DrumBeat: July 20, 2006

[Update by Leanan on 07/21/06 at 8:31 AM EDT]

I'm out in the field and away from the computer this morning, but I wanted to post this before I go (free registration required):

Saudi Arabia's oil a huge question

The Saudis say they are still committed to affordable, stable petroleum. But prices have roughly tripled in four years despite periodic Saudi announcements of plans to pump up production.

Control, it seems, has slipped away.

So when the Saudis a few weeks ago suddenly reversed field and announced a production cut, some analysts scratched their heads and wondered if, at long last, Saudi Arabian oil production has peaked. If it has, the effect is potentially huge on oil markets and the price of gasoline at the pump.

[Update by Leanan on 07/20/06 at 9:41 AM EDT]

North Sea oil faces 'dark times'

Oil companies in the UK are being left behind by international competition, according to an industry annual report.

The UK Offshore Operators Association (UKOOA) claimed that record prices could not offset rises in costs for exploration and recovery.


Mexican crude oil exports, output slip in June


India to build SPR

India will start building its first strategic crude oil storage facility in January at Vizag in the southern state of Andhra Pradesh, a senior government official was quoted by the Wall Street Journal Asian edition as saying.
YUKOS CEO quits before "sham" meeting
MOSCOW (Reuters) - The American chief executive of fallen Russian oil major YUKOS (YUKO.MM) has tendered his resignation before a meeting of creditors on Thursday that is expected to take the company a step closer to bankruptcy.


High temperatures may spark power emergency

SACRAMENTO -- Five years after a massive energy crisis roiled California, the state has added capacity to power nearly 6 million more households -- but it's still barely enough.

With soaring temperatures baking California this week, the state is struggling to meet record demand for electricity and is once again on the verge of a first-stage power emergency.

While the situation is far better than the rolling blackouts that rocked the state in 2000-01, California utilities and state officials remain concerned by the ever-increasing demand driven not only by population growth, but lifestyle changes and booming development in warmer inland regions.


France imports power in heatwave

French firm EDF had to purchase 2,000 megawatt hours of electricity from abroad to make up for its shortfall.

Meanwhile Britain turned to expensive oil-fired stations to meet demand but said enough supplies were available.


China to face energy security crisis by 2010


U.K.: CBI chief warns of looming energy crisis


China May Reopen Deep-Sea Oil Hunt

A major gas discovery deep under the South China Sea could reopen a frontier for oil and gas exploration that some multinational companies abandoned decades ago after shallower wells turned up dry, said the chairman of Cnooc Ltd., China's biggest offshore oil producer.


The Best Nuclear Option

The U.S. Energy Department's fuel-recycling initiative could be a distraction from a more achievable goal: reviving today's nuclear industry and averting some carbon emissions in the short term.


Amory Lovins on nuclear power


Tom Whipple writes about the media and peak oil:

The Wall Street Journal's treatment of peak oil is the complete opposite. They don't want to even think about it. They would rather read that a giant meteor is heading for the earth and it will all be over next week than to contemplate the possibility that the GDP just might stop growing because there is no longer enough oil.


Goldman Sachs: Rising Biofuel Use to Drive Up Crop Prices


Peak oil not piquing the interest of CVRD board


An inconvenient hill. A house in the lowlands is great if you plan to lug 300 pounds of manure home on a bike trailer. It's not so great if global warming causes the oceans to rise.

That story out of Mexico is interesting, if short-term.
Pemex said crude oil exports fell to 1.776 million barrels per day from 1.831 million bpd in May, while production dropped to 3.287 million bpd from 3.329 million bpd in May.
Usually graphs of United States peak show only year-by-year results that go into decline starting in 1971 I believe. Does anybody have the month-by-month figures at the moment of exact U.S. peak production? I'm curious to see how noisy the data at that time was, and whether there were some months where it made a short-lived rebound.
Note that Mexican oil production fell by about 1%, while net oil exports fell by about 3%, i.e, net exports are being squeezed by both falling production and rising consumption.  With Cantarell crashing, these numbers are like little pebbles falling down the mountainside, in advance of an avalanche.  

Also note that while the Russians are claiming higher oil production (I have my doubts since they were pushing the IPO), they are admitting to declines in net oil exports.

I predict successive rounds of bidding for declining net oil export capacity, and I continue to predict that net oil export capacity will fall faster than total world oil production.

There was a 42,000 bpd drop in production, 55,000 bpd drop in exports. Meanwhile, the natural gas treadmill is speeding up for Mexico: 10 million cubic feet per day drop in production, 55 million cubic feet per day rise in imports (almost all from the US, I believe). Small numbers, right now.

Annualize these numbers and it gets really scary-- 660,000 bpd drop in oil exports, or about one-third of total exports to the US. Combined with continuing troubles in GOM, and on shore depletion in the US, and we suddenly have to replace between 5 and 8% of our total consumption from other sources. Not even the new expansion at Syncrude is going to dent this.

Ouch.

Hello TODers,

Outgoing Mexican Presidente' Vicente Fox calls for runoff election to help calm the situation and establish a voting majority.  I am still looking to find additional confirmation from other newsources, as I have never heard of this link before [SperoNews], but I am just trying to keep us TODers up to date on what is increasingly become a polarized country.

Bob Shaw in Phx,AZ  Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?

Interesting!  If it turns out to be real, then I will find the silence from the MSM propaganda organs to be very revealing.  OTOH, I'm unlikly to think much better of the MSM even if it isn't! ;-)
Hello Twilight,

Thxs for responding.  I think the American organizations should send some of those statisticians that analyzed the Florida[2000] & Ohio[2004] votes down Mexico way to help physicist Luis Mochán of UNAM complete his voting analysis to help resolve the Mexican Standoff.

Even better--send Stuart Staniford's and Khebab's resumes' down South.  I bet the Mexican Election Board [IFE] would hire these guys for huge $$$$ to do their wonderful data freak computational analysis on the Mexican vote.

The more I look at the statistical graphs of the election-->the more I think something is rotten: but I am no expert.  Hopefully, Freddy, Dave, DuncanK, and other TODers will comment on these disturbing graphs.

Top link excerpts:
--------------------
Doing maths in Mexico

While Mexicans take to the streets over the presidential vote, democracy's fairweather friends are standing silent.

Yet the stalwarts of democracy outside Mexico are silent. Bush has congratulated Calderón, not waiting for the court to rule. Reuters and Bloomberg echo the confidence of the elites that Calderón will win in court - never mind whether he won at the polls. When The New York Times is heard from, the headlines tell us of the "leftist claims" about the occurrence of fraud, while Calderón is described as "presidential." The Times never doubted that fraud did occur in Ukraine. In Mexico on the other hand, it seemingly renounces any duty to examine the facts on the ground.

Here's one difference between the two situations. In Ukraine, it was extremely hard to learn exactly what the evidence of fraudulence actually was. In Mexico, it is extremely easy. That is because the Mexican electoral authority, known as IFE, posted the ongoing count on its website in real time, an initiative called PREP. Independent scholars kept a record of PREP as the night progressed. A statistical analysis of that record does not, of course, constitute proof. But it brings to mind Henry David Thoreau's remark that circumstantial evidence can be very strong, as when you find a trout in the milk.
------------------------
Arizona is obviously on the front lines with Mexico.  If this election goes really bad, we will be swamped with refugees.

Bob Shaw in Phx,Az  Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?

Thank you Totoneila for your updates on the Mexican Presidente' elections. I for one look forward to more as they develop. Please keep us updated.

By the way! I quit watching TV for the past 6 six weeks, and guess what?
 I don't miss it. ocassionally i'll walk past one and see a snippet here and there, i noticed CNN, MSNBC and FOX can flog a dead horse forever. GEEZ, i find other things to do. Though i have enjoyed the history channel and national geographic channel on the variety of topics, i do not miss TV at all.

I could go on a long time about how pleasant it is not to see or hear main stream media or reality shows. GEEZ!

Note that, again based on Khebab's excellent work, Mexico arrived at the 50% of Qt mark this year.  

If you limit the HL method to regions that have produced about 2 mbpd for 20 years or so, I am not aware of any case histories where the HL method failed.

And from Bloomberg today about remote Russian island drilling north of Japan.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aCi3NokxCtys&refer=exclusive_to_bloomber g

Shell Slips on Sakhalin Ice, Costs in Fight to Boost Reserves

i wonder whether the net oil exports will be the light sweet or the heavier grades.
 a very good point
Is this historical chart from the EIA what you want?

I took that historical chart, converted it to a CSV file, then plotted the 5 years surrounding the peak. The graph below is what I got. It shows that things were very noisy then and that we had a situation very much like the last 24 months, some months up, some down, but no real clear trend til a few years had passed.




Click on the image to see it full sized. I didn't want the graph to blow up the entire page formatting. I've saved the image at flickr. Hopefully I've got the URL right for others to see it.

At a guess, it's going to be a lot sharper for fields that have been doing water flooding for a while.
GZ, thanks. This is exactly what I was looking for.  Interesting.
From BusinessWeek:

Can't Stop Guzzling: Rising prices are supposed to curtail consumption. So why doesn't that hold true for American drivers?

Gasoline keeps getting more expensive, but Americans keep buying more of it. They bought 10% more gasoline in the first half of 2006 than in the first half of 2000 even though the price at the pump rose 75%. It isn't just essential trips, either--leisure travel remains strong. Gasoline consumption during the week of the Fourth of July holiday this summer was 2% higher than a year ago.

It would be interesting to see what the per capita gasoline use is.  Our population is increasing, so presumably energy use will, too, barring extraordinary measures.

More typical is Scott Parker, 36, of Manhattan, who fills up his Nissan XTerra SUV three times a week at around $50 a shot. Parker enjoys road trips on weekends. And although there is a commuter train to Norwalk, Conn., where he works as a marketing director, he prefers to drive. Says Parker: "At the end of the day, I'd rather be on my own schedule." The extra cost of gas goes onto his credit-card balances, which he plans to pay off with his end-of-year bonus.

Great...but what happens if his company has to cut back and doesn't give him a bonus?

CNN had a segment yesterday about how people are dealing with high gas prices.  A lot of them are doing what Mr. Parker is doing, and putting it on their credit cards.  Gotta wonder how sustainable that is...

Not to mention the accumulated interest.  This guy will just be more road kill when peak oil really starts to kick in.
not to mention the fact that he's definitely on the wrong side of Westexas' "net producer" choice of professions - he says he's a marketing director - seems like he'd be a good candidate for working in the fields when positions like his suddenly become completely expendable
If $150/week really is his average, he is spending almost $8000  on gas and driving about 50,000 miles per year (assuming $3 gas and 20 mpg).  Not to mention spending about 1,000 hours per year in his car while racking up all that credit card interest.  Not a lifestyle I'd want.

Here's another article from the NYTimes, not quite as "bullish" as the BusinessWeek article regarding fuel consumption:

Reluctantly Adjusting to Oil Cost

"For a long time people anticipated that gas prices would fall back, so they ran up more debt to cover their higher expenses without cutting back on purchases," said Richard T. Curtin, director of the Michigan surveys. "And now they have reluctantly concluded, in the past three or four months, that gasoline prices are not going to go down."

"Rising gasoline prices are really driving a wedge between lower- and higher-income households," Mr. Curtin said.

I've noticed a resurgence of anti-hybrid feeling on the road recently.  Do they hate me for being right?
It's cultural differences between affluent, educated PO-aware folks and Joe Six-Pack. You're a member of a different tribe, thus a threat.
Possibly.  One guy (in a pickup) was gesticulating at me wildly for only going 35 in a 40 zone.  He was ignoring the fact that I was right behind another pickup also doing 35.  The truck and I were both doing 35, but I was in another tribe.
hybrid=liberal=enemy

You're either with them or against them.  Welcome to the New American Century.

Were you the guy directly in front of him?  That is probably why you received the bulk of his anger.  I doubt he even understood you were driving a hybrid car.
calorie
I do the math about the same except that if this character is doimg 50,000 miles a year between Manhattan and Norwalk he is not averaging 50mph. He is in his XTerra 1500 or 2000 hours a year, That's why he drives around in his living room. He lives there
The text immediately after the passage you quoted reads:

"Why the resilience? After all, when prices of most things rise, people buy less. You would think they would react to costlier gasoline by gradually making such adjustments as carpooling, switching to more fuel-efficient vehicles, or even getting a job closer to home. To an extent, they do. Energy Dept. economists say gasoline consumption, driven by an expanding population and economy, would be even higher today if prices hadn't risen."

Higher prices do restrain demand.  In this case, the downward price pressure on demand was overwhelmed by the upward pressure on demand from an increasing population and economic growth.

Agreed that higher prices restrain demand. This was also the thesis of yesterday's EIA This Week in Petroleum report (News Flash: High Gasoline Prices Do Restrain Demand).  I think the market is working more or less as it should right now.  That is not to say it is not causing pain, especially for lower income earners and certain businesses, including GM and Ford.

Here's a rare free Wall Street Journal article:

States Boost Speed Limits On Major Highways: Moves Come Despite Concerns Over Safety, High Gas Prices; 80 Miles Per Hour in Texas

With gasoline prices approaching an average of $3 a gallon and Middle East strife escalating, it might seem like a bad time to encourage drivers to burn even more fuel. But speed limits on stretches of freeways around the country are rising -- just in time for summer road trips.
I expect that the low gas prices that prevailed until about two years ago "hard-wired" a good deal more energy consumption into the economy, and that it will take higher prices a while to begin to destroy demand. Much of the country's population growth, for example, was at the suburban or exurban fringe, and many jobs followed the workers out to suburban locations. Many people replaced older, more fuel-efficient cars with SUV's. Big-box stores and "power centers" replaced smaller, nearby shops.

These items -- houses, office and commercial buildings, cars -- are big capital investments, and are not easily or frequently replaced. Folks may be inclined to go into debt to hold on to a lifestyle in the hopes that the current high gas prices will pass. If one relies on the MSM for news, one could get the impression that the high oil prices will pass, and everything will go back to "normal".

"....just finished an 800-mile trip through the Northeast in his 515-horsepower, bus-size Newell Coach recreational vehicle. Features include heated granite floors, a full-size washer and dryer in the master bathroom and a tow for his GMC Envoy SUV"
Fuel cost him maybe $450 for his 800 miles.. didn't bat an eyelash.
Why would he bat an eyelash? Do you have any idea how much the stuff he's driving around costs? $450 barely rises to the level of pocket change.
I just did a quick search and injured my jaw (it fell on the floor).  I knew they were expensive, but the cheapest Newell Coach I saw was $540,000.  So $450 is roughly...ooohhh .0008% of the cost of owning the whole rig (conservatively).
If you can afford a Newell Coach, you are not woried about $450!
Yeah. That is my point. How do we prevent wealthy consumers from taking us all on a one way energy crash dive?

It's not just all the average folks in 'developed' countries who will get priced out as he drives the palace on wheels around at $5 or $6 a gallon. It is a whole bunch of 'developing' world farmers and businesses that can barely afford to operate now. "let them find more labor intensive sustainable methods and ride bicycles" we say, not realizing we are talking about us pretty soon.

It seems we tax the heck out of cigarettes and booze. I believe the rates are higher than on gasoline and diesel. Seems like we could come up with a fair way to target over-consumption of FF. Our singular addiction.

Very problematic, I know, but I'll take a crack at it. We now ration by price and the price rises because some individuals have lots of money and can afford all they want.
Good let them have it. Only add on the carbon reduction tax. Subsidize wind, rail, and solar with it.

Allow every tax paying wage earner filing their own taxes a standard deduction equal to the equivalent tax based on a moderate amount of liquid FF. Enough to get most folks that commute and some to spare in an economy car. Buy an electric car or a hybrid.. keep the deduction. Ride a bike ..keep the deduction. Don't drive ever ...and so on.

I know. What do we do about businesses. What about the unemployed? Well...?

We've kicked this around before but we it seems it can't work because it's 'regressive' or encouages people to have more kids or something. For Peat's sake let's figure out a way to put some of that 'waste' to work.

How do we prevent wealthy consumers from taking us all on a one way energy crash dive?

Well if their money can't buy services from the 'we' without oil... that would put an end to their lifestyle, right?

Now how many of you opted to not work for someone because they had too much money and were willing to overpay you for your labor?

Do you really think America's fuel problems are caused by people driving Newell Coaches?  Why don't we put a tax on distance you live from work?  That probably contributes far more to our energy usage.  Or let's tax ludicrous television shows (i.e. all of them including the news) because whatever energy they use creating the show is a waste and should be discouraged.  Or how about frivolous foods at the supermarket?  Let's get back to a healthy complementary protein diet and do away with meats (an massive waste of energy both from a fuel standpoint and from an efficient use of feed standpoint).  Who gets to decide which eoyments are justifiable and which should be taxed into oblivion?
If nobody but the very rich are driving, who's going to pay all the gasoline taxes to keep the roads and interstates maintained?

I don't really see much future in roads and highways ...

Yet remarkably (and sadly), our politicians keep funding road projects.
Xxxburb, I'm feeling pessimistic these days.    

I feel like someone who has been warned about a coming tsunami - the water has receded and I'm moving to higher ground, but most people don't believe it and are out wandering on the newly revealed beach.  I don't know if I'll make it to higher ground in time or not, but I can guess what will happen to them.  Meanwhile we talk about how to stop the tsunami, but I'm thinking it's unlikely that any of it will happen.

How do we prevent the wealthy from screwing us over?  We don't.  It's how things are.  Democracy was a good try, but it is failing - destroyed by the wealthy and power hungry, as these things meant more to them than the society, and the people allowed them to get away with it.

Democracy was a good try, but it is failing - destroyed by the wealthy and power hungry, ...

Twilight,

Me thinks you are confusing terms.
"Democracy" simply means rule by all the people themselves.

What you complain of is actually the Smithian Religion.

When we are young, we are taught many religions.

One of them is to get a high paying job.
To be a success.
To be a millionaire.
To take care only of ones self.
To maximize profits.

The Invisible Hand will take care of everything else.

So what do you see?
Millions of people following that programming.
They are doing as they were programmed to do. What more should we expect?