DrumBeat: April 4, 2007

DOE Does Not Accept Initial SPR Bids

The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Fossil Energy today said that it had reviewed, and deemed unacceptable, the bids that it had received in response to a solicitation to purchase up to four million barrels of crude oil for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR). The Office of Fossil Energy determined that the bids were too high and not a reasonable value for taxpayers.

In keeping with Secretary Bodman’s commitment to fill the SPR in a deliberate, predictable, and transparent manner, consistent with the Department’s updated guidelines that were announced in November 2006, the Office of Fossil Energy will issue another solicitation for bids in mid-April.

Robert Rodriguez’s Perspectives on Energy Stocks

In the case of supply, within the next five years, three countries may reach a peak in oil production: Mexico, China and Russia. Several analysts estimated that Mexican oil production would likely peak around 3.4 million barrels per day and that this event would occur in 2004. Mexico ’s largest oilfield, Cantarell, appears to have peaked and if this is the case, so has Mexican oil production, since six of every ten barrels produced by Mexico comes from this one field. Earlier this year, a 3% decline rate was forecast for Cantarell’s production. This has proved incorrect since it is now estimated that the decline rate is 8%. Obviously, this is likely to be of some concern to Mexico. Should this forecast of peak oil production for these three countries be correct, an additional 35% of non-OPEC oil production will have peaked, and together with the 41% from eleven major countries and others that have experienced a peak in production rates, 76% of non-OPEC oil production might have peaked by 2012. If this occurs, it will give the middle-eastern countries even more clout in the setting of oil prices. This is not a pleasant thought.


Palm oil: the biofuel of the future driving an ecological disaster now

"When you look closely the areas where companies are getting permission for oil palm plantations are those of high-conservation forest," said Willie Smits, who set up SarVision, a satellite mapping service that charts the rainforest's decline. "What they're really doing is stealing the timber because they get to clear it before they plant. But the timber's all they want; hit and run with no intention of ever planting. It's a conspiracy."


Coal the car fuel of the future, claim experts

But while visions of the future have focused on cars powered by electricity or bio-fuel, experts claim that motorists could fill up their tanks with coal in the not-too-distant future.


Japan Pumps Funds Into Energy Drive

Increasingly concerned about its medium- and long-term energy security amid stubbornly high prices -- and intensifying global competition -- for oil and gas, resource-poor Japan has set an ambitious goal of boosting the ratio of "Hinomaru oil." or oil developed and imported through domestic producers, from the current 15 percent to 40 percent by 2030.


China's CNPC sees 2007 natural gas output at 54 bln cu m, up from 44.5 bln

Li Jingming, a vice president and member of PetroChina's Research Institute for Petroleum Exploration and Development, told XFN-Asia on the sidelines of a energy forum here that natural gas will mainly come from a field in Sichuan province, and the Tarim and Qaidam Basins in Qinghai province, which account for 80 pct of its gas output.


China energy reduction target tough to reach - state researcher

China will struggle to reach its goal of reducing energy consumption by 20 pct per GDP unit by 2010 as heavy industry continues to grow at a rapid pace, a government researcher said.


Tax on Carbon Emissions Gains Support

As lawmakers on Capitol Hill push for a cap-and-trade system to rein in the nation's greenhouse gas emissions, an unlikely alternative has emerged from an ideologically diverse group of economists and industry leaders: a carbon tax.


Reports From Four Fronts in the War on Warming

Over the last few decades, as scientists have intensified their study of the human effects on climate and of the effects of climate change on humans, a common theme has emerged: in both respects, the world is a very unequal place.


Denial in the Desert

Some climatologists have not hesitated to call this a "mega-drought," even the "worst in 500 years." Others have been more cautious, not yet sure whether the current aridity in the West has surpassed the notorious thresholds of the 1930s (the Dust Bowl in the southern Plains) or 1950s (devastating drought in the Southwest). But the debate is possibly beside the point: The most recent and authoritative research finds that the "evening redness in the West" (to invoke the portentous subtitle of Cormac McCarthy's Blood Meridian) is not simply episodic drought but the region's new "normal weather."


Environment: For a Greener Garden

All gardens may look green, but some are greener than others. Truly green, or organic, gardens are free of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides and filled with native plants that need minimal amounts of extra water. They're good for the environment, and they're safe for kids and pets to play in. Planting one is simpler—and cheaper—than you might think.


Postponing the Effects of Peak Oil

In honor of the U.S. Government Accountability Office's (GAO) report warning us of the effects of peak oil, this week we'll examine its recommendations on how to delay the catastrophe.

The global peak in oil production is right around the corner, and closer than you might think.


Studying the hydrogen energy chain

Alternative-energy companies are targeting state and local governments as the places to showcase the latest hydrogen fuel technology, but there are still many issues to clear up before the technology becomes a significant part of everyday life.


Could uranium hit $1,000 a pound?

And over the weekend, I heard an industry insider propose $1,000-a-pound uranium!

"That's crazy talk," I said.

"No," the industry insider said. "It would only raise the price of power from a nuclear plant to a level five times as high as it is currently. In a peak oil scenario – where gasoline is trading at $15 per gallon – that's quite doable."

He has a point. If the cost of fuel for our cars can quintuple, then so can the cost of electricity for our houses. And the idea of quintupling energy prices is not that far-fetched.


Getting the price right for solar

Even without technology breakthroughs, solar power will get cheaper from economies of scale, say experts. But without government subsidies, it is still more expensive than fossil fuels.


Georgia's energy woes continue

Georgia's energy supply still faces an uncertain future. On a recent trip to Baku, Nika Gilauri, Georgia's Energy Minister, met with his Azerbaijani counterpart, Natik Aliyev. His aim was to extend the terms of the Georgian-Azeri agreement which has seen Georgia receive 1.3 million cubic meters of natural gas per day since January from Azerbaijan's internal reserves. The inconclusive outcome of this meeting has only made the precariousness of Georgia's position clearer.


Uganda: Kenyan Pipeline Blamed for Fuel Shortage

"The Kenyan pipeline is facing frequent shutdowns arising from power and other mechanical breakdowns. It is reported that power supply to the line is inadequate and the transformers are stripping frequently," a statement by the ministry revealed.


Iraq's economy

The government is seeking foreign money to finance the huge infrastructure upgrades needed—including a proposed road linking all three of Kurdistan's main towns with their borders—and Mr Muhamad floated the intriguing option of "sharing management services" usually associated with the government, such as greater private-sector participation in the education sector, and even potentially PFIs in road and bridge construction. With the constitution confining sovereign debt issuance solely to the federal government, and the KRG allocated just 17% of federal oil revenue (after current spending)--the planning minister, Othman Shwani, among others, has argued that Kurdistan needs more, considering Saddam's legacy in the Kurdish areas — foreign money is desperately needed.


Corny Energy 'Solution'

Last stage of denial: ethanol will save us!


Gas prices could set new record this year

Gasoline prices are still 15 cents a gallon away from last May's all time high for Northern Nevada, but new highs could be set this summer, an American Automobile Association spokesman said Tuesday.


This week in bad energy news

One of the world's great oil fields is Cantarell, located in the Bay of Campeche (the southernmost area of the Gulf of Mexico), and it has been worked by PEMEX for years. According to Simmons, it's gone into decline. "That's a disaster happening in front of our eyes," said Simmons last week. He mentioned he had been in Mexico the week before and suggested Canterell is down 20% in a year, a frightening prospect. "[Canterell] produces six out of every 10 barrels from our friendliest supplier right across the border," said Simmons. (Let's ignore the diss to Canada there.) "The big discussion in PEMEX is, will the 20% persist or might it ease off to 14%? I raised the issue it might go to 25%."


For cleaner US ports, cut truck fumes first?

An L.A. ports coalition hopes its plan to allow only trucking firms that embrace new emissions standards will expand nationwide.


Silicon Valley's "best brains" work on energy

Venture capitalists in Silicon Valley have been searching for the next big thing in high-tech for years, but now many have switched to greener pursuits -- finding technology to help cut global warming.


Global warming happens: but is it "catastrophic?"

Likely headlines predicting a global warming "catastrophe," "disaster" or "cataclysm" after a U.N. report due on Friday risk sapping public willingness to act by making the problem seem too big to tackle, some experts say.


NASA: Arctic lost part of its perennial sea ice in 2005

But "recent studies indicate Arctic perennial ice is declining seven to 10 percent each decade," said Ron Kwok from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California.


Ruling Undermines Lawsuits Opposing Emissions Controls

Yesterday’s Supreme Court ruling on carbon dioxide emissions largely shredded the underpinning of other lawsuits trying to block regulation of the emissions and gave new momentum to Congressional efforts to control heat-trapping gases linked to climate change.


Emissions law could still face hurdles

California won a major victory in its campaign to regulate greenhouse gases on Monday. But the battle is not over.

The state still faces challenges on two fronts — at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and in a lawsuit by automakers — before it can implement its landmark law slashing greenhouse gas emissions from car exhaust. Even if California prevails, Congress could end up passing weaker national legislation that would supersede the state's.


Bush holds line on global warming despite ruling

President George W. Bush said on Tuesday he planned no new action to impose caps on greenhouse gases blamed for global warming despite the Supreme Court ruling that the Environmental Protection Agency must regulate U.S. emissions.

Instead, Bush pointed to his proposal to require cars to burn more gasoline made from home-grown sources like ethanol, and repeated his long-held stance that U.S. action is meaningless without changes by China and India.


Time to Pay Attention, China Trade War, Housing, Iran and more

Probably the most shocking news of the week was not the tension in the Middle East around Iran. No, as disturbing as is the possibility of another shooting war in immediate proximity to 25% of the world's daily oil shipments, the reality of a trade war with China announced on Friday (March 30 th , 2007) was even more disturbing:


Foreign oil workers freed in Nigeria

Kidnappers on Wednesday released two foreign oil workers abducted in Nigeria's restive southern oil region.


American Association of Petroleum Geologists convention: Oil peak predicted for year 2020

Development of the globe's remaining untapped oil reserves will push world production to its ultimate peak as early as 2020, before a long, slow decline begins near mid-century, petroleum experts predicted Tuesday.


Oil — Venezuela's lifeblood — is also a political flashpoint

Hugo Chavez vs. Big Oil. Now there's a showdown without an obvious crowd favorite.

The notoriously anti-American president of Venezuela started this fight by tearing up his contracts with four oil industry partnerships, demanding they convert the government's minority stakes into majority control. The oil majors developing the projects, including ExxonMobil, Chevron and ConocoPhillips, fume about having their deep pockets picked, but they don't have much choice. If they can't agree on financial terms by June 26, Chavez could always order the army to seize the oil fields.


U.S. Must Get Head out of Sand on Oil Dependency

The House Committee heard from two extraordinary witnesses – Daniel Yergin, author of the definitive history of the oil industry, “The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money and Power,” and former CIA Director John Deutch, co-chair of a recent Council on Foreign Relations task force report on “The National Security Consequences of U.S. Oil Dependence.”


What if coal is running out too?

But what if our core beliefs about coal are wrong? What if coal isn't as abundant as we thought? What if we're rapidly approaching peak coal?


Reaping the benefits of Scotland's oil

However, Gordon Brown and his colleagues in Westminster would have us believe only bad news about Scotland's oil wealth. His recent gaffe in claiming that oil revenues were falling, despite the undeniable fact that they are on a rising trend only serves to demonstrate the UK government's attitude to Scotland's oil wealth – to downplay its significance and squander its future potential.


Heinberg: Nations must prepare for life after plentiful oil

Nations may suffer severe economic, social and political effects if they remain unprepared for the time when maximum oil production is reached, according to a speaker for the Truckee Meadows Livable Communities Series.


BP proposes pipeline reversal to accommodate Canadian crude

The UK-based oil industry giant’s North American subsidiary BP Pipelines Inc. launched a so-called "open season" process last week to gauge the interest of its shipping customers in reversing the flow of the BP No. 1 Pipeline, which currently terminates in Whiting.

This would boost the flow of Canadian light crude oil from the Chicago area to Cushing, Okla., which dubs itself the "Pipeline Crossroads of the World."

"The open season demonstrates the changing nature of North American crude oil movement,” said BP spokesman Scott Dean. “Midwest refineries are taking larger volumes of Canadian crude oil, which has caused a need to transport the oil south.”


US refinery problems and high demand to have depleted gasoline stocks

Refinery problems in the US and heightened demand are expected to be highlighted in this week's snapshot of oil inventories, said analysts.


Fueling debate

When Anne Siglin moved to Alameda from Chicago in 2005, she was shocked by the price of gas in the Bay Area.

"There are refineries right here," she said. "Why does gas cost so much more?"

As gas prices continue to soar and Californians are paying 60 cents more for a gallon of unleaded than the national average, many Bay Area residents are wondering the same thing.


Kernel of truth for corn

Rain and cold in the Midwest, coupled with falling prices, could put a damper on the planting record fueled by ethanol demand.


Better than ethanol

Biobutanol, the plant based fuel similar to ethanol, promises more power and less transport headaches. But can it be done cheaply enough?


Palm oil is not a failure as a biofuel

The Associated Press (AP) recently quoted Marcel Silvius, a renowned climate expert at Wetlands International in the Netherlands, as saying palm oil is a failure as a biofuel. This would be a misleading statement and one that doesn't help efforts to devise a workable solution to the multitude of issues surrounding the use of palm oil.


Biofuels in Africa: Investment Boon or Food Threat?

Africa's vast arable lands have the potential to rival top agricultural nations like the United States in supplying biofuels to a world seeking cleaner energy sources.

But using land reserved for food production to supply biofuel demand could squeeze food supplies in a region vulnerable to shortages. It could also hurt poor consumers if the biofuel boom continues to push food prices higher.

Things are already getting very tough out West. Cities are drying up. Desal plants are restarting. They take a lot of energy, mostly diesel energy. When both the price of water and the price of oil go through the roof, people in the Southwest will be in a world of hurt.

From the New York Times. It requires (free) registration:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/04/us/04drought.html?_r=1&th&emc=th&oref=...

The scramble for water is driven by the realities of population growth, political pressure and the hard truth that the Colorado River, a 1,400-mile-long silver thread of snowmelt and a lifeline for more than 20 million people in seven states, is providing much less water than it had.

According to some long-term projections, the mountain snows that feed the Colorado River will melt faster and evaporate in greater amounts with rising global temperatures, providing stress to the waterway even without drought. This year, the spring runoff is expected to be about half its long-term average. In only one year of the last seven, 2005, has the runoff been above average.

Ron Patterson

You beat me to it....but how about this one...

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/9e60dd7a-e1fd-11db-af9e-000b5df10621.html

Opportunities for water ­companies are booming around the world because of looming shortages and decades of underinvestment, a conference in Barcelona heard on Tuesday.

China, Saudi Arabia and Algeria, where water shortages have become acute, are placing billions of dollars of contracts out to tender to improve water supplies for their growing populations. The trend is expected to grow, as 40 per cent of the world’s population will suffer water shortages by 2050, according to the United Nations Development Programme. Global warming is expected to exacerbate the problem.

Most water companies deal with this "problem" by drilling wells as a "solution". But all that does is drain the existing aquifer faster, much like we're doing with some of our oil fields.

Many people don't really know what to expect from climate change but decreasing fresh water availability, coupled with rising temperatures, makes me expect massive desertification. This is what I believe Lovelock sees too, hence his belief that homo sapiens will consist of a "few million breeding pairs" scrounging out a living near the arctic circle by 2100.

Ghawar Is Dying
The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function. - Dr. Albert Bartlett

re: water shortage problem solved by well drilling solution, resulting in faster depletion.

In a nut shell, this encapsulates our entire insane 'mop and bucket' mindset toward all our problems!

Rather than making acknowledgment of the impending and collective cliff faces surrounding mankind a matter of supreme public policy reversal (i.e., give our complete and undivided attention to living on less while there is still time & energy), we instead scurry up more mops and buckets which only hasten us closer to the noose tightening cliff.

In all this mop and bucket insanity I am reminded of the natural history museum dioramas depicting pre-historic hunters driving buffalo herds toward and over a cliff. Despite our advanced technological prowess and veneer of sophisticated civilization, we still tend to operate with blunt tactical force toward the problems we confront.

Except now the diorama would depict all of mankind being herded forward closer and closer to the precipice and it is our present day civilization cart with all its insane mops and buckets that is behind this march of doom.

Indeed, what a march of folly we continue to trod.

"It was your skill and your science
That led you astray.
And you thought to yourself,
I am, and there is none but me."

Isaiah 47:10

Well not even the slightest sing of water conservation here in Phoenix peoples grass lawns are as green as ever

GM *MIGHT* Bring 45 to 50 mpg Minicars to US for 2010 Model Year

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17878603/

New series under development in Korea.

IMHO, "A day late and a dollar short".

Best Hopes that I am wrong,

Alan

Yeah, I will believe it when I see it....

From the article:

“The honest answer is, I don’t know yet how serious we are,” Smith said, referring to the mini car segment.

“Our internal forecast shows gas at $2.50 a gallon for quite some time to come,” Smith said . . .

“There’s an age-old debate in our business of responding to consumers or presenting them with a case they haven’t thought about,” Smith said.
- - - -
Smith doesn't seem to remember GM's 3-cylinder Geo Metro, which delivered 52mpg and was sold until oil prices tanked in the late 90s.

Where do they get these multimillion dollar clowns to run their company? I wonder what they were discussing in their boardroom when crude rose to $50 in 2004?

Screw market research. Jack up gas prices and CAFE standards until 50 mpg plus cars are necessary for company survival. But noooo, the U.S. policy/strategy is to wait for a miracle to occur. Besides, according to Bush, we're making great progress and, besides, we ain't gonna do nothing much until China and India show the way. I knew that Bush would just give the middle finger to the supreme court after their ruling.

It costs big bucks to scale down doncha know?
http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070405/AUTO04/704050...
Funny how the Japs can do it and still make huge profits.
The prevailing mindset that the GM "car guys" have revolves around building cars with V-8's. Many of them own classic muscle cars from the '60's and participate in events such as the "Woodward Dream Cruise" which is a sight that has to be seen to be believed. As long as that atmosphere dominates, American car companies are doomed.

From linked article:

Some "market research" on interest in minicars (Hint: PR, this is NOT how market research is done) but I did it anyway.

www.vote4chevrolet.com

A N D

“Our internal forecast shows gas at $2.50 a gallon for quite some time to come,” Smith said, noting that stability in that price range won’t seriously change consumer demand or inspire “a seismic shift in consumption habits.”

Best Hopes for New GM Management,

Alan

While GM is wringing their hands over whether or not to manufacture fuel effiecient cars because it goes against their internal long term gasoline forecast of $2.50/gal, the North Carolina State Treasurer Richard Moore said on TV yesterday that the automakers "...need to plan for an era without fossil fuels".
That's a good sign to NC residents- i would imagine that Moore isn't investing NC State pension assets in all the asset classes that will go bankrupt (like automakers).

So, the mean time,let the planet burn. "Not my problem" Nice.

Something that I found interesting today, while watching Bloomberg, was the General Motors representative giving info on their first quarter of 2007. It says a lot about how people are (or aren’t) changing their levels of oil / gasoline usage. GM sold about the same number of cars as last year, but had “strong growth” in Luxury SUVs and Full-size pickup trucks.

General Motors Q1 2007:

Total sales up only 1%

Lux SUV up double digits

Full-size pickups up double digits

Ahmadinejad has just said that Iran will release the captured British sailors.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6525905.stm

Fortunately it doesn't look like war anytime soon now...

No reason NOT to bomb them now.

Agreed. Especially considering that Iran has made numerous threats about wiping Israel off the face of the map. The US isn't going to risk anything when it comes to "protecting" the Middle East. An attack on Iran is coming.

http://www.infowars.net/articles/march2007/300307Iran_provocation.htm

Check out the video about half way down.

I'm tired of repeating this, but here goes again:

None of Iran's leaders has threatened to "wipe Israel off the map". Iran has never ever suggested it might attack Israel, and that makes sense, considering Israel could turn much of Iran into a radioactive wasteland. What Iranian leaders do want is an end to the Zionist regime, and even that is negotiable: in 2003 Khatami's government approached the US with an offer that could have led to a normalization of relations between the two countries, and the Iranians even suggested they could, under those circumstances, recognise Israel. Bush turned it down.

I wonder if people will ever come to accept that Ahmadinejad didn't threaten to "wipe Israel off the map". Here's a brief technical explanation of that mistranslation:

He made an analogy to Khomeini's determination and success in getting rid of the Shah's government, which Khomeini had said "must go" (az bain bayad berad). Then Ahmadinejad defined Zionism not as an Arabi-Israeli national struggle but as a Western plot to divide the world of Islam with Israel as the pivot of this plan.

The phrase he then used as I read it is "The Imam said that this regime occupying Jerusalem (een rezhim-e ishghalgar-e qods) must [vanish from] from the page of time (bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahv shavad)."

Ahmadinejad was not making a threat, he was quoting a saying of Khomeini and urging that pro-Palestinian activists in Iran not give up hope-- that the occupation of Jerusalem was no more a continued inevitability than had been the hegemony of the Shah's government.

http://www.juancole.com/2006/05/hitchens-hacker-and-hitchens.html

I know you get tired of having to do this, but thanks. I'm sick of the zionist propaganda machine and its endless streams of disinformation and misinformation.

I have yet to meet an Iranian I did not like. Who was not smarter than the average bear and did not behave with exemplary manners and courtesy. And I have met a fair few.

There was very little UKGov could do:

1. Incompetent MilINT.
2. No top cover
3. Frigate miles away
4. Small boats with piss-poor armaments
5. No stand-off boats with heavy weapons.
6. Complacency on behalf of Her Majesty's Royal Navy.

There should be Courts Martial over this and not involving the crew and squaddies of these boats.

Some here have said why did they not stick to Name, Rank and Serial Number?

I wouldnt. I would sing. The idea of dying for Blair (or doing porridge in an Iranian jail) who sends good people into losing situations without proper protection and back up negates the covenant between UKGov and UK Mil. And UKMil families.

UK is now all mouth and no trousers. Sad , but true You can bet that some desk driver decided that equipping the RN and RM units was 'sub-cost/benefit'

Good luck to Iran. They played this hand very well.

Smart people, those Iranians. Despite what it says in that travesty of a film about the Spartans.

The iranian's played their hand well considering this might of been a attempt to start a war.

UK is now all mouth and no trousers.

In the states (and especially Texas), that would be "all hat and no cattle". With our current, so-called, president, a very appropriate saying.

Ending the "occupation" of Jerusalem means one thing according to Khomeini: Judenrein.

Yes. Let the blood flow. Smell the burning flesh.

Yes. Let the blood flow. Smell the burning flesh.

Expect the 4 iranians the US captured in January to be quietly released about a week from now.

They will be sent to Guantanamo bay for further questioning.

I think the release makes war harder, for sure. But there is very strong determination on the part of the neo-cons to proceed with this thing. There is also lots of opposition to it, even, or especially perhaps, in our own military. But I think it is far too early to relax. Relax means: think about other impending disasters -- not watch TV.

I disagree. I don't think the neocons want war in the sense that you are expecting. I don't think this abduction of British sailors had anything to do with longer term plans.

I remain convinced that the entire process revolves around fomenting unrest and looking for an opportunity to break the southwestern oil producing provinces, which is Shiite ARAB away from the rest of Iran which is Shiite Persian. The US is looking for a trigger and that is an excellent trigger that would give them cover to move into southwestern Iran to "protect" the new breakaway government (that just happens to have most of Iran's oil). Then if Iran retaliates, which is likely, the US can proceed to bomb the snot out of them while "defending" the new breakaway republic.

In that scenario, the US almost cannot be painted as the bad guy and, by prodding Iran back even harder than Iran has prodded them, they may provoke an Iranian response that then lets them go full bore against Iran. This would also break down internal resistance at the Pentagon by changing the scenario from a preventative first strike to a followup retaliatory strike for attacking US forces and the breakaway republic.

Ghawar Is Dying
The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function. - Dr. Albert Bartlett

On NPR last night John Negraponte (former ambassador to Iraq, I believe) was being interviewed and he said the administration does not consider the hostage situation tied to the nuclear situation. They are completely independent of each other. If that is the case, the hostage release shouldn't affect the administration's actions toward Iran.

Tom A-B

I agree with Greyzone.

They will need to be provoked, and 15 sailors won't do it. They could have kept them and the US still wouldn't have set a foot on Iranian soil. They can't afford any more discontent at home, so it will coincide with a homeland security event, and/or Peak Oil rearing its ugly head.

Plus TPTB are not ready yet. The surge deployment to Iraq is still underway. The 3rd carrier is still deploying. Patriots/THAADS still deploying/not on station.

Unlikely any action before the end of May(on station time), but my gut tells me its a Fall event if it happens this year.

Can't imagine them pushing this thing to the fall.
Better to disrupt the summer driving season than
the winter heating season, if push really comes to shove.

Agree with davebygolly that there are serious divisions
in US govt about the whole thing. Baker's realists
and much of the US military con and neocons pro. Of
course, Bushies have been purging the crap out of
the highest corners of the Pentagon to get their
yes men in place. Latest carrier group could be
on station in three weeks if they push it.

Do you honestly think that the ramifications of an action against Iran in the summer would be all worked through by the fall? No way. Messing with Iran would be the mother of all quagmires. I can't even believe anyone, even Dubya, would consider it. OTOH, Dubya will do what he is told by his neocon handlers.

Then again, like you say, the Bushies have been putting their yes-men in place. What a moronic, evil (the two are related) administration. They seem determined to destroy the USA.

Ohhh, I don't think the ramifications would all
play out by fall, or even several falls hence, but
the neocons probably would be inclined to think so
you know, rose petals in the street of the newly
liberated and so forth...

I see now what you meant. Never misunderestimate the idiocy of the neocon powers that be :-)