DrumBeat: August 25, 2006

[Update by Leanan on 08/25/06 at 9:21 AM EDT]

Oil jumps on U.S. Gulf storm threat

As CNN noted this morning, the models on this one are unusually congruent. Not the typical mess of spaghetti:

TheStormTrack thinks this one could be nasty - worse than the NHC is currently predicting.


USDA-DOE Announce Additional Key Note Speakers for Review: Matt Simmons is on the list.

Additional keynote speakers have been confirmed for Advancing Renewable Energy: An American Rural Renaissance. This conference is co-hosted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and is designed to create partnerships and strategies that will accelerate commercialization of renewable energy industries and distribution systems, the crux of President Bush's Advanced Energy Initiative. Advancing Renewable Energy, is scheduled to take place October 10-12, 2006, at the America's Center in St. Louis, Missouri.


Biofuels may strain U.N. goals of ending hunger


Venezuela's Chavez plans to more than triple oil exports to China


Arab region's gas demand growth overtakes oil


South American Gas Pipeline Project on Hold, Petrobras Says

Petroleo Brasileiro SA, Brazil's state-controlled oil company, said plans to build a $20 billion natural gas pipeline from Venezuela to Argentina are on hold because of an impasse between Brazil and Bolivia over energy prices.


Mexico's PEMEX Restarts Development of Mature Fields


Russia spins global energy spider's web


Geostrategic oil interests and the Gulf


Oil firms 'hushing up' crisis of corroding pipelines


World can absorb oil rises, bank chief says


Six Steps to Beating Global Warming


Coal Gasification Archive Goes Online


Analysis: The death of oil?


Is $5 Per Gallon Gasoline Enough?


DOE predicts gasoline shortages

Here we go again. Oh well. Sigh.

At least I got the first comment. ;)

Anyone know if this is projected to be a really massive storm, width-wise, like some of the monsters last year?
I think it's too early to tell. The Weather Channel is predicting it will be a tropical storm later today and a hurricane threatening the gulf by early next week. It will probably turn northward as it enters the GOM, as usual. There is will encounter very warm water and could become a massive storm, or could remain compact.

Right now it's too early to say if it will even make landfall -though the smart money says it will. But the question is where, and right now the tracks show anywhere but northeast Mexico to the Florida.

Yup, too early.  But TheStormTrack thinks this one will intensify quickly, because of the warm water in the Gulf.  They're predicting it will be Hurricane Ernesto by Saturday night.
I know things change, but the guy I heard this morning emphasised the "it's a big if this thing stays together" side of the equation.  Citing dry air and lots of shear ahead of the storm on it's current track.

We'll see.  

Oil companies are preparing to evacuate.

BP PLC, which is responsible for 2,500 employees and contractors working on offshore rigs and platforms, has in-house meteorologists tracking the storm and has begun assessing the amount of time it would take to evacuate various facilities.

BP spokesman Hugh Depland said one of the key factors behind any decisions about when to evacuate employees is whether the winds are light enough for helicopters to land on offshore rigs and platforms. "Helicopters that we have historically flown, they don't like to shut down if the wind is above 60 knots," Depland said.

It's official: Tropical Depression 5 is now Tropical Storm Ernesto.

The StormTrack is predicting that it will become a hurricane, and will have a track something like Dennis.  (Thunder Horse, beware!)

You know, everyone's saying that this season is such a lessened threat than last year, but the fact of the matter is you only need one really BAD hurricane to screw things up for awhile.

I think if anything, Global Warming has made weather prediction much more difficult because we are seeing new patterns all the time....an increase in anomalies (droughts, warm where it should be cold and vice versa, etc.)  

Heck, I wouldn't be surprised to see a hurricane that formed in the Gulf and just sat there spinning around for a few days without moving anywhere...kinda like the Great Eye on Jupiter.

Assuming it does. What's the deal with insurance companies. Can they even afford another one.
I'm sure they'll be all right.   They've been dumping the high-risk customers for awhile now.

Risky Business

With $58 billion in claims to pay for last year alone, U.S. insurers are jacking rates, canceling policies, and learning to cope with climate change.

...In 18 states, from southern Texas to the northern tip of Maine, insurance companies are scrambling to reduce the risk of major hurricane-related payouts. The upshot: For the 43% of the U.S. population who live and do business in these states, rates are likely to rise between 20% and 100% over the next year, according to the Insurance Information Institute. (In the rest of the country, premiums are expected to rise about 4%.)

The insurance industry does not officially believe in global warming, but they do accept that the climate is changing.

A changing climate shakes the industry

Says Allstate CEO Edward Liddy: "We are in a period of increased land and sea surface temperatures. When you couple that with more people living along coasts and dramatically increased home values in those areas, that's when you step back and you say, 'Wait a minute. This is not yesterday's game.' "

Publicly, insurers have not accepted the theory of global warming, which says that the accumulation of greenhouse gases - in part because of activities like burning fossil fuels - is changing weather patterns. What the industry does believe is that, for whatever reason, weather isn't what it used to be.

HAS ANYONE SEEN THIS?

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/08/state_farm_insi.html

Exclusive: Whistleblowers Say State Farm Shredded Documents to Avoid Paying Katrina Victims, Allegations of Massive Fraud

Social collapse first maybe?  Thousands of people are pissed!  Now they've got PROOF!  Bring em down...

i am not surprised. it was probably either shred them or go bankrupt.
Bankrupt em in court.  We need a flippin reset button.
Aren't they making record profits though?
Not sure, I know they are MIGHTY healthy in face of the hurricanes and this would explain why.  I bet the aggregate numbers would astonish all of us.  I think they are paying less than 25% of their claims.
insurance company's run basically like a casino.
they are placing there bets that the monthly fee's from the insured will vastly outnumber the amount of claims they do have to pay out when stuff happens.
the big sign post that tells people that they actually lost the bet with Katrina is that they are trying to find ways no matter how minor to deny people their insurance payouts.
They don't just rely on fees...they actually invest the fee money as well.
still their entire model is based on betting their income will always be bigger then what they have to pay out.
the damage done by Katrina would do any one insurance company in so they are franticly trying to minimize their lost income by shredding and denying claims.
With some limited exceptions, the performance of major, NAME BRAND insurance companies has been shameful after Katrina.

Uncontested claims, where the homeowner was willing to just take the adjusters estimate, went many months before payout.  Local theory was that they had to liquidate real estate / other investments and just did not have the $$$.

Allstate & State Farm did NOT do right by many of their policy holders.  Others kept a tally of the few good and many bad insurance companies.

I don't suppose you have a link to that list of good companies?  I'm in Alabama an have state farm.

On the other hand don't insurance regulations vary greatly state by state.  Is it really that state farm was so bad, or is it that the state government was lax in making an enforcing regulations.

So much for the "Like a good neighbor..." and "You're in good hands" advertising jingles, eh?
These are corporations -- amoral, profit-maximizing machines that will do almost anything for a buck. The people who run them are legally bound to run as many risks as possible to make a profit.

Remember the Pinto and how Ford calculated it would be cheaper to settle lawsuits than recall the car and therein save lives?

Enron. WorldComm. And now maybe State Farm. When do exceptions become the rule?

Actually, Ford made the calculation that it would be cheaper to pay a few death claims than put a very cheap (<$25) fix in the Pinto. The US courts rightly reminded Ford that we don't allow them to do this kind of "cost-benefit analysis."
they were only unlucky enough to get caught.
Ah, but they had to be punished by the court system to be reminded of this, no? Only threat of punishment, not moral considerations, led to Ford correcting its behavior.

This is normal behavior for the corporation. Only the relatively sure threat of costly punishment leads to what we would call 'good' behavior.

Warren Buffett, whose Berkshire Hathaway Corp. is prominent in re-insurance and catastrophe insurance, seemed to have played this well. He raised rates to reflect last year's risks, and so far the bet seems to be paying off on a less active hurricane season. Berkshire has reported strong results in the last two quarters; its Class A stock is trading at all-time highs of about $96,300 per share.

Last year Berkshire was profitable overall despite a $2 billion hurricane-related re-insurance/ catastrophe insurance payout. Buffett is clearly hoping to make money on the catastrophe lines this year, with prices high enough to cover at least some payouts before having to draw on other funds. It could work unless there is another huge disaster like Katrina.

So did Buffett pay out all HIS legally binding Katrina claims?
Hey, is Alan around?  I'd like to get his take on the light rail thread that's posted on Daily Kos now.  You'll find it here:

"My other car gets 100 miles to the gallon"
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/8/24/132130/286

It raises some great points, some of which Alan has raised in his posts some of which are new (I may have missed some of Alan's posts).

I'd also like to know if everything the author says in the Daily Kos post is true.  For example, here's one bit where he says a train gets the equivalent of 180 miles per gallon (if you calculate it figuring in all the people it carries):

"The average current technology diesel locomotive gets two to three gallons per mile. Based on this, given a fuel economy of 3.45 gallons to the mile (2004 average fuel economy for diesel commuter rail per US government statistics), the train uses 217 gallons of diesel to travel from Chicago to Harvard. Given the average train load of 619 passengers, this gives a fuel usage of 0.35 gallon (slightly more than 1/3 gallon) used per passenger to travel the 63 mile trip. Doing the math, this gives a fuel economy of 180 passenger miles per gallon of fuel used."

Don't forget canals. Graceful and efficient. :-)
Canals are also stinky cesspools.    Throw in some mosquitoes with tropical diseases, and you have a ditch of death.
Show me some land without trashed tires pooling water providing prime habitat for your foreign invaders and I'll show you a place not suitable for a canal.
From what Alan told me, even comparing diesel to diesel, a trolley car on rails is five to eight times more efficient than a bus on wheels.

The US is not Switzerland, but (as Alan has noted) in the Second World War, per capita oil consumption in Switzerland was 0.15% of per capita US oil consumption today.  

I think that Alan Drake and Jim Kunstler--electric trolley car lines and New Urbanism (Alan would say "Old Urbanism")--are pointing us toward the only real hope of retaining some semblance of a civilized society.  The irony of course is that we are just trying to get back to what we had in the early years of the 20th Century--before the nightmare of out of control suburban growth descended upon the land.  We have only begun to see the McMansion Meltdown.  

Re:  McMansion/Real Estate Meltdown

CNBC is reporting that H&R Block, which has a sub-prime mortgage division, is warning of very large mortgage related losses. . . A "tiny" paid for house, or a small rented apartment along a mass transit line looks better and better.

"Cut thy spending and get thee to the non-discretionary side of the economy."  

(Because very large segments of the discretionary side of the economy are going to be contracting very fast.  BTW, the Tom Cruise/Paramount fight is just one example of this.  Hollywood, and the rest of the entertainment industry, are going to be fighting over a shrinking pie for years to come.)


Westexas,

Is education considered non-discretionary?

Garth

The non-discretionary economy I agree is bound to take a wallop.  Regarding Hollywood specifically, I believe they prospered during the Great Depression--escapism needed during trying times.  I used to think Starbucks fortunes would be a bellweather for the economy, since about every financial advice-giver tells you the first thing to cut back on is the $5/day latte habit.  (However, this might not be the best example as I'm realizing people are actually addicted to the stuff.)  But I'd watch similar (non-luxury) segments of the economy (the restaurant trade?)for signs of the coming economic collapse.
Restaurants are indeed taking a hit, at least the $10-$20 a plate places. Micky-D's is doing OK since they're a cheaper alternative, In-N-Out etc. Expensive "housewares" places are taking a hit as per a recent article in the MSM here (san francisco bay area) and while Macy's has plenty of $40 pillows, they seem to be selling a lot of their $10 ones like the one I got last night - wow I had a good night's sleep.

Very very slow motion wreck of a very very large and ponderous train.....

I think I would look for big ticket discretionary items to take an early fall. Say, big screen televisions, expensive DVD players, and high end personal computers.
Note the upsurge in $600 laptops. It's partly because of the upcoming demise of Mini-IDE in favor of SATA, but also because people aren't buying so many laptops now.
Fewer people are buying expensive laptops, because the existing laptop market's mature and saturated. I used to replace my home computer every 3 years. Last time, I replaced with a laptop, which is still fine three years later, every bit as capable as a new $600 machine (though it cost twice that). I can't see myself replacing it for another three years (after which, it may be too late anyway!)

I'll guess that people are now replacing their home desktop computers with $600 laptops. And then the home computer market will be completely saturated. This generation of machine has a good lifespan (and fairly low energy consumption!) And people's disposable incomes will take a nosedive... so they will be stuck with them anyway.

General recommendation : replace your 2+ year old desktop system with a laptop.

Just make sure you don't buy the laptop model with the battery that explodes and catches fire.
I suspect that is a hazard with all Li-ion batteries, to some extent.  It's been a serious issue with electric bikes.  The battery packs are a lot bigger than the ones for a laptop, and they're right under your butt.  
I use to know a guy who sold alcohol for a living.  During recessions, sales of the premium product increased.   Strange but true!  

Hard times mean that people like to give themselves little rewards.  A movie or a premium beverage is a relatively cheap thrill.  On the other hand, there is a difference between a recession and depression.

All you need to service that addiction for a fraction of the cost is a home coffee maker and a can of cheap Folgers (or equivalent).