DrumBeat: April 5, 2008


Can't drive 55? How about 65 instead

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Sammy Hagar's protest ballad for speeders would need a 10-mile-per-hour update if a trucking group gets its way.

The American Trucking Associations, which represents trucking companies, is calling for the return of a uniform national speed limit, something this country hasn't seen since the 1990s. But this time the ATA is after something a little more modest: It wants to drop the limit to 65 mph for all cars and trucks.

Skybus becomes third airline this week to close

(CNN) -- Skybus Airlines announced Friday it is shutting down its passenger flights -- becoming the third airline this week to cease operations.

The low-cost carrier couldn't overcome "the combination of rising jet fuel costs and a slowing economic environment," the company said Friday. "These two issues proved to be insurmountable for a new carrier."


Diesel’s second coming - Will Americans finally warm to diesel cars?

So, two decades after vanishing in a puff of smoke, diesels seem poised to reappear on the American landscape. Your correspondent will be among the first to plonk down his cash the moment diesel versions of family runabouts arrive. But he wonders where all the fuel will come from if Americans take to diesels as much as they’ve embraced hybrids.

Fact is, there’s a global shortage of the stuff. That’s why, shorn of tax breaks, diesel costs so much more than petrol. Over the past year, the average price of diesel in America has risen by 117%—twice as fast as petrol. While both carry the same taxes in America, diesel now costs 60 to 70 cents a gallon more than regular gas.


Thailand: Bunker-oil imports to maintain power

Thailand will import 110 million litres of bunker oil to keep generating power until the broken pipeline from Burma's Yetagun gas field can be repaired in 10 days.


Tower Colliery closure prompts coal shortage

SOUTH Wales has been hit by a shortage in top quality fuel since the closure of the area’s most famous colliery.

Coalfields in the region became famous for their anthracite coal, which is the best quality and popular with householders.

But since the closure of the Tower Colliery, coal merchants say they are struggling.


Shell Trans Niger Pipeline Fully Repaired After 'Tampering'

Shell reported that the fire had been started by locals trying to steal oil from the pipeline. The individuals reportedly used a hacksaw to cut into the pipeline.


Middle East atomic moves

A period of hiatus following a wave of Arab nuclear announcements appears to have ended with the signing of a Franco-UAE atomic pact, as Egypt prepares to launch a tender for the country's first nuclear energy plant.

There are strong indications that the UAE deal could constitute the first step in a developing trend of atomic development and competition promoted both by pressing energy needs and regional instability.


Thailand: Rising rice prices fuel fears of food shortages and starvation

BANGKOK (IRIN) - International aid agencies are increasingly worried by the recent dramatic rise in food costs, and particularly rice prices, across Asia and the effect this will have on food assistance projects for the poorest people in the region.

The UN World Food Programme (WFP) is watching the rising price of rice, especially in Thailand, with alarm. “I have sleepless nights,” Jack Keulemans, regional procurement officer for the organisation, told IRIN.


Cuba's organic revolution

The collapse of the Soviet Union forced Cuba to become self-reliant in its agricultural production. The country's innovative solution was urban organic farming, the creation of 'organoponicos'. But will it survive a change of government?


Jordan faces oil price bind

The sharp rise in oil prices over the past year has provided a massive economic boost for many Arab states. In Jordan, however, it has forced the government into a delicate balancing act in order to preserve political and fiscal stability.

Unlike most of its neighbours, Jordan does not sit on vast oil and gas riches. All the same, the kingdom has for many years offered citizens generous subsidies to buy cheap petrol and heating fuel. Yet with oil climbing towards – and recently topping – the $100-a-barrel mark, the cabinet has been forced to reduce subsidies steadily to prevent soaring deficits. In February, they were eliminated entirely.


New Zealand: How long can oil fuel our leisure?

BP says that, taken together, these factors should push the price of petrol past $2 a litre, perhaps as high as $2.40.

That is going to be painful enough if you are filling the family car. What if you run a Cessna C180, a '55 Chevy dragster, a Fi-Glass Dominator outboard boat, or a Centurion battle tank at the weekend?

Is the end fast approaching for petrolheads? Or do people love their hobbies so much they will take the bus to work and save their petrol money for recreation?


Social critic warns, offers hope

WILKES-BARRE – Oil has fueled the engine driving America’s growth, but James Howard Kunstler warned it’s also greasing the nation’s slide down the slippery slope to trouble.

In a wide-ranging hour-long talk Friday morning, the social critic and author of “The Long Emergency” predicted regional fuel shortages, forecasted the end of suburbia, championed a return to railroad travel and held out hope for change.


Kunstler: Upscale

Lovins's long-running emblematic project with that outfit is something they call the "hyper-car," a car that gets such supernaturally great mileage that it will save the human race's threatened Happy Motoring program from extinction. The hyper-car program, which RMI still trumpets to this day, has, of course, the unintended consequence of promoting future car dependency -- which is about the last thing that America needs -- but that hasn't prevented RMI from pushing it. Beyond that, Lovins's RMI program-for-America resembles an actuarial exercise in "carbon credits" and other statistics-based fantasies aimed at inducing theoretically rational behavior among the WalMart executives (and "greening" up WalMart has been another of RMI's consulting projects -- I'm not kidding).


Vermont senators call for oil-price investigation

MONTPELIER -- The state Senate called this week for Attorney General William Sorrell to launch a criminal investigation of major oil companies to see if recent petroleum price increases might involve price-fixing, consumer fraud or other violations of law.

"At the same time that we are paying $3 and $4 a gallon for gas and oil, the oil companies are making record profits, billions and billions of dollars," said Senate President Pro Tem Peter Shumlin, D-Windham. "It's puzzling to us that so few politicians, both on a state and national level, are saying enough is enough."


Oil firms no longer need tax break, but renewable energy does

Bipartisanship is welcome, and renewable energy is essential. But senators shouldn't be so quick to forget about fiscal responsibility.


U.S. DOE To Continue Royalty-In-Kind Strategic Oil Stocks

The U.S. Department of Energy Friday solicited bids for royalty-in-kind, or RIK, oil to fill the Strategic Petroleum Reserve by up to 13 million barrels from August to December.


Outcry Muted Over New Colorado Oil and Gas Rules

After all the griping and gnashing of teeth over the new rules for oil and gas production in Colorado, it was perhaps inevitable that the actual draft regulations, which were released this week, were less inflammatory than the industry rhetoric would have led you to believe.


Central Asia’s Looming Water Wars

Fans of Thomas Homer-Dixon know the story—way back in 1992 (pdf), he was one of the early voices raising serious concern about conflicts arising from resource competition. And to bring things close to home for our readers, Tajikistan is thirsty, and this past winter has faced severe electricity shortages because its hydroelectric power plants froze. Indeed, since the Pamirs in Tajikistan see the head of so many rivers that flow into neighboring countries, Tajikistan has seen a rise in tension over water use rights and national boundaries along the Ferghana Valley.


A Crude Source of Welfare

"In short, apparently these countries need the price of oil to stay high to pay for their welfare expenses…which means that they will necessarily be raising oil prices again pretty soon…"


Fuel shortages cause price hikes Nigeria

With massive fuel shortages in the north of Nigeria since mid March, transport costs have doubled exacerbating food prices.


Pakistanis face food shortage

Due to the previous administration’s reluctance to reduce subsidies for food and fuel, the government is saddled with a widening fiscal deficit.

While wanting to alleviate the hardship of the poor, the new government will face some painful economic choices.


Chile sees higher diesel imports in '08

SANTIAGO (Reuters) - Chile's diesel imports should grow 5-10 percent in 2008 from a year earlier due to a domestic fuel shortage, state oil company ENAP said on Friday, with consumption expected to spike in the coming winter months.


Bangladesh: Biofuel production hits food security?

Biofuel emerged as an alternative fuel to benefit the biotech companies and the trans-national corporations (TNCs) which claim that biofuel is a unique `green innovation' of the modern technology sensitive to the environment, ecology and the poor. Refuting this TNC claim, reputed and established scientists of the world are saying that the TNC claim is contrary to the reality as biofuel production causes food scarcity and environmental degradation. That by propagating this, they are rather committing crime against humanity.


Fuel prices will make big trucker shortage even bigger

Albany-- Gas prices hit another record Friday and truck drivers say they continue to be hit the hardest. This week, many independent truckers went on strike. Some even threatened to leave the industry altogether because of rising fuel prices.

This adds to the already huge trucker shortage nationwide. It'll only get bigger. The record diesel prices even has future truckers worried about their livelihood before they even get in the cab.


Diesel fuel cost a big load for truckers

Reducing idling time can only save so much, and some drivers claim the big trucking firms are cutting corners by reducing the number of employees for whom they pay benefits.

“I’ve been a truck driver for 17 years,” said Brian Chrans, originally from Indian Harbor Beach, Fla., but now of Ludington. “Three years ago I was making $140,000 a year, plus, but now, as of about two weeks ago, the company I was working for can’t afford to pay me anymore.”

Chrans claims the trucking industry is telling the public there is a driver shortage to keep the turnover high, so they don’t have to pay benefits. “A trucking company will entice you to work with them, and in 90 days, they will look at a driver to try and see how to get him out the door,” Chrans said.


Fukuda calls for people's effort to fight global warming

"Efforts by only the government and the industry are not good enough for measures against global warming," he said after the meeting in Toyako, a mountain resort on the northern island of Hokkaido, where the next Group of Eight rich nations summit will be held in July.

"We want all the people to participate. We want them to seek a change in lifestyle," he added.


Nations take first step to climate deal

BANGKOK (AFP) - More than 160 nations agreed late Friday on the first step to drafting an ambitious new treaty on global warming after hours of haggling between rich and poor countries.

House Republican Whip Blunt says U.S. Dependence on OPEC Jumps Seven Points in a Year thanks to the majority’s misguided energy strategy.

U.S. reliance on the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) grew from 50.9 percent of total crude imports in 2006 to 57.6 percent in 2007.

That is actually an increase of 6.7 percent of our total petroleum imports that came from OPEC. The actual
barrels imported from OPEC increased slightly more. I ran the numbers and found that imports from OPEC countries increased 8.46 percent from 2006 to 2007. Imports were 2,013,603,000 barrels in 2006 and 2,183,964,000 barrels in 2007.

However I fail to see where Representative Blunt can blame this on the Democrats misguided energy strategy. I wonder what would have happened if the Republicans were in the majority? And after all, the Republicans did have the Presidency. I think it really shows a person’s ignorance when they blame the opposite party for the terrible energy mess this nation is in. The whole world is in the same mess, is the opposite party responsible for that also?

The blame, methinks, lies elsewhere.

Ron Patterson

The blame game will still be getting played a time long after people are queing for bread, rice and flour. Unfortunately as the mess unravels much of it will still not be connected (in the minds of the sheeple) to peak oil / peaking resources. Instead it will all just have been the failure of some party, some group, some government.

Marco.

We would be a couple of weeks into the construction of the Tysons Corner-Dulles extension of DC Metro (thereby stimulating the economy) and saving 20,000 to 25,000 b/day of oil when completed & built out if it were not for the last minute, unexpected kill by the Bush Administration.

Alan

It is painful to think how much public transport could be added to the system if not for the war in Iraq. $600,000,000,000 - thats $1500/good bicycle and all gear required for every man woman and child in the US. God only knows how many kms of trams/busses that would have bought.

true, and add to that,that all the Iraqi oil would still reach the world market one or the other way. Status Q as for oil supply in other words, but subtract all US-military-oil used and add that to the civil market ...

Man, how bad has not that war been and still is ... in regards to all possible parameters.

BTW where is the world police (US/UN) on Zimbabwe? Mugabe is 1000-times worse than Saddam in my eyes!
....ahh stupid me, no oil !

I don't know the situation in Zimbabwe and I don't defend Mugabe. But there is no world police, only the UN and the US, and the UN follows the baton of the US, even though sometimes reluctantly. That Mugabe has gotten the media attention he's gotten means there is something in Zimbabwe the US or the western powers want -- otherwise you wouldn't be hearing about him, anymore than, say, you do about the Saudi rulers or any number of others. You can be sure the US rulers don't give a damn about the killing, whatever its scale, in Darfur -- they care about the Chinese eating "their" lunch. That's the only reason for the media blitz. Same thing too with Tibet and China. I'm sure the Tibetans are getting shat upon by the Chinese gov't. But I'm also sure that the scale of what's happening doesn't remotely compare to what the US is doing to Iraq (and Afghanistan). All this stuff is no doubt real to one extent or another, but the way media attention is portioned out is very much managed and selective, and serves ends that are far from humanitarian. Give me control of the spotlight and ...

Dave, I find your post cynical and silly, without any reason or logic, only accusatory. The media reports on Mugabe because he is news. The "rulers" of the US as you call them, do not rule the media. And the media in the US print or broadcast whatever they damn well please. Neither Bush nor Congress tell them what to print about Zimbabwe, Darfur or Tibet.

And when you say the "US" does not give a damn about the killing in Darfur, just who are you talking about? It is the Chinese who are ignoring the massive genocide in Darfur, not the US or UN. It is the Chinese who do not have a free press and are able to buy oil from the purveyors of genocide without a uttering a word of objection. And not a word of it is reported in the Chinese press.

I am just as pissed off about what is happening in Iraq as anyone, (but not Afghanistan). I think Bush is the worst President in US history but that does not lessen the horror of what is going on in Darfur, Tibet or Zimbabwe. And the US press has every right, indeed a duty, to report on atrocities going on there.

but the way media attention is portioned out is very much managed and selective, and serves ends that are far from humanitarian.

The media has two masters, its subscribers and its advertisers. And contrary to popular belief their advertisers do not control content. Witness CNN and CNBC and virtually every other media outlet chastising WalMart, one of their largest advertisers, for taking the proceeds of a lawsuit from a disable victim of an accident. Also when auto safety test are run, they give the results in great detail regardless of which of their advertisers it hurts. They are far more concerned with ratings than how the news will affect advertisers. Because if their ratings are good, the advertisers will come regardless.

If you had been following the US press you would realize that they are not at all friendly toward Bush and the Iraqi war. In fact all except Fox and a few others are usually extremely critical and continually hammer both Bush and Congress daily. So just where do you get off saying that they would not be reporting on Mugabe unless there was something there there the US wants?

Ron Patterson

Very naive, Ron.
The same interests control the media and congress / US gov. They own both. They own you too.

Bl4 or whatever you are called, Congress IS the US Government, or at least a large part of it. And it is not only extremely naive to think the government controls everything, it is just downright dumb. If the government controls the media then the media would not beat up on the government all the time. No government in the history of the world has ever taken the pounding that the press and the US mass media dishes out to our government. They hammer them every chance they get. They hammer them because they deserve it, they hammer them because they are inept and they hammer them because their reading and watching public just love it. The press cater to their subscribers at the expense of those inept fools in government who so justly deserve being exposed for what they are.

But you conspiracy theory wingnuts believe everything is controlled clandestinely by "The Powers That Be" or "The Government" or "The Elites" or " The Bilderberg Group" or "The Trilateral Commission" or "The Bankers" or "The Jewish Conspiracy" or some other crap like that.

All such positions are absolutely silly. But I guess it takes all kinds. You guys sure add a little hilarity in my life.

Ron Patterson

Ron,

You are always so sure about "the world according to Ron". Maybe, just maybe, you should admit that you dont know it all.

You and I had an argument once about the FED directing the buying of shares through Repos and Pomos. You did not even know what it was then, but you argued that they are not "allowed" to do that. Except they did and they are.
Now they financed the buying of a whole company (Bear Stearns), and I have not heard you say a thing about that.

Empty pots make the most noise.

Francois.

IMHO, your conspiracy theory on this subject is based totally on emotion. You strongly desire to believe that e.g. members of the US Congress or Senate are "inept fools". One could quantify exactly how much money per annum being a member of Congress or Senate is worth, and it is huge. The actual salary is dwarfed by the total amount. Inept, stupid people don't just continually fall into money as you need to believe-sure, they are hammered by the MSM for being "inept" just like they call Mozillo "inept".

As far as I am concerned, I have seen way too many laws and tax breaks passed for "special interests".

I feel most congressmen are whores, paid to do the bidding of the payer.

Any politician failing to "play the game" is economically forced to yield his power to one who will.

I do not subscribe to the concept that Members of Congress are inept fools... but I do think they are prostitutes, driven by lobbyists.

The Congressman does what he has to do in his environment to survive.

Unless the people organize a uproar, the lobbyists get their way.

This is the reason we can "justify" things like the Kelo vs. New London crap while simultaneously holding people who share music liable for criminal copyright infringement - even when we promise "justice for all" in exchange for "I pledge Allegiance".

Bit by bit the people are taxed more and more to pay for the largesse of the organizations represented by the lobbyist.

Yes, we have a good government system... but we the people MUST be vigilant. We aren't. We are allowing others to enslave us.

Steve

BrianT

Thank you. One of the downsides of writing in things that talk about real issues is that they are often filled with conspiracy theory nutjobs. Politicians probably dream of having the power that people sometimes give them credit for.

This just reminded me of a story I read that some of the Taliban in Afghanistan thought that we had a kind of "smart dust" that they could get on them and we could then track them from the dust. That would be pretty interesting, wouldn't it?

But you conspiracy theory wingnuts

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Conspiracy Features quotes from 'wingnuts' like:

- Winston Churchill, 1922
- Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom (1913)
- Benjamin Disraeli, first Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, in a novel he published in 1844 called Coningsby, the New Generation
- Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets.
- Andrew Jackson, letter, April 26, 1824
- Thomas W. Lawson Frenzied Finance, 1905
- Reginald McKenna, President of the Midlands Bank of England
- Professor Carroll Quigley, Tradgey and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time, 1966
- Congressman Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee
- Grace Commission Report, submitted to President Ronald Reagan on January 15, 1984
- John F. Kennedy, speech at Columbia University, 10 days before his assassination
- Senator Claiborne Pell, Senate Intelligence Committe member, commenting on a USA/USSR treaty signed in 1978
- US Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter
- Congressman Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee, June 20, 1932
- John Sherman letter sent to New York bankers, Morton, and Gould, in support of the then proposed National Banking Act,June 25, 1863
― Congressman Louis T. McFadden
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to then Secretary of the Treasury, Albert Gallatin, 1802
― Sir Josiah Stamp - president of the Bank of England in the 1920’s and the second richest man in Britain
― Henry Ford, Sr. — American Developer of the Automobile (Emerging Struggle pg. 165)
― Congressman Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of House Banking Committee 1921 through 1931 — in a speech made before the House in 1934
― Robert H. Hemphill (Credit Manager of Federal Reserve Bank, Atlanta, Ga.)
― Congressman Louis McFadden, Chairman of House Comm. on Banking and Currency from 1920 to 1931 (Shadows of Power, pg. 23
― Reginald McKenna, Chancellor of England’s Exchequer, January 1924
― Willis A. Overholser, LL.B - in History of Money in the United States.

All such positions are absolutely silly

Yup. Silly. People like US Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter Winston Churchill are silly gooses.

You guys sure add a little hilarity in my life.

Well, I'm sure all the above quoted people are happy to provide you with snickers and giggles.

Ya Gonna believe me or your lying eyes?

Instead of another peak oil book, read Creature from Jekyll Island next.

I think that book was a standard part of the Liberty Dollar membership.

Ron, it is no conspiracy theory that the US gov't, Executive Branch, controls media. This is simple fact. The NYT sat on the wiretap story for a YEAR. What was the time frame, eh? Let's see they revealed it in 2005... wasn't there an election in... 2004? Given how close the election was, do you think there was a chance it might have turned out differently?

Please. Don't ignore facts due to a visceral reaction to "conspiracy theorists." A few conspiracies we know DID happen: The USS Liberty, Tonkin Gulf, NYT and warrantless wiretapping, extraordinary renditions, Saddam attacked the US!!, the Reichstag fire, Abu Ghraib cover-up, Watergate, Pentagon publishing propaganda as news (current war in Iraq), etc.

I'm always amazed by the "It can't happen NOW" response.

Cheers

Ron, there's a movie call War Made Easy. I saw it a few weeks ago in NY. But it's available on DVD. Watch it.

Or google: cia media control, cia mockingbird, etc.

Or: did you see the David Frost interview with Bhutto where Bhutto identified one of her possible assassins the killer of bin Laden. No? Why not? Did you know that a former Star Wars chief, a asst tres'y secretary and father of Reaganomics (plus many, many others worth noting) accuse the gov't of complicity in 911? How much do you see about the depleted uranium being dumped over Iraq and Afghanistan? (I'm not talking about being sympathetic to any of this -- just about reporting it!)

Or try http://www.projectcensored.org/

The "rulers" of the US as you call them, do not rule the media. And the media in the US print or broadcast whatever they damn well please. Neither Bush nor Congress tell them what to print about Zimbabwe, Darfur or Tibet.

I cannot believe what I'm hearing. Do you honestly believe that there is a free press in the United States? Maybe there is in the so-called "free speech zones", where people can say what they want in the middle of nowhere so long as nobody is around to hear them. American media is consolidated into very few hands. About 6 for-profit (right-wing) corporations control the vast majority of what Americans see on television. And since 1975, 2/3 of independent newspapers have vanished. Very few liberal voices are left in main stream media. And the Bush administrarion is very supportive of loosening the rules even further to allow for more consolidation. So I believe the truth is somewhere in the middle of your arguments. It is unlikely that leading government officials sit in their thrones and dictate what will be shown on every channel and in every newspaper, but the press certainly is not free (at least the major names that are widely watched). I mean, FOX news was still reporting that WMDs had been found in Iraq as late as July 2004. It is no wonder that so many Americans live in the dark about what is actually going on in the world. Consolidation has dramatically affected the quality and diversity of information available to the public.

Okay, I am not going to respond to any more of you conspiracy theory wingnuts, people who believe everything that is printed or broadcast in the media is controlled by...by....somebody. (Almost every wingnut has a different media controller.) Hell, I do have my standards you know. I have set the bar very low as to the type of post I will respond to. And most of the responses I read are way below that.

Ron Patterson

Okay, I am not going to respond to any more of you conspiracy theory wingnuts

IS that a promise?

Hell, I do have my standards you know.

Yes, that would be calling heads of state and court members 'silly'.

Good thing we'll never hear you comment on this JFK quote about the press and government interaction:
http://www.jfklibrary.org/Historical+Resources/Archives/Reference+Desk/S...

The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.

But I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to reexamine his own standards, and to recognize the nature of our country's peril. In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort based largely on self-discipline, to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In time of "clear and present danger," the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public's need for national security

And a bit later....

It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions--by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

Can't you find a different forum for this stuff?

When Ron stops with his position of 'all conspiracy talk is silly' - I won't have to dig up people for Ron to call silly.

All this conspiracy talk among people who believe in global warming? I believe in global warming myself, but there are people that say global warming doesn't exist and that it's a conspiracy to move create emissions controls that would move jobs to other countries that don't have emissions regulations, among others. The government/"others paying off scientists to say there is an issue that isn't real is more plausible than the government controling the media, the economy, and all political dialogue to serve "themselves".

Head, meet sand.

There is a free press in the United States. Just because the press isn't run the way you want, and doesn't cover the stories you want, doesn't mean there isn't a free press. If you want to know the difference between the presence and absence of a free press, there are plenty of countries you can visit. Your rhetoric comes from a seriously parochial perspective.

There is a free press in the United States.

Really?

As one of the Presidents said:

But I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to reexamine his own standards, and to recognize the nature of our country's peril. In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort based largely on self-discipline, to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In time of "clear and present danger," the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public's need for national security

And your point is what, exactly?

A president asking reporters not to act as the enemy's forward observation officers does not mean the press isn't free. Again, if you would like to learn what it means not to have a free press, there are plenty of countries you can visit.

For the daily cost of the Iraq War ($343,000,000 per day), 9,800 homes could be electrified with 4kW solar electric systems each day. For the yearly cost of the Iraq War ($125,000,000,000 per year), 3,557,000 homes could be electrified with 4kW solar electric systems each year. For the total appropriated cost of the Iraq War ($607,000,000,000 through FY08), 17,342,857 homes could have been electrified with 4kW solar electric systems.

Sources and Calculations:
*Congressman Murtha on the daily cost of the War in Iraq: http://www.murtha.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=39...
*Congressional Joint Economic Committee on the total appropriated cost of the War in Iraq: http://www.jec.senate.gov/Documents/Releases/11.13.07IraqReportRelease.p...

Number of Residential Solar Electric (PV) Systems Installed
- $8.75 per Watt Installed is the current cost of residential solar electric systems
- 4,000 Watt Solar Electric System installed is $35,000 ($8.75 x 4,000)
- $343,000,000 / $35,000 = 9,800 Residential Solar Systems Installed Per Day
- $125,000,000,000 / $35,000 = 3,577,000 Residential Solar Systems Installed Per Year
- $607,000,000,000 / $35,000 = 17,342,857 Residential Solar Systems Installed through FY08

Calculating Total Solar Electric Power Production
- Total System Size (kW) Installed per Day for $393 Million = 39,200 (4kW x 9,800 systems)
- Total System Size (kW) Installed per Year for $1.25 Billion = 14,308,000 (4kW x 3,577,000 systems)
- Total System Size (kW) Installed through FY08 for $607 Billion = 69,371,429 (4kW x 17,342,857 systems)

- Hours of "Peak" Sunlight per Day = 4.47 (From NOAA Database)
- Conversion Efficiency = 0.77 (Industry standard assumption)

- kW-Hours (kWh) per Day Generated for $343 Million = 134,922 (kW Installed per Day x Peak Sun Hours per Day x Conversion Efficiency)
- kWh Generated per Day for $125 Billion = 49,246,705 (kW Installed per Year x Peak Sun Hours per Day x Conversion Efficiency)
- kWh Generated per Day for $607 Billion = 238,769,520 (Total kW Installed for $607 Billion x Peak Sun Hours per Day x Conversion Efficiency)
- kWh Generated per Year for $607 Billion = 87,150,874,800 (kWh per Day Generated for $607 Billion x 365)

- MW-Hours (MWh) Generated per Day for $343 Million = 135 (Total kWh Generated per Day for $343 Million/1000)
- MWh Generated per Day for $125 Billion = 49,247 (Total kWh Generated per Day for $125 Billion/1000)
- MWh Generated per Day for $607 Billion = 238,770 (Total kWh Generated per Day for $607 Billion/1000)
- MWh Generated per Year for $607 Billion = 87,150,875 ((Total kWh Generated per Day for $607 Billion/1000) x 365)

Solar Electric Power produced over 30 Years
- 9,800 PV Installations in kWh/Year x 30 Years = 1,477,401,156 (kWh Generated per Day for $343 Million x 365 days x 30 years)
- 3,577,000 PV Installations in kWh/Year x 30 Years = 539,251,421,970 (kWh Generated per Day for $125 Billion x 365 days x 30 years)
- 17,342,857 PV Installations in kWh/Year x 30 Years = 2,614,526,244,000 (kWh Generated per Day for $607 Billion x 365 days x 30 years)

- 9,800 PV Installations in MWh/Year x 30 Years = 1,477,401 ((kWh Generated per Day for $343 Million x 365 days x 30 years)/1000)
- 3,577,000 PV Installations in MWh/Year x 30 Years = 539,251,422 ((kWh Generated per Day for $125 Billion x 365 days x 30 years)/1000)
- 17,342,857 PV Installations in MWh/Year x 30 Years = 2,614,526,244 ((kWh Generated per Day for $607 Billion x 365 days x 30 years)/1000)

You can cut a hell of a lot of cost out of that by using micro systems and having individuals/communities build their own.

I can build a solar over that will go to nearly 300F for ten bucks.

You can build a windmill for a few hundred bucks - or less.

Cheers

Methinks the bad energy policy from Washington has spanned many Congresses, party majorities, and presidents since Ford and Carter. For many moons they have been going out of their way around our mountain of coal here in America and our ability to build massive solar and LNG infrastructure to make us dependent on politically unstable crude with its ELM problems. And when they do decide to take massive action, we get corn ethanol, no foreign oil displacement, and massive food inflation from them. It's like they are doing nearly all they can to create an oil crisis.

And an economic crisis.

Hmm.....

The whole world is in the same mess, is the opposite party responsible for that also? The blame, methinks, lies elsewhere.

I guess to a turkey other turkeys look different but here in the 'whole' world Republican an Democrat birds look the same, just more trouble. War and debt, that is what the world gets from both those parties.

That American Experiment or narcissist's wet dream is some big failure. Wouldn't it be nice to sweep all it's failed apparatus into that trash can called history? Methinks, Ron Patterson, you could start looking for something that cooks the lab book for more than a select few.

Methinks, Ron Patterson, you could start looking for something that cooks the lab book for more than a select few.

CrystalRadion, did you not understand a word of that last sentence?

The whole world is in the same mess, is the opposite party responsible for that also?

Get that Crystal, the whole damn world! That was my exact point, that this is not a problem for just the US but a problem for the entire world. And the second half of that sentence was pure sarcasm. That being said, I do not need to start looking for something that cooks the lab books for the entire world, I know exactly where the fault lies. To quote John Gray: It is a consequence of the evolutionary success of an exceptionally rapacious primate.

No one is to blame CrystalRadio, the human population stumbled upon the detritus of millions of years of past life. This supplied us with massive amounts of food and energy. The extra food enabled our population to explode. Also all that extra energy