiles into the Sea of Japan, raising concern that fuel supplies to Asia, the fastest-growing energy consumer, could be disrupted by conflict in the region.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&sid=amxMOFKzMVUo&refer=latin_america

... I find the Korea/oil connection kind of strange, actually.

You would think that oil prices would go lower if demand from the fastest growing energy consumer would be disrupted!?
I think the article drew a tenuous connection, perhaps trying to think of some way to tie the Korean news to higher oil prices.  I mean, is it all reasonable that Korea is about to launch a war on tankers?

Maybe there'd be a higher general fear factor if people thought Korea was going to start any kind of war .. but I haven't heard that either.

1/3 of the world's oil passes through Malacca Straits, so its possible - if the range of their missiles is high enough.

Then again, a lot of 'stuff' passes through that area, so you would expect to see price rises for many security-traded items.

I would stick with the Kuwait explanation.

rlaws,

  The one long range missile failed, and the other six are upgunned SCUDS, so they have little accuracy. A scare tactic.

You would think that oil prices would go lower if demand from the fastest growing energy consumer would be disrupted!?

Yes.

More oil for the rest of us.

Alan,
The way oil (or any other futures) market works has little to do with fundamentals of supply and demand. As John Maynard Keynes pointed out back in 1936, speculative markets depend on what speculators think other speculators will do. He has a very amusing passage on this topic, and BTW was a highly successful speculator himself.

When and if I speculate, I dump all my econonic knowledge in the garbage and tap deep into what I know of social psychology (of panics, mob behavior, mass hysteria, delusions, feverish overheating of tulip markets, etc.).

Whenever folks talk about 'rational markets' I think Tulips and sockpuppets.com.
Aha, at long last, a good rational analysis on the rationality of "the market".

We can probably compile a long list of irrationally exuberant moves by "the market" to contradict those who believe that the market acts rationally. Yes, the 2001 dot.com bust and Tulip fever are part of that list as well as the build up of stock values during the roaring 1920's, but numbers one, two on my list are:

  1. Continuing to invest scarce resources and time (also a scarce resource) into the building up of our oil-based infrastructure (suburbia, superhighways to nowhere, SUV factories, etc.) when we know that this is a mad drive towards the cliffs.
  2. Continuing to pump more and more CO2 into our atmosphere when we know the Inconveniant Truth about that tactic.
  3.  Not building a de-centralized DC electric grid.
  4. Not building up intelligence and knowledge in our populations (the dumbing down of the sheeple)
  5. What's on your list???
Did you hear that Atlanta plans to expand one of its freeways to 23 lanes?  Hello?  No doubt they plan to run all those cars on peanut oil.

Frankly, I think we should be shrinking our current road system, not expanding it.  Let's convert part of those 12+ lane freeways to bus only lanes that actually get you through the whole city, not half way through, like they had in Denver when I used to take a bus to work there.  

Did you hear that Atlanta plans to expand one of its freeways to 23 lanes?
Is that in one direction or two?
Not building up intelligence and knowledge in our populations (the dumbing down of the sheeple)

Actually, it is worse than that.  The education system is teaching the wrong skills and knowledge for a post peak world while, at the same time, using information appropriate to children, i.e., dumbing down the little, meaningless crap that is taught.  At some point, people will look back (well, at least old farts like me hope they will look back) and realize that "shop" and "home economics" were far more important than diversity training.

I would also include living on credit (both personal and agency/government) on the list list.

Todd

Maybe they meant to say "oil prices rise as Kuwait considers a 50% cut in production".
I forgot to add that oil prices actually fell in London this morning.
4 July, 9 am Brent August contract was $73.49
5 July, 9 am Brent August contract was $72.97
Because they do have an elected parliament they can demand the truth, as opposed to Saudi Arabia who is not the least bit concerned with the truth.

But if the truth ever is revealed by Kuwait, this will hopefully, cast a shadow of doubt about the rest of Middle East reserves. Then, then, then perhaps a little common sense will seep through the thick skulls of all those cornucopians who see no peak in sight.

The controversy led veteran Kuwaiti lawmaker Ahmad Al Saadun to demand that the government reveal what he calls "the truth" about the emirate's oil reserves. "This raises justified and legitimate concerns that these reserves could be depleted in a very short duration on the basis of current production figures," Al Saadun, a three-time former speaker, said in a question sent to the energy minister in March.
"We must know the full truth on the proven and non-proven reserves and other data regarding the oil wealth," Al Saadun said. The MP has not yet received an answer.

http://www.itp.net/business/news/details.php?id=21237&category=
(Same link as above)

In regard to the Kuwaiti story, note that the lower estimate of remaining recoverable reserves is a close fit to Stuart's HL estimate.
After Bernanke hinted about ending the interest rate hikes, all commodities are on the rise again. In this environment we will hear all kinds of excuses for a certain price rise. People need to have some explanation, whether logical or not...
odograph,

Correct, N. Korea and his fat leader have nothing to do directly with oil, but not too many TOD readers are from either Japan or S. Korea. They are not happy, hence the increase in the price of oil.

By the way, those Vietnamese catfish have shown up in our markets with the amusing name ... "white roughy."  Not at all like "orange roughy."
Well, this is no longer offtopic, but sorry anyway for duplicating messages....

I need the help of the TOD community.

We (Crisis Energética and AEREN) have translated our own Peak Oil Primer to English:

The Oil Peak and the World (pdf file, 2,5MB).

We would be very grateful to hear your opinion about this document, its contents, the translation (is there something that sounds strange), etc.

We intend to print some copies and we would be bringing some of them to ASPO in Pisa, so I would like to hear your opinion before that.

Many thanks!!!

Bad URL?

Not Found

The requested URL /ficheros/The_Oil_Peak_and_the_world.pdf was not found on this server.

Your link to the PDF doesn't work
Interesting front-cover graphics.

In looking at it, it dawned on me that there is a difference between The World As We Each Individually Know It (TWA-WEIKI) and The World As We Should Collectively Know It.

What does that mean?
Well look each of our 6,500 million citizens and how he or she sees that world from his/her viewpoint:

  1. There is gasoline for my automobile everytime I pull up to the gas station. Sometimes I have to pay more, but so what? This is how the Invisible Hand works.

  2. There are people smarter than me. Surely they are making sure that everything works out.

  3. I am a religious person and I know God is looking out for me.

  4. Even if oil/gasoline runs out, I am confident that the smarter people or God or the markets will provide alternative solutions. They always have. Worrying never helps. Therefore I will not worry or go out of my way to learn more. I am happy with the world as I individually know it. I have no intention to change it.
Oh, thank you kind sir! Now I can sleep well at night;-)
TEHRAN, Iran -- Iran, the world's second-largest holder of oil reserves, may run out of gasoline by the end of August, one month earlier than expected, as surging world prices bankrupt the government's price-subsidy program.

http://www.columbusdispatch.com/business/business.php?story=196901

Pre-emptive actions continue to be contemplated.
Link courtesy of Energybulletin:

Pre-emptive Energy Security otherwise known as Might is Right

You know, this is scary at first, like something that might have been written by Japan in the 30's ...

but I think it really puts a gun to congress' head.  It says fix the nation's energy problems, of face this.

let me amend ... it is still scary, even thinking that it is about shaping domestic policy.  it's a dangerous game.
"Pre-emptive Energy Security otherwise known as Might is Right" - or "If you don't sell us what we want at price we can afford, we will invade your country and steal it"
I hope the closing paragraph is the truly operative one:

      The reality of this nation's energy situation must elevate concerns within the American public to demand a new direction. As suggested by John M. Amiden, "The current world energy situation poses a national threat unparalleled in 225 years."69 Energy is an essential component of the daily life of this nation. The realistic solution is to eliminate our reliance on oil to avoid further international incidents, reduce environmental pollutions, and lessen the cost of energy for our citizens. The President should demand an immediate reduction in all oil consumption and offer a date to render the nation completely free of foreign oil. A leader with strategic vision and strong leadership must initiate programs for increased conservation and efficiency to curb a comprehensive long-range strategy that capitalizes on technology to achieve energy independence. A national effort on the scale of the Manhattan Project is needed to shift the nation away from oil placing America on a more secure path. Because lessons of the past have not been learned, we are left in a dangerous position that may require us to act preemptively to guarantee access to sources of energy. Our leaders and citizens must fully understand the link between oil, the economy, and national security.  They must realize the costs in treasury and blood we are paying for oil. Then they will demand a new strategic direction toward energy independence. Without a change in policy, laws, habits, and attitudes, we will remain chained to oil.

BTW, lots of "end of oil" references in the footnotes.

Your link above opens to a blank browser page.  Could you provide the link to the article?
It works for me.

It's PDF, and needs the Adobe Reader to be installed.  

Hmmm...strange.  I have Adobe loaded, but still not pulling up.  May have to do with a security setting here at work.  I'll futz with it.

Thanks.

This graphic from the CTL article (NY Times) is of some interest.

If carbon can be sequestered and the cost of new plants lowered the promise of CTL technology is enormous

These two premises seem to quite contradict themselves, at least in the foreseeble future. If we are going to rule one of them out the obvious choice would have to be carbon sequesteration, IMO. Add to this that most of the carbon would still be released from the liquid fuel itself, and that sequesteration eliminates other sources of heat for the process (NG for example) and the CS part turns into an empty sound aimed to please the GW aware public.

Yes, why doesn't the NYT get the obvious. There are no circumstances whereby CTL can be produced without making the release of greenhouse gases even worse.  Sequestration is partial mitigation.  The liquid fuel will still endanger the planet.  China will develop this technology to the max. That is the only way conceivable that they can take care of their plans for further expansion of their auto dependency.  

The liquid fueled auto needs to be erased from the future.  

My 5 cents would be on that there are certain commercial interests behind the article. Even the format looks more like a presentation or a commercial rather than balanced article with all the pros and cons.
You are spot on.
"A group of lawmakers in the previous parliament had submitted a bill that would limit Kuwait's annual production to 1% of proven reserves."

***

Imagine the PRECEDENT if a democatically elected parliament decides to limit output to that which it perceives to be in its long-term national best interest.

There could be a line of other countries itching to do the same thing ... lower production, longer life, higher prices!

That sounds la lot ike it came straight from Richard Heinberg's "oil depletion protocal."

Best,

Matt

To stockpile gasoline, use plenty of Seafoam or Equal. Then it will keep for years. Kerosene and diesel keep better than gasoline, but you can treat them too.

How well stocked is your retreat now?

Want to hire me as a consultant and tennis coach? :=)