DrumBeat: August 18, 2006

[Update by Leanan on 08/18/06 at 9:12 AM EDT]

Shanghai Petroleum Exchange Reopened

The Shanghai Petroleum Exchange resumed business on Friday after a 12-year hiatus, a step toward the eventual lifting of domestic controls on gas and oil prices.

Ethanol is changing the way farmers farm

Farmers weaned on the virtues of crop rotation -- planting corn one year and soybeans the next to stem the build-up of disease and insect damage in their fields -- are considering planting programs that include two or more years of continuous corn.


Ukraine fears energy crisis as gas prices bite


Higher taxes on flights and cars in Tory plan

Big rises in car taxes and petrol duty are being considered by the Tories in a review of transport policy that threatens the party's reputation as the "motorist's friend". The Conservatives are also considering an increased levy on short-haul flights to curb stag weekend travel to Europe, as they move to establish the "polluter pays" principle over the environmental cost of transport.


Nicaragua Muses on Energy Crisis. The energy crisis is causing water shortages and street protests.


Necessity mother of invention in gas-fuelled Armenia

Stop one of the creaking, Russian-made taxis plying their trade in Armenia's capital, Yerevan, and odds are it will have a gas canister strapped into the trunk. Battered buses have rows of red canisters fastened onto their roof-racks.


Prices prompt oil, gas investment scams


Clock company helps workers save time, money: Atlanta employer offers flex time, van pool to ease pain at the pump.


Oil prices 'may retreat to $58 in 2008'


Bye Bye Petroleum

With demand for oil soaring yet supply stable at best, the idea that oil stocks have 'peaked' is increasingly influential. So what are the latest theories around peak oil?
After one month, deafening silence concerning Kuwait's oil reserves.

In a statement published on the Kuwait Oil Ministry's Web site, Sheikh Ali said he had "undertaken to clarify the truth and volume of Kuwaiti oil reserves" for lawmakers and ministers over the next few days. Kuwait publicly boasts 100 billion barrels of oil reserves but a report some months ago by Petroleum Intelligence Weekly said internal Kuwaiti records suggested the volume was only 48 billion barrels.
http://www.easybourse.com/Website/dynamic/News.php?NewsID=25440&lang=fra&NewsRubrique=2

In a news release on July 18th, Kuwait's Oil Minister promised to clarify Kuwait's oil reserves within days. Well, days have turned into weeks, and now it has been one full month since that statement was released. What has caused this delay? I really do not know but I suspect it is because the news is not good and the release of that data might have serious consequences.

After all, if Kuwait really had 100 billion barrels of reserves, there would be no delay, only jubilation in the announcement. In several earlier releases, the newly elected opposition party, announced that, in order to preserve the oil for future generations, oil production should be limited to 1% of reserves.  Well, current yearly production from Kuwait is, today, just under 1% of 100 billion barrels at .922 billion barrels per year. But if it were determined that Kuwait has only 50 billion barrels, then to stay at 1% per year of reserves, production would have to be cut by about 1.16 million barrels per day, almost in half. That would be devastating, if not to Kuwait's economy, it would be to the political future of the opposition party. It would mean that all the free dole and other goodies, handed out to the public, would be cut at least in half. Say goodbye to any politician that tried that trick.

But the controversy still rages. The latest news, just out today, can be found here:
http://www.kuwaittimes.net/localnews.asp?dismode=article&artid=125678638

I'm not so sure it would be devistating.  If Kuwait cut their oil reserves in half and then their production, I think you could see the price of oil double or at least come close.  Then they'd be right back to where they were before.
But perhaps they believe like everybody else that SA and others can pick up the slack, thus keeping prices down.
If Kuwait had 100 Gb left, their remaining reserves would be roughly equal to what the Saudis have produced so far, but look at the difference in the current production rates between the two countries, 9.2 mbpd for SA and 2.5 mbpd for Kuwait (last EIA crude + condensate numbers).

Also, the lower number for Kuwait is supported by Stuart's HL analysis.

Darwinian says Kuwait produces just under 1mbpd, you say 2.5m.  Which is it?  Makes all the difference to Darwinian's point.
OOOPS..never mind.   My bad.  Mistook Darwinian's barrels/year for bpd. Sorry.
Even members of Kuwait's parliament complain that they do not know the true level of the country's reserves.  Yet still no word from the energy minister.

AME Info - Energy Oil and Gas
August 13, 2006

Kuwait's reserves queried again

Kuwait's parliament has again called for the government to reveal how much oil the country has in its reserves, reported the Kuwait Times. Speculation has continued for months that the country has 48bn barrels of oil in reserve, about half of the official figure of 99bn. Kuwait's new Energy Minister, Sheikh Ali Al Jarrah Al Sabah, who was appointed in July, has said that he will clarify the situation shortly.

My Wife and I saw "The Ditty Bops" last night at the Ark in Ann Arbor.  They (and their opening group, the Ginn Sisters) were really wonderful.  Why is that even vaguely relevant?

Well, Amanda and Abby have biked across the US on their latest tour:  http://www.thedittybops.com/shows.htm

They've cycled over 3000 miles so far!

Makes me feel quite guilty about not cycling to the grocery store, a mere 1/1500th of their journey ;-)

(oh, and I also highly recommend both the Ginn Sisters americana, and the Ditties' eclectic melodies)

Can anyone comment on this?

Oil and water can for the first time be mixed and separated on demand thanks to a new, reversible surfactant.

The liquid molecule could prove invaluable in mitigating the environmental damage caused by oil spills, such as the one currently spreading along the coasts of Lebanon and Syria.

Such a chemical could also simplify commercial oil extraction from currently inaccessible deposits, its designers say.

http://www.newscientisttech.com/article/dn9781-oil-and-water-mix-and-unmix-on-demand.html

A modern "philosopher's stone" to turn base metals into gold!

"Living better through chemistry"

Well, we can all hope so.  It's a better bet than ethanol

Questions I would ask include:

To what extent are surfactants already used to help with oil extraction?

Is its use expensive?

Is it difficult to recover the oil from the water emulsion with current surfactants?

For what it's worth, the Dutch for a few years now have had oil paints with no solvents other than water and a little propylene glycol. Factory makes trad oil paint, removes and reuses solvent, adds water. I'm told surfactants are part of what makes it work. Works great. Pricey.
Water-based oil paints are as close as your local art store. I've not tried them, but they've been on the market for years. And they're pricey because all oil paints are pricey. My suggestion - paint like Whistler, lots of thin washes.
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/bus/stories/081806dnbusforeclosure.317270a.html
Foreclosures soar in North Texas

More losing houses because of poor planning, rising expenses

12:11 AM CDT on Friday, August 18, 2006

By STEVE BROWN / The Dallas Morning News
Excerpt:

"There are a lot of people out there who live on the edge," Mr. Roddy said. "If our economy had stayed about the same as when they bought the property, things would probably be going OK for them.

"But add the tremendous increases in the cost of living, driving, cooling and credit cards, and it all turns bad," he said. "And of course, there have been bumps in interest rates which have dramatically impacted payments on adjustable-rate loans."

But most of the foreclosure distress comes from a familiar problem - not enough money at the end of the month.

"Wages are stagnant," said Gail Cunningham, with Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Greater Dallas. "And energy costs and other expenses are going through the roof.

"One hiccup can put someone over the edge," Ms. Cunningham said. "We are seeing people with electric bills that are higher than their mortgage."

"One hiccup can put someone over the edge," Ms. Cunningham said. "We are seeing people with electric bills that are higher than their mortgage."

That virus that makes people fat must make them stupid as well.

Hey it ain't Newport Beach, their mortgage may be only a few hundred a month if they've been there a while.
I guess I had this mental image of someone on the financial edge, blindly running the whole-house air conditioning up to hundreds of dollars a month, and then wondering what happened to all the money.  The article hit the words "poor planning" a few times, which reinforced that.

My small condo's electricity runs about $18/mo, with the computer on too much.  That might be the other source of my boggle.

My e-mail to the Dallas Morning News regarding this story:

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Following is a copy of a e-mail to the group of people that helped organize the Simmons/Kunstler Symposium last year on "The unfolding energy crisis and its impact on development patterns."  We brought two nationally known figures on energy and New Urbanism to Dallas.   Among those attending were Boone Pickens and Herbert Hunt.  

In case you have forgotten, the sole DFW media coverage of the Simmons/Kunstler event was by the SMU student newspaper.  I would suggest that you keep that little factoid in mind when you are writing your energy related editorials.  If you are looking for people to blame, I suggest that you start by looking in the mirror.

Copy of e-mail (regarding foreclosures):

 Well, we at least tried to warn them last year, via the Simmons/Kunstler event.   BTW, consulting engineer Alan Drake has some fascinating case histories.  One of them is Switzerland, in the Second World War, when they responded to an almost total disruption of their oil supplies by electrifying their transportation system.  

One of Alan's articles:  http://www.energybulletin.net/14492.html

Swiss citizens, in the Second World War, used about 0.15% of per capita US oil consumption today.  Switzerland is now embarked on a plan to virtually eliminate truck transportation, via continued electrification of transportation.   FYI--a trolley car on rails, even one powered by diesel, is five to eight times more efficient than a bus on wheels.  Electrification provides about another two to three fold increase in efficiency.  

The irony is that we had marvelous electric trolley car systems almost everywhere, including Dallas, up until the post-war period.  Insofar as transportation is concerned, the future is the past.  IMO, soon the only real development game in town will be Transit Oriented Development.  

How about a conference featuring Kunstler and Alan Drake?  Something like New Urbanism and Electrification of Transportation as a Response to the Energy Crisis.  

BTW, I finally obtained a CD of the Simmons/Kunstler interview on KERA.  I'm having it transcribed right now.  I'll send it over to you when it is done.

Jeffrey Brown

That is a great letter Jeffrey. Keep the pressure on.
That is a great letter.  Thanks.
"only real development game in town will be Transit Oriented Development."

TOD.  A little nod to The Oil Drum huh?

The "Other TOD", Transit Orientated Development :-)

Like the "Other White Meat" (but kosher)

"Swiss citizens, in the Second World War, used about 0.15% of per capita US oil consumption today."

Somewhat playing devil's advocate -
If that's the case then how critical is oil?  Apparently they didn't need very much.

Switzerland made the strategic decision in the 1920s to electrify their freight railroads.  It paid off during WW II.

In 1998, Switzerland voted (national referundum) to spend 31 billion Swiss francs to drastically improve their already good rail system.  #1 goal (of several) was to get freight off of heavy trucks and onto their (hydro) electric rail.  #2 goal was semi-high speed pax rail from Zurich & Bern to various points.  1 billion CH franc to make rail cars quieter, etc.

Adjusted for population & currency, this is equal to a US vote to spend US$1 trillion on our rail system.

I suspect that this 1998 strategic decision will pay off post-Peak Oil.

Switzerland prepares BEFORE it "has to".

"We are seeing people with electric bills that are higher than their mortgage."

I guess turning off the air conditioning to fix that problem isn't a viable option to those people.

When the temperature is 100 degrees. That doesn't seem like a good idea.

If the grid starts falling during the summers we are going to loose baby boomer in droves.  On the other hand, some mid summer grid failures may just fix the whole Social security problem.

The WSJ has a front page story on the status of the electric infrastructure in the US.  There is some electric cable still in use that dates to about 1900.  BTW, peak electricity demand in Texas set a new record yesterday, up about 4.6% over last year.
I owned a business that was burned down by the electric company when a splice in a alumnium cable failed. It was wrapped with tape and corrision had it down to next to nothing and a surge killed it. The interesting thing is that is not started the fire. It was started when a poorly trained tech in a hurry was measuring in the basement to find were the fault was and neglected to re tape the splice there. The cable in the street was from the late 50s. If you are going to have a building burn down have the Electric co. start the fire. It cost them a lot of money and I got a new building. I don't think aluminum underground wiring is a good way to go. The fire would not have gotten out of control if they had still been using two man crews but of course that cost money.  I have since been told  they figure it is cheaper to pay for a new building then pay for two man crews.
Oil prices 'may retreat to $58 in 2008'

This guy has not talked to SelfAggravatedTrader. ;-) He says oil prices will be $57 by November.

Seriously though, at least this article concentrates on the fundamentals, which are probably wrong, but he has a far better chance of being correct than if he was looking at the charts. SelfAggridisedTrader says the charts are never wrong.

I just love that ad on CNBC for Jim Cramer's afternoon show "Stop Trading" or something like that. Jim, in the ad, screams; "If I had listened to the charts I would have looked like......pause......a total moron."

Seriously again, there are times when the charts do help. And there are other times when following the charts are lead to financial suicide. The times when following the charts lead to financial suicide are the times when the fundamentals are so overwhelmingly important that they outweigh any "overbought" or "oversold" technical data. And those times are right now in the oil patch. We are looking at a depleting finite resource with little or no spare capacity.

From this day forward, well actually, from over two years ago forward, the fundamentals will rule the oil price. Looking only at the technical data, charts, swings and such, will only lead you to the poorhouse if you are an oil trader. And it is likely to lead the rest of us to the poorhouse as well.

http://www.tradearabia.com/tanews/newsdetails_snOGN_article109744_cnt.html

I suspect this week's slide is just the big boys readying a platform for a big run up using the looming Iranian crisis as a justification.  The market movers make money up and down regardless of the underlying trend.  They can sell in such quantity that the price drops.  The momentum of that move continues the drop past the point where they have completed their selling especially when there is a prominent cover story to seemingly justify it.  They then buy at the bottom and are back where they started plus a nice profit on the difference between the sell and buy price.  The process works just as well the other way.  The loser is generally the speculator who cannot know when and where the movers intend to strike, who is highly leveraged and can thus be forced to surrender an ultimately profitable position, and who has to pay a fee for every trade. A scheduled market moving event, like the Iranian deadline or a FED data release draws the speculators.  If they enter before the big boys, the big boys pinch them out.  If they enter after the big boys, they miss the boat.  I think the big boys are dropping the price to keep the speculators out using the cover story that oil traditionally drops towards Labor day.  Be ready for sharp rise when they strike.
That seems to imply collusion. Or is it just a happy accident that all the big boys act together?

Peter.

How about the Bilderberg Group?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilderberg_Group

They are all pals.

of course, the "big boys" need to let the "speculaters" win once in a while to keep them in the game.  

Gambling -- even against rigged odds-- is part of human behavior.  It's probably what has made homo sapiens the dominant species on the planet.  

Never take investment advice from a stockbroker (or commodies trader)that is still working for a living.  If they knew what they were talking about, they would have retired long ago.
If you believe in peak oil, buy on the dips. Buy oil companies with the longest term reserves and the best potential for increasing reserves. Stay away from serial acquirers. They are going to dilute your price per reserves every chance they get. Buy for the long term. Prepare to hold thru an economic downturn. You could have some intermediate pain. Oil company stocks almost always over react to moves in the commodity. Traders are short term motivated. Their time frame is their end of the year bonus.

Can't recommended individual stocks. Gave up all my licenses. Retired a long time ago.

Good advice...hold for long term.  Anyone here believe the price of oil over the next ten years won't keep with or surpass the inflation rate? Thought not. Best investment going right now, IMHO.
"Keep up with", dammit. Where's that blasted edit button?
not there to prevent people from retro-activly editing their posts.
I knew that...just adding a bit of sarcasm to the mix.
Recommend looking at mcdep. He is a veteran and consistent in his methadology. Although I disagree on taking geopolitical risk.
I have noticed lately that WTI has been less than Brent by a buck or more.  IIRC WTI used to be less than Brent by about the same amount.  Any comments as to why?
Geographic distribution?  My guess is that while oil is fungible, there might be a small price difference between regional markets.