DrumBeat: September 8, 2006

[Update by Leanan on 09/08/06 at 10:17 AM EDT]

Total chief says world will find oil target tough

THE world will struggle to raise oil output to levels much greater than 100 million barrels per day, Thierry Desmarest, chief executive of Total, has given warning.

The head of the French energy multinational is sceptical that the global oil industry can raise output from current levels of 85 million bpd to meet demand forecasts by the International Energy Agency of 120 million bpd by 2030.

Total is expecting a return to oil production growth after a setback in this year’s second quarter, when civil disturbance in Nigeria and unplanned maintenance shutdowns caused an 8.6 per cent fall in output.

[Update by Leanan on 09/08/06 at 10:44 AM EDT]

How low can gasoline prices go?


MENAFN says Aramco will save us...

"If we look at the overall Ghawar field, water cuts showed a moderate increase until 1999, approaching 36.5 percent. But our three-pronged efforts have since lowered the (water cut) level to below 35 percent, something that is not commonly seen in the industry," the spokesperson emphasized.


Predictions vary, but one day the oil will run out


Peak oil or has oil peaked? It’s the theory stupid!

Anyway, the point is that Peak Oil is still a theory. Feel free to cling to it as tightly as you wish. But, keep in mind that global growth seems to be cooling. It may be as simple as supply and demand. And by the way, did anyone notice Chevron found a bit of oil recently?


Oil is over: What happens when petroleum peaks?


New oil find tests drilling's watery limits

But amid the exuberant claims of a new era for domestic oil drilling, some energy industry insiders could be forgiven for their subdued responses. The sheer depth of Chevron's discovery reinforces a well-known truth: the world's much-needed petroleum reserves are harder and more expensive to find than ever.


Desperately seeking silicon

In a world of silicon scarcity, many solar energy companies are trying to find ways to stretch, cut back on, or even cut out the traditional photovoltaic panel's main ingredient.


Former BP executive pleads the Fifth


Developing economies, peak oil, and the future: U.K. parliament is not that worried about peak oil.


Nigeria May Face Gas Scarcity From 2009

The Nigerian Association of Petroleum Explorationists (NAPE), which made the statement in Lagos yesterday, said with the estimate of Nigeria's gas reserves standing at about 173 trillion cubic feet of gas and the short, medium and long term demand for gas standing at about 160 trillion cubic feet a deficit seriously threatens.

Engr. Austin Avuru, President of NAPE who presented the associations statement said the age long myth of Nigeria having so much gas and not knowing what to do with it has been voided by this reality.


Australia: Blackout threat to millions over shortage

SYDNEY'S power supply is at risk of network failure within two years with a new report showing the city's demand for electricity almost outstripping supply.


Oil 'threat' to SEQ

BRISBANE suburbs and nearby centres have been classified on an "oil vulnerability" map as a Senate report finds the explosive Peak Oil theory could strike Australia within two decades.


Tightly Rigged for the Future

...one of the most interesting features of the NCS is that the Norwegian government has been somewhat dismayed by the fact that production has hit a plateau for the last three years. They see the entry of a new generation of players as key to pushing up production and they have revamped the approval procedure for new entrants to make things easier.


Briefing for the Descent

As evidence piles up for the reality of peak oil, and more and more people start to grapple with an issue that challenges almost every assumption our society makes about the future, the issue of what to do about it becomes harder to avoid.


Power to spare: By slightly altering their behavior, consumers can drive down gasoline prices.


Redesigning Crops to Harvest Fuel


Richard Heinberg: About the Oil Depletion Protocol


I-937: Take a Lesson from History


Wal-Mart aims for even lower prices

Wal-Mart is preparing to go deeper with discounts in a bid to boost customer traffic and offset lost sales as higher gas prices force its core low-income shoppers to cut back, Wal-Mart CEO Eduardo Castro-Wright told an industry gathering Thursday.
Mensa type question here.

How many ('average') barrels of oil would it take to increase atmospheric CO2 by 1PPM?

Bearing in mind the % that doesn't get burned (plastic, chemicals, fertilizer etc..)

Marco.

Just on a mass basis, I come up with 40 billion barrels.

The mass of the atmosphere is 5x10^18 kg. 1 ppm would be
5x10^12 kg. Dividing that by 120 kg/barrel gives 4x10^10 barrels.

Aside from the fraction of oil not burned, there is the fraction of the CO2 absorbed by the oceans and a small amount of additional plant growth.

Each 1m2 (square meter) of atmosphere above the earth contains 3kg of CO2. Buring 1 kg of oil generates almost 3kg of CO2. So for each 12 km you drive you put as much CO2 into the atmosphere as there is in 1m2 above the earths surface.

On average we drive 10.000km per year. So we put the same amount of CO2 into the atmosphere each year as there is in 1000m2 above the earth!

I'm just certain you mean m^3, cubic meters.
Not sure if this is a repeat, but I just tripped over this other electric car yesterday:

http://www.universalelectricvehicle.com/

Odograph - I don't think we have seen graphs from you or Stuart Staniford in a while.

I long for graphs of undulating plateaus. We seem to have more recent IEA and EIA data without any pretty pictures.

Too many words and too few graphs!

I'm afraid I'm a graphics (and data analysis) consumer.  I appreciate all presented here at TOD but rarely have anything to add to the math/modeling discussions.
Gack! $69,995.00 for the Spyder.  I'm hoping to be able to afford something like this.  

This is what I use ...

http://tinyurl.com/o2jqk

Another avenue is these ...
http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/Xebra_EV/

http://www.goingreen.co.uk/

They are proliferating like wildfire here.

They are made in Bangalore (although apparently a different model to the one there).  Cost about £7,950.

Major pluses for a London driver:

  • avoid the congestion charge (£10/day or USD $18) levied from 7am to 7pm to cross into Central London (roughly Zone 1 on the Tube map)

  • 4 hours free parking in Westminster (West End) but try convincing the rapacious meter readers of that!

Major structural problem:

  • Londonders don't have garages, and if they do, there are no engine block heater points (vs. say Alberta or Minnesota)

  • running an extension cord out of your house to repower you car would be illegal

BTW sorry you closed your blog down.
Here's another one annouced for the end of the year.

http://www.tomberlin.net/tag/a-features.html

It's an NEV, regulated to only 25 mph, but 42 horsepower is not insubstantial.  The last I heard the street price will be $6900.  Tomberlin seems to have its products made in China, based on the website.  I might go for this one if there was a big enough tax credit.

I saw something on the highway today that looked like this or the Nissan Hypermini.  It was headed the other way, so I didn't get a chance to check it out, but it looked to be traveling at a suitable speed. Didn't even get a chance to count the number of wheels. Could have been ZAP.
 But, small?  Don't even think about surviving an accident. Up here, you wouldn't even want to use it at night, cuz hitting a deer would kill ya.


http://alan.batie.org/ev.html

Rat

I like three-wheelers. One of my neighbors has a Corbin with noisy bearings. Safer than a motorcycle. They're classified by the NHTSA as a motorcycle, so they aren't subject to the American byzantine automobile safety laws.

The rear wheel can be the drive wheel and powered by chain, like a motorcycle. I've daydreamed about taking a VW beetle front end, a Harley rear-end, an electric motor and a 12hp Yanmmar diesel to drive the charging system for a plug-in hybrid.

Ever seen a three-wheel Morgan from the 1930s?

A Letter to My Brother
*  --  DRAFT  --  *

My brother asked "What should we do ?"

I have been pushing a partial solution, but never consolidated a comprehensive "solution"

Below is what I typed up but have not sent yet.

Comments appreciated.

As I said, it is difficult to forecast the future of oil supplies, but below are two data points to consider.

20 Percentile Scenario - World Conventional Oil & Liquids Production Peaks in 2011 at just above 90 million barrels/day, and declines by -1% or less till 2015.  After that, conventional depletion increases to -3% to -4% each year.

Unconventional Oil increases from 1.4 million b/day in 2006 to 4 million in 2015 and surges after that to 8 million in 2020.

90 Percentile Scenario - World Conventional Oil & Liquids Production Peaks in 2006 at 84 million barrels/day, and declines by -3% or less till 2010.  After that, conventional depletion increases to -6% to -8% each year.

Unconventional Oil increases from 1.4 million b/day in 2006 to 3.5 million in 2017 (project delays) and surges after that to 6 million in 2025.

Price elasticity of supply has an 7 to 10 year time lag due to capital project schedules.  Effectively no notable response (> 1/2 million b/day) before 2012/14.  200 Euro/barrel vs. 60 Euro/barrel should add 2 to 3 million b/day of conventional oil by 2020.  Most price sensitive projects are small and remote.  There are no half million barrel/day prospects waiting for higher oil prices, but a series of much smaller prospects.  In the last five years, 9 barrels were consumed for every one found.

OTOH, "stranded" Natural Gas to gasoline projects will compete with Liquified Natural Gas, mainly in Iran, Qatar and Russia and Coal to Liquids projects will become financially viable.  Five to ten years from decision to production with "bottlenecks" that limit quantity in short time frames.  Canadian tar sands production increases are fixed at 1.75 million b/day till 2015/17.  Venezuela has significant asphalt reserves that could be exploited, and the Chinese may finance that.

World Oil Exports will decline faster than World Oil Production.  The US and the "Fourth World" will be (IMHO) at a disadvantage to the EU, Japan, China, India and other 3rd World exporters because we do not export enough to pay for what we want to import.  So decline in World Oil Production < decline in World Oil Exports < decline in US Oil Imports.  Our 25% of world oil consumption will decline, perhaps to 22% or 20% ?

The default means of reducing oil consumption is recession (and depression).  Demand destruction.  Other means are MUCH better.

The US price elasticity of demand for oil is quite low, but elasticity for natural gas demand is fairly high.

This lack of elasticity means that structural changes and gov't incentives and taxes are needed to limit the free market solution of prolonged economic decline.  The appropriate specific strategies vary by scenario (see above).

One proposal is over $5 trillion (+$3 trillion operating) invested in coal to liquids, oil shale, enhanced oil recovery and improved vehicle efficiency to replace 2/3 of US oil demand over 20 years.  IMO, the projections overstate the possible in just two decades except for vehicle efficiency.  And they would more than double US transportation carbon emissions.

My alternative is more multi-faceted, and gives more protection against a sudden oil supply interruption.

Goals  (Methods to reach goals can be discussed later)
============
Make it both patriotic and "cool" to save energy.

Dramatic increases in new vehicle fuel mileage and speeded up replacement of poor mileage vehicles

Shifting natural gas, electricity and butane/propane to speciality transportation from home heating via widespread solar water heating and limited solar space heating if any excess over declining supplies can be generated.

Greater home insulation to shift natural gas, electricity and butane/propane to speciality transportation if any excess over declining supplies can be generated.

Displace natural gas from electricity generation by increased conservation, wind and nuclear production and limited coal fired production.  A nation wide HV DC grid to shift non-carbon electricity into natural gas generation areas.

Replace most oil fired space heating with ground loop heat pumps.  Wood and other bio-fueled district heating and cooling may work in some areas.

Investigate displacing industrial oil use with bio-sources for specific monomers.

More research into cellulose source ethanol and butanol.  Corn source ethanol is not to be encouraged.

Use more concrete and less asphalt for road repairs.

Reduced transportation miles (higher mpg x fewer miles = less oil)

Generate carbon dioxide for enhanced oil recovery nearby with either advanced coal gasification fired electricity or coal-to-liquids plants.  Use coal-to-liquids only if the process CO2 is sequestered.

Electrify almost all US rail lines and encourage capacity expansion (double tracking).  If completely new rail lines are needed, change laws to make it easier.

Discourage long and medium distance inter-city trucking (Interstate Highway tolls ?).

Consider semi-high speed passenger and freight service.  Basically expansion of the North East Corridor down the East Coast and to Great Lakes and California.  Perhaps Texas.

Build Urban Rail at a rate comparable to 1897 to 1916 when a much smaller and very much poorer US built 500 streetcar systems in less than two decades; including much of the NYC, Chicago, Philadelphia and Boston subways.  The worse things get, the more effective and desirable will be non-oil transportation.

Build electric trolley buses on any heavy bus route not suitable for streetcars.

Make transportation bicycling easier, including inter-modal with mass transit.

Do nothing to preserve or artificially support energy inefficient urban forms, including building or expanding highways.   Do support energy efficient, walkable, dense neighborhoods and mass transit accessible offices and other employment centers.  Use the carrot more than the stick to change living patterns.

Add a fourth leg, energy, to the three legs of major gov't taxation, income, sales and property.  In particular, shift the burden off payroll taxes and sales taxes and onto energy taxes.  "If you want less of something, tax it", is a fundamental conservative precept.  Gov't needs funding and the source should be things that public policy wants to discourage.

I like it Alan - I think the preamble is long before you get to "Goals" and could be reduced to something like: Imagine net oil export capacity declines by 5-10% annually for a decade or more.

One big area that often gets overlooked and needs more attention is local land use regulation. Communities across the country should put up very high barriers to greenfield development. They should concentrate more on transit oriented development, brownfield remediation and restoring old underutilized buildings near transit hubs. There should be major incentives for green building design being a necessary step in any new development.

Local zoning laws limiting development should be relaxed to allow greater density in some areas near transit. At the same time less dense suburban areas not near major transit corridors or hubs should encourage more mixed use zoning to create more small commercial zones near residential blocks.

And much of the free parking should have a fee attached to it to encourage people to walk, ride a bike or take mass transit.

Looks good, and I look forward to seeing the methods for some of these.  And this one:

"Do nothing to preserve or artificially support energy inefficient urban forms, including building or expanding highways.   Do support energy efficient, walkable, dense neighborhoods and mass transit accessible offices and other employment centers.  Use the carrot more than the stick to change living patterns."

is so very important and often overlooked.  Also, it is often overlooked in how effective carrots can be.  Doesn't even need to cost anything, often the carrots are regulatory (more advantageous zoning, faster/lower risk permitting etc).

This is a nice list, comprehensive, reasonable...

...and totally out of the average person's power.

I try to keep it simple:

"Imagine that gasoline is 5, 7, 10 dollars a gallon...
imagine that everything is expensive...
imagine that gasoline isn't always available, even, same with fuel oil, heating oil...

what would YOU do?

If you're rich, no problem.

You figure it out."

Alan.

Here are some other ideas, some of which may overlap somewhat with what you have put forth.

Provide tax incentives for employers to provide opportunities for employees to telecommute.

Provide that all new shopping centers include multifamily housing within the perimeter of said shopping centers.

Discourage the construction of all so called regional (read auto dependent) mega shopping centers.

Provide tax incentives for people to live closer to work, to include income deductions or credits  for moving expenses.  

Prohibit any new shopping centers of big box stores that are not closely integrated with residential areas.

Enforce urban growth boundaries and encourage "mother in law" structures adjacent to existing houses.

Prohibit subdivisions that are not adjacent to and closely inegrated with existing infrastructure and full service shopping.

Maximize transit oriented development.

Provide free or very inexpensive passes to access all elements of metro transportation.

If roads are expanded, do this only for the purpose of adding lanes restricted to buses and carpools, including perhaps high mpg vehicles (not just hybrids).

Tax gasoline to include the full external costs of producing that gasoline, including military expenditures.

Provide incentives to get automakers to provide PHEVs or EVs now, not in ten years.  

Provide incentives to establish a network of neighborhood electric vehicles to fill gaps not satisfied by public transportation.

Establish a long term goal of car free cities.  Instead of randomly proliferating auto dependent subdivisions, establish highly integrated small towns adjacent to or within existing urban centers which are largely car free.  

Prohibit the construction of any new fossil fueled plants that do not fully sequester or otherwise offset their carbon production.

Encourage the construction of small (1,000 square feet or less) houses and discourage the construction of large houses by taxing btu usage above a certain amount.

On a related note, my brother is running for the Washington state house and has a strong background as a city councilman in Seattle who focused heavily on transportation issues. If elected, he will replace the current chairman of the Washington state transportation committee. He is seriously committed to transportation solutions which deemphasize automobile use.  I am sure he would be very interested in your work in this area.  

Tax gasoline to include the full external costs of producing that gasoline, including military expenditures.

Milton Copulos did the math, and testified in the Senate that it would come to $11 per gallon, $480 a barrel.

Are we ready?

What? What?
Are you saying "The Market" does not provide us with an honest Price "signal"? That it lies to us? That we cannot rely on the Price "signal" to make rational comparisons and to determine which lifestyle is the most "cost" effective?

I am shocked, shocked that there is deception going on in our most esteemed institutions.

Is that from Paths of Glory?
we could do all that or we could just go to war to get oil. I wonder when we'll know which decision we've made, at least in the aggregate that is?
If the whole country were saying "bring it on" right now, maybe.  I think we've had a painful experiment though, and found ourselves without the (callous) nature for true empire.
Just wait until the economic and social effects of Peak Oil become considerably worse, though.  Things might change.
Provide that all new shopping centers include multifamily housing within the perimeter of said shopping centers.

Consumerism is what got us into the situation we have now. Just how much more growth do you believe we can have a finite resources??  Its this kind of thinking that will not aloow people to change. Without change we are all on train headed for the cliff..

Change the way you think about the future with less oil!!

This is intended to cut down on automobile use and the necessity for parking, for that matter. People will shop, regardless. As long as they are shopping, anyway, it makes sense to be close to the shopping.  I don't think this is going to increase consumerism.  Consumerism is in the head. That's what needs to change.  I am thinking about less oil.  Almost  everything I suggested cuts down on auto use.  The best solution is that which cuts down the need to use the auto in the first place, not the technology that drives the auto.  
Several of you items are more "Means" rather than goals.  But I will think them over.

I have been busy today helping my father with his recovery, so limited time for TOD.

If you or your father would like to contact me, please do so.  My eMail is in my profile.

Best Hopes,

Alan

tstreet said:
Tax gasoline to include the full external costs of producing that gasoline, including military expenditures.

I just had an idea:

From now on the US military will be funded exclusively by a special gasoline tax called "the Patriot Tax".

Btw. I've been thinking for years about how to sell gasoline taxes to the public, think this will work?

"Use more concrete and less asphalt for road repairs."

I dunno about that one...
CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS FROM THE GLOBAL CEMENT INDUSTRY1
The cement industry contributes about 5% to global anthropogenic CO2 emissions, making the cement industry an important sector for CO2-emission mitigation strategies

http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.energy.26.1.303

Why cement-making
produces carbon dioxide

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cement manufacturing is the third largest cause of man-made carbon dioxide emissions. While fossil fuel combustion and deforestation each produce significantly more carbon dioxide (CO2), cement-making is responsible for approximately 2.5% of total worldwide emissions from industrial sources (energy plus manufacturing sectors).
http://www.cs.ntu.edu.au/homepages/jmitroy/sid101/uncc/fs030.html
Rat

 Also asphalt is basicially uncracked tar, so appling it directly would save energy over burning lime for cement. Even better than that would be not repairing the chug-holes, which would slow traffic very considerably saving gasoine and save states and municipalities tax money and energy. Louisianna is very familiar with that solution.
But it kills the efficiency of the vehicles.  Penny-wise, pound-foolish.
  Alan, I also like your letter to your brother. I agree with Peakguy that the intro is too long to hold most people's interest. Of course, you know your audience and we don't, but, possibly this could be handled very well by refferal to the great Energy Bulletin article that Leanne linked above, or reference to the Peak Oil primers.
  As far as suggested actions, they're great. I  personally advocate free public transportation funded by increased gasoline and diesel taxes and increased license plate fees on inefficent vehicles. This would help poor people and commuters at the expense of the energy hogs.
"A nation wide HV DC grid to shift non-carbon electricity into natural gas generation areas."

Tesla's AC won out over Edison's DC because of the ease of stepping up (for transmission) or down (for residential use) the voltage. Wall warts everywhere, but hey. What advantage is there in a DC grid?

Transmission losses are lower with high voltage DC. Take a look at these articles:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HVDC
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_Intertie
North America has several "out-of-sync" 60 Hz grids.  West Coast, West Coast, Texas (ERCOT), most of Mexico and 50 Hz Mexico City.  The only way to transmit power between them is via DC.

Once AC is "pushed too far" (say 500 miles) the sine wave gets distorted by capacitance, etc. and power is lost.  HV DC  has a limited but useful niche.

What sort of voltage are we talking here ?

How do you step it up and down ?

HV can mean 400kV. I think the stepping up or stepping down is done as a pulsed signal which is rectified or chopped as needed. I can't seem to find a figure for energy losses or heat generated. See for example
http://www.siemens.com/index.jsp?sdc_p=fmls2u12o1378279ni1213837pPRcz3&sdc_bcpath=1240032.s_2,&a mp;sdc_sid=23784190784&
Here's something I found about a Brazilian HVDC line running at +/- 600 KV.  Wikipedia notes a second one at the same site.
I can see the advantage here.

If you want to join two or more power stations together you need to get 3 things exactly right :-

  1. Voltage