DrumBeat: July 14, 2006

[Update by Leanan on 07/14/06 at 9:32 AM EDT]

Oil prices strike record high above $78 per barrel

"We are certainly in uncharted territory," said Victor Shum, an energy analyst with Purvin & Gertz in Singapore. "I wouldn't be surprised if $80 is attained soon with this slew of geopolitical events in a tight market."

..."We haven't even taken into account a potential hurricane in the United States, so getting to $80 and beyond this summer seems quite inevitable," Shum said. "But if these Middle East events somehow get resolved, prices could also drop sharply."

Can't make the trip to Italy for ASPO-5? Check out the ASPO-5 Live Blog.

See the new and improved version of Westexas' article about Daniel Yergin Day at Energy Bulletin.

An Early Retirement For The Hydrogen Fuel Cell:

At last weekends Lucerne Fuel Cell Conference, which is a highly respected technical conference, Ulf Bossel, the organizer, made a pretty signinficant announcement: the European PEMFC Forum series will not be continued because hydrogen fuel will never contribute to a sustainable world. Instead they will focus on phosphoric acid fuel cells, molten carbonate fuel cells and solid oxide fuel cells which "can meet the challenges of a sustainable future".

Supermarkets and Service Stations Now Competing for Grain, according to Lester Brown.

China to allow foreign exploration in key oil, gas blocks:

China has traditionally limited foreign access to its onshore oil and gas resources but as demand for energy to power its booming economy has grown, it has opened the door and in March Petrochina signed a deal with Total of France on exploration in the Erdos Basin.
Will new pipeline ease the West's energy woes?
The 1,094-mile Caspian oil duct, inaugurated Thursday in Turkey, may not be as tangle-free as America had hoped.

..."Increasingly, Russia is dictating its terms," says Necdet Pamir, an energy expert with the Eurasia Strategic Research Center in Ankara.

A Russian monster arrives, and its name is Rosneft.

Pentagon and Peak Oil: A Military Literature Review

Uganda: Power Outages Fueling City Fires

President Clinton says he was never briefed on peak oil.

Santa Barbara Prepares for Peak Oil

Dreamliners and Peak Oil - designing airplanes for energy efficiency.

Peak Oil and Energy Resources - a ten-minute intro to peak oil.

3 ways to win from the oil glut:

Believe it or not, there's an excess of oil -- but it's an excess of hard-to-refine heavy sour crude.
How fungible will net oil exports be in a post-Peak Oil environment?

Following is a post I made yesterday.  I am  beginning to wonder if oil exporters are going to increasingly turn away from the US market in favor of exporting their oil to importers that have better quality and/or lower cost goods and services to offer in exchange for oil.    

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=email_en&refer=latin_america&sid=a_H7VhJXt_6I

Venezuela's Oil Sales to U.S. Drop as Chavez Sends More to Asia

The Venezuela story is (mostly) not related to my Export Land model, but there are three points:

(1) It does raise the question of whether oil, in a declining net export capacity environment, is truly fungible;  

(2)  Note that Chavez is transporting his oil seven times farther than the distance to the US Gulf Coast.  This effectively reduces net export capacity because of the greater amount of oil locked up in transit;

(3)  Combined with gas station story, it makes one wonder if Chavez is gradually withdrawing from the US market.  Given China's low cost manufacturing capability, if I were Chavez I would prefer to trade with China, versus the US, even with the higher transportation cost.

How fungible will net oil exports be ...?

Good question. I've asked TOD before how much oil is traded on the spot market (as opposed to fixed price long term contract) but no-one seems to know. Chavez also has his Petro-Caribe initiative which offers oil to Caribbean nations at less than (market) cost. I think you're right, this trend will accelerate.

I am beginning to think that the contraction of the discretionary (majority) side of the US economy is going to happen far faster than I initially thought--it's beginning to happen right now.  Note that the home foreclosure rate in North Texas is already up 26% year over year.

My continuing advice: ELP (Economize; Localize; Produce).

I very strongly suggest that you get yourself on the nondiscretionary side of the US economy ASAP.

That's what I call the Peak Oil "Duck and Cover" procedure.  Westexas' ELP guidelines are this generations equivalent to the Cold War's "Duck and Cover" drills.

The difference is of course that Westexas' advice will actually help you.

For "production" I suggest
  1. a 19th century style trading post
  2. an 18th century style tavern

These are what I have, up and running--and even legal!
You need to advertise on TOD.
Thank you.

From friends and family, I already have plenty of customers.

My most lucrative business is consulting about survival supplies.

e.g., I can provide a $100 package for college students, a $1,000 package for young couples and all the way up to the "Fortress Package" at $300,000.

whats in each of those packages?
I customize each package based on:
  1. What a person already has and knows.
  2. What is most needed.
  3. What will be of value no matter what happens.

I offer money-back guarantees.

Since 1962, nobody has ever asked for their money back. Also during and before, nobody has asked.

I do it because I like people, and I make no money at it that I do not give to the Nature Conservancy.

Who was it who said: "Allhands buid boats!"?
Noah.

The only boat builder in history who finished on time.

Amazing what sufficient motivation can do, eh?
Andrew Jackson Higgins finished ahead of time in New Orleans, and won WW II ias a consequence.  City streets were converted into factory expansions, street lights were retimed to spped deliveries to the various shipyards in New Orleans

A major reason that the offical US WW II museum is a mile from my home on Andrew J. Higgins Blvd..

Andrew Jackson Higgins finished ahead of time in New Orleans, and won WW II is a consequence.  City streets were converted into factory expansions, street lights were retimed to speed deliveries to the various shipyards in New Orleans.

To insure adequate materials in case of war, he bought the entire 1941 Phillipines mahogany harvest.  All of which ended up on various invasion beaches.

A major reason that the offical US WW II museum is a mile from my home on Andrew J. Higgins Blvd..

I LOVE Higgins boats!
Something's gotta be done

This was a quote, by a disgruntled grocery shopper, shown on CNBC this morning.   She said that if you go into a Safeway with a $100 bill, you come out with $20 worth of groceries.  She then said that "Something's gotta be done."  

We will see similar interviews with consumers in front of gas pumps--"Something's gotta be done."

The epic paradigm shift that we are witnessing is American consumers' very gradually dawning realization that the days of cheap food and energy are fading away.  They are not going to be happy campers, and they are going to demand that politicians do something to bring back cheap food and cheap gasoline.   I suppose that a first step would be for Congress to repeal the Laws of Thermodynamics.

Probably something like they're doing in New Brunswick:  price controls.
Yup. And then (as implied by the article) if the controls actually bite, they will get shortages and lines (as we got in the 1970s). Then, I suppose, they can haul Hugo Chavez into court for "hoarding", and try to enforce a judgement to that effect. Oh, what fun.
'seems to me that the highly processed (convenince) foods are climbing most rapidly, and that if you cook basic items there is less of an impact.

I guess I'm suggesting "eating lower on the food chain" in two senses of the phrase.

Could it be that the record production of ethanol is starting to have an effect?  Corn based,i.e., heavily processed foods would be the first affected. Corn is in just about everything processed, including meat.  We've had a cheap food policy for years through our subsidy policy, but with the ramp up of ethanol, this will probably end.

 

Meat is cheap now and getting cheaper due to drought in some areas.
I'd like to see some data on it.  I'm betting its transportation and other petroleum costs creeping in.
Buy a Sunday newspaper.

Shop the specials.

That is what I do.

Meat is cheap and getting cheaper.

I agree and my great fear is that what some (and especially those in power) will demand is that "doing something about it . . ." means going to war for the remaining oil rather than actually doing something about the way we live. I see a situation unfolding over the coming months and years where a large segment of the American population is convinced that the countries with the oil are "holding out on us" or "using oil as a weapon."  Remember, as Bush told us, the American way of life is not negotiable.
I think you've got it.  You aren't "doing something", at least not seriously, unless the military is involved.
Hello Twilight,

Speaking of military involvement, how about a US naval ship docked in the Black Sea port of Feodosia setting off demonstrations, then riots, then a blockade with anti-NATO Russian seperatists discovering onshore US weaponry [if purportedly to be used in upcoming seaborne exercises--why unload it offshore]?

http://en.rian.ru/world/20060608/49231209.html

Does anyone think the G8 does not have a lot to discuss?

Bob Shaw in Phx,AZ  Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?

I know what you mean.  This whole Israel/Lebanon thing is beginning to taste like a pretext for an oil war in Iran.  If we can't invade over WMD we use our surrogate.
Sure thing. Something's got to be done.

  1. cancel Star Wars anti-missile systems
  2. don't build the next generation Raptor airplanes.
  3. close most of the 700 offshore military bases
  4. quit pushing corporate globalization agendas
  5. quit pulling our winkies over gay marriage and abortion rights and immigration
  6. quit listening to lobbyists from K street and listen to constituents
  7. quit subsidizing corn
  8. etc... etc... etc...

Sometimes I feel like Herbert Hoover is in office and we are waiting for the "market" to make things right.

Not going to happen.

I think what we'll see politically are two things:

  1. A return to classic 'class warfare' economic politics by the left.

  2. An ever more strident effort by the right to focus on 'cultural' issues to fob off growing economic discontent.

This means in the US:

A. Further political polarization.

B. Purge of moderates from both US political parties.

C. Increasing institutional dysfunction and gridlock.

D. Increasing search for 'extra-constitutional' solutions by whichever party controls the Presidency.

In the formerly 'hot' real estate markets, such as here in Florida, the foreclosure statistics are even worse:

http://tinyurl.com/nmu3n

"In Broward County [Ft. Lauderdale area], foreclosures were up in the first quarter over the end of last year by 57 percent. In Palm Beach, they jumped 69 percent, and in Miami-Dade, they were up 17 percent.

Overall, South Florida had about 3,000 more foreclosures than at the end of 2005 -- a jump of 40 percent."

The ARMs with no money down are coming home to roost.

  1. I wonder if China, that apparently had trouble with heavy sour Saudi crude, could handle heavy sour Venezolan crude?

  2. The export capacity does not diminish because of oil locked up, since once the switch is made, the deliveries will be as regular as they were. However, this locks up more oil transport capacity and that has the same effect. Plus the fuel burned underway also costs something.
They hydrogen thing seems to be a good sign that those folks are "getting real" and not just supporting a hydrogen lobby.  Maybe I shouldn't count these political chickens before they're hatched ... but with MSM pushback on ethanol EROEI and corn subsidies, there seems to be more practical thinking than there was a year ago.
Reality may be a two edged sword. Two of Bush's greatest achievements, in his befuddled brain, are hydrogen and ethanol. He said something to the effect that people will look back in the future and see his initiatives as the turning point in the fight against global warming.

When reality sets in, people in the camp that magic will fix everything, may wake up and say to themselves,"what the f**k?, there no wizard behind the curtain, after all".  And when people realize that the SRIHTF, what will they do?  In the short run, we will see an even greater effort to make sure we are drilling everywhere all the time.  

All things considered, however, I've gotta go with reality.  Reality tends to make you invest in things that actually have some hope of doing something useful.  It's good to see that someone finally had the courage to stand up and point out that the hydrogen emperor, "our hope for the future", has no clothes.

Well, we've got all those day traders thowing money at every alt-energy company with a glimmer of a chance.  Whatever other flaws we have (and there are many) we are at least funding research.

... I do wish conservation and efficiency had as strong a value network.

I never thought that Bush and the corporate powers behind him ever considered hydrogen seriously even for a minute.

This was all a little expensive PR event, in order when the shortages come by they could say: "Gosh, we tried so hard to get something clean but it didn't work. Unfortunately we will need to go fo CTL, tar sands, heavy oil and nuclear now... Oh, yes we will also need to wage 1-2-3 more wars to secure "our" oil...". I see ethanol as the next excuse in the transitioning campaign to more and more dirtier and/or controversal energy sources and measures to preserve our "non-negotiatable" way of life.

Right, but my point is that the dream/PR-effort crashed early.  They had to move on to the ethanol dream/PR-effort, and that is already under assault (not just from us, but from the WSJ, etc.)
Yes, I also share your optimism. The old rule that in order to get the attention or change the mind of Joe Average you have to make him reach deeper in his pocket worked even better than expected.
This should be "nice" of course... my personal spell-checker is out of order, I guess.
The whole hydrogen/ethanol boondoggle reminds of the old "star wars" effort under Reagan.

One of the scientist told a senator that it was ridiculous to build a enormous laser prior to getting the table top prototype  working.  The senator accused him of being disloyal to the president and tried to get him fired.

When dealing with politicians it is important to realize that they don't understand technology.  To them (and most of the public) it IS magic.  An those 'liberal arrogant scientists" are just trying to be difficult.

It's amazing what the govt. spin doctors can do. The propaganda machine, unfortunately, works pretty well. I predict that at some point the Bushies will say that Larry Linney was fired for underestimating the expense of the Iraq war :-()
Thank a deity for living in a country where politicians fairly often listen to scientific reasoning. The rot is mostly in social sciences where the real world can be ignored.
Alas. Speaking as an economist and sociologist, I must agree.

Oy, veh.

The problem is too many factors, or impossible ones  to measure; so intuitive knowledge(or more likely the lack of) -with it's myriad of perspectives gets studies projected in journals to scientifically prove(?)- well the subjective point of view. Ain't sciences; but dammed important!That is why we need this dialogue.
BTW this community  seems to be moving beyond 'bargaining'.