DrumBeat: August 5, 2007
Posted by Leanan on August 5, 2007 - 9:02am
Topic: Miscellaneous
For the North Sea, the statement in the NPC report did not cite specific data. A different style, also misleading, is to present the data but camouflage the bad news. Specifically, Figure T-VII.1 on page 262 contains historical data on oil discoveries. The NPC graph locates the peak of oil discoveries in the five years from 1960 to 1965. (Oddly, their world data excludes the US and Canada. A similar result for world discoveries including the US and Canada is on pages 48-49 of Beyond Oil.) As far as I know, this striking result was originally presented by ExxonMobil around the year 2000. In the NPC report, the oil data (shown in blue) are buried beneath natural gas discoveries on the same graph in a lighter shade of blue. Further, a second curve (shown in red) reports the number of new-field discoveries, peaking around 1985. In my opinion, the number of discovered oilfields is massively irrelevant. Is counting yet another one-well oilfield in Kansas relevant to the present debate? I tip my hard hat to the NPC authors; figure T-VII-1 is a competent job of camouflaging.
Oil sector’s big issue now delivery, not discovery
So, what happened to $100-per-barrel oil? On Wednesday, the price of US light crude reached $78.77, briefly topping last summer’s record and then subsided. A few dreary bulletins about the US economy and signs that American petrol stocks were rising were enough to kill the excitement and stall the rally.Those investors who are obsessed with the notion of the end of oil tend to forget that the price fluctuates on short-term supply considerations and signals from the underlying economy about energy demand. The oil market is not driven by guesses about how large are the Saudi Arabian reserves.
Canada's oil sands mergers get painfully pricey
Fat wallets and limited opportunities elsewhere may continue to push acquisitions in Canada's oil sands region, analysts say, though soaring costs may leave the sector open to only the very biggest companies.
Cold war breaks out as Russia freezes out rivals in Arctic
Mir-1 is part and parcel of this new swagger - a voyage in search not only of national pride, but also economic leverage. Russia is already an energy superpower - it has by far the biggest gas reserves and, in oil export terms, is second only to the Saudis. Now it wants the Arctic too - home to around a quarter of the world's untapped oil and gas.
Peak Oil, and what I think it means to the petroleum industry
Innovations are especially needed in the earth science and engineering disciplines where they will lead to new science. Sciences that may require multiples of effort per barrel of oil. Asking the current bureaucracies to keep up with the current and future changes in the sciences is asking too much in my opinion. Would anyone argue the organizational bureaucracies of today will be the solution to Peak Oil?What would a system based on these changes look like, how would it be different, and could it make the difference?
As a former denizen of Harvard, I’ve had to learn that a sense of reality doesn’t always flourish in elite institutions. It is the street virtue par excellence. Bus drivers can display a shrewder grasp of what’s what than Nobel Prize winners. The only way any of us can improve our grasp of reality is to confront the world every day and learn, mostly from our mistakes, what works and what doesn’t. Yet even lengthy experience can fail us in life and in politics. Experience can imprison decision-makers in worn-out solutions while blinding them to the untried remedy that does the trick.
Market Meltdown: Understanding Climate Economics
The market's real failure is that it allows for no signal from the future to the present, either from the conditions that will exist 30 years hence or from the people who will be alive and working then. The question becomes: Can we really create a market in which those far-off voices are effectively heard?
While the high-tech industry pursues solutions to global warming, it's also contributing to the problem.Ever-multiplying computer server facilities will double their consumption of energy in the next five years, according to a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency study sent to Congress on Friday.
Record oil prices deepen rich-poor divide, say analysts
Record high oil prices, while having little effect on the world's industrialised nations and benefiting oil-producing emerging economies, are taking a toll on poor countries that rely on imports, analysts say.
'Hot fuel' putting oil companies in hot seat
The oil companies are again in the hot seat, trying to fend off claims they've been taking advantage of motorists for decades by not taking temperature into account when dispensing fuel during the summer months.The industry has been adjusting for temperature when selling fuel in bulk at the wholesale level since the 1920s.
Investigations into whether the oil industry has undue influence in the state should come as no surprise.
Fuel problem wreaks havoc with Inuvik flights
Some flights in Inuvik, N.W.T., are being cancelled or delayed Friday because of a mysterious problem making the local airport's supply of jet fuel unusable.
Strained to breaking, Iraq’s power grid falters
Iraq’s power grid is on the brink of collapse because of insurgent sabotage, rising demand, fuel shortages and provinces that are unplugging local power stations from the national grid, officials said Saturday
Zimbabwe 'has come to a standstill'
Zimbabweans trying to survive food shortages, lengthy power outages, lack of fuel and other economic and social pressures have found a way to let the world know of their suffering - regular emails to friends and family abroad.
The Philippines: We have a serious crisis coming
Even if the prolonged dry spell does not end in drought, the country still faces a possible energy crisis down the road - perhaps even earlier than the next three years. There has been so much talk about an energy crisis but we have not really tapped alternative sources, which is quite ironic considering that the Philippines has such a great potential for clean and reliable sources of energy like geothermal, wind, solar, hydro, and biomass - which could lessen our dependence on imported oil.
Brazil: Amazon Fruit Gatherers Face Biofuel Dilemma
he babaçú, an abundant native palm tree in the eastern Amazon and in the north and northeast of Brazil, has great potential for the production of "biodiesel" and biomass fuel, but the women who make their living from gathering its fruit fear the loss of their traditional source of income.
House slaps $16 billion in taxes on oil industry
Declaring a new direction in energy policy, the House on Saturday approved $16 billion in taxes on oil companies, while providing billions of dollars in tax breaks and incentives for renewable energy and conservation efforts.Republican opponents said the legislation ignored the need to produce more domestic oil, natural gas and coal. One GOP lawmaker bemoaned "the pure venom ... against the oil and gas industry."
Do your part to destroy the Earth
By now, most of us have heard of peak oil, the concept that we've tapped the majority of the world's oil reserves and are now on a downward trajectory.As far as peak water goes, we ran out of clean water years ago, with five countries completely out of fresh, clean water. Saudi Arabia is one of them, and one of its leaders has recently said he wishes they had water instead of oil.
Trouble is, we Americans haven't changed our ways much, knowing what we know. We haven't signed the environmental accords like every other country on the planet. We aren't about to act like good world citizens, conserving resources, using alterative energy sources and leading the way out of the mess we made.
Going Green Without Starting From Scratch
Consumer interest in green construction has continued to grow, but few people can afford to build an environmentally friendly house from the ground up. They don't have to, says architect Kelly Lerner, co-author of "Natural Remodeling for the Not-So-Green House."
A straight switch is happening from food to fuel. As oil prices rise - and Peak Oil guarantees they will - it pulls up the price of biofuels as well, so it becomes more attractive for farmers to switch from food to fuel.Lester Brown of the Earth Policy Institute says: "The stage is now set for frontal competition for grain between the 800 million people who own automobiles, and the world's two billion poorest who will need it to survive."
Farmland, too, has a 'community need:' I call it vision and planning
Technological advances will continue and the nature and character of industry will change. Yet people will still work and work places will occupy land -- some more intensively than others.We will always need to eat; therefore, we will continue to need to secure a food supply, albeit with our efforts impacted by climate change and peak oil on international distribution.
CNN Heroes: Mathias Craig (video)
Many of Nicaragua's poorest and most isolated communities do not have electricity. Mathias Craig helped start "blueEnergy," a non-profit company that has brought sustainable energy -- generated by wind turbines -- to six communities on Nicaragua's Caribbean coast.Craig builds the windmills on site, and trains locals to maintain them. But I'm not sure you can really call that sustainable, if the parts must be shipped in.
India on African safari, hunting oil
Mahatma Gandhi once said that "commerce between India and Africa will be of ideas and services, not of manufactured goods against raw materials after the fashion of western exploiters." However, according to Zambian opposition MP Guy Scott, "People are saying, 'The Whites were bad, the Indians were worse, but the Chinese are worst of all.'"
Hopefuls use jets at cut rates
Matthew Simmons, a Texas investment banker who deals with oil and gas companies, said people are foolish to think he wants something in return for providing a plane to former Gov. Mitt Romney, a Massachusetts Republican, on several occasions."Anyone that thinks me offering time in a plane to Mitt Romney means that I'm buying his mind, that's wrong," he said.
Energy Search Goes Underground
When tremors started cracking walls and bathroom tiles in this Swiss city on the Rhine, the engineers knew they had a problem."The glass vases on the shelf rattled, and there was a loud bang," Catherine Wueest, a teashop owner, recalls. "I thought a truck had crashed into the building."
But the 3.4 magnitude tremor on the evening of December 8 was no ordinary act of nature: It had been accidentally triggered by engineers drilling deep into the Earth's crust to tap its inner heat and thus break new ground - literally - in the world's search for new sources of energy.



Any offerings as to what to make of the Whitehouse declaration of a state of emergency with respect to Syrian interference in Lebanon:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/08/20070802-1.html
I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, determine that the actions of certain persons to undermine Lebanon's legitimate and democratically elected government or democratic institutions, to contribute to the deliberate breakdown in the rule of law in Lebanon, including through politically motivated violence and intimidation, to reassert Syrian control or contribute to Syrian interference in Lebanon, or to infringe upon or undermine Lebanese sovereignty contribute to political and economic instability in that country and the region and constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat.
No mention on any MSM sites
Records
There are currently elections going on in Lebanon. I found this. I will look for more.
http://www.jnewswire.com/article/2098
http://www.thewest.com.au/aapstory.aspx?StoryName=406346
http://www.thestar.com/article/243111
A decleration of emergency seems a dramatic pre-emptive step, presumably they have 'good intelligence' and are trying to suppress Syrian planned hostile actions, by freezing assets.
Records
Lots of this kind of stuff appears in blogs and never appears in the MSM. There was another such declaration on July 17 that threatens to freeze assets of those interfering with the Iraq war effort. Maybe someone can find and post.
There is no reason to presume hostile Syrian intent any more than there is to presume hostile Iranian intent or hostile X-ian intent where X is anything other than the US gov't. It has been and is on a rampage. Not that China and Russia are lambs -- but they haven't, so far, been doing the "pre-emptive" military thing.
davebygolly, read the Executive Order dated July 17th on the Whitehouse website. You can find it by googling Bush, executive order. Don't believe it unless you've read it yourself. I read it myself, and I believe it, but if you have another interpretation, tell us.
Bob Ebersole
Here's the link to the press release: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/07/20070717-3.html
An interesting analysis by Prof Michel Chossudovsky here, sees it in terms of the criminalization of dissent - and no response from the House? WTF?
http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=6377
There's an argument for legitimizing the EO in terms of its application to acts of "violence" (or threat thereof), rather than opposition per se. But what is really interesting is how the EO seems to apply to those who work for or with agents who may *later* be deemed to have used violence to upset the Iraq plan. Read it closely, folks, this is the future (present).
Incidentally, Chossudovsky sees the EO (and others like it. surely) tied in with NSPD 51, which we should all be aware of by now:
"In May 2007, Bush issued a major presidential National Security Directive (National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive NSPD 51/HSPD 20), which would suspend constitutional government and instate broad dictatorial powers under martial law in the case of a "Catastrophic Emergency" (e.g. Second 9/11 terrorist attack)."
Like they say, by the time you hear the gunshot, you're already hit.
sm
About Lebanon, previous order, June 29, 2007,
Suspension of Entry as Immigrants and Nonimmigrants of Persons Responsible for Policies and Actions That Threaten Lebanon's Sovereignty and Democracy
white house
The US supports the Siniora Govmt, with all the clout is has. The Lebanese reacted very badly to this order: travel restrictions, etc. and who can certify who supports or not the present Govmt? How do ‘they’ decide? What about a person who is somewhat for and a bit against?
Fascist Gvmts. as we all know tend to keep such criteria secret so that ppl are left vulnerable, subservient, afraid, and guessing, as in WW2, then within nation States (not only but mainly).
Other views: unapplicable orders are empty sops, posturing, to satisfy this or that party, thus making a mockery out of any law, rule, order, etc.
so now dissent about 2 countries is effectivley stopped
Why doesn't Bush just pass an Executive Order that says "Anyone that does not think what I think, is going to be hunted down and jailed/tortured"? It would save him time instead of passing all these "little" Executive Orders.
I like the way it also covers spouses and dependent children. Nice touch - leave no bit of the Constitution behind. [I don't recall this in previous Edict - was it there?]
cfm in Gray, ME
you would think that wouldn't you? but no thats not what they will use it for. Crushing all dissent by using this would be too obvious of a power grab and would be extremely counter-productive. The military industrial complex as well as the current handlers of bush learned this lesson during Vietnam. No what they are doing is slightly more complex but very simple to understand. they will let small scale dissent flourish under their watchful eye of course. though when a group of these dissenters start to make traction thats when they act, with this order and the one about iraq they can effectively shut these operations down. When doing so they will of course not state the real reason, they will say they were terrorist or some such thing but the effect is the same.
They don't even have to hide this any further then a simple lie as to the reason of any of the required raids. Anyone else in the dissenting crowd would be even further marginalized by both factions in their own group and the public at large if they tried to tell the truth. Mainly because it is hard to believe a so called free and democratic country could practice tactics, the same kind of tactics used by nations many of us were taught as we grew up were evil. Remember only small lies need protection, the big ones protect themselves.
so breed dissent with the system but prevent the people from expressing it to their elected officials!
hooray fascism.
Dissent has to find a legitimate support, has to have some validation in the media, otherwise ppl might riot.
If mild dissenters or questioners or grumps are ‘represented’ by the Dems, by some TV shows, commentators, pundits, they can nod and say, right on, and feel they are still part of the total fabric of the US, their pov is out there in the public space, legitimate. This defangs them completely and keeps them quiet, buying charcoal for the BBQ, debating about supporting Hillary C or Obama - a *lot* to discuss over the beers and steaks.
Not to mention that any active dissenters are easily tagged if they join groups, so that disinformation campaigns and false-flag infiltrators can get them into trouble and separated from the larger group quite quickly. If someone starts a "Democrats for Death" group, then an undercover agent will join and offer the tools to get them into 'proper' trouble, when otherwise, they might have slowly educated people to stand up for themselves.
Speculation Alert: The Republicans are sure to lose the White House in 2008, unless they employ extraordinary means to win the election. One of those tactics may be the use of this EO, in combinations with others, to pick off one or more of the prominent democratic grassroots organizations such as moveon.org or kos. Their assets would be taken or frozen and the MSM would brand them supporters of terrorism. By branding them terrorist supporters, any presidential candidate would also be tainted and excoriated by most of the MSM as well. Such a tactic could have the effect of swaying some independent voters to the Republicans who would otherwise have voted Democratic.
This seems more logical to me than the theory that a catastrophe will be engineered to justify imposition of martial law under these EOs. Martial law would be too disruptive to business interests. They've got enough on their hands with the credit and mortgage debacle.
I agree with the slow erosion as I suspect The Patriot Act powers will be used to track down criminals that the public will not care that their rights were violated. I am wondering if the original Pedophile and high level drug prosecutions will be used to get law enforcement and the public to accept this type of invasion of privacy.
I was stationed at Rhein Main airbase in Frankfurt, Germany back about a million years ago in the summer of 1990, we had a Chief Master Sargent running around the flightline asking which mechanics were M-16 qualified, I wasn't! So I couldn't go on this mystery TDY! (temporary duty). Destination unknown! But anyone available that was qualified had to quickly grab their goods and report to a certain C-141 on the flightline!
About a day or later, the news broke out on CNN, Iraq invaded Kuwait. The US government had already had plans to deal with this incident, but the news corps were in the dark. (thus Operation Desert Shield). So I quickly realized the main stream media are just mere puppets, they tell us what they think we should see/hear!
Asian Markets Close Down, Singapore STI loses 3.53% on exposure to US debt.
http://www.sharewatch.com/story.php?storynumber=478235
Bear Stearns President Resigns
http://www.globeinvestor.com/servlet/story/ROC.20070806.2007-08-06T07381...
Cid: I wouldn't worry about the Bear Stearns guy- the retard that got fired for running Home Depot into the ground just got hired to run Chrysler.
Confirmation Bias and Self-Deception
"None of the circuits involved in conscious reasoning were particularly engaged. Essentially, it appears as if partisans twirl the cognitive kaleidoscope until they get the conclusions they want, and then they get massively reinforced for it, with the elimination of negative emotional states and activation of positive ones.... Everyone from executives and judges to scientists and politicians may reason to emotionally biased judgments when they have a vested interest in how to interpret 'the facts'."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias
http://atheism.about.com/od/logicalflawsinreasoning/a/selfdeception.htm
http://atheism.about.com/od/logicalflawsinreasoning/a/confirmation.htm
http://psychology.utoledo.edu/images/users/10/Geers%20and%20Lassiter%202...
http://cogsci.uwaterloo.ca/Articles/self-deception.pdf
In reference to Leanans post 'Energy Source Goes Underground'...Following are some events in Colorado which seems especially succeptable to earthquakes caused by liquid injection. It is well documented that drilling followed by liquid injection can sometimes cause movement of geologic formations.
http://www.aapg.org/explorer/2001/12dec/colo_quakes.cfm
'The most famous episode of a human-induced earthquake began in 1961, when a 12,000-foot disposal well was drilled in the U.S. Army's Rocky Mountain Arsenal northeast of Denver. The well was used for disposing of waste fluids from arsenal operations, and injection commenced in March 1962.
Shortly thereafter an unusual series of earthquakes erupted in the area, and by the end of December 1962 about 190 earthquakes had occurred. None caused damage until December, when several structures were damaged in Dupont and Irondale.
Over 1,300 earthquakes were recorded between January 1963 and August 1967. In April 1967 the largest earthquake since the series began in 1962 occurred, and damage was recorded in the arsenal, Derby and Boulder. This tremor measured 5.0 on the Richter scale.
Even after the Rocky Mountain Arsenal waste dumping practice stopped, earthquakes continued to be felt in the Denver area, so in 1968 the Army began removing fluid from the arsenal well very slowly in an effort to reduce the earthquake activity.
The most famous episode of a human-induced earthquake began in 1961, when a 12,000-foot disposal well was drilled in the U.S. Army's Rocky Mountain Arsenal northeast of Denver. The well was used for disposing of waste fluids from arsenal operations, and injection commenced in March 1962.
Shortly thereafter an unusual series of earthquakes erupted in the area, and by the end of December 1962 about 190 earthquakes had occurred. None caused damage until December, when several structures were damaged in Dupont and Irondale.
Over 1,300 earthquakes were recorded between January 1963 and August 1967. In April 1967 the largest earthquake since the series began in 1962 occurred, and damage was recorded in the arsenal, Derby and Boulder. This tremor measured 5.0 on the Richter scale.
Even after the Rocky Mountain Arsenal waste dumping practice stopped, earthquakes continued to be felt in the Denver area, so in 1968 the Army began removing fluid from the arsenal well very slowly in an effort to reduce the earthquake activity.
The most famous episode of a human-induced earthquake began in 1961, when a 12,000-foot disposal well was drilled in the U.S. Army's Rocky Mountain Arsenal northeast of Denver. The well was used for disposing of waste fluids from arsenal operations, and injection commenced in March 1962.
Shortly thereafter an unusual series of earthquakes erupted in the area, and by the end of December 1962 about 190 earthquakes had occurred. None caused damage until December, when several structures were damaged in Dupont and Irondale.
Over 1,300 earthquakes were recorded between January 1963 and August 1967. In April 1967 the largest earthquake since the series began in 1962 occurred, and damage was recorded in the arsenal, Derby and Boulder. This tremor measured 5.0 on the Richter scale.
Even after the Rocky Mountain Arsenal waste dumping practice stopped, earthquakes continued to be felt in the Denver area, so in 1968 the Army began removing fluid from the arsenal well very slowly in an effort to reduce the earthquake activity.'
disapointing that the author did not acknowledge the work of Dr. H. K. Van Poolen on the causes of the rma earthquakes.
From that same post:
"It said an investment of $800 million to $1 billion could produce more than 100 gigawatts of electricity by 2050, equaling the combined output of all 104 nuclear power plants in the U.S"
$1 billion over 40 years for 100 gigawatts? That can't possibly be right - a typical nuke costs $3 or $4 billion! I could believe $1 trillion...
Re: The End of Cheap Food
More misinformation in one article than I've seen is a long time.
1. American forests are not being cleared to produce ethanol. Total lie. In Brazil probably true.
2. Farmers do not decide whether their corn will be used for food or ethanol. The market decides. It is because corn is so cheaply priced by the market that it is used for ethanol. The energy content of corn is grossly undervalued by the market. Markets are not efficient is terms of pricing stuff according to its energy content. This is even true among fossil fuels. Diesel vs gasoline is the most common case of this. It leaves an opening to convert one form of energy to another at a profit or to switch from one form to another at a profit.
3. All corn can be used for food. All that is necessary is that the value of the food be greater than the value of the corn when used for ethanol. Food has been subsidized through the corn subsidy for so long that most can't remember a different situation. Feeding corn to animals is grossly energy inefficient. All you get from 15 bushels of corn fed to a hog is a carcass a lot of which is fat and bone. And the hog used a lot of energy just to live for 6 months.
4. The poor of the world who have no money can not expect farmers in the U.S. to feed them for free as they continue to reproduce without regard of the consequences. There is no more moral obligation for U.S. farmers to provide free food for the world than there is for Saudi Arabia to provide free oil to American drivers. Peak Oil demands that food be produced locally. Those who can not produce food must reduce population or slow down growth. Selling food below cost or giving it a away destroys incentives for production.
The poor in the world will benefit is the long term with rising food prices because a large share of them are engaged in food production. Those who are not had better switch.
practical,
Thanks for the clear thinking about corn for ethanol and food supply. Ethanol producers don't want to hurt the tortilla consumers of Mexico, its a clear case of unintended consequences. Yet, because of the global nature of are markets, our choices do affect others.
Corn is the perfect example of that. In the late 18th century in America, corn producers started producing alcohol, because it was cheaper to transport a finished product and otherwise their crop would be worthless. The feds wanted alcohol taxes, and out of that came the "Whiskey Rebellion". Corn prices in Kentuckey had no bearing on the prices in Great Britain, because the transport cost was too high.
But now, the ethanol craze is causing the prices in Mexico to skyrocket, because Mexican corn producers sell to the highest buyer, who happen to be the ethanol plants.
I don't agree that other's population growth relieves us of an ethical obligation to help feed starving people. But , it seems that the best way to solve both the food problem and the population problem is to help others to be prosperous and educated, as developed populations seem to have no problem with either.
Just a little food for thought.
Bob Ebersole
yes, but really what is so different about this. it's been going on since.........well at least since oct 12, 1492.
only now it is not only the aristocrats but suv driving vinyle sided house living soccor moms of heavenlyglenn subdivision doing the exploiting. party on you yuppie scum in a rat race up and down the highway to nowhere.
While you may be entirely right, I think that perhaps very little if any corn grown in Mexico is exported for ethanol production. Like the urban myth started last week about Venezuela ceasing to be an exporter and starting to import - it only applies to finished or refined products - the linkage between tortillas and ethanol has been an accepted factoid.
Maybe there is a link, but I'm guessing that there isn't, for several reasons, but I'd love to be shot down with some good hard stats before I take this one for granted.
I've written before on the tortilla subsidy factor, which dwarfed the price of corn, yet the easy to believe urban myths just won't go away.
Anybody out there have some good statistics to link this up or are we just going to assign blame to the ethanol guys? Did I miss some article[s] on the subject? To merely observe tortillas going up at the same time as ethanol production isn't good enough.
Hello Petrosaurus,
Ask and ye shall receive =):
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/2825/219799
57 more ethanol plants possible for Mexico to go with three existing.
Bob Shaw in Phx,Az Are Humans Smarter than YEast?
>1. American forests are not being cleared to produce ethanol. Total lie. In Brazil probably true.
Land in the US is most definately beig cleared for planting corn. Its just not happening in the corn belt because there aren't a heck of lot of trees there.
>3. All corn can be used for food. All that is necessary is that the value of the food be greater than the value of the corn when used for ethanol.
Land that was previous used to grow other crops (ie wheat, rice, soy, etc) have been planted with corn this year because the margins are higher (caused by subsidies).
> Peak Oil demands that food be produced locally. Those who can not produce food must reduce population or slow down growth. Selling food below cost or giving it a away destroys incentives for production.
The US will have a hard time meeting its internal demand for food without the green-revolution, large quantities of diesel to operate farming machinery and for transported crops to consumers, and natural gas to dry grain for winter storage. As I recall, the US is already a net food importer.
Where I live, fields that have never in my lifetime seen a corn crop are now planted fence row to fence row.
The problem with starving people in other countries is not that we are not feeding them, it is the fact that we ship our subsidized overproduction to low-tech countries where their labor intensive farming practices cannot compete with our energy intensive practices. Thus we dump extremely cheap grain on their market, call it humanitarian, pat ourselves on the back for being so damned generous, then wonder why they cannot feed themselves. The reason is people buy our cheap grain and so the farmers there have no incentive to plant their own. Where does the grain go? Often it is resold or exported at a profit.
THe complete ignorance and arrogance of the people here is often astounding.
Also, do not forget that natural gas is essential for anhydrous ammonia. (Fertilizer.)
currently yes, but we could in theory find other feedstocks for the ammonia NH3. This is not something I know alot about however, but think it will be important.
anhydrous fuel cell, anyone ?
Holy jeez. Desperate times call for desperate measures, I guess:
Minnesota Gov. Ready To Consider Gas Tax
I guess it may be possible to increase gas taxes while prices are high after all.
This gas tax idea is a good thing. They ought to make those who use the roads, brdiges, tunnels, traffic lights, and street lights along highways pay for them. It might also stimulate interest in energy conservation and reduce gasoline consumption per capita, allowing for spending on other items.
In times gone by there was a 55 mph speed limit to reduce fuel lost to wind resistance and maximum heat of 68 degrees in government buildings.
>It might also stimulate interest in energy conservation and reduce gasoline consumption per capita, allowing for spending on other items.
No it doesn't. I just allows someone else to consume oil at a lower cost. Europe has very high gas taxes and look what that does to american consumption. If we slapped a $3 gallon tax in the US, China, and India are more than willing to consume all the oil we conserve.
In addition gas taxes hike inflation. First by putting more money into the hands of gov't which will spend it on wasteful usless programs. Second every worker will demand higher wages to adjust to the higher taxes. There already is plenty of taxes for road maintance. The problem is that local gov't siphon off gas taxes to fund other (non-road) projects.